Alternative PACS interface devices are well-accepted and may reduce radiologist's musculoskeletal discomfort as compared to keyboard-mouse-recording device.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of two alternative picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) interface devices (a graphics tablet and a handheld controller) in clinical practice and on task-oriented exercises. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eleven senior radiologists were prospectively evaluated. The participants used the two tested interface devices for 10 working periods each and answered a questionnaire to evaluate the ergonomics of this experience. The prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal discomfort with the standard PACS interface set (mouse-keyboard-recording device) and these two devices was assessed. Exercises evaluating image scrolling and selection, image zooming and panning, image windowing, performing measurements, and reporting were performed with the standard PACS interface set and with the two tested devices. The sitting posture and hand position were evaluated. RESULTS: The general appreciation of the two alternative interface devices was considered to be similar to that of the standard interface set. The ergonomics of the handheld controller was considered to be slightly better than that of the standard interface set. The prevalence of musculoskeletal discomfort was 81%, 45%, and 18% for the standard interface set, graphics tablet, and handheld controller, respectively. With the graphics tablet and the handheld controller in 45% and 60%, respectively, there was a working posture change with respect to the standard interface set. The mean total exercise completion times of both tested devices were 27% higher than that of the standard interface set. CONCLUSION: Despite the increase in completion time of the task-oriented exercises, the tested devices were well accepted and considered to be more comfortable than the standard set. KEY POINTS: • Alternative PACS interface devices can be used as a substitute for the standard mouse-keyboard-recording device set with a potential improvement in work ergonomics and a reduction in work-related musculoskeletal discomfort.

Comparison of radiographs, tomosynthesis and CT with metal artifact reduction for the detection of hip prosthetic loosening.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of digital tomosynthesis (DTS) for the diagnosis of hip prosthesis loosening (PL) compared with conventional radiographs and CT with metal artifact reduction (CT-MAR). METHODS: Forty-nine patients with painful hip prosthesis were prospectively included and underwent anteroposterior and lateral radiographs, anteroposterior DTS and CT-MAR of the hip. This study was approved by the local ethics committee, and all patients signed an informed consent form. Images were evaluated independently by two radiologists. Periprosthetic radiolucent lines wider than 2 mm found in two or more Gruen or De Lee and Charnley zones were considered diagnostic of PL. All cases of PL were confirmed surgically. Patients with a stable radiological follow-up for at least 1 year with an alternative cause for the symptoms or with no surgical evidence of PL were considered PL negative. RESULTS: There were 21 cases of PL, 9 unilateral and 12 bilateral. For both the acetabular and femoral sides, DTS had a specificity for PL detection similar to that of conventional radiographs and CT-MAR (98.5-100%, 96.9%-100% and 96.9-95.4% respectively for both readers) and a sensitivity similar to conventional radiographs (39.9-45.4% versus 33.3-51.5% for both readers) but lower than CT-MAR (84.85% for both readers). The interobserver agreement was 0.84 for CT-MAR, 0.53 for DTS and 0.39 for conventional radiographs. CONCLUSION: DTS has a similar diagnostic performance to radiographs for the diagnosis of PL with a better interobserver agreement. The sensitivity however remains lower than that of CT-MAR. KEY POINTS: • Plain radiograph is still the first imaging step when hip prosthesis loosening is suspected. • Interobserver agreement is better with digital tomosynthesis than radiographs. • Sensitivity of CT with state-of-the-art metal artifact reduction is superior to that of digital tomosynthesis.

Impact of ROI Positioning and Lesion Morphology on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Analysis for the Differentiation Between Benign and Malignant Nonfatty Soft-Tissue Lesions.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to assess the impact of two methods of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) selection on the diagnostic performance of DWI in the characterization of nonfatty soft-tissue masses. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Sixty-five histologically confirmed soft-tissue tumors imaged from November 2009 through October 2012 were evaluated. The minimal ADC (ADCmin) and average ADC (ADCavg) values for each tumor were obtained using two ROI-positioning methods: manual and semiautomatic. Two readers correlated the findings to lesion histology and morphology on conventional MRI sequences. RESULTS: The ADCmin values obtained using the manual method presented a better sensitivity with a similar specificity when compared with the ADCmin values obtained using the semiautomatic method (manual vs semiautomatic: 75-83% and 59-63% vs 58-67% and 63% and 63%, respectively). The interobserver agreement for the ADCmin values was similar between the ADC selection methods (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.81 and 0.87 for manual and semiautomatic methods, respectively). In the subgroup of solid lesions, the ADCavg values obtained using the manual method offered a better sensitivity for benign-malignant differentiation (60-81% vs 60% and 60% for ADCavg and ADCmin, respectively). CONCLUSION: The ADCmin values obtained with manual ROI positioning offered the best diagnostic performance for tumor characterization. The semiautomatic method yielded similar specificity values. For solid masses, the ADCavg values were better correlated with tumor histology than the ADCmin values.