Ten years of maintenance treatment of severe melancholic depression in an adult woman including discontinuation experiences.

BACKGROUND: There are only few publications on long-term treatments for major depressive disorder (MDD) lasting 5 years or longer. Most clinical controlled trials lasted no longer than 2 years and some recent studies suggested an advantage of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) over antidepressants in relapse prevention of MDD. METHODS: Exclusively outpatient "real world" treatment of severe melancholia, prospectively documented over 10 years with different serial treatment strategies, discontinuation phenomena and complications. METHODS: Compared to CBT, agomelatine, mirtazapine, bupropion and high-dose milnacipran, high-dose venlafaxine (extended-release form, XR) was effective, even sustainably. Asymptomatic premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) were found at the beginning of the treatment of the MDD, which initially led to the discontinuation of high-dose venlafaxine (300 mg daily). Even the various treatment strategies mentioned above were unable to compensate for or prevent the subsequent severe deterioration in MDD (2 rebounds, 1 recurrence). Only the renewed use of high-dose venlafaxine was successful. PVC no longer occurred and the treatment was also well tolerated over the years, with venlafaxine serum levels at times exceeding 5 times the recommended upper therapeutic reference level (known bupropion-venlafaxine interaction, otherwise 2.5 to 3-fold increase with high-dose venlafaxine alone). During dose reduction or after gradual discontinuation of high-dose venlafaxine, rather mild withdrawal symptoms occurred, but as described above, also two severe rebounds and one severe recurrence happened. DISCUSSION: This long-term observation supports critical reflections on the discontinuation of successful long-term treatment with antidepressants in severe MDD, even if it should be under "the protection" of CBT. The PVC seemed to be more related to the duration of the severe major depressive episode than to the venlafaxine treatment itself. A particular prospective observation of this longitudinal case study is that relapses (in the sense of rebounds) during or after previous venlafaxine tapering seemed to herald the recurrence after complete recovery. Remarkably, neither relapses nor recurrence could be prevented by CBT. CONCLUSION: In this case, high-dose venlafaxine has a particular relapse-preventive (and "recurrence-preventive") effect with good long-term tolerability.

Phenibutan-an Illegal Food Supplement With Psychotropic Effects and Health Risks.

BACKGROUND: Phenibut (ß-phenyl-γ-aminobutyric acid) is an analog of the neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). Like abapentin and pregabalin, it inhibits α2-δ-subunits of voltagedependent presynaptic calcium channels. The potential harm resulting from the use of these gabapentinoids is currently a matter of debate. METHODS: This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective literature search and on cases reported to the Giftinformationszentrum-Nord (GIZ-Nord), a poison information center at the University of Göttingen, Germany. RESULTS: Phenibut is a prescription drug in Russia but its production, possession, use, trafficking, or administration is illegal in Germany. The phenibut toxicity syndrome resembles that of gabapentinoids and GABA mimetics: benzodiazepine-like with - drawal symptoms including epileptic seizures, delirium and paradoxical activation have been described, as have cases of abuse and dependence. A few cases of use in the setting of multidrug abuse, and of phenibut-related death, have been described to date in the USA. The GIZ-Nord received 17 inquiries about phenibut, 55 about gabapentin, and 126 about pregabalin over the period 2008-2022. Over the same period, the GIZ-Nord was informed of 1207 cases involving Z substances and 4324 involving benzodiazepines. In the majority of the registered intoxications, including those with phenibut, the symptoms were mild. Overdoses of phenibut (2-100 g) were reported in 15 of the 17 cases; 8 of the persons who had taken an overdose were somnolent. In such cases, observation in intensive care was recommended. Respiratory depression or coma was not encountered in any case, not even in the patient who had taken 100 g of phenibut. CONCLUSION: Phenibut causes symptoms resembling those of gabapentinoid and benzodiazepine use. There have been reports of phenibut use in combination with other psychotropic drugs; in particular, its use together with opiates could increase the risk of coma and respiratory depression. No deaths due to phenibut intoxication have been published in Germany or elsewhere in Western Europe, although such cases may have been overlooked, as this drug is still largely unknown to Western medicine.

Effectiveness of Medical Cannabis for the Treatment of Depression: A Naturalistic Outpatient Study.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of studies on the course and effectiveness of medical cannabis in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: Retrospective longitudinal (18 weeks) study of n=59 outpatients with MDD, treated with medical cannabis via a telemedical platform. Previous treatment with antidepressant medication was required for inclusion into the study. Standardized data collection was carried out at entry and during monthly consultations. Severity of depression was measured on a 0-10 point rating scale. Side-effects were assessed by a checklist. RESULTS: Patients were 20-54 years old; 72.9% were male; one third reported times of regular cannabis consumption within the previous five years. Drop-out rate was 22% after 18 weeks. Mean severity of depression decreased from 6.9 points (SD 1.5) at entry to 3.8 points (2.7) at week 18 (baseline observation carried forward; 95% CI for the mean difference: 2.4 to 3.8; p<0.001). A treatment response (>50% reduction of the initial score) was seen in 50.8% at week 18. One third of patients complained about side effects, none was considered as severe. Concomitant antidepressant medication (31% of patients) was not associated with outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Medical cannabis was well tolerated and dropout rate was comparable to those in clinical trials of antidepressant medication. Patients reported a clinically significant reduction of depression severity. Further research on the effectiveness of medical cannabis for MDD seems warranted. Risks of this medication, such as sustaining or inducing a cannabis use disorder, or side effects such as poor concentration, must be taken into consideration.

Patient Perspectives on Pharmacotherapy of Alcohol Dependence.

INTRODUCTION: Pharmacotherapy with drugs like naltrexone or acamprosate is a well-evaluated element in the treatment of alcohol dependence (AD). However, in many countries, these medications are rarely administered. The objective of the present study was to identify from patients' perspective factors that prevent the initiation and compliance with pharmacological treatment of AD. METHODS: Patients from inpatient alcohol withdrawal treatment underwent a standardized interview. Questions included socio-demographic data, history of AD, treatment history, knowledge and personal experience regarding pharmacotherapy of AD, and personal views about the causes of AD. RESULTS: Three hundred patients (mean age 47.3 years, 27.7% female, mean duration of AD 8.9 years, 67% with a history of previous inpatient withdrawal treatment) were included. The majority of patients (58.7%) already knew drugs for the pharmacotherapy of AD. Thirty percent had ever used such medications, most often acamprosate. Except for disulfiram, pharmacotherapy of AD had lasted only a few weeks, on average. Medication usually had been applied without additional psychotherapy. No severe side effects were reported. Patients had often stopped pharmacotherapy on their own, when assuming they had reached stable abstinence. Openness to start pharmacotherapy for AD was currently stated by 67% of the total sample. In multiple logistic regression, openness was predicted by having a concept of AD as a medical disease and by a shorter duration of AD. DISCUSSION: To improve the administration of pharmacotherapy for AD implementation strategies should be systematically developed and evaluated with a focus on the concept of AD as a medical disease.

Opiate maintenance patients' attitudes and self-reported adherence to protective measures against SARS-CoV-2 infections.

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic we assessed to which extent patients in opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) adhere to official recommendations regarding preventive intervention strategies against COVID-19. Methods: Patients enrolled in two OMT clinics in Germany were interviewed applying a standardized questionnaire, which covered socio-demographic information, recent psychotropic substance use, recent social activities, the history of SARS-CoV-2 infection, attitudes toward official protection recommendations, and levels of adherence to these suggestions. Current mental and medical diagnoses were retrieved from medical files. In subjects without known infection and without vaccination, blood samples were tested for the identification of anti-SARS-CoV-2-S-antibodies. Interviews were performed between the end of May and the end of September 2021. Results: Patients' (n = 155) average age was 47 years; 74% were males. In addition to the opiate dependence, in nearly 80% of cases another medical disorder was recorded. The range of medical factors that predispose for severe COVID-19 outcomes were present in 39% of patients; 18% of the sample refused to be vaccinated. Nearly all patients reported having carried out a range of activities outside their residence during the week prior to the interviews, including visits of treatment facilities (86.5%; 95% confidence interval [80.2%; 91.0%]) or meeting with friends (64.5% [65.7-71.6%]). Despite the fact that only about 47.1% [39.2%; 55%] felt well informed about measures against infection, adherence to COVID-19 countermeasures was generally high: 83.9% [77.3; 88.8%] claimed to have worn face masks always/nearly always; social distancing was performed always/nearly always by 58.7% [50.8%; 66.2%]; and hand hygiene was conducted by 64.5% [56.7%; 71.6%] of participants. None out of n = 25 tests from unvaccinated subjects was positive for anti-SARS-CoV-2-S-antibodies. Psychiatric comorbidity and educational degree were not statistically significantly associated with attitudes and compliance, except that patients with lower education felt relatively worse informed. Conclusion: Self-reported adherence to recommended non-therapeutic intervention strategies and vaccination rates were similar to the German general population. Provision of more health-related information tailored to OMT patients appears necessary.

Exploratory Growth Mixture Modeling of Cannabis-Withdrawal Syndrome Trajectories of Adult Pure Cannabis Dependents During Detoxification: Two Subtypes?

As clinical studies about subtypes of the cannabis withdrawal syndrome (CWS) are scant, we performed a re-analysis of longitudinal data with German adult cannabis-users seeking inpatient cannabis detoxification-treatment. Sixty-seven cannabis-dependents without active comorbidity were included for growth-mixture-analysis (GMM) of their CWS-severity-trajectories during a scheduled 24-day detox-treatment. As of treatment-day 12, thirty-six (53.7%) of 67 patients were discharged after successful detoxification. This led to artificial imputations for I-GMM. Therefore, we preferred the results of the GMM including raw data-only (R-GMM). By both, I-GMM and R-GMM, we found two classes of CWS severity time-courses. Class one (n = 44, R-GMM) showed a continuously decreasing CWS-severity; class two (n = 23, R-GMM) exhibited a sharp peak (generally between days 2-6 post-cessation). A short inpatient treatment-period and low urinary 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9 -tetrahydrocannabinol-level upon admission predicted the peaking trajectory of R-GMM-class-two-CWS. Withdrawal syndrome medication (PRN), comorbidity, cannabis-history data and gender balance were not significantly different between the CWS-classes. Although possibly confounded by PRN-medication, this exploratory study supports the presence of two CWS-variants in adult cannabis-dependents, characterized by a slowly decreasing ("protracted") slope (class one) or a clear crescendo-decrescendo trajectory (class two). The latter was associated with a significantly shorter inpatient detoxification period and lower urinary THC-COOH-levels at admission.

Further evidence of relationship between thiamine blood level and cognition in chronic alcohol-dependent adults: Prospective Pilot Study of an inpatient detoxification with oral supplementation protocol.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between thiamine blood level (TBL) and cognition remains uncertain, including among alcohol-dependent persons (ADP). AIM: To evaluate this relationship during protocol-driven inpatient alcohol detoxification treatment including thiamine supplementation (AD + Th). METHODS: Prospective 3-week study with 100 consecutively admitted detoxification-seeking ADP (47.7 ± 11 years old, 21% females) without superseding comorbidities requiring treatment. TBL and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) were measured at admission (t1, pre-AD + Th) and discharge (t3, post-AD + Th). Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) was performed at t1. AD + Th included abstinence, pharmacological alcohol withdrawal syndrome treatment, and oral thiamine supplementation (200 mg/day for 14 days). Regression and mediation analyses assessed TBL-cognition relationships. RESULTS: We found no cases of Wernicke Encephalopathy (WE) and only one case of thiamine deficiency. Both MoCA and TBL significantly improved across AD + Th (with medium-to-large effect sizes). At t1, TBL significantly predicted MoCA and FAB sum scores (medium effect sizes; extreme and very strong evidence, respectively). The clear TBL-MoCA association disappeared at t3. In multivariate regression and mediation analyses exploring key influential factors of cognition (identified by LASSO regression), the TBL-MoCA interactions did not relevantly change at t1 and t3. Age, serum transaminases, vitamin D levels, drinking-years, and depression score weakly modified the relationship. CONCLUSION: TBL was a robust predictor of pre-detoxification cognitive impairment, and both TBL and cognition improved significantly during AD + Th (including abstinence) in our ADP population, supporting routine thiamine supplementation for ADP, even those at low WE-risk. The TBL-cognition relationship was minimally confounded by age, alcohol-toxicity proxies, mood, and vitamin D levels.

The Role of Gabapentinoids in the Substance Use Pattern of Adult Germans Seeking Inpatient Detoxification Treatment - A Pilot Study.

To shed more light on the addictive power of the gabapentinoids (GPTs) gabapentin and pregabalin, we performed a structured face-to-face interview with GPT-users about DSM-IV-dependence-criteria (sedatives), consume-motives and cessation-needs. Among 100 patients consecutively admitted to a detoxification-ward, fifteen (15%) reported lifetime GPT-use (18-50 years old, 2 females): seven (7%) used gabapentin, twelve (12%) pregabalin and four had lifetime experiences with both GPTs. Of the seven gabapentin-users, three patients were dependent including one person with a spontaneous remission. Of the 12 pregabalin-users, five were dependent, including two persons with a spontaneous remission. Fourteen of fifteen cases reported GPT-use side-by-side with an opioid-use, mostly for sparing opioids. Twelve GPT-users additionally co-used benzodiazepines. In no case, a GPT was the reason for detoxification treatment or reported to be involved in an emergency event. Altogether, every 7th patient (n = 15) of our inpatient detoxification-seeking sample reported GPT-use including 50% (n = 8) who were dependent. Among them, 35% (3/8) had been already spontaneously remitted. As GPT-users reported no cession-need and the vast majority were primarily affected by co-occurring opioid- and benzodiazepine-addiction, we assume that GPTs more likely played a bystander-role than mediating the addictive behavior of this population with multiple recreational drug use experience.

How Effective is a Web-Based Mental Health Intervention (Deprexis) in the Treatment of Moderate and Major Depressive Disorders when started during Routine Psychiatric Inpatient Treatment as an Adjunct Therapy? A Pragmatic Parallel-Group Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Internet-based self-help-programs like deprexis have been increasingly shown to reduce depressive symptoms if added to distinct, primarily outpatient-treatment-settings. There is limited information about the effectiveness of deprexis if started at routine psychiatric hospital inpatient treatment of moderate-to-severe major depressive disorder (MDD). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: To examine, sixty-nine adult MDD-inpatients were randomly assigned to a 12-week-period of treatment-as-usual (TAU, N=33) or TAU plus guided deprexis (TAU-PLUS, N=36). The study was planned as a pragmatic approach considering psychiatric routine conditions, particularly, offering an instant and flexible discharge management when the patients felt stabilized enough for primary/secondary care. Therefore, there was no fixed time frame for the inpatient treatment duration. Post-discharge, patients were followed by structured telephone interviews up to study-endpoint, i. e., 12 weeks after deprexis-initiation. Primary (Beck-Depression-Inventory-II, BDI-II) and secondary outcome-measures (Hamilton-Depression-Scale, Clinical-Global-Impression-Severity, WHO-Well-Being-Index, Helping-Alliance-Questionnaire) were carried out at study entry and every 2 weeks. Furthermore, the working alliance with deprexis as well as the inpatient treatment duration, the daily activity and the utilization of post-hospital care after discharge were determined. RESULTS: At week 12, modified ITT-analyses showed significant between-group differences of BDI-II scores in favor of the TAU-PLUS-patients (p=.03) corresponding to a medium effect size (d=-.73, 95% CI -1.4 to .06). TAU-PLUS-patients showed greater daily activity (p=.04, d=.70, 95% CI -.03 to 1.38) and had been discharged significantly earlier from inpatient treatment (p=.003). Post-discharge, the TAU-PLUS-group reported a lower rate of post-hospital care (p=.01) and re-admissions (p=.04). Secondary outcome-measures including the alliance with the therapists were not significantly different between the groups at study-endpoint. The patients´ working-alliance with deprexis significantly predicted MDD-improvement and wellbeing. Both groups (TAU and TAU plus deprexis) were comparable with regard to the prescribed antidepressant medication. Unfortunately, detailed data on the amount and actual duration of the psychotherapeutic and special therapeutic individual and group settings of the TAU were not collected CONCLUSION: TAU plus deprexis was superior to TAU in improving subjective depression-severity (BDI-II) and daily activity in patients having sought psychiatric inpatient MDD-treatment before. This beneficial effect appeared 12 weeks after inpatient deprexis-initiation, i. e. when the vast majority of patients were back in primary/secondary care. Adjunctive deprexis was associated with earlier discharges and a significant advantage for post-hospital stabilization. In this regard, it could be promising to include deprexis into inpatient treatment conditions, thereby also preparing its continuing outpatient use. We found no evidence that deprexis interfered negatively with the alliance between the patients and their therapists.

Cannabis use, abuse and dependence during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review.

The interaction between cannabis use or addiction and SARS-COV-2 infection rates and COVID-19 outcomes is obscure. As of 08/01/2022 among 57 evaluated epidemiological/clinical studies found in Pubmed-database, most evidence for how cannabis use patterns were influenced by the pandemic was given by two systematic reviews and 17 prospective studies, mostly involving adolescents. In this age group, cannabis use patterns have not changed markedly. For adults, several cross-sectional studies reported mixed results with cannabis use having increased, decreased or remained unchanged. Two cross-sectional studies demonstrated that the severity of adults´ cannabis dependence was either increased as a consequence of increasing cannabis use during the pandemic or not changed. Regarding the effect of cannabis use on COVID-19 outcomes, we found only five retrospective/cross-sectional studies. Accordingly, (i) cannabis use did not impact mild COVID-19 symptoms; (ii) cannabis using individuals experienced more COVID-19-related hospitalizations; (iii) cannabis using veterans were associated with reduced SARS-COV-2 infection rates; (iv) frequent cannabis use was significantly associated with COVID-19 mortality, and (v) cannabis dependents were at higher risk of COVID-19 breakthrough after vaccination. It should be outlined that the validity of these retrospective/cross-sectional studies (all self-reports or register/e-health-records) is rather low. Future prospective studies on the effects of cannabis use on SARS-COV-2 infection rates and COVID-19 outcomes are clearly required for conclusive risk-benefit assessments of the role of cannabis on users' health during the pandemic. Moreover, substance dependence (including cannabis) is associated with (often untreated) somatic comorbidity, which severity is a proven key risk factor for worse COVID-19 outcomes.

[Comparative Harm/Benefit Analysis of Various Psychotropic Substances from the Perspective of German Drug Users and Addiction Medicine Experts - A Contribution to Psychoeducation of Substance-Addicted Individuals and Restriction/Legalization Debates]. / Vergleichende Risiko/Nutzen-Analyse verschiedener psychotroper Substanzen aus der Perspektive deutscher Drogenkonsumenten und Suchtmediziner ­ Ein Beitrag für die Psychoedukationsarbeit mit Abhängigkeitserkrankten und Restriktions-/Legalisierungsdebatten.

BACKGROUND: To date, we cannot find any current international comparative study on the assessment of a benefit/harm profile of various licit and illicit psychoactive substances conducted by adult drug users and addiction experts as well. Particularly, there is no study from the German-speaking area of Western Europe. METHODS: In addition to the data already published by 101 German addiction medicine experts (published in this journal, [1]), we carried out interviews using a structured questionnaire with 100 German substance dependent users, residing in acute and rehabilitation clinical setting, to evaluate 34 psychoactive substances regarding their health and social harm potential for users and others as well as their potential benefit. RESULTS: Both, users and experts estimated traditional illicit drugs, such as heroin, crack/cocaine and methamphetamine, to be particularly harmful. Synthetic cannabinoids, alcohol and benzodiazepines were in the upper midfield, cannabis and psychotropic mushrooms in the lower midfield, and gabapentinoids at the bottom of the harm rankings of both, users and experts. In comparison with the experts, the users estimated methadone and benzodiazepines to be significantly more harmful. In the benefit analysis, users rated traditional illicit drugs including cannabis and psychotropic mushrooms as well as nicotine as significantly more useful than the experts. In contrast to the experts (traditional illicit drugs), the users did not assess any substance as very harmful and very useless at the same time. Only a few users reported to have experiences with opioid analgesics which, however, did not differ between the users´ and experts´ harm/benefit-assessments. Neither users nor experts predicted cannabis-legalization to change the overall risk potential of cannabis. Specific cognitive valuation biases seemed to be prominent in both groups. CONCLUSION: This study presents first harm/benefit assessments of psychotropic substances from the perspective of German addiction medicine experts and drug users. The results can be valuable to the psychoeducation of substance-addicted individuals and to current restriction or legalization debates.

Differences between users' and addiction medicine experts' harm and benefit assessments of licit and illicit psychoactive drugs: Input for psychoeducation and legalization/restriction debates.

Background: There is a lack of benefit/harm assessments of illicit and licit psychoactive substances performed by substance-dependent users in comparison to addiction medicine experts. Methods: We extended the analyses of substance harm/benefit assessments of German addiction medicine experts (N = 101), in parts reported recently in this journal [doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.59219], by the perspectives of substance-addicted persons. The same questionnaire as used for the abovementioned "experts-study" was handed out to inpatient detoxification or rehab treatment seeking German substance-dependent adults (N = 117) for a subsequent structured interview about harms and benefits of 33 new and traditional psychoactive substances comprising also prescription drugs. Results and discussion: Both, users and experts, ranked the traditional illicit psychoactive substances heroin, cocaine and amphetamines within the top overall harm level group. Synthetic cannabinoids, alcohol and benzodiazepine were in a subordinate top-harm level position. Both cohorts also ranked methadone, nicotine and cannabis within the midrange and buprenorphine as well as psychotropic mushrooms within the lowest harm level positions. Experiences with prescription drugs (including opioidergic analgesics and gabapentinoids), cathinones, GHB, methamphetamine and methylphenidate was not prevalent in our user population. The same applied to barbiturates, propofol, kratom, ayahuasca with nearly zero assessments for each substance. The most user-experiences (>50% per assessed substance) were reported with nicotine, cannabis, alcohol, cocaine, heroin, amphetamine and methadone (core group). The user's overall harm ratings in terms of these psychoactive substances were similar to those of the experts with the exception of the methadone assessment which was rated by the experts to be significantly less harmful if compared with the users' estimation (supposed "treatment bias" of experts). The users' benefit ratings for the traditional illicit psychoactive substances, cannabis as well as for nicotine were significantly more positive in comparison to those of the experts (supposed "attraction bias" of users). Both, experts and users, ranked the harms arising from the use of alcohol or benzodiazepines (usually unregulated substances) higher than the harms caused by the use of methadone, cannabis or psychotropic mushrooms (regulated by most Western narcotic acts). Users attributed the most benefits to buprenorphine, methadone and cannabis. This might reflect a main limitation of the study as the data are from an user population comprising over 50% patients who sought detoxification-treatment of opiates where methadone and buprenorphine are usual transient medications (supposed "selection bias"). Conclusion: This study addressed current trends of psychoactive substance abuse (e.g., synthetic cannabinoids, prescription drugs) and provides from both perspectives (that of the user and that of the addiction medicine experts) robust harm/benefit evaluations at least of a core group of psychoactive substances (traditional illicit psychoactive substances, cannabis, methadone, alcohol and nicotine). The results of this study can be valuable to the psychoeducation of substance-addicted individuals and to current restriction/legalization debates, especially in the Western-EU.

Subjective reward processing and catechol-O- methyltransferase Val158Met polymorphism as potential research domain criteria in addiction: A pilot study.

The Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) approach seeks to understand mental functioning in continuous valid dimensions ranging from functional to pathological. Reward processing is a transdiagnostic functioning domain of the RDoC. Due to prototypical abnormalities, addictions are especially applicable for the investigation of reward processing. Subjective reward processing is challenging to determine and differs between genotypes of the catechol-O-methyltransferase gene (COMT) Val158Met polymorphism for incomparable daily life experiences. Thus, we implemented the monetary incentive delay (MID) task with comparable reward cues and visual analog scales (VAS) to assess subjective reward processing in male abstinent cannabis-dependent individuals (N = 13) and a control group of nicotine smokers (N = 13). COMT Val158Met genotypes were nominally associated with differences in cigarettes smoked per day and motivation in the MID Task (p = 0.028; p = 0.017). For feedback gain, activation of the right insula was increased in controls, and activation correlated with gain expectancy and satisfaction about gain. Subjective value is not detached from reward parameters, but is modulated from expectancy and reward by the insula. The underlying neural mechanisms are a fundamental target point for treatments, interventions, and cognitive behavioral therapy.

Referral to aftercare following inpatient withdrawal treatment and readmission: retrospective chart review of patients with substance use disorders.

AIMS OF THE STUDY: Aftercare following inpatient withdrawal treatment improves the prognosis and prevents future readmissions in patients with substance use disorders. According to the stepped care approach, the setting and intensity of aftercare should be adjusted to the patients' specific needs and resources. This study evaluated the real-life referral to different types of aftercare in Switzerland and the rate of inpatient readmission within a 1-year follow-up. METHODS: All substance use disorder patients admitted for inpatient withdrawal treatment in a Swiss psychiatric hospital between January and December 2016 (n = 497) were included in this retrospective study. Clinical and sociodemographic characteristics were extracted from the electronic medical records and their impact on the likelihood of being referred to a particular type of aftercare (general practitioner, psychiatric outpatient care, psychiatric day clinic, inpatient rehabilitation programme) was evaluated. For each type of referral, we determined the readmission rate within one year after discharge. RESULTS: In the sample of substance use disorder patients (mean age 41 years; 69% male), alcohol use disorder was by far the most frequent substance use disorder. Most patients were referred to psychiatric outpatient care (39.8%), followed by a general practitioner (31.0%), inpatient rehabilitation (19.3%) and psychiatric day clinic (9.9%). Patient characteristics that point to an unfavourable course of disease, including higher symptom severity, history of more than two previous admissions, compulsory admission and treatment discontinuation, were associated with a higher likelihood to be referred to lower-level aftercare (general practitioner, psychiatric outpatient care), whereas patients with lower symptom severity, fewer than two previous admissions, voluntary admission and regular discharge were more likely to be referred to high-intensity aftercare (psychiatric day clinic, inpatient rehabilitation). The readmission rate after one year did not differ between the different settings of aftercare (range 40.4-42.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that patients suffering from severe substance use disorders and/or from an unfavourable course of disease who would benefit from a more intensive aftercare setting, such as psychiatric day clinics or inpatient rehabilitation programs, might be under-treated, whereas patients with a rather favourable prognosis might similarly benefit from a less intensive treatment setting, such as psychiatric outpatient care. Regarding the comparable readmission rates, we recommend considering more efficient resource management by promoting stepped care approaches for substance use disorders and establishing standardised placement criteria in Switzerland.