RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the efficacy of MMR vaccine and MIP vaccine for resolution of Cutaneous warts (Cw). METHODS: The hospital-based prospective randomized interventional study was done where a total of 60 patients of Cw were divided into two groups of 30 patients each: Group A received 0.1 ml of intralesional injection of MIP vaccine and Group B received 0.5 ml of MMR vaccine. The treatment protocol involved three intralesional injection of vaccines at intervals of 3 weeks (maximum of three injections). The follow-up was done every 4 weeks for at least 24 weeks for the comparison of the two groups. The primary outcomes were the decrease in size of the wart or clearance of primary warts. The secondary outcomes were the improvement in the distant warts and any complications related to the use of vaccines. The data were entered in MS Excel and analyzed using SPSS 17.0 version. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The baseline demographic and wart characteristics were comparable between the two groups (P > 0.05). As compared to MMR, MIP showed an early (9.41 vs 11.71 weeks, P = 0.027), and a significantly higher complete response (90% vs 76.67%) with P < 0.05. The less duration of the warts was significantly associated with the higher complete response (P < 0.05) in both the groups. The common side effects were erythema/inflammation [19 (63.34%)] in Group A and pain during the injection [19 (63.34%)] in Group B with P < 0.0001. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, MIP intralesional injections have a quicker response and are more efficacious compared to MMR in the treatment of Cw, though each vaccine carries its own sets of side effects.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Dinoprostone (DNP), a prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) analogue, has been found to cause repigmenation in vitiliginous lesions. Combined medical and surgical therapy might be more useful for successful treatment of vitiligo. OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dermabrasion followed by dinoprostone gel and to compare it with tacrolimus ointment following the same procedure in the treatment of localized stable vitiligo. METHODS: 40 patients of stable vitiligo were enrolled which were divided in two groups of 20 patients each. In group 1, dermabrasion followed by tacrolimus 0.1% ointment was done and in group 2, dermabrasion followed by dinoprostone gel was done. RESULTS: Group 1 patients showed slightly better response (P=0.039), whereas the side effect profile was better for group 2. CONCLUSION: DNP and tacrolimus have immunomodulatory and melanocyte stimulating effect and are well tolerated when combined with dermabrasion. Their effect on skin pigmentation could be enhanced by dermabrasion. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(5):519-522. doi:10.36849/JDD.5751.
Asunto(s)
Dermabrasión/métodos , Dinoprostona/administración & dosificación , Tacrolimus/administración & dosificación , Vitíligo/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Dermabrasión/efectos adversos , Dermabrasión/instrumentación , Dinoprostona/efectos adversos , Femenino , Geles , Humanos , Masculino , Melaninas/biosíntesis , Melanocitos/efectos de los fármacos , Melanocitos/metabolismo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pomadas/administración & dosificación , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Pigmentación de la Piel/efectos de los fármacos , Tacrolimus/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vitíligo/diagnóstico , Adulto JovenAsunto(s)
Melanosis , Plasma Rico en Plaquetas , Humanos , Melanosis/diagnóstico , Melanosis/terapia , Agujas , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Circinate balanitis, although a common manifestation of reactive arthritis, is usually an associated finding present along with the triad of arthritis, conjunctivitis, and urethritis. It is rarely seen as the only preceding manifestation of reactive arthritis. We hereby report a case of circinate balanitis as alone preceding presentation of reactive arthritis that was successfully treated with topical pimecrolimus 1% cream.