RESUMEN
Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in de-novo acute myeloid leukemia patients receiving induction chemotherapy. Despite using posaconazole, a broad-spectrum antifungal, for IFI prophylaxis, the breakthrough IFI rate is high in the real-world setting. One of the reasons could be frequent suboptimal plasma posaconazole levels. In the present study, we evaluated if therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) guided posaconazole prophylaxis can reduce the IFI rates in comparison to a historical cohort. We enrolled 90 patients, > / = 16 years of age, without baseline IFIs, planned for remission induction therapy. All patients were started on posaconazole suspension 200 mg TDS and the dose was increased in a stepwise manner if trough levels were found to be suboptimal (< 350 ng/ml for day 2 or < 700 ng/ml subsequently). The TDM based approach resulted in a significant decline in breakthrough IFI rates (18% versus 52%, P < 0.0001) A total of 69 patients (78%) required dose escalation. Thirty-one patients required change in antifungals due to either suboptimal levels, persistent fever, diarrhoea or vomiting. We could not demonstrate an exposure-response relationship but the difference in IFI rates in patients with a median posaconazole level > / = 700 ng/ml (0%) and < 700 ng/ml (21.6%) was clinically meaningful. Posaconazole levels were found to be significantly lower in patients on antacids and prokinetics. The incidence of posaconazole-related grade 3 toxicity was low (2.3%). Thus TDM-based dosing of posaconazole helps reduce breakthrough IFI rate and should be a part of posaconazole prophylaxis. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12288-023-01709-3.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Multiple low-cost biosimilars of bevacizumab are now available but their clinical efficacy has never been compared against the original (innovator) molecule in glioblastoma. The aim of the current analysis is to compare the overall survival (OS) in recurrent/progressive glioblastoma patients between the biosimilar and innovator molecules. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult recurrent/progressive glioblastoma patients treated with bevacizumab from 1 July 2015 to 30 July 2019 were identified. These patients were either offered Bevacizumab innovator (Avastin, Roche) or biosimilar (BevaciRel: Reliance Life sciences or Bryxta: Zydus Oncosciences) depending upon the financial status and affordability of the patients. The primary endpoint of the study was OS, while progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events were the secondary endpoints. RESULTS: There were 82 patients, out of which 57 received innovator and 25 received biosimilar bevacizumab. At median follow-up of 26 months, the median PFS was 3.66 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.08 to 5.25) and 3.3 months (95% CI 2.38 to 4.21) in innovator and biosimilar group, respectively (Log-rank test p-value = 0.072). The hazard ratio (HR) for progression was 0.61 (95% CI 0.35 to 1.05; p-value = 0.075). At the time of data cut-off, the median OS was 5.53 (95% CI, 5.07 to 5.99) versus 7.33 months (95% CI, 5.63 to 9.03) in innovator and biosimilar group, respectively (Log-rank test p-value = 0.51). The HR for death was 1.21 (95% CI, 0.67 to 2.17; p-value = 0.51). The adverse events and safety profiles were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In the recurrent/progressive glioblastoma patients, both innovator and biosimilar bevacizumab seem to have similar safety and clinical efficacy.
