Effectiveness of a nurse-led one-to-one education programme in addition to standard care in children with atopic dermatitis: a multicentre randomized control trial.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic patient education (TPE) is recommended for children with atopic dermatitis (AD), but no consensus has been reached on the optimal tailoring of delivery. While repeated multidisciplinary group education sessions have shown effectiveness, the benefits of one-on-one educational interventions led by nurses for children with AD have not yet been assessed. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits of additional, well-structured, 1-h nurse-led individual TPE interventions in children with AD and their families compared with standard care alone. METHODS: Children with moderate-to-severe AD and their parents were randomized to receive a 1-h nurse-led education session in addition to standard care vs. standard care alone. The primary outcome was the area under the curve (AUC) of the SCORing of Atopic Dermatitis index (SCORAD) from baseline to week 24 (lower AUC values represent better long-term control of the disease). RESULTS: In our study, 176 patients were randomized across 11 centres, and 153 were included in the full analysis set. The mean (SD) age was 4.47 (4.57) years. By week 24, there were no significant differences in the AUCs of the SCORAD between the two groups (P = 0.3). Secondary outcomes including patient-reported severity and quality of life [AUCs of the patient-oriented SCORAD (PO-SCORAD) and Infants' Dermatitis Quality of Life Index (IDLQI), Children's Dermatitis Quality of Life Index (CDLQI) and Family Dermatitis Quality of Life Index (FDLQI)] were not significantly different between the two groups. The only significant change observed in the intervention group, when compared with the one receiving standard care, was a decrease in topical steroid phobia, as assessed by the topical corticosteroid phobia (TOPICOP) score. Prespecified subgroup analyses showed that disease severity in the intervention group was significantly lower throughout the study, compared with the standard-care group when participants had moderate AD at baseline (n = 47); while participants with severe AD at baseline (n = 106) did not show benefit from the intervention. Participants showed no additional benefit from the intervention regardless of age group. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not show any additional effectiveness, in long-term severity control, of a 1-h nurse-led TPE intervention in children with AD treated with standard care, compared with those treated with standard care alone. However, it should be noted that the intervention reduced the fear of using topical steroids and may be beneficial for patients in the subgroup with moderate AD.

Atopic dermatitis (AD), also known as atopic eczema, is a chronic relapsing disease that affects 7­15% of children worldwide. Therapeutic patient education (TPE) is recommended for children with AD, but no agreement has been reached on the best way to tailor delivery. While repeated multidisciplinary group education sessions in a hospital setting have been found effective, this type of intervention requires a lot of resources and is time-consuming. To assess the benefits of TPE in children with AD, researchers in France carried out this study with children with moderate-to-severe AD, to compare a 1-hour nurse-led education session in addition to standard care vs. standard care alone. The main aim of this research was to assess the effectiveness of a TPE intervention over a period of 6 months, using a measurement tool called the SCORAD (SCORing of Atopic Dermatitis index). We found no additional benefits in terms of long-term severity control and quality of life at 6 months of a 1-hour nurse-led education intervention in children with AD treated with standard care. However, it should be noted that the intervention reduced the fear of using topical steroids and may be beneficial for people in the moderate AD subgroup.

Accurate diagnosis of acute hemorrhagic edema of infancy: a French multicenter observational study.

The purpose of the study is to highlight clinical signs that are either suggestive of or against the diagnosis of AHEI to improve diagnosis and management. The medical records of children under 3 years old diagnosed with AHEI were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical data and photographs were reviewed by three independent experts, and the cases were classified as probable, doubtful, or unclear AHEI. Of the 69 cases of children diagnosed with AHEI included in 22 centers, 40 were classified as probable, 22 as doubtful, and 7 as unclear. The median age of patients with probable AHEI was 11 months [IQR 9-15], and they were in overall good condition (n = 33/40, 82.5%). The morphology of the purpura was targetoid in 75% of cases (n = 30/40) and ecchymotic in 70% of cases (n = 28/40) and affected mostly the legs (n = 39/40, 97%), the arms (n = 34/40, 85%), and the face (n = 33/40, 82.5%). Edema was observed in 95% of cases and affected mostly the hands (n = 36/38, 95%) and feet (n = 28/38, 74%). Pruritus was absent in all patients with probable AHEI and described for 6/21 with doubtful AHEI (29%). AHEI was the original diagnosis in only 24 patients (n = 24/40, 60%). The major differential diagnoses were purpura fulminans and urticaria multiforme.  Conclusion: AHEI, which the diagnosis is made on clinical findings, is often misdiagnosed. Purpuric lesions localized on the face/ears, arms/forearms, and thighs/legs with edema of the hands without pruritus in a young child with a good overall condition are highly suggestive of AHEI. What is Known: •Acute hemorrhagic edema of infancy (AHEI) is a cutaneous leukocytoclastic vasculitis affecting children under 3 years old. •Appropriate diagnosis is important to distinguish this benign disease from more serious diseases to avoid investigations and treatments, iatrogenic harm and unnecessary follow-up. What is New: •AHEI is an uncommon disorder often misdiagnosed by pediatricians and dermatologists. •Purpuric lesions localized on the face/ears, arms/forearms, and thighs/legs with edema of the hands without pruritus in an infant with a good overall condition are highly suggestive of AHEI.

Correction: A systematic review and an individual patient data meta-analysis of ivermectin use in children weighing less than fifteen kilograms: Is it time to reconsider the current contraindication?

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009144.].

Neonatal toxic shock syndrome-like exanthematous disease: A French case series.

Neonatal toxic shock syndrome-like exanthematous disease (NTED) was first described in Japan in the 1990s. It results from the secretion of superantigenic toxins by Staphylococcus aureus. Diagnostic criteria include generalized macular erythema and at least one of the following three features: fever (>38°C), thrombocytopenia (<150,000/mm3 ), low positive C reactive protein (10-50 mg/L) in the absence of another known disease process. We herein describe four cases from France, involving both MSSA and "Geraldine" MRSA. This report aims to bring this underdiagnosed disease to the attention of pediatricians and infectious disease specialists, to improve the management of affected newborns.

Biologics combined with conventional systemic agents for the treatment of children with severe psoriasis. Real-life data from the BiPe cohorts and a practice survey among French and Italian pediatric dermatologists.

Combined therapies involve the use of multiple drugs to increase efficacy and reduce the toxicity of individual treatments. We evaluated the use of combinations of conventional systemic therapies and biologics in children with psoriasis in daily practice. This two-part study used data from the 170 children in the Franco-Italian BiPe cohorts to evaluate the use, efficacy, and safety of combined conventional systemic-biologic therapies, and from a survey carried out among French and Italian dermatologists to better understand the reasons for using or avoiding these combinations. In total, 33 children (19.4%) from 13 dermatology centers received 48 combined conventional systemic-biologic therapies (cumulative duration: 43.6 years), including three triple combination therapies (acitretin-methotrexate, with a TNF-alpha inhibitor). A total of 14 different combinations were used, most frequently etanercept-acitretin (n = 10), adalimumab-acitretin (n = 7), adalimumab-methotrexate (n = 5), and ustekinumab-methotrexate (n = 5). The combined therapies were started at biologic initiation in 41 cases (85.4%), and after a period of biologic monotherapy in the remaining 7 cases. Mean PGA and PASI scores decreased between baseline and M3 with all the combinations used. Four serious adverse events were reported, all with favorable outcomes. The survey was completed by 61 dermatologists: 39 (63.9%) had previously used or planned to use the combined therapies, most commonly TNF-alpha inhibitors with acitretin or methotrexate. The main reason for using these treatments was to improve the outcome of biologic therapies in cases of partial efficacy or loss of efficacy. Combined therapies have been used frequently in the treatment of childhood psoriasis, in a range of clinical situations and in variable drug combinations, without significant toxicity. Although the use of these combined therapies needs to be clarified in future management guidelines, these combined therapies should be considered for the treatment of children with severe psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and recalcitrant disease.

Crusted scabies in children in France: a series of 20 cases.

To evaluate the risk factors for crusted scabies in children in France. The retrospective multicenter study, conducted in France, of children (aged < 18 years) with profuse and/or crusted scabies confirmed by dermoscopy and/or microscopy. Data were obtained using a standardized questionnaire. We included 20 children. The mean age was 4.5 years, and 70% of the patients were girls. Their medical history revealed a neurological pathology (agenesis of the corpus callosum; n = 1, 5.0%), prematurity (n = 1, 5.0%), Down syndrome (n = 1, 5.0%), atopic dermatitis (n = 2, 10%), and asthma (n = 2, 10.0%). Fifteen (75.0%) children were treated with steroids before being diagnosed with scabies: 12 (60.0%) with topical steroids, one (5.0%) with a systemic steroid, and two (10.0%) with inhaled steroids. One child (5.0%) lived in a precarious environment. The mean duration of pruritus was 3.4 months, and that of the skin lesions was 3.1 months. The most commonly affected areas for crusted scabies were the palms/hands (66.7%) and the armpits (33.3%). Thirteen children (65.0%) were hospitalized, 14 (70.0%) were treated with ivermectin and all received topical treatments; 85.7% were cured within an average of 38 days, but one child had a relapse 3 months later in the form of common scabies.Conclusion: The main risk factor for developing crusted scabies in France was the misdiagnosis and the use of corticosteroids, especially topical forms typically used in "healthy" children. Management of the children was effective and similar to that used in adults. What is Known: • Crusted scabies is an extremely contagious disease which is rarely reported in infancy, especially in healthy children. • The main risk factors include immunosuppression, physical debilitation, and intellectual disability. What is New: • The main risk factor of severe scabies in this study was delayed diagnosis associated with the use of topical or systemic corticosteroids. • The treatment was successful in 85.7% of cases, and 65% of children needed to be hospitalized.

Cutaneous adverse events in children treated with vemurafenib for refractory BRAFV600E mutated Langerhans cell histiocytosis.

BACKGROUND: The somatic BRAFV600E mutation occurs in 38-64% of pediatric cases of Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH). Vemurafenib (VMF), a BRAF inhibitor, was approved for refractory BRAFV600E mutated LCH. In adults, VMF causes frequent cutaneous adverse events (CAE) including skin tumors (squamous cell carcinomas, melanomas), but little is known in children. The objective of this study was to evaluate the frequency, clinical spectrum, and severity of CAEs in children treated with VMF for LCH. In addition, a correlation between CAE occurrence and VMF dose, residual plasma levels (RPLs), and efficacy was searched for. PROCEDURE: Multicentric retrospective observational study including patients <18 years treated with VMF alone for refractory BRAFV600E mutated LCH in 13 countries between October 1, 2013 and December 31, 2018. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients: 56% female, median age 2.1 years (0.2-14.6), median treatment duration 4.1 months (1.4-29.7). Forty-one patients (72%) had at least one CAE: photosensitivity (40%), keratosis pilaris (32%), rash (26%), xerosis (21%), and neutrophilic panniculitis (16%). No skin tumor was observed. Five percent of CAEs were grade 3. None were grade 4 or led to permanent VMF discontinuation. Dose reduction was necessary for 12% of patients, temporary treatment discontinuation for 16%, none leading to loss of efficacy. VMF dose, median RPL, and efficacy were not correlated with CAE occurrence. CONCLUSIONS: At doses used for pediatric LCH, CAEs are frequent but rarely severe and have little impact on the continuation of treatment when managed appropriately. Regular dermatological follow-up is essential to manage CAEs and screen for possible induced skin tumors.

A systematic review and an individual patient data meta-analysis of ivermectin use in children weighing less than fifteen kilograms: Is it time to reconsider the current contraindication?

BACKGROUND: Oral ivermectin is a safe broad spectrum anthelminthic used for treating several neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). Currently, ivermectin use is contraindicated in children weighing less than 15 kg, restricting access to this drug for the treatment of NTDs. Here we provide an updated systematic review of the literature and we conducted an individual-level patient data (IPD) meta-analysis describing the safety of ivermectin in children weighing less than 15 kg. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) for IPD guidelines by searching MEDLINE via PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid Embase, LILACS, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, TOXLINE for all clinical trials, case series, case reports, and database entries for reports on the use of ivermectin in children weighing less than 15 kg that were published between 1 January 1980 to 25 October 2019. The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO): CRD42017056515. A total of 3,730 publications were identified, 97 were selected for potential inclusion, but only 17 sources describing 15 studies met the minimum criteria which consisted of known weights of children less than 15 kg linked to possible adverse events, and provided comprehensive IPD. A total of 1,088 children weighing less than 15 kg were administered oral ivermectin for one of the following indications: scabies, mass drug administration for scabies control, crusted scabies, cutaneous larva migrans, myiasis, pthiriasis, strongyloidiasis, trichuriasis, and parasitic disease of unknown origin. Overall a total of 1.4% (15/1,088) of children experienced 18 adverse events all of which were mild and self-limiting. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Existing limited data suggest that oral ivermectin in children weighing less than 15 kilograms is safe. Data from well-designed clinical trials are needed to provide further assurance.

Congenital haemangiomas: a single-centre retrospective review.

OBJECTIVE: Congenital haemangiomas (CHs) are rare, benign vascular tumours that are fully developed at birth. Three subtypes of CHs have been described based on clinical behaviour: rapidly involuting CHs (RICHs), non-involuting CHs (NICHs) and partially involuting CHs (PICHs). We explore in our study clinical, evolutionary and paraclinical characteristics of the three CH subtypes. DESIGN: Children with CH attending our department of paediatric dermatology at Bordeaux University Hospital over a 13-year period were retrospectively included. Epidemiological, clinical and evolutionary data, photographs and imaging results were reviewed. All available tissue samples were histologically examined. RESULTS: We included 57 patients: 22 with RICH, 22 with NICH and 13 with PICH. Males predominated (ratio 1.7); the most common CH location was on the limbs. RICH, NICH and PICH exhibited overlapping characteristics; all were single telangiectatic lesions with pale peripheral halos. At birth, NICHs were flat but RICHs and PICHs bulky. The median age at complete RICH involution was 12 months. One-third of CHs that appeared RICH-like at birth underwent incomplete involution to become PICHs. Heart failure and thrombocytopenia were rare complications. PICHs were frequently ulcerated. Pain was common for NICH and PICH. The imaging and histological data of the three CH subtypes were rather similar. CONCLUSIONS: We describe the characteristics and evolution of the three CH subtypes using a case series. Certain overlapping features were apparent, reinforcing the hypothesis that RICH, NICH and PICH lie on the same pathological spectrum.

Efficacy and safety of oral immunotherapy with AR101 in European children with a peanut allergy (ARTEMIS): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Peanut allergy is the leading cause of food-related anaphylaxis. Current management options can negatively affect food allergy-related quality of life. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of an investigational oral biologic drug (AR101). METHODS: The AR101 Trial in Europe Measuring Oral Immunotherapy Success in peanut-allergic children (ARTEMIS) trial was a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial done at 18 hospitals in Ireland, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden, and the UK. Children and adolescents with peanut allergy, aged 4-17 years, who developed dose-limiting symptoms to 300 mg or less peanut protein (equivalent to approximately one peanut kernel) during a double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge test at study entry were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned (3:1) to receive daily doses of either AR101 oral immunotherapy (AR101 group) or a taste-masked placebo (placebo group). All participants, investigators, and care providers were masked to treatment allocation until the study was completed. Doses were increased every 2 weeks over 6 months until a dose of 300 mg was reached and maintained for 3 months. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants in the intention-to-treat or safety population (defined as those participants who had been randomly assigned and had received at least one dose of the assigned drug) who could consume a single dose of 1000 mg (cumulative dose 2043 mg) peanut protein without developing dose-limiting allergic symptoms at an exit double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge after 9 months of treatment. Additional endpoints included safety (ie, the frequency and severity of adverse events) and changes in food allergy-related quality of life, assessed by use of age-appropriate Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaires (FAQLQs) and the Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM). The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03201003, and is completed. FINDINGS: Between June 12, 2017, and Feb 15, 2018, 227 patients were screened, of whom 175 were randomly assigned to the AR101 group (n=132) and the placebo group (n=43). All primary and secondary endpoints were met. 77 (58%) of 132 participants in the AR101 group tolerated 1000 mg peanut protein at the exit food challenge versus one (2%) of 43 participants in the placebo group (AR101-placebo treatment difference 56·0% [95% CI 44·1-65·2], p<0·0001). Adverse events were reported by almost all participants. The maximum severity of adverse events reported was mild or moderate for most participants who received AR101 (mild, 66 [50%] of 132 participants; moderate, 63 [48%]; and severe, one [1%]) or placebo (mild, 24 [56%] of 43 participants; moderate, 18 [42%]; severe, none). Participants aged 8-12 years in the AR101 group reported improvements that exceeded the minimum clinically important difference between the two groups across all FAQLQ domains. Additionally, participants in the AR101 group and their caregivers reported improvements that exceeded the minimum clinically important difference in FAIM domains related to the perceived likelihood and outcomes of a severe allergic reaction. INTERPRETATION: AR101 oral immunotherapy treatment led to rapid desensitisation to peanut protein, with a predictable safety profile that improved with treatment, and an associated improvement in self-reported and caregiver-reported food allergy-related quality of life. These patient-oriented outcomes provide invaluable data to help physicians, patients, and caregivers make informed, shared decisions on the management of peanut allergy. FUNDING: Aimmune Therapeutics.

Defining the risk of first intravenous immunoglobulin unresponsiveness in non-Asian patients with Kawasaki disease.

About 10-20% of patients with Kawasaki disease (KD) are unresponsive to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and are at increased risk of coronary artery abnormalities (CAAs). Early identification is critical to initiate aggressive therapies, but available scoring systems lack sensitivity in non-Japanese populations. We investigated the accuracy of 3 Japanese scoring systems and studied factors associated with IVIg unresponsiveness in a large multiethnic French population of children with KD to build a new scoring system. Children admitted for KD between 2011-2014 in 65 centers were enrolled. Factors associated with second line-treatment; i.e. unresponsiveness to initial IVIg treatment, were analyzed by multivariate regression analysis. The performance of our score and the Kobayashi, Egami and Sano scores were compared in our population and in ethnic subgroups. Overall, 465 children were reported by 84 physicians; 425 were classified with KD (55% European Caucasian, 12% North African/Middle Eastern, 10% African/Afro-Caribbean, 3% Asian and 11% mixed). Eighty patients (23%) needed second-line treatment. Japanese scores had poor performance in our whole population (sensitivity 14-61%). On multivariate regression analysis, predictors of secondary treatment after initial IVIG were hepatomegaly, ALT level ≥30 IU/L, lymphocyte count <2400/mm3 and time to treatment <5 days. The best sensitivity (77%) and specificity (60%) of this model was with 1 point per variable and cut-off ≥2 points. The sensitivity remained good in our 3 main ethnic subgroups (74-88%). We identified predictors of IVIg resistance and built a new score with good sensitivity and acceptable specificity in a non-Asian population.

Improvement of epidermal covering on AEC patients with severe skin erosions by PRIMA-1MET/APR-246.

P63 is a major transcription factor regulating skin development and homeostasis. It controls many genes involved in cell proliferation, adhesion, and early differentiation. P63 is mutated in several rare syndromes called p63-related ectodermal dysplasia syndromes (ED). The main forms are EEC and AEC syndromes due to p63 missense mutations on the DBD and SAM domains, respectively. ED patients display many developmental defects, including ectrodactyly, clef/lip palate, and ectodermal dysplasia, while AEC patients suffer from severe skin erosions that not always heal. We have previously showed that ED-derived iPSC display altered epidermal commitment. P63 belongs to the p53 gene family sharing similar structural domains. We found that ED-iPSC epidermal commitment can be rescued by a p53-reactivating compounds called PRIMA-1MET, also named APR-246 and currently used in anticancer clinical trials. Here, we established primary epidermal culture from two AEC children (S.F. and Y.M.) suffering from persistent skin erosions at age of 9 and 15, respectively. These patients carry missense mutations on the SAM domain (I576T and I537T). We found that primary keratinocytes (KCs) isolated from these AEC patients underwent altered epidermal differentiation that was rescued by PRIMA-1MET treatment. It prompted us to formulate the compound onto a cream that was topically applied on the right hand of one patient and on the scalp of the second patient. In both cases, the daily treatment allowed re-epithelialization of the eroded skin and a drastic loss of pain after few weeks, improving quality of life. Normally, mutant p63 exerts a dominant-negative effect, mainly through the formation of aggregate with WT p63 and p73. PRIMA-1MET did not reduce protein aggregation while enhancing cell differentiation, suggesting that PRIMA-1MET targets cell differentiation and not p63 activity directly. In conclusion, we propose that repurposing of the antitumoral PRIMA-1MET compound could become a general treatment of AEC skin erosions.

Clinical Profile of Methotrexate-resistant Juvenile Localised Scleroderma.

Methotrexate has demonstrated its efficiency for the treatment of juvenile localized scleroderma but some patients may be resistant. The aim of our study was to define the profile of such patients. We performed an observational retrospective multicenter study between 2007 and 2016 and included all children seen in the French Paediatric Dermatology and Rheumatology departments with active localized scleroderma treated by methotrexate for a minimum of 4 months. Metho-trexate efficacy was assessed clinically and/or by imaging between the fourth to twelfth months of treatment. A total of 57 patients were included. Metho-trexate dosage ranged from 7 to 15 mg/m2/week. Only 4 patients were resistant. No common features could be identified between these 4 patients. Children with localized scleroderma are rarely resistant to metho-trexate and we did not identify a clinical profile for those resistant patients.