EUropean REcommendations for female FERtility preservation (EU-REFER): A joint collaboration between oncologists and fertility specialists.

In recent years, following the improved prognosis of patients with cancer, interest and attention has grown around fertility issues in these patients. International guidelines on fertility preservation in patients with cancer recommend that physicians discuss with all patients of reproductive age (or their parents/guardians, if children) the risk of infertility arising from their cancer or its treatment. Oncofertility counselling is recommended at the earliest opportunity and prior to cancer treatment, to help patients make informed decisions on pursuing fertility preservation. Currently, however, such discussions are not being routinely held. In June 2017, an esteemed group of European oncofertility experts met to discuss current unfulfilled needs in oncofertility for female cancer patients. This expert group has produced here a number of key recommendations in order to guide oncologists, haematologists, and other involved professionals with oncofertility discussions and appropriate referrals for further fertility preservation counselling and follow-up.

Margin width should not still enforce a systematic surgical re-excision in the conservative treatment of early breast infiltrative ductal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: In cases where breast conservative surgery was performed for infiltrative ductal carcinoma (IDC), margin status is an independent prognostic factor for local ipsilateral relapse (LIR). There is no validated definition of a clear margin. We investigated factors associated with residual disease on re-excision specimen and the impact of margin status on the risk of LIR. METHODS: From January 1992 to December 2002, 454 patients were retrospectively included. Patients had undergone conservative surgery and radiotherapy for IDC. Two groups were defined: group 1, involved or close margin (<3 mm) and a re-excision; and group 2, involved or close margin without re-excision. The risk factors for residual disease in the re-excision specimen were analyzed in group 1, and the rate of 5-year LIR was analyzed in both groups. RESULTS: Among patients who experienced a surgical re-excision for involved or close margin, 21% (55 of 206) had residual tumor. The multivariate analysis showed that only a margin involved with intraductal carcinoma remained predictive for residual disease. According to the multivariate analysis, only hormone therapy (p < 10(-6)), diffuse involved margins (p = 0.003), and margins involved with intraductal component (p < 10(-6)) were predictive of LIR. Re-excision for a margin involved with intraductal carcinoma significantly improved local relapse-free survival (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In cases of IDC, re-excision for a close margin or a focally involved margin had no impact on local relapse-free survival. The decision to perform a surgical re-excision for an involved margin should not be systematic but should take multiple risk factors into consideration, such as patient age or margin diffuse involvement.

[The role of interval surgery in the treatment's strategy of advanced ovarian cancer]. / Place de la chirurgie d'intervalle dans le traitement du cancer avancé de l'ovaire.

The extent of cytoreductive surgery and the amount of residual disease are among the most important factors impacting the survival of women with advanced ovarian cancer. Chronology of treatment is still debating. In the French standard treatment, primary surgery remains the cornerstone and interval surgery is an option. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery may reduce morbidity and mortality. Nevertheless the impact of this strategy on survival is still controversial.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer: results of Ganglion Sentinelle et Chimiotherapie Neoadjuvante, a French prospective multicentric study.

PURPOSE: To determine the detection rate, the false-negative rate, and the accuracy of sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective multicentric study was initiated to evaluate the results of SLN biopsy with the combined method after NAC for advanced large operable breast cancer. RESULTS: From September 2003 to March 2007, 195 patients enrolled from 12 institutions were found suitable for evaluation. The detection rate was 90% (176 of 195 patients), and the false-negative rate was 11.5% (six of 52 patients). Patients without axillary palpable nodes (N0) before NAC had a better detection rate compared with patients with axillary suspicious nodes (N1, 94.6% v 81.5%; P = .008). The false-negative rate was not correlated with clinical nodal status before NAC (9.4% v 15%; P = .66). CONCLUSION: This study confirms the feasibility of SLN biopsy after NAC in the case of large operable breast cancer. The detection rate, false-negative rate, and accuracy do not differ from those obtained in the case of early breast cancer without NAC, thus demonstrating the feasibility of SLN biopsy after NAC.