RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) is a poorly understood and heterogeneous manifestation of SLE. Common major NPSLE syndromes include strokes, seizures, myelitis, and aseptic meningitis. Easily obtainable biomarkers are needed to assist in early diagnosis and improve outcomes for NPSLE. A frequent end-result of major syndromes is neuronal or glial injury. Blood-based neurofilament light (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) have been utilized as markers for monitoring disease activity and/or severity in other neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory diseases; however, they have not been evaluated in active major NPSLE. METHODS: This was a case-control study. We enrolled patients aged 12-60 years with active major NPSLE, SLE without active major NPSLE, and healthy controls. Active NPSLE was defined as being <6 months from last new or worsening neuropsychiatric symptom. Demographics, clinical data, and serum or plasma biosamples were collected. RESULTS: Thirteen patients with active major NPSLE, 13 age/sex/kidney function matched SLE controls without active major NPSLE, and 13 age/sex matched healthy controls (mean ages 26.8, 27.3, 26.6 years) were included. 92% of each group were female. Major syndromes included stroke (5), autonomic disorder (3), demyelinating disease (2), aseptic meningitis (2), sensorimotor polyneuropathy (2), cranial neuropathy (1), seizures (1), and myelopathy (2). Mean (standard deviation) blood NfL and GFAP were 3.6 pg/ml (2.0) and 50.4 pg/ml (15.0), respectively, for the healthy controls. Compared to healthy controls, SLE without active major NPSLE had mean blood NfL and GFAP levels 1.3 pg/ml (p = .42) and 1.2 pg/ml higher (p = .53), respectively. Blood NfL was on average 17.9 pg/ml higher (95% CI: 9.2, 34.5; p < .001) and blood GFAP was on average 3.2 pg/ml higher (95% CI: 1.9, 5.5; p < .001) for cases of active major NPSLE compared to SLE without active major NPSLE. In a subset of 6 patients sampled at multiple time points, blood NfL and GFAP decreased after immunotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Blood NfL and GFAP levels are elevated in persons with SLE with active major NPSLE compared to disease matched controls and may lower after immunotherapy initiation. Larger and longitudinal studies are needed to ascertain their utility in a clinical setting.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores , Proteína Ácida Fibrilar de la Glía , Vasculitis por Lupus del Sistema Nervioso Central , Proteínas de Neurofilamentos , Humanos , Femenino , Biomarcadores/sangre , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Adulto , Masculino , Vasculitis por Lupus del Sistema Nervioso Central/sangre , Proteína Ácida Fibrilar de la Glía/sangre , Proteínas de Neurofilamentos/sangre , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Persona de Mediana Edad , Niño , Neuroglía/patología , Neuroglía/metabolismo , Neuronas/patologíaRESUMEN
The impact of B cell deficiency on the humoral and cellular responses to SARS-CoV2 mRNA vaccination remains a challenging and significant clinical management question. We evaluated vaccine-elicited serological and cellular responses in 1) healthy individuals who were pre-exposed to SARS-CoV-2 (n = 21), 2) healthy individuals who received a homologous booster (mRNA, n = 19; or Novavax, n = 19), and 3) persons with multiple sclerosis on B cell depletion therapy (MS-αCD20) receiving mRNA homologous boosting (n = 36). Pre-exposure increased humoral and CD4 T cellular responses in immunocompetent individuals. Novavax homologous boosting induced a significantly more robust serological response than mRNA boosting. MS-α CD20 had an intact IgA mucosal response and an enhanced CD8 T cell response to mRNA boosting compared with immunocompetent individuals. This enhanced cellular response was characterized by the expansion of only effector, not memory, T cells. The enhancement of CD8 T cells in the setting of B cell depletion suggests a regulatory mechanism between B and CD8 T cell vaccine responses.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Esclerosis Múltiple , Humanos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , ARN Viral , COVID-19/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , ARN MensajeroRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The ability to recognize and address bias is an important communication skill not typically addressed during training. We describe the design of an educational curriculum that aims to identify and change behavior related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). "DEI at the Bedside" uses the existing infrastructure of bedside teaching and provides a tool to normalize DEI discussions and develop skills to address bias during a neurology inpatient rotation. METHODS: As part of traditional clinical rounds, team members on an inpatient service shared experiences with DEI topics, including bias. The team developed potential responses should they encounter a similar situation in the future. We report the results of our needs assessment and curriculum development to evaluate the feasibility of incorporating a DEI educational curriculum in the neurology inpatient setting. RESULTS: Forty-two DEI experiences were recorded. Medical students were the most frequent discussants (44%). Direction of bias occurred between healthcare team members (33%), against patients (31%), and patients against healthcare team members (28%). Experiences ranged from microaggressions to explicit comments of racism, sexism, and homophobia. CONCLUSIONS: Based on needs assessment data, we developed a DEI educational curriculum for the inpatient neurology setting aimed to improve knowledge and skills related to DEI topics as well as to normalize conversation of DEI in the clinical setting. Additional study will demonstrate whether this initiative translates into measurable and sustained improvement in knowledge of how bias and disparity show up in the clinical setting and behavioral intent to discuss and address them.
Asunto(s)
Educación Médica , Neurología , Humanos , Diversidad, Equidad e Inclusión , Pacientes Internos , ComunicaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To describe a case of glycine receptor (GlyR) antibody-positive stiff person syndrome (SPS) treated with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (aHSCT). METHODS: This was a multicenter collaboration for the treatment of a single patient who underwent aHSCT as part of a clinical trial (NCT00716066). To objectively assess the response to transplantation, several clinical outcome measures were evaluated pretransplant and up to 18 months post-transplant, including modified Rankin Score (mRS), stiffness index, Hauser Ambulation Score (HAS), hypersensitivity index, timed 25-foot walk, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment. RESULTS: After transplant, the patient achieved sustained clinical improvement evidenced across various clinical scales, including mRS, stiffness index, HAS, and 25-foot walk time. DISCUSSION: aHSCT represents a promising treatment option for SPS, including for GlyR-positive patients. In addition, this case represents the need to validate and standardize best clinical outcome measures for patients with SPS. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: Class IV; this is a single observational study without controls.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Síndrome de la Persona Rígida , Humanos , Receptores de Glicina , Síndrome de la Persona Rígida/terapia , Trasplante Autólogo , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos como AsuntoRESUMEN
Emerging evidence is encouraging and suggests that a substantial proportion of patients without antibody responses (due to anti-CD20 therapy or other etiologies) to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines develop T cell responses. However, antigen-specific T cellular responses are notoriously difficult to assess clinically, given the lack of such assays under satisfactory CAP/CLIA regulation, and the laborious nature of the flow cytometric assessment. To evaluate the ability to apply a clinically feasible assay to measure T cellular responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination, we compared flow cytometric and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) based assays in 24 participants treated with anti-CD20 therapy. T cellular activation (CD69 + CD137+ surface expression, i.e., activation induced markers [AIM]) and intracellular interferon gamma (INFγ) production via flow cytometry was compared to plasma Interferon Gamma Release Assay (IGRA) via ELISA. Plasma INFγ production measured by IGRA correlated with the percent of INFγ-producing AIM positive T cells, supporting the use of IGRA assay as a robust assessment of T cellular response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine for B-cell depleted patients that is clinically feasible, time efficient, and cost effective.