12-Month Real-Life Efficacy of the MiniMed 780G Advanced Closed-Loop System in Patients Living with Type 1 Diabetes: A French Observational, Retrospective, Multicentric Study.

Aim: To evaluate the evolution of glycemic outcomes in patients living with type 1 diabetes (T1D) after 1 year of use of the MiniMed 780G advanced hybrid closed-loop (AHCL) system. Methods: We conducted an observational, retrospective, multicentric study in 20 centers in France. The primary objective was to evaluate the improvement in glycemic control after 1-year use of AHCL. The primary endpoint was the variation of time in range (TIR) between pre-AHCL and after 1-year use of AHCL. Secondary objectives were to analyze the glycemic outcomes after 3, 6, and 12 months of AHCL use, the safety, and the long-term observance of AHCL. Results: Two hundred twenty patients were included, and 200 were analyzed for the primary endpoint. 92.7% of patients continued to use AHCL. After 1 year of use of AHCL, TIR was 72.5% ± 10.6% (+9.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI] [7.6-10.5] compared to pre-AHCL initiation, P < 0.001), HbA1c 7.1% ± 0.7% (-0.5%; 95% CI [-0.6 to -0.4]; P < 0.001), time below range 2.0% [1.0; 3.0] (0.0% [-2.0; 0.0], P < 0.001), and time above range 24.8% ± 10.9% (-7.3%; 95% CI [-8.8 to -5.7]; P < 0.001). More patients achieved the glycemic treatment goals of HbA1c <7.0% (45.1% vs. 18.1%, P < 0.001) and TIR >70% (59.0% vs. 29.5% P < 0.001) when compared with pre-AHCL. Five patients experienced severe hypoglycemia events and two patients experienced ketoacidosis. Conclusion: After 1 year of use of AHCL, people living with T1D safely improved their glucose control and a higher proportion of them achieved optimal glycemic control.

The effects of switching from ceftriaxone to cefotaxime on the occurrence of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales: A stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of the replacement of ceftriaxone by cefotaxime on the incidence of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (3GC-RE). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a 24-month monocentric prospective, stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. During the control phase of the study, clinicians prescribed either ceftriaxone or cefotaxime. During the intervention phase, they systematically prescribed cefotaxime. RESULTS: The cefotaxime/ceftriaxone ratio was inversely correlated with the incidence of 3GC-RE. All in all, 3GC-RE incidence was 1.05 (27/25,692) acquired cases/1000 hospitalization days during the control phase and 0.54 (11/20,419) acquired cases/1000 hospitalization days during the intervention phase (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 0.51 [0.22-1.07], p = 0.06). In multivariable analysis, intervention phase (versus control phase) (p = 0.007), cefotaxime/ceftriaxone ratio (p = 0.003) and imported 3GC-RE (p = 0.005) were associated with the incidence of acquired cases of 3GC-RE. CONCLUSIONS: We found that replacing ceftriaxone with cefotaxime reduced the occurrence of 3GC-RE isolates. More studies are needed to confirm these results.

Perioperative blood glucose variability and autonomic nervous system activity in on-pump cardiac surgery patients: Study protocol of a single-center observational study.

INTRODUCTION: On-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and surgical valve replacement (SVR) are high-risk procedures. Several studies reported that perioperative blood glucose (BG) variability was independently associated with impaired postoperative outcome. However, the underlying mechanisms contributing to increased perioperative BG variability and to its deleterious impact remain unknown. The hypothesis of the study is that perioperative BG variability could be related to perioperative alteration of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity and to preoperative BG variability. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We designed a prospective observational single-center study. Four groups of 30 patients will be studied: group 1, including insulin-requiring type 2 diabetic patients undergoing on-pump CABG; group 2, including non-insulin-requiring type 2 diabetic patients undergoing on-pump CABG; group 3, including non-diabetic patients undergoing aortic SVR; and group 4, including non-diabetic patient undergoing on-pump CABG. Preoperative (baseline) and postoperative BG variability will be quantified using the Abbott's Freestyle Libre Pro sensor allowing for continuous subcutaneous BG monitoring. Preoperative (baseline) and postoperative ANS activity will be measured using noninvasive continuous heart rate monitoring (Mooky HR memory®). Blood level and urinary concentration of inflammatory and endothelial dysfunction biomarkers will be measured from blood and urinary samples at the end of the surgery and on postoperative day 1 and 2. The primary objective is to describe the relationship between baseline BG variability and postoperative BG variability. The secondary objectives are to describe the relationship: between baseline and postoperative BG variability according to the diabetes phenotype and to the type of surgery; between the ANS activity and the BG variability; and between postoperative BG variability and, urinary and blood biomarkers.

[One hundred years after the discovery of insulin: a new revolution for patients living with type 1 diabetes?] / Cent ans après la découverte de l'insuline : une nouvelle révolution pour les patients vivant avec un diabète de type 1 ?

The year 2021 saw the 100-year celebration of the discovery of insulin as a treatment for type 1 diabetes, saving lives of people previously condemned by the disease. However, insulin replacement, so different from physiological secretion, remains a challenge. Until the 1990s, people living with type 1 diabetes were treated with two injections of intermediate insulin and prandial regular insulin injections. Their kinetics led to frequent hypoglycemia, justifying meals taken at fixed times, with fixed amount of carbohydrates avoiding fast sugars. The development of rapid and then long acting insulin analogues in the 1990s and 2000s and the principle of patient empowerment have reduced these constraints by introducing the notion of functional insulin therapy, dissociating meals managed by rapid insulins from basal insulin (= insulin for living). Meals can be taken at variable times, with variable carbohydrate content and without food restrictions. But the revolution started 5 years ago, with the development of continuous glucose monitoring systems, freeing the patient from blood glucose controls, coupled thereafter to an insulin pump driven by artificial intelligence in the very recent hybrid closed-loop systems. These systems showed significant glucose control improvement, together with reduction of both the time spent in hypoglycemia and the mental burden on the individual, pending a cure for the disease for the next century.

Title: Cent ans après la découverte de l'insuline : une nouvelle révolution pour les patients vivant avec un diabète de type 1 ? Abstract: L'année 2021 a vu célébrer le centenaire de la découverte de l'insuline comme traitement du diabète de type 1, sauvant la vie de personnes condamnées auparavant par la maladie. La substitution insulinique, tellement différente de la sécrétion physiologique, reste cependant un défi. Jusque dans les années 1990, les personnes vivant avec un diabète de type 1 étaient traitées par deux injections d'insuline intermédiaire, d'une durée d'action de 12 à 16 h, et des injections d'insuline rapide humaine, d'une durée d'action de 7 h environ, dont la cinétique entraînait des hypoglycémies fréquentes justifiant des repas pris à heures fixes, une quantité de glucides fixe et des collations obligatoires en évitant les sucres rapides. Le développement des analogues rapides (durée d'action de 4 h) puis lents (sans pic d'action) de l'insuline dans les années 1990 et 2000 et de l'éducation thérapeutique ont permis un allègement de ces contraintes. Ils ont permis aussi l'essor de l'insulinothérapie fonctionnelle, dissociant les repas, gérés par les insulines rapides, de l'insuline lente (c'est-à-dire l'insuline vitale), permettant des repas à horaires variables, à contenus variables et sans restriction d'aliments. Mais la grande révolution vient de ces cinq dernières années, avec l'apparition des capteurs de mesure du glucose en continu, libérant le patient des contrôles glycémiques capillaires, couplés par la suite à une pompe à insuline pilotée par une intelligence artificielle dans les systèmes très récents de boucle fermée hybride. Ces systèmes permettent une amélioration majeure du contrôle de la glycémie, en réduisant à la fois le temps passé en hypoglycémie et la charge mentale de la personne.

Impact of diabetes on COVID-19 prognosis beyond comorbidity burden: the CORONADO initiative.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Diabetes has been recognised as a pejorative prognostic factor in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Since diabetes is typically a disease of advanced age, it remains unclear whether diabetes remains a COVID-19 risk factor beyond advanced age and associated comorbidities. We designed a cohort study that considered age and comorbidities to address this question. METHODS: The Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 and Diabetes Outcomes (CORONADO) initiative is a French, multicentric, cohort study of individuals with (exposed) and without diabetes (non-exposed) admitted to hospital with COVID-19, with a 1:1 matching on sex, age (±5 years), centre and admission date (10 March 2020 to 10 April 2020). Comorbidity burden was assessed by calculating the updated Charlson comorbidity index (uCCi). A predefined composite primary endpoint combining death and/or invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), as well as these two components separately, was assessed within 7 and 28 days following hospital admission. We performed multivariable analyses to compare clinical outcomes between patients with and without diabetes. RESULTS: A total of 2210 pairs of participants (diabetes/no-diabetes) were matched on age (mean±SD 69.4±13.2/69.5±13.2 years) and sex (36.3% women). The uCCi was higher in individuals with diabetes. In unadjusted analysis, the primary composite endpoint occurred more frequently in the diabetes group by day 7 (29.0% vs 21.6% in the no-diabetes group; HR 1.43 [95% CI 1.19, 1.72], p<0.001). After multiple adjustments for age, BMI, uCCi, clinical (time between onset of COVID-19 symptoms and dyspnoea) and biological variables (eGFR, aspartate aminotransferase, white cell count, platelet count, C-reactive protein) on admission to hospital, diabetes remained associated with a higher risk of primary composite endpoint within 7 days (adjusted HR 1.42 [95% CI 1.17, 1.72], p<0.001) and 28 days (adjusted HR 1.30 [95% CI 1.09, 1.55], p=0.003), compared with individuals without diabetes. Using the same adjustment model, diabetes was associated with the risk of IMV, but not with risk of death, within 28 days of admission to hospital. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Our results demonstrate that diabetes status was associated with a deleterious COVID-19 prognosis irrespective of age and comorbidity status. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04324736.

History of bariatric surgery and COVID-19 outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: Results from the CORONADO study.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the impact of a history of metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) on the clinical outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and severe obesity hospitalized for COVID-19. METHODS: In this post hoc analysis from the nationwide observational CORONADO (Coronavirus SARS-CoV2 and Diabetes Outcomes) study, patients with T2D and a history of MBS were matched with patients without MBS for age, sex, and BMI either at the time of MBS or on admission for COVID-19. The composite primary outcome (CPO) combined invasive mechanical ventilation and/or death within 7 and 28 days following admission. RESULTS: Out of 2,398 CORONADO participants, 20 had a history of MBS. When matching for BMI at the time of MBS and after adjustment for diabetes duration, the CPO occurred less frequently within 7 days (3 vs. 17 events, OR: 0.15 [0.01 to 0.94], p = 0.03) and 28 days (3 vs. 19 events, OR: 0.11 [0.01 to 0.71], p = 0.02) in patients with MBS (n = 16) vs. controls (n = 44). There was no difference in CPO rate between patients with MBS and controls when matching for BMI on admission. CONCLUSIONS: These data are reassuring regarding COVID-19 prognosis in patients with diabetes and a history of MBS compared with those without MBS.

Sex disparities in COVID-19 outcomes of inpatients with diabetes: insights from the CORONADO study.

OBJECTIVE: Male sex is one of the determinants of severe coronavirus diseas-e-2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to characterize sex differences in severe outcomes in adults with diabetes hospitalized for COVID-19. METHODS: We performed a sex-stratified analysis of clinical and biological features and outcomes (i.e. invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), death, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and home discharge at day 7 (D7) or day 28 (D28)) in 2380 patients with diabetes hospitalized for COVID-19 and included in the nationwide CORONADO observational study (NCT04324736). RESULTS: The study population was predominantly male (63.5%). After multiple adjustments, female sex was negatively associated with the primary outcome (IMV and/or death, OR: 0.66 (0.49-0.88)), death (OR: 0.49 (0.30-0.79)) and ICU admission (OR: 0.57 (0.43-0.77)) at D7 but only with ICU admission (OR: 0.58 (0.43-0.77)) at D28. Older age and a history of microvascular complications were predictors of death at D28 in both sexes, while chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was predictive of death in women only. At admission, C-reactive protein (CRP), aspartate amino transferase (AST) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), according to the CKD-EPI formula predicted death in both sexes. Lymphocytopenia was an independent predictor of death in women only, while thrombocytopenia and elevated plasma glucose concentration were predictors of death in men only. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with diabetes admitted for COVID-19, female sex was associated with lower incidence of early severe outcomes, but did not influence the overall in-hospital mortality, suggesting that diabetes mitigates the female protection from COVID-19 severity. Sex-associated biological determinants may be useful to optimize COVID-19 prevention and management in women and men.

Decreased maximal cortisol secretion rate in patients with cirrhosis: Relation to disease severity.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hepatic enzymes play a major role in the metabolic elimination of cortisol, and reduced rates of cortisol clearance have been consistently observed in patients with chronic liver disease. It is less clear whether there are concomitant abnormalities of adrenocortical function in patients with cirrhosis. In the present study, we sought to assess adrenocortical function in patients with cirrhosis using measures of free cortisol appearance and elimination rates that are independent of serum concentrations of cortisol binding proteins. METHODS: Post hoc analysis used computer-assisted numerical and modelling methods with serial total and free cortisol concentration data to obtain rates of free cortisol appearance and elimination. Rate parameters were obtained in 114 patients with chronic liver disease, including Child-Pugh (CP) ≤8 (n = 53) and CP >8 (n = 61). RESULTS: Maximal cortisol secretion rate (CSRmax) was significantly decreased (p = 0.01) in patients with cirrhosis with CP >8 (0.28 nM/s; 95% CI 0.24-0.34) compared with those with CP ≤8 (0.39 nM/s; 95% CI 0.33-0.46), and CSRmax was negatively correlated with CP score (r = -0.19, p = 0.01). Free cortisol elimination rate was significantly (p = 0.04) decreased in the CP >8 group (0.16 ± 0.20 min-1) compared with that in the CP ≤8 group (0.21 ± 0.21 min-1), and free cortisol elimination rates were negatively correlated with CP score (r = -0.23, p = 0.01). A significant correlation between CSRmax and free cortisol elimination rate (r = 0.88, p <0.001) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: CSRmax and free cortisol elimination rates were significantly reduced according to severity of cirrhosis. In contrast to stimulated total cortisol concentrations, CSRmax estimates were independent of cortisol-binding protein concentrations. Results provide additional evidence of subnormal adrenocortical function in patients with cirrhosis. LAY SUMMARY: We applied numerical analytic methods to characterise adrenocortical function in patients with varying stages of chronic liver disease. We found that patients with more severe cirrhosis have decreased rate of free cortisol elimination and decreased maximal cortisol secretion rate, which is a measure of adrenocortical function. In contrast to conventional measures of adrenocortical function, those obtained using numerical methods were not affected by variation in corticosteroid binding globulin and albumin concentrations. We conclude that patients with cirrhosis demonstrate measurable abnormalities of adrenocortical function, evidence of which supports aspects of the hepatoadrenal syndrome hypothesis.

No more hypoglycaemia on days with physical activity and unrestricted diet when using a closed-loop system for 12 weeks: A post hoc secondary analysis of the multicentre, randomized controlled Diabeloop WP7 trial.

A post hoc analysis of the Diabeloop WP7 multicentre, randomized controlled trial was performed to investigate the efficacy of the Diabeloop Generation-1 (DBLG1) closed-loop system in controlling the hypoglycaemia induced by physical activity (PA) in real-life conditions. Glycaemic outcomes were compared between days with and without PA in 56 patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using DBLG1 for 12 weeks. After the patient announces a PA, DBLG1 reduces insulin delivery and, if necessary, calculates the amount of preventive carbohydrates (CHO). Daily time spent in the interstitial glucose range less than 70 mg/dL was not significantly different between days with and without PA (2.0% ± 1.5% vs. 2.2% ± 1.1%), regardless of the intensity or duration of the PA. Preventive CHO intake recommended by the system was significantly higher in days with PA (41.1 ± 35.5 vs. 21.8 ± 28.5 g/day; P < .0001), and insulin delivery was significantly lower (31.5 ± 10.5 vs. 34.0 ± 10.5 U/day; P < .0001). The time spent in hyperglycaemia and the glycaemic variation coefficient increased significantly on days with PA. In real-life conditions, the use of DBLG1 avoids PA-induced hypoglycaemia. Insulin adjustments and preventive CHO recommendation may explain this therapeutic benefit.

Ten-year outcomes of islet transplantation in patients with type 1 diabetes: Data from the Swiss-French GRAGIL network.

To describe the 10-year outcomes of islet transplantation within the Swiss-French GRAGIL Network, in patients with type 1 diabetes experiencing high glucose variability associated with severe hypoglycemia and/or with functional kidney graft. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all subjects transplanted in the GRAGIL-1c and GARGIL-2 islet transplantation trials and analyzed components of metabolic control, graft function and safety outcomes over the 10-year period of follow-up. Forty-four patients were included between September 2003 and April 2010. Thirty-one patients completed a 10-year follow-up. Ten years after islet transplantation, median HbA1c was 7.2% (6.2-8.0) (55 mmol/mol [44-64]) versus 8.0% (7.1-9.1) (64 mmol/mol [54-76]) before transplantation (p < .001). Seventeen of 23 (73.9%) recipients were free of severe hypoglycemia, 1/21 patients (4.8%) was insulin-independent and median C-peptide was 0.6 ng/ml (0.2-1.2). Insulin requirements (UI/kg/day) were 0.3 (0.1-0.5) versus 0.5 (0.4-0.6) before transplantation (p < .001). Median (IQR) ß-score was 1 (0-4) (p < .05 when comparing with pre-transplantation values) and 51.9% recipients had a functional islet graft at 10 years. With a 10-year follow-up in a multicentric network, islet transplantation provided sustained improvement of glycemic control and was efficient to prevent severe hypoglycemia in almost 75% of the recipients.

Impact of ischemia time on islet isolation success and posttransplantation outcomes: A retrospective study of 452 pancreas isolations.

Many variables impact islet isolation, including pancreas ischemia time. The ischemia time upper limit that should be respected to avoid a negative impact on the isolation outcome is not well defined. We have performed a retrospective analysis of all islet isolations in our center between 2008 and 2018. Total ischemia time, cold ischemia time, and organ removal time were analyzed. Isolation success was defined as an islet yield ≥200 000 IEQ. Of the 452 pancreases included, 288 (64%) were successfully isolated. Probability of isolation success showed a significant decrease after 8 hours of total ischemia time, 7 hours of cold ischemia time, and 80 minutes of organ removal time. Although we observed an impact of ischemia time on islet yield, a probability of isolation success of 50% was still present even when total ischemia time exceeds 12 hours. Posttransplantation clinical outcomes were assessed in 32 recipients and no significant difference was found regardless of ischemia time. These data indicate that although shorter ischemia times are associated with better islet isolation outcomes, total ischemia time >12 hours can provide excellent results in appropriately selected donors.

Correction to: Phenotypic characteristics and prognosis of inpatients with COVID-19 and diabetes: the CORONADO study.

The authors regret a mistake in Table 1.

Phenotypic characteristics and prognosis of inpatients with COVID-19 and diabetes: the CORONADO study.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is a life-threatening infection caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. Diabetes has rapidly emerged as a major comorbidity for COVID-19 severity. However, the phenotypic characteristics of diabetes in COVID-19 patients are unknown. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide multicentre observational study in people with diabetes hospitalised for COVID-19 in 53 French centres in the period 10-31 March 2020. The primary outcome combined tracheal intubation for mechanical ventilation and/or death within 7 days of admission. Age- and sex-adjusted multivariable logistic regressions were performed to assess the prognostic value of clinical and biological features with the endpoint. ORs are reported for a 1 SD increase after standardisation. RESULTS: The current analysis focused on 1317 participants: 64.9% men, mean age 69.8 ± 13.0 years, median BMI 28.4 (25th-75th percentile: 25.0-32.7) kg/m2; with a predominance of type 2 diabetes (88.5%). Microvascular and macrovascular diabetic complications were found in 46.8% and 40.8% of cases, respectively. The primary outcome was encountered in 29.0% (95% CI 26.6, 31.5) of participants, while 10.6% (9.0, 12.4) died and 18.0% (16.0, 20.2) were discharged on day 7. In univariate analysis, characteristics prior to admission significantly associated with the primary outcome were sex, BMI and previous treatment with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockers, but not age, type of diabetes, HbA1c, diabetic complications or glucose-lowering therapies. In multivariable analyses with covariates prior to admission, only BMI remained positively associated with the primary outcome (OR 1.28 [1.10, 1.47]). On admission, dyspnoea (OR 2.10 [1.31, 3.35]), as well as lymphocyte count (OR 0.67 [0.50, 0.88]), C-reactive protein (OR 1.93 [1.43, 2.59]) and AST (OR 2.23 [1.70, 2.93]) levels were independent predictors of the primary outcome. Finally, age (OR 2.48 [1.74, 3.53]), treated obstructive sleep apnoea (OR 2.80 [1.46, 5.38]), and microvascular (OR 2.14 [1.16, 3.94]) and macrovascular complications (OR 2.54 [1.44, 4.50]) were independently associated with the risk of death on day 7. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATIONS: In people with diabetes hospitalised for COVID-19, BMI, but not long-term glucose control, was positively and independently associated with tracheal intubation and/or death within 7 days. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT04324736.

DIABEO System Combining a Mobile App Software With and Without Telemonitoring Versus Standard Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Diabetes Patients Poorly Controlled with a Basal-Bolus Insulin Regimen.

Background: The DIABEO® system (DS) is a telemedicine solution that combines a mobile app for patients with a web portal for health care providers. DS allows real-time monitoring of basal-bolus insulin therapy as well as therapeutic decision-making, integrating both basal and bolus dose calculation. Real-life studies have shown a very low rate of use of mobile health applications by patients. Therefore, we conducted a large randomized controlled trial study to investigate the efficacy of DS in conditions close to real life (TELESAGE study). Methods: TELESAGE was a multicenter, randomized, open study with three parallel arms: arm 1 (standard care), arm 2 (DIABEO alone), and arm 3 (DIABEO+telemonitoring by trained nurses). The primary outcome assessed the reduction in HbA1c levels after a 12-month follow-up. Results: Six hundred sixty-five patients were included in the study. Participants who used DIABEO once or more times a day (DIABEO users) showed a significant and meaningful reduction of HbA1c versus standard care after a 12-month follow-up: mean difference -0.41% for arm 2-arm 1 (P = 0.001) and -0.51% for arm 3-arm 1 (P ≤ 0.001). DIABEO users included 25.1% of participants in arm 2 and 37.6% in arm 3. In the intention-to-treat population, HbA1c changes and incidence of hypoglycemia were comparable between arms. Conclusions: A clinical and statistically significant reduction in HbA1c levels was found in those patients who used DIABEO at least once a day.

Effect of adding vildagliptin to insulin in haemodialysed patients with type 2 diabetes: The VILDDIAL study, a randomized, multicentre, prospective study.

AIM: To evaluate the effect of adding the dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitor vildagliptin to insulin on the glycaemic control of patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing haemodialysis. METHODS: Overall, 65 insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing haemodialysis (HbA1c: 7.3% ± 1.1%; age: 70.5 ± 8.5 years) were randomized (1:1) either to receive vildagliptin 50 mg/day in addition to insulin (vildagliptin-insulin group) or to pursue their usual insulin regimen (insulin-only group). Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) was performed for 48 ± 6 hours at baseline and at week 12. The primary study endpoint was change from baseline in mean interstitial glucose using CGM. The secondary endpoints included other CGM variables and glucose control markers. RESULTS: After 12 weeks, a greater reduction in mean CGM glucose from baseline was observed in the vildagliptin-insulin group compared with the insulin-only group, although the between-treatment difference was not statistically significant (mean difference [CI 95%]: -0.96 mmol/L [-2.09; 0.18] vs. -0.29 mmol/L [-1.29; 0.76], P = 0.32). However, a significant decrease from baseline in HbA1c, glycated albumin and insulin daily doses was observed in the vildagliptin-insulin group versus the insulin-only group (-0.6% [-1.19; -0.1], P < 0.01), in the vildagliptin-insulin group versus no change in the insulin-only group (-130.6 µmol/L [-271; 10.7] vs. +36.2 µmol/L [-164.4; 236.9], P = 0.04 and - 5.9 IU/day [-1.8; 7.1] vs. +1.1 IU/day [-14.5; 16.6], P = 0.01, respectively). There was no significant difference in the percentage of time spent in hypoglycaemia using CGM, occurrence of severe hypoglycaemia or number of adverse events. CONCLUSION: In this study, vildagliptin added to insulin improved glycaemic control with an associated insulin-sparing effect in patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing haemodialysis and was well tolerated.

Sarcopenia and visceral obesity assessed by computed tomography are associated with adverse outcomes in patients with Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Altered body composition may impact on the clinical course of Crohn's disease (CD) but is not detected by the simple body mass index (BMI) assessment. AIM: To assess the prevalence of sarcopenia and visceral obesity by a single computed tomography (CT) slice, and its association with adverse events in an adult hospitalized CD cohort. METHODS: 88 CD patients who had abdominal CT scans during hospitalization were retrospectively enrolled. The skeletal muscle index (SMI) at the third lumbar vertebra level was used to assess sarcopenia. Sarcopenia was defined as a SMI <38.5 cm2/m2 in women, <52.4 cm2/m2 in men and visceral obesity as a visceral fat area ≥130 cm2. Clinical malnutrition was defined by a BMI <18.5 kg/m2. Univariate analysis was performed, and predictors for surgery in the follow-up were entered in a stepwise logistic regression model for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The prevalence of sarcopenia was 58%, malnutrition 21.6%, and visceral obesity 19.3%. Among sarcopenic patients, 49% had a normal BMI, 13.7% were overweight, and 1(2%) was obese. Sarcopenic CD patients had significantly more abscesses (51% vs 16.7%, p = 0.001), hospitalizations (61.2% vs 36.1%, p = 0.022) and digestive surgery (63.3% vs 27.8%, p = 0.001) than non-sarcopenic patients during the follow-up, whereas usual malnutrition assessment was not correlated with disease outcomes. In multivariate analysis, both sarcopenia and visceral obesity were associated with further occurrence of digestive surgery. CONCLUSION: Both sarcopenia and visceral obesity were associated with adverse outcomes in severe CD patients whereas usual nutritional assessment was not.

Efficacy of the Diabeloop closed-loop system to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes exposed to gastronomic dinners or to sustained physical exercise.

AIMS: To compare closed-loop (CL) and open-loop (OL) systems for glycaemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) exposed to real-life challenging situations (gastronomic dinners or sustained physical exercise). METHODS: Thirty-eight adult patients with T1D were included in a three-armed randomized pilot trial (Diabeloop WP6.2 trial) comparing glucose control using a CL system with use of an OL device during two crossover 72-hour periods in one of the three following situations: large (gastronomic) dinners; sustained and repeated bouts of physical exercise (with uncontrolled food intake); or control (rest conditions). Outcomes included time in spent in the glucose ranges of 4.4-7.8 mmol/L and 3.9-10.0 mmol/L, and time in hypo- and hyperglycaemia. RESULTS: Time spent overnight in the tight range of 4.4 to 7.8 mmol/L was longer with CL (mean values: 63.2% vs 40.9% with OL; P ≤ .0001). Time spent during the day in the range of 3.9 to 10.0 mmol/L was also longer with CL (79.4% vs 64.1% with OL; P ≤ .0001). Participants using the CL system spent less time during the day with hyperglycaemic excursions (glucose >10.0 mmol/L) compared to those using an OL system (17.9% vs 31.9%; P ≤ .0001), and the proportions of time spent during the day with hyperglycaemic excursions of those using the CL system in the gastronomic dinner and physical exercise subgroups were of similar magnitude to those in the control subgroup (18.1 ± 6.3%, 17.2 ± 8.1% and 18.4 ± 12.5%, respectively). Finally, times spent in hypoglycaemia were short and not significantly different among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The Diabeloop CL system is superior to OL devices in reducing hyperglycaemic excursions in patients with T1D exposed to gastronomic dinners, or exposed to physical exercise followed by uncontrolled food and carbohydrate intake.

Immune phenotype predicts new onset diabetes after kidney transplantation.

Few data are available concerning immune factors involved in the occurrence of new onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT). Our objective was to determine an immune profile associated with the subsequent development of NODAT. The secondary objective was to build a predictive model of NODAT. We studied a prospective cohort of incident kidney transplant patients to determine whether pre-transplant immune characteristics could be associated with the occurrence of NODAT. 818 patients were included. We observed a significant inverse correlation between BMI and recent thymic emigrants (RTE) % at transplant time (p < 0.001). 177 (17.3%) of 677 non-diabetic patients experienced NODAT in the first year post-transplant. In multivariate analysis, age, body mass index (BMI), use of Tacrolimus, use of anti-thymocyte globulins (ATG), higher B cell count, and lower recent thymic emigrants (RTE) % were associated with NODAT. A differential effect of immune profile was observed in ATG-treated patients and non-ATG-treated patients. B cell count predicts NODAT only in non-ATG-treated patients whereas lower RTE% was associated with NODAT only in ATG-treated patients. Tacrolimus sparing and B cell depletion may efficiently prevent NODAT in selected patients. We identified an immune profile associated with the occurrence of post-transplant diabetes. Further studies should better precise the exact mechanisms involved in this association. Trial registration NCT02843867, registered July 8, 2016 - retrospectively registered https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT02843867.

Efficacy of two telemonitoring systems to improve glycaemic control during basal insulin initiation in patients with type 2 diabetes: The TeleDiab-2 randomized controlled trial.

TeleDiab-2 was a 13-month randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of two telemonitoring systems to optimize basal insulin (BI) initiation in subjects with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (HbA1c, 7.5%-10%). A total of 191 participants (mean age 58.7 years, mean HbA1c 8.9%) were randomized into three groups: group 1(G1, standard care, n = 63), group 2 (G2, interactive voice response system, n = 64) and group 3 (G3, Diabeo-BI app software, n = 64). The two telemonitoring systems proposed daily adjustments of BI doses, in order to facilitate the achievement of fasting blood glucose (FBG) values targeted at ~100 mg/dL. At 4 months follow-up, HbA1c reduction was significantly higher in the telemonitoring groups (G2: -1.44% and G3: -1.48% vs. G1: -0.92%; P < 0.002). Moreover, target FBG was reached by twice as many patients in the telemonitoring groups as in the control group, and insulin doses were also titrated to higher levels. No severe hypoglycaemia was observed in the telemonitoring groups and mild hypoglycaemia frequency was similar in all groups. In conclusion, both telemonitoring systems improved glycaemic control to a similar extent, without increasing hypoglycaemic episodes.