Admission levels of serum biomarkers have additive and cumulative prognostic value in traumatic brain injury.

Elevated levels of CNS-derived serum proteins are associated with poor outcome in traumatic brain injury (TBI), but the value of adding acute serum biomarker levels to common clinical outcome predictors lacks evaluation. We analyzed admission serum samples for Total-Tau (T-Tau), Neurofilament light chain (Nfl), Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCHL1) in a cohort of 396 trauma patients including 240 patients with TBI. We assessed the independent association of biomarkers with 1-year mortality and 6-12 months Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) score, as well as the additive and cumulative value of biomarkers on Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Marshall Score for outcome prediction. Nfl and T-Tau levels were independently associated with outcome (OR: Nfl = 1.65, p = 0.01; T-Tau = 1.99, p < 0.01). Nfl or T-Tau improved outcome prediction by GCS (Wald Chi, Nfl = 6.8-8.8, p < 0.01; T-Tau 7.2-11.3, p < 0.01) and the Marshall score (Wald Chi, Nfl = 16.2-17.5, p < 0.01; T-Tau 8.7-12.4, p < 0.01). Adding T-Tau atop Nfl further improved outcome prediction in majority of tested models (Wald Chi range 3.8-9.4, p ≤ 0.05). Our data suggest that acute levels of serum biomarkers are independently associated with outcome after TBI and add outcome predictive value to commonly used clinical scores.

Age-dependent thrombin generation predicts 30-day mortality and symptomatic thromboembolism after multiple trauma.

Trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) is a risk factor for death and is associated with deviations in thrombin generation. TIC prevalence and thrombin levels increase with age. We assayed in vivo and ex vivo thrombin generation in injured patients (n = 418) to specifically investigate how age impacts thrombin generation in trauma and to address the prognostic ability of thrombin generation. Biomarkers of thrombin generation were elevated in young (< 40 years) and older (≥ 40 years) trauma patients. In vivo thrombin generation was associated with Injury Severity Score (ISS) and this association was stronger in young than older patients. In vivo thrombin generation decreased faster after trauma in the young than the older patients. Across age groups, in vivo thrombin generation separated patients dying/surviving within 30 days at a level comparable to the ISS score (AUC 0.80 vs. 0.82, p > 0.76). In vivo and ex vivo thrombin generation also predicted development of thromboembolic events within the first 30 days after the trauma (AUC 0.70-0.84). In conclusion, younger trauma patients mount a stronger and more dynamic in vivo thrombin response than older patients. Across age groups, in vivo thrombin generation has a strong ability to predict death and/or thromboembolic events 30 days after injury.

The Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Following Lower Limb Fracture Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-established complication after many orthopaedic injuries, such as hip and lower limb fractures. The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs, previously termed novel oral anticoagulants) is well-established as thromboprophylaxis after major elective orthopaedic surgery, but not in the nonelective setting. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of DOACs after nonelective lower limb fracture surgery. DATA SOURCES: A systematic literature search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and CENTRAL databases was conducted. No limitation was placed on publication date, with only manuscripts printed in English were eligible. STUDY SELECTION: Included studies were either randomized controlled trials or prospective and retrospective comparative studies. Included studies compared DOACs to conventional methods of thromboprophylaxis in the postoperative period after surgical management of lower limb fractures. DATA EXTRACTION: Outcomes included VTE, bleeding, wound complications, mortality, and adverse events. Eight studies met inclusion criteria, of which 7 compared direct factor Xa inhibitors (XaIs) with conventional VTE prophylaxis and one study compared a direct thrombin inhibitor with conventional VTE prophylaxis. DATA SYNTHESIS: Revman 5.3 (Nordic Cochrane Centre, Denmark) was used to complete the meta-analysis and generate forest plots. CONCLUSIONS: XaIs were shown to have lower rates of deep vein thrombosis (Odds ratio 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.76; P < 0.0001) and less pharmacologically attributable adverse events (Odds ratio 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.82; P = 0.0007). There was difference between DOACs and conventional VTE prophylaxis regarding mortality, PE, symptomatic deep vein thrombosis, or bleeding events. The results generally support the use of DOACs for VTE prophylaxis after nonelective lower limb fracture surgery, such after hip fracture. The results more strongly support the use of XaIs; however, more evidence is needed to fully assess DOACs' role in clinical practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Bosworth fracture dislocation of the ankle: - Two case reports with perioperative illustration.

The Bosworth fracture dislocation of the ankle is rare and present difficulties in treatment if not immediately recognized. Here we present two cases with pre- and postoperative x-rays and perioperative image of the dislocation. The fracture dislocations were further complicated by talocrural dislocations and were treated with open reduction and internal fixation.

Postoperative blood transfusion strategy in frail, anemic elderly patients with hip fracture: the TRIFE randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hip fracture (HF) in frail elderly patients is associated with poor physical recovery and death. There is often postoperative blood loss and the hemoglobin (Hb) threshold for red blood cell (RBC) transfusions in these patients is unknown. We investigated whether RBC transfusion strategies were associated with the degree of physical recovery or with reduced mortality after HF surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 284 consecutive post-surgical HF patients (aged ≥ 65 years) with Hb levels < 11.3 g/dL (7 mmol/L) who had been admitted from nursing homes or sheltered housing. Allocation was stratified by residence. The patients were randomly assigned to either restrictive (Hb < 9.7 g/dL; < 6 mmol/L) or liberal (Hb < 11.3 g/dL; < 7 mmol/L) RBC transfusions given within the first 30 days postoperatively. Follow-up was at 90 days. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found in repeated measures of daily living activities or in 90-day mortality rate between the restrictive group (where 27% died) and the liberal group (where 21% died). Per-protocol 30-day mortality was higher with the restrictive strategy (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.4, 95% CI: 1.1-5.2; p = 0.03). The 90-day mortality rate was higher for nursing home residents in the restrictive transfusion group (36%) than for those in the liberal group (20%) (HR = 2.0, 95% CI: 1.1-3.6; p = 0.01). INTERPRETATION: According to our Hb thresholds, recovery from physical disabilities in frail elderly hip fracture patients was similar after a restrictive RBC transfusion strategy and after a liberal strategy. Implementation of a liberal RBC transfusion strategy in nursing home residents has the potential to increase survival.

Prothrombin fragment 1+2 in urine as a marker on coagulation activity in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.

INTRODUCTION: We have recently reported that increased levels of urine prothrombin fragment 1+2 reflected radiologically verified deep vein thrombosis. In this study we evaluated whether urine prothrombin fragment 1+2 was associated with pulmonary embolism in non-selected patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with clinical suspected pulmonary embolism were interviewed on comorbidities and medications. Urine was collected from each patient before radiological examination and snap frozen until analysed on urine prothrombin fragment 1+2 with an ELISA kit. Imaging of the pulmonary arteries were conducted with contrast enhanced computer tomography. RESULTS: Pulmonary embolism was diagnosed in 44/197 patients. Non-significantly higher urine prothrombin fragment 1+2 levels were found in non-selected patients with pulmonary embolism vs. those without (p=0.324). Significantly higher urine prothrombin fragment 1+2 levels were found in the pulmonary embolism positive patients without comorbidities (n=13) compared to the control group (n=28) (p=0.009). The calculated sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value using the lowest detectable urine prothrombin fragment 1+2 level was 82%, 34% and 87%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant urine prothrombin fragment 1+2 level difference in patients with and without pulmonary embolism. In non-comorbide pulmonary embolism positive patients the urine prothrombin fragment 1+2 levels were significantly higher compared to the control group. The negative predictive value found in this study indicates that uF1+2 has the potential to identify patients with a low risk of PE.

Thrombin split products (prothrombin fragment 1 + 2) in urine in patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis admitted for radiological verification.

INTRODUCTION: The appearance of prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1 + 2) in urine has been associated with postoperative hypercoagulability and thromboembolism. We wanted to assess if F1 + 2 was released in urine (uF1 + 2) in patients with procoagulant disorders, and if higher levels were found in patients with radiological verified deep vein thrombosis (DVT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients were interviewed on comorbidities and medications. An unselected total cohort (n = 534) and a control cohort (n = 177) were analysed. A urine sample (10 ml) was collected and snap frozen before levels of uF1 + 2 were measured with an ELISA kit. Visualisation of DVT was done with compression ultrasound, supplied with venography when feasible. All patients were followed up for 3-6 months. RESULTS: DVT was diagnosed in 108/534 patients. Statistical significant higher uF1 + 2 levels were found in patients with DVT (p < 0.001), in DVT positive patients with ongoing malignancy (p = 0.034) and in pregnant women compared to the control cohort (p < 0.001). Non-significant increased urine concentrations were found in DVT positive vs. DVT negative patients with infections and traumas. CONCLUSIONS: Levels of uF1 + 2 was associated with DVT both in the total cohort and in the control cohort as well as in most patients with coexisting conditions.

Urinary Prothrombin Fragment 1+2 in relation to Development of Non-Symptomatic and Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolic Events following Total Knee Replacement.

Prothrombin fragment 1+2 is excreted in urine (uF1+2) as a result of in vivo thrombin generation and can be a marker of coagulation status after an operative procedure. This study compared uF1+2 levels in patients with symptomatic and non-symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) after total knee replacement (TKR) and in event-free sex- and age-matched controls. Significantly higher median uF1+2 levels were seen in the VTE patients on days 1, 3, and the day of venography (mostly day 7) after TKR compared with controls. The uF1+2 levels tended to be high in some patients with symptomatic VTE; however, the discriminatory efficacy of the test could not be evaluated. In conclusion, this study showed that patients with VTE tend to have significantly higher uF1+2 levels compared with patients without events between days 1 and 7 after TKR surgery. Measurement of uF1+2 could provide a simple, non-invasive clinical test to identify patients at risk of VTE.

Emerging antithrombotic agents for thromboprophylaxis, clinical potential and patient considerations.

Patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery, total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are at high risk of venous thromboembolism, manifesting as deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. The recommended pharmacologic treatment options for thromboprophylaxis after major orthopedic surgery include the vitamin K antagonists (VKAs eg, warfarin), low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs; eg, enoxaparin) and the synthetic pentasaccharide fondaparinux. Most clinics use some kind of thromboprophylaxis routinely. However, due to the frequent need for coagulation monitoring (VKAs) and subcutaneous injections (LMWHs and fondaparinux) barriers exist to prescribing prophylaxis after discharge from hospital. Targeting specific components of the coagulation cascade has yielded several new antithrombotic agents for use as thromboprophylaxis after THA or TKA. Two of these, dabigatran etexilate and rivaroxaban, have already reached the markets in the European Union member states and Canada. Both are administered by the oral route, once-daily fixed dose and without the need to monitor the anticoagulant effect. Whether these new drugs facilitate guideline adherence, particularly in the outpatient settings and thereby improve the overall clinical outcomes remains to be shown.

Rivaroxaban and dabigatran etexilate: two new oral anticoagulants for extended postoperative prevention of venous thromboembolism after elective total hip arthroplasty.

Extended thromboprophylaxis is vital in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) because of the prolonged risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Despite evidence that extended prophylaxis can reduce the incidence of symptomatic VTE in this high-risk patient population and the evidence-based guideline recommendations, a large proportion of patients still do not receive an adequate duration of thromboprophylaxis. This is partly due to the limitations of conventional anticoagulants, such as the subcutaneous route of administration or the requirement for routine coagulation monitoring and dose adjustment. New oral anticoagulants (such as the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate and the Factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban) could address the current unmet need. Phase III clinical studies in VTE prevention in patients undergoing THA and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) showed that dabigatran etexilate was non-inferior to the EU regimen of enoxaparin, but did not achieve non-inferiority to the US regimen of enoxaparin. In contrast, rivaroxaban demonstrated superiority to both enoxaparin regimens for the prevention of VTE after THA and TKA, without a significant increase in major bleeding rates. Their convenient, once-daily, fixed dosing, with no need for routine coagulation monitoring, could facilitate adherence to evidence-based guideline recommendations of extended thromboprophylaxis after THA.

Rivaroxaban, a new, oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor for thromboprophylaxis after major joint arthroplasty.

The new oral, antithrombotic drug rivaroxaban is a direct factor Xa inhibitor, which can restrict thrombin generation both in vitro and in vivo. It has a predictable dose-dependent pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile and is well tolerated. In patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty, rivaroxaban, 10 mg once daily started 6 - 8 h after the operation, had a significantly better antithrombotic efficacy and a comparable safety when compared with enoxaparin. Furthermore in all studies performed the drug had no adverse influence on the liver function in comparison with enoxaparin. In conclusion, rivaroxaban is a potent and safe new compound for antithrombotic prophylaxis in orthopaedic surgery.

Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of once- and twice-daily rivaroxaban for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing total hip replacement.

Rivaroxaban (Xarelto) is an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor in advanced clinical development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. The aim was to compare the population pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of twice-daily (bid) and once-daily (od) rivaroxaban in patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR). Blood samples were collected from patients enrolled in two phase IIb, dose-ranging studies undertaken to investigate rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis after THR. A sparse sampling technique was used and the samples were pooled for PK and PD analysis, which used non-linear mixed effect modelling. Rivaroxaban PK (samples from 758 patients) were well described by an oral, one-compartment model; age and renal function influenced clearance, and body surface area affected volume of distribution. When comparing the same total daily doses, maximum plasma concentrations of rivaroxaban were higher and minimum plasma concentrations were lower with od dosing, compared with bid dosing; however, the 90% intervals overlapped. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve was 18-30% higher in the od than in the bid study. Prothrombin time in seconds (samples from 1181 patients) correlated with rivaroxaban plasma concentrations in a linear fashion in both studies. In conclusion, the PK and PD of rivaroxaban were predictable when given either bid or od. These findings, along with the suggested efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in the phase II studies, relative to enoxaparin, supported the selection of a convenient, once-daily 10 mg rivaroxaban dose for investigation in phase III studies.

Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: This phase 3 trial compared the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban, an oral direct inhibitor of factor Xa, with those of enoxaparin for extended thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind study, we assigned 4541 patients to receive either 10 mg of oral rivaroxaban once daily, beginning after surgery, or 40 mg of enoxaparin subcutaneously once daily, beginning the evening before surgery, plus a placebo tablet or injection. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of deep-vein thrombosis (either symptomatic or detected by bilateral venography if the patient was asymptomatic), nonfatal pulmonary embolism, or death from any cause at 36 days (range, 30 to 42). The main secondary efficacy outcome was major venous thromboembolism (proximal deep-vein thrombosis, nonfatal pulmonary embolism, or death from venous thromboembolism). The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 3153 patients were included in the superiority analysis (after 1388 exclusions), and 4433 were included in the safety analysis (after 108 exclusions). The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 18 of 1595 patients (1.1%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 58 of 1558 patients (3.7%) in the enoxaparin group (absolute risk reduction, 2.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5 to 3.7; P<0.001). Major venous thromboembolism occurred in 4 of 1686 patients (0.2%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 33 of 1678 patients (2.0%) in the enoxaparin group (absolute risk reduction, 1.7%; 95% CI, 1.0 to 2.5; P<0.001). Major bleeding occurred in 6 of 2209 patients (0.3%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 2 of 2224 patients (0.1%) in the enoxaparin group (P=0.18). CONCLUSIONS: A once-daily, 10-mg oral dose of rivaroxaban was significantly more effective for extended thromboprophylaxis than a once-daily, 40-mg subcutaneous dose of enoxaparin in patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty. The two drugs had similar safety profiles. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00329628.)

Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the efficacy of rivaroxaban, an orally active direct factor Xa inhibitor, in preventing venous thrombosis after total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind trial, 2531 patients who were to undergo total knee arthroplasty received either oral rivaroxaban, 10 mg once daily, beginning 6 to 8 hours after surgery, or subcutaneous enoxaparin, 40 mg once daily, beginning 12 hours before surgery. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of any deep-vein thrombosis, nonfatal pulmonary embolism, or death from any cause within 13 to 17 days after surgery. Secondary efficacy outcomes included major venous thromboembolism (i.e., proximal deep-vein thrombosis, nonfatal pulmonary embolism, or death related to venous thromboembolism) and symptomatic venous thromboembolism. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. RESULTS: The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 79 of 824 patients (9.6%) who received rivaroxaban and in 166 of 878 (18.9%) who received enoxaparin (absolute risk reduction, 9.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.9 to 12.4; P<0.001). Major venous thromboembolism occurred in 9 of 908 patients (1.0%) given rivaroxaban and 24 of 925 (2.6%) given enoxaparin (absolute risk reduction, 1.6%; 95% CI, 0.4 to 2.8; P=0.01). Symptomatic events occurred less frequently with rivaroxaban than with enoxaparin (P=0.005). Major bleeding occurred in 0.6% of patients in the rivaroxaban group and 0.5% of patients in the enoxaparin group. The incidence of drug-related adverse events, mainly gastrointestinal, was 12.0% in the rivaroxaban group and 13.0% in the enoxaparin group. CONCLUSIONS: Rivaroxaban was superior to enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty, with similar rates of bleeding. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00361894.)

Prothrombin fragment 1+2 in urine as an indicator of sustained coagulation activation after total hip arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Prothrombin fragment 1+2 measured in spot urine (uF1+2) is an indicator of thrombin generation. We examined whether measured levels of uF1+2 can be used to differentiate between patients who do and do not acquire sustained coagulation activation after total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: We performed two separate studies in patients undergoing THA. Study 1 was a prospective pilot study aiming to roughly estimate the extent of pre- and postoperative fluctuations in the uF1+2 concentration. Study 2 was a larger prospective cohort study aiming to verify the findings of Study 1 and to examine the association between the uF1+2 concentrations and risk of vascular thrombotic complications (VTC) or death. Finally, we sought to define a cut-off concentration value that could be used to identify patients with a sustained uF1+2 elevation after the first postoperative week. The urine samples were analysed by ELISA. In both studies thromboprophylaxis was used for at least 7 days after the operation. RESULTS: The operative trauma resulted in elevation of the uF1+2 level in all patients compared with the preoperative level and levels in the healthy volunteers. Ten out of 113 patients (8.8%) in the second study suffered VTC or death, assumed to be caused by a coagulation problem. Analysis of variance revealed the following statistically significant associations: pre- vs. postoperative log uF1+2 levels (P<0.0001), log uF1+2 levels comparing patients with and without events (P=0.004); and the individual log uF1+2 levels (P<0.0001). A cut-off value of uF1+2 concentration between 0.3 and 0.5 nmol/l had a sensitivity and a negative predictive value between100% and 90%, and specificity between 45% and 63% and overall accuracy between 50% and 65%. This value was obtained by the analysis of a receiver operating characteristic curve with the purpose of identifying patients with sustained coagulation activation on day 5 after operation. CONCLUSION: Our studies suggest that measured levels of uF1+2 can be potentially used to assess the individual risk of VTC after THA and to test for non-invasive detection of sustained coagulation activation.

Dose-escalation study of rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939)--an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor--for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing total hip replacement.

INTRODUCTION: Rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939) is a novel, oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor in clinical development for the prevention of thromboembolic disorders. The aim of this study was to demonstrate proof-of-principle for rivaroxaban. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an open-label, dose-escalation study to assess the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban, relative to enoxaparin, for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after total hip replacement surgery. Patients were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to rivaroxaban (2.5, 5, 10, 20 and 30 mg twice daily [bid] or 30 mg once daily [od] starting 6-8 h after surgery) or enoxaparin (40 mg od starting the evening before surgery). Therapy continued until mandatory bilateral venography was performed 5-9 days after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 625 patients received therapy, of whom 466 patients were eligible for the per-protocol efficacy analysis. The primary efficacy endpoint - deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE) or all-cause mortality - occurred in 22.2%, 23.8%, 20.0%, 10.2%, 17.4%, 15.1% and 16.8% of patients receiving rivaroxaban 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 30 mg bid, 30 mg od and enoxaparin, respectively. The dose-response relationship with rivaroxaban for the primary efficacy endpoint was not statistically significant (p=0.0504), although major VTE (proximal DVT, PE and VTE-related death) decreased dose dependently with rivaroxaban (p=0.0108). Major, post-operative bleeding increased dose dependently with rivaroxaban (p=0.0008), occurring in 0-10.8% of patients, compared with 0% in patients receiving enoxaparin. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated proof-of-principle for rivaroxaban for the prevention of VTE after total hip replacement surgery.

A once-daily, oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor, rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939), for thromboprophylaxis after total hip replacement.

BACKGROUND: Rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939)--an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor--could be an alternative to heparins and warfarin for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. METHODS AND RESULTS: This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-comparator-controlled, multinational, dose-ranging study assessed the efficacy and safety of once-daily rivaroxaban relative to enoxaparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing elective total hip replacement. Patients (n=873) were randomized to once-daily oral rivaroxaban doses of 5, 10, 20, 30, or 40 mg (initiated 6 to 8 hours after surgery) or a once-daily subcutaneous enoxaparin dose of 40 mg (given the evening before and > or = 6 hours after surgery). Study drugs were continued for an additional 5 to 9 days; mandatory bilateral venography was performed the following day. The primary end point (composite of any deep vein thrombosis, objectively confirmed pulmonary embolism, and all-cause mortality) was observed in 14.9%, 10.6%, 8.5%, 13.5%, 6.4%, and 25.2% of patients receiving 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 mg rivaroxaban, and 40 mg enoxaparin, respectively (n=618, per-protocol population). No significant dose-response relationship was found for efficacy (P=0.0852). Major postoperative bleeding was observed in 2.3%, 0.7%, 4.3%, 4.9%, 5.1%, and 1.9% of patients receiving 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 mg rivaroxaban, and 40 mg enoxaparin, respectively (n=845, safety population), representing a significant dose-response relationship (P=0.0391). CONCLUSIONS: Rivaroxaban showed efficacy and safety similar to enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after total hip replacement, with the convenience of once-daily oral dosing and without the need for coagulation monitoring. When both efficacy and safety are considered, these results suggest that 10 mg rivaroxaban once daily should be investigated in phase III studies.

Use of the low-molecular-weight heparin reviparin to prevent deep-vein thrombosis after leg injury requiring immobilization.

BACKGROUND: Deep-vein thrombosis is a well-recognized complication after trauma to the legs and subsequent immobilization, but there are no generally accepted approaches to preventing this complication. METHODS: We performed a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous reviparin (1750 anti-Xa units given once daily) in 440 patients who required immobilization in a plaster cast or brace for at least five weeks after a leg fracture or rupture of the Achilles tendon. The study drug was given throughout the period of immobilization. Venography of the injured leg was performed within one week after removal of the plaster cast or brace, or earlier if there were symptoms suggesting deep-vein thrombosis. RESULTS: Data on efficacy and end points were available for 371 patients. Deep-vein thrombosis was diagnosed in 17 of the 183 patients randomly assigned to receive reviparin (9 percent) and in 35 of the 188 patients randomly assigned to receive placebo (19 percent) (odds ratio, 0.45; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.24 to 0.82). Most of the thromboses were distal (14 in the reviparin group and 25 in the placebo group). There were two cases of pulmonary embolism, both in patients in the placebo group who also had proximal deep-vein thrombosis. There were no differences between the two groups with respect to bleeding or other adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Deep-vein thrombosis is common in persons with leg injury requiring prolonged immobilization. Reviparin given once daily appears to be effective and safe in reducing the risk of this complication.