Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Drug Saf ; 36(6): 455-65, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23516007

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In October 2009, in the context of an A(H1N1)v2009 influenza pandemic, a vaccination campaign was launched in France, in which one of the priority groups was pregnant women, on account of the high risk of developing complications following infection by this virus. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this multicentric, prospective, observational study was to assess safety and pregnancy outcomes in a cohort of pregnant women when receiving the A(H1N1)v2009 influenza pandemic vaccine. METHODS: This was a prospective study that followed up pregnant women recruited mainly in vaccination centres and maternity departments. Following the expected delivery date, follow-up data were collected concerning the delivery, the infant, and, if appropriate, the reasons why the pregnancy did not reach its term. RESULTS: Between 1 November 2009 and 31 March 2010, 2,415 pregnant women were included at the time of vaccination; 97.6 % of women received a vaccine without adjuvant and 2.4 % received an adjuvanted vaccine. Ninety-two (3.9 %) women were vaccinated during the first trimester of pregnancy, 1,090 (46.5 %) during the second trimester, and 1,162 (49.6 %) during the third trimester. One hundred and thirty-three adverse events (5.5 % of women) were reported, of which 12 were unexpected or serious. There were 2,246 (93.0 %) known pregnancy outcomes with 12 spontaneous abortions (0.5 %), 6 stillbirths (0.3 %), and 4 therapeutic abortions (0.2 %). There were 65 neonates with congenital anomalies, among which 31 were major. But only one congenital malformation (1.4 %) was reported for the 92 women vaccinated in their first trimester. Of the women, 93.3 % were delivered full term and 6.7 % preterm. For 96 (4.2 %) neonates, a disorder was reported in the neonatal period and 130 (5.6 %) were transferred to the neonatology department. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that exposure to the A(H1N1)v2009 pandemic influenza vaccine during pregnancy does not increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, because of the relatively small number of women exposed during the first trimester, other studies are needed to exclude an increased risk of malformation.


Asunto(s)
Anomalías Congénitas/etiología , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/efectos adversos , Complicaciones del Embarazo/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Anomalías Congénitas/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Vacunas contra la Influenza/uso terapéutico , Gripe Humana/inmunología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/inmunología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Resultado del Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Riesgo , Adulto Joven
2.
BJOG ; 120(5): 568-74, 2013 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23346916

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To report the follow-up of continuing pregnancies after first-trimester exposure to mifepristone. DESIGN: Observational prospective study. SETTING: France. SAMPLE: Patients exposed to mifepristone during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy. METHODS: Women were included in the study when they or their doctors asked a French pharmacovigilance centre or the Paris Teratogen Information Service about the risk of mifepristone exposure in early pregnancy. Exclusion criteria were requests received after 22 weeks of gestation or subsequent elective termination of pregnancy without a pathological examination of the fetus. Data on maternal history and drug exposure were collected on first contact, and pregnancy outcomes were documented at follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rate of major congenital malformations. RESULTS: A total of 105 pregnancies were included, with 46 exposed to mifepristone alone, and 59 exposed to both mifepristone and misoprostol. There were 94 live births (90.4%) and 10 (9.6%) miscarriages (including one with major malformation). Elective termination of pregnancy was performed after the subsequent diagnosis of trisomy 21 in one case. The overall rate of major congenital malformations was 4.2% (95% CI 1.2-10.4%), with two cases among 38 patients exposed to mifepristone alone, and two cases among 57 patients exposed to both mifepristone and misoprostol. CONCLUSIONS: This first prospective study found that the rate of major malformations after first-trimester exposure to mifepristone is only slightly higher than the expected 2-3% rate in the general population. Such findings provide reassuring data for risk evaluation for continuation of pregnancy after mifepristone exposure.


Asunto(s)
Abortivos Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Aborto Espontáneo/epidemiología , Anomalías Congénitas/epidemiología , Mifepristona/efectos adversos , Misoprostol/efectos adversos , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Francia , Humanos , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos
3.
Mult Scler ; 13(7): 941-4, 2007 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17881403

RESUMEN

Glatiramer acetate (GA), a well tolerated immunomodulatory treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RR-MS), consists of a 4-amino acid polymer that mimics the myelin basic protein (MBP). We report the first case of biopsy-proven erythema nodosum (EN) in a patient presenting RR-MS under GA treatment. Comprehensive exams were negative in the search of the etiology of EN, which spontaneously resolved despite treatment continuation. GA treatment is known to generate reactive polyclonal antibodies that can cross-react with myelin epitopes, like MBP. These antibodies may also be implicated in allergenic reactions and auto-immune adverse events, such as anaphylactic shock, lymphadenopathy, livedo-like dermatitis, or lymphocytic infiltration. EN is an unspecific skin reaction occurring in several disorders and induced by many treatments. As EN can result from a polyclonal antibody response or type I hypersensitivity mechanisms, we hypothesize that GA treatment could be responsible for the occurrence of EN.


Asunto(s)
Eritema Nudoso/inducido químicamente , Eritema Nudoso/patología , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/tratamiento farmacológico , Péptidos/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos , Biopsia , Eritema Nudoso/inmunología , Femenino , Acetato de Glatiramer , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/inmunología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/inmunología , Péptidos/inmunología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...