KESTREL and KITE Phase 3 Studies: 100-Week Results With Brolucizumab in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema.

PURPOSE: To report the 100-week outcomes from the KESTREL and KITE trials. DESIGN: Two phase 3, double-masked, active-controlled, randomized trials. METHODS: Patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) were randomized 1:1:1 to brolucizumab 3 mg/6 mg (BRO3/BRO6) or aflibercept 2 mg (AFL) in KESTREL (N = 566) or 1:1 to BRO6 or AFL in KITE (N = 360). BRO3/BRO6 arms received 5 loading doses every 6 weeks (q6w) followed by q12w dosing, with an option to adjust to q8w at predefined disease activity assessment visits. In KITE, at week 72, based on the disease stability assessment, treatment intervals could be extended by 4 weeks in the BRO6 arm. AFL arms received 5 monthly loading doses followed by fixed q8w dosing. RESULTS: At week 100, change from baseline in BCVA (letters) was +8.8 for BRO6 and +10.6 for AFL in KESTREL; and +10.9 for BRO6 and +8.4 for AFL in KITE. In both studies, fewer BRO6 subjects had intraretinal fluid and/or subretinal fluid than AFL subjects. Results were achieved with 32.9% (KESTREL) and 47.5% (KITE) of BRO6 subjects maintained on q12w and q12w/q16w dosing, respectively. Intraocular inflammation rates for BRO6 vs AFL were 4.2% vs 1.1% (KESTREL) and 2.2% vs 1.7% (KITE), of which retinal vasculitis rates were 0.5% vs 0% in KESTREL, with no cases in KITE. Retinal vascular occlusion rates were 1.6% vs 0.5% (KESTREL) and 0.6% in both treatment arms in KITE. CONCLUSIONS: Results show the long-term efficacy and durability of brolucizumab in improving visual and anatomical outcomes in DME; the overall safety profile of brolucizumab remained unchanged through year 2.

HAWK Extension Study: Safety and Efficacy of Intravitreal Brolucizumab in Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration.

Purpose: To collect data on efficacy and safety of brolucizumab 6 mg drug product intended for commercialization in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration to support comparability to brolucizumab product used in the Phase III HAWK and HARRIER studies.Methods: The HAWK extension study was a 24-week, double-masked, multicenter study of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration who completed the 96-week HAWK core study. All patients were planned to receive three intravitreal injections of either brolucizumab 6 mg or aflibercept 2 mg. Key endpoint measures included change in best-corrected visual acuity and central subfield thickness from baseline, and incidence and characteristics of treatment emergent adverse events.Results: Best-corrected visual acuity gain and central subfield thickness reduction observed at the end of the core study were maintained to Week 24 of the extension study. There was no indication of difference in the safety profile of the brolucizumab 6 mg drug product intended for commercialization and the brolucizumab 3 mg or 6 mg drug product used in the Phase III clinical trials.Conclusions: Efficacy and safety with the intended commercial formulation of brolucizumab 6 mg in neovascular age-related macular degeneration patients was consistent with that observed in the Phase III studies.

KESTREL and KITE: 52-Week Results From Two Phase III Pivotal Trials of Brolucizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab with aflibercept in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN: Double-masked, 100-week, multicenter, active-controlled, randomized trials. METHODS: Subjects were randomized 1:1:1 to brolucizumab 3 mg/6 mg or aflibercept 2 mg in KESTREL (n = 566) or 1:1 to brolucizumab 6 mg or aflibercept 2 mg in KITE (n = 360). Brolucizumab groups received 5 loading doses every 6 weeks (q6w) followed by 12-week (q12w) dosing, with optional adjustment to every 8 weeks (q8w) if disease activity was identified at predefined assessment visits; aflibercept groups received 5 doses every 4 weeks (q4w) followed by fixed q8w dosing. The primary endpoint was best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change from baseline at Week 52; secondary endpoints included the proportion of subjects maintained on q12w dosing, change in Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale score, and anatomical and safety outcomes. RESULTS: At Week 52, brolucizumab 6 mg was noninferior (NI margin 4 letters) to aflibercept in mean change in BCVA from baseline (KESTREL: +9.2 letters vs +10.5 letters; KITE: +10.6 letters vs +9.4 letters; P < .001), more subjects achieved central subfield thickness (CSFT) <280 µm, and fewer had persisting subretinal and/or intraretinal fluid vs aflibercept, with more than half of brolucizumab 6 mg subjects maintained on q12w dosing after loading. In KITE, brolucizumab 6 mg showed superior improvements in change of CSFT from baseline over Week 40 to Week 52 vs aflibercept (P = .001). The incidence of ocular serious adverse events was 3.7% (brolucizumab 3 mg), 1.1% (brolucizumab 6 mg), and 2.1% (aflibercept) in KESTREL; and 2.2% (brolucizumab 6 mg) and 1.7% (aflibercept) in KITE. CONCLUSION: Brolucizumab 6 mg showed robust visual gains and anatomical improvements with an overall favorable benefit/risk profile in patients with DME.

Evaluation of the Effects of Repeat-Dose Dabrafenib on the Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics of Rosuvastatin (OATP1B1/1B3 Substrate) and Midazolam (CYP3A4 Substrate).

Dabrafenib is an oral BRAF kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of various BRAF V600 mutation-positive solid tumors. In vitro observations suggesting cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A induction and organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) inhibition prompted us to evaluate the effect of dabrafenib 150 mg twice daily on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam 3 mg (CYP3A substrate) and rosuvastatin 10 mg (OATP1B1/1B3 substrate) in a clinical phase 1, open-label, fixed-sequence study in patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive tumors. Repeat dabrafenib dosing resulted in a 2.56-fold increase in rosuvastatin maximum observed concentration (Cmax ), an earlier time to Cmax , but only a 7% increase in area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 (predose) extrapolated to infinite time. Midazolam Cmax and AUC extrapolated to infinite time decreased by 47% and 65%, respectively, with little effect on time to Cmax . No new safety findings were reported. Exposure of drugs that are CYP3A4 substrates is likely to decrease when coadministered with dabrafenib. Concentrations of medicinal products that are sensitive OATP1B1/1B3 substrates may increase during the absorption phase.

Relationship between Pulmonary Adverse Events and Everolimus Exposure in Japanese and Non-Japanese Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Oncology Trials.

AIMS: This meta-analysis explores the relationship between the everolimus minimum (Cmin) and maximum (Cmax) exposure and the risk for pulmonary adverse events (AEs) in Japanese versus non-Japanese patients. METHODS: Patient-level data from patients treated with daily everolimus in advanced solid tumor trials were evaluated using a Cox regression model, stratified by cancer type or treatment arm, with log-transformed time-averaged Cmin or Cmax as a time-varying covariate. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between pulmonary AEs and pharmacokinetic parameters. RESULTS: Thirty studies were identified. In the Cmin population (n = 1,962), all-grade pulmonary AE incidence was significantly higher in Japanese versus non-Japanese patients (19.9 vs. 9.4%). Pharmacokinetic parameters were similar between Japanese and non-Japanese patients. A 2-fold increase in everolimus Cmin significantly increased the risk for the first any-grade pulmonary AE in Japanese (risk ratio: 1.824; 95% CI: 1.141-2.918) and non-Japanese patients (risk ratio: 1.406; 95% CI: 1.156-1.710). CONCLUSIONS: The risk for pulmonary AEs is related to everolimus exposure. Local monitoring and reporting differences might account for the significantly higher reported incidence of low-grade everolimus-associated pulmonary AEs in Japanese versus non-Japanese patients. Patients should be carefully monitored for early signs of pulmonary AEs, and appropriate medical management should be implemented.

Bioavailability of everolimus administered as a single 5 mg tablet versus five 1 mg tablets: a randomized, open-label, two-way crossover study of healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor everolimus has a well-established pharmacokinetics profile. We conducted a randomized, single-center, open-label, two-sequence, two-period crossover study of healthy volunteers to assess the relative bioavailability of everolimus administered as one 5 mg tablet or five 1 mg tablets. METHODS: Subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive everolimus dosed as one 5 mg tablet or as five 1 mg tablets on day 1, followed by a washout period on days 8-14 and then the opposite formulation on day 15. Blood sampling for pharmacokinetic evaluation was performed at prespecified time points, with 17 samples taken for each treatment period. Primary variables for evaluation of relative bioavailability were area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUCinf) and maximum blood concentration (Cmax). Safety was assessed by reporting the incidence of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Twenty-two participants received everolimus as one 5 mg tablet followed by five 1 mg tablets (n=11) or the opposite sequence (n=11). The Cmax of five 1 mg tablets was 48% higher than that of one 5 mg tablet (geometric mean ratio, 1.48; 90% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-1.62). AUCinf was similar (geometric mean ratio, 1.08; 90% CI, 1.02-1.16), as were the extent of absorption and the distribution and elimination kinetics. AEs, all grade 1 or 2, were observed in 54.5% of subjects. CONCLUSION: Although the extent of absorption was similar, the Cmax of five 1 mg tablets was higher than that of one 5 mg tablet, suggesting these formulations lead to different peak blood concentrations and are not interchangeable at the dose tested.

Deferasirox effect on renal haemodynamic parameters in patients with transfusion-dependent ß thalassaemia.

Some patients with ß thalassaemia experience non-progressive creatinine increases with deferasirox, mostly within normal limits; the mechanisms involved are not fully elucidated. The effects of deferasirox on renal haemodynamics, including glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal plasma flow (RPF), were investigated in a Phase I, open-label study in ß thalassaemia major patients with iron overload. Patients received deferasirox 30 mg/kg/d up to Week 8, followed by a 2-week washout period, and extended treatment up to Week 104 with a 4-week washout period. In the short-term study (n = 11), mean GFR and RPF declined from baseline to Week 8 (mean [%] change:-9·2 [-9·5%] and -105·7 ml/min [-17·8%], respectively). A similar pattern was observed during the long-term study (n = 5); mean GFR and RPF decreased up to Week 52 (-19·1 [-17·7%] and -155·6 ml/min [-26·1%]), with similar change at Week 104 (-18·4 [-17·2%] and -115·9 ml/min [-19·6%]). Measures returned to baseline values after each washout. Serum creatinine and creatinine clearance followed a similar pattern. Effects of deferasirox on renal haemodynamics were mild and reversible for up to 2 years of treatment, with no progressive worsening of renal function over time. www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00560820.

An open-label dose-escalation study of once-daily and twice-daily pasireotide in healthy volunteers: safety, tolerability, and effects on glucose, insulin, and glucagon levels.

Pasireotide is a multireceptor-targeted somatostatin analogue that has high affinity for 4 of the 5 somatostatin receptor subtypes (sst1,2,3 and sst5) and has therapeutic potential in conditions with tumors of neuroendocrine origin, such as Cushing disease, acromegaly, and neuroendocrine tumors. This phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation study assessed the overall safety and tolerability of once-daily and twice-daily pasireotide and its effects on glucose, insulin, and glucagon levels in healthy volunteers. Eleven cohorts (n = 6 for each) received subcutaneous pasireotide 150, 300, 600, 900, 1200, or 1500 µg once daily, or 150, 300, 450, 600, or 750 µg twice daily, for 8 days. Pasireotide was generally well tolerated at all doses; adverse events were predominantly mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal disorders. All participants experienced fasting and postprandial plasma glucose elevations after all doses of pasireotide; increases in blood glucose level seemed to be dose dependent. Hyperglycemia was associated with a marked suppression of insulin secretion and a mild inhibition of glucagon secretion. In conclusion, pasireotide showed good overall tolerability at doses up to 1500 µg once daily and 750 µg twice daily for 8 days. Both fasting and postprandial hyperglycemia occurred after all doses of pasireotide, which was related to the suppression of insulin secretion.

Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of a long-acting release (LAR) formulation of pasireotide (SOM230) in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: results from a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase I study.

PURPOSE: Pasireotide (SOM230), a novel multireceptor ligand somatostatin analog (SSA), binds with high affinity to four of the five somatostatin receptor subtypes (sst1-3, 5). This study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics profiles of pasireotide long-acting release (LAR) formulation in patients with advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (GEP NET) refractory to other SSAs. METHODS: In this randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase II study, patients with biopsy-proven primary or metastatic GEP NET refractory to available SSAs were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive pasireotide LAR by deep intragluteal injection at a dose of 20, 40, or 60 mg once every 28 days for 3 months. RESULTS: Forty-two patients received pasireotide LAR. Adverse events were reported by 34 (81 %) patients, with the most frequently reported including diarrhea, fatigue, abdominal pain, and nausea. Mean fasting glucose levels were increased compared with baseline at all points throughout the study. After the third injection of pasireotide LAR, the median trough plasma concentrations on day 84 were 4.82, 12.0, and 19.7 ng/mL in the 20-, 40-, and 60-mg treatment groups, respectively. Drug accumulation was limited for each dose based on the increase in trough concentrations after the first to third injections (accumulation ratios were approximately 1 from all dose levels). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that a new, once-monthly, intramuscular LAR formulation of pasireotide was well tolerated in patients with advanced GEP NET. Steady state levels of plasma pasireotide were achieved after three injections.

Effects of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of everolimus: a single-dose, open-label, parallel-group study.

BACKGROUND: Although the pharmacokinetics of everolimus, an oral mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, have been characterized in patients with moderate hepatic impairment, they have not been assessed in those with mild or severe hepatic impairment. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics and safety of everolimus in healthy volunteers with normal hepatic function and patients with mild (Child-Pugh class A), moderate (Child-Pugh class B), and severe (Child-Pugh class C) hepatic impairment in otherwise good health to inform dosing in the clinical setting. METHODS: A multicenter, open-label, Phase I study in which all enrollees received a single, 10-mg, oral everolimus dose was conducted. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic assessment were collected at predetermined time points up to 168 hours postdosing. Safety was also assessed. Proposed dose recommendations based on Child-Pugh status at baseline and day 8 were calculated based on AUC0-∞ geometric mean ratios and their associated 90% CIs. Post hoc analysis of the relationship between pharmacokinetic parameters and markers of hepatic function was also performed to identify thresholds for dose adjustment. RESULTS: Thirteen subjects with normal hepatic function and 7 patients with mild, 8 patients with moderate, and 6 patients with severe hepatic impairment were enrolled. Compared with normal subjects, everolimus AUC0-∞ for patients with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment increased by 1.60-, 3.26-, and 3.64-fold, respectively. Based on Child-Pugh classification at day 8, the everolimus doses required to adjust the exposure of patients with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment to that of normal subjects were 6.25, 3.07, and 2.75 mg, respectively. Thresholds for 2-fold everolimus dose reduction were 15.0 µmol/L for bilirubin, 43.1 g/L for albumin, and 1.1 for the international normalized ratio; using these thresholds could lead to underdosing or overdosing in some patients. Most adverse events were of grade 1 severity, ≤1 day in duration, and not everolimus related. CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus exposure after a single 10-mg dose was influenced by the degree of hepatic impairment. Child-Pugh classification was found to be the most conservative means of guiding dose adjustment in patients with hepatic impairment. Based on these data, as well as previously reported data for patients with moderate hepatic impairment, everolimus once-daily dosing should be 7.5 mg and 5 mg in patients with mild and moderate impairment, respectively. Everolimus is not recommended in patients with severe hepatic impairment unless benefits outweigh risks; in that case, 2.5 mg once daily should not be exceeded. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00968591.

A phase I study evaluating the effect of everolimus on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam in healthy subjects.

The selective mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor everolimus has demonstrated competitive inhibition of cytochrome P450 enzyme (CYP) 3A4 in vitro; however, its influence on CYP3A4 activity in humans is unknown. This study examined the influence of everolimus on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam, a sensitive CYP3A4/5 substrate, and its 1-hydroxy metabolite in 25 healthy male subjects. Compared with administration of oral midazolam 4 mg/day alone, coadministration with everolimus 10 mg/day increased the midazolam maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) by 25% and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) by 30%. The C(max) and AUC of 1-hydroxymidazolam increased by 20% and 25%, respectively. Concomitant administration of everolimus with midazolam did not change the midazolam metabolic ratio (i.e., the ratio of 1-hydroxymidazolam AUC to midazolam AUC) or the midazolam or 1-hydroxymidazolam terminal half-lives (geometric mean ratios for midazolam + everolimus vs. midazolam alone of 0.96, 1.03, and 1.06, respectively). These results suggest everolimus may affect the bioavailability, but not the systemic clearance, of orally coadministered CYP3A4 substrate drugs.

A first-in-man study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of pasireotide (SOM230), a multireceptor-targeted somatostatin analog, in healthy volunteers.

Pasireotide (SOM230) is a multireceptor-targeted somatostatin analog with high binding affinity for four of the five somatostatin receptor subtypes (sst(1,2,3) and sst(5)), and potential clinical activity in several neuroendocrine and oncologic conditions, including acromegaly, Cushing's disease, and neuroendocrine tumors (NET). This manuscript reports the first-in-man dose-escalation study of pasireotide, evaluating its safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) in healthy male volunteers. A single dose of pasireotide 1-1200 µg was administered subcutaneously in four to eight subjects per dose level, with two additional subjects per cohort administered placebo. PK and safety evaluations were carried out over 7 days post-dose. Growth hormone (GH) suppression was evaluated using a GH-releasing hormone stimulation test on Day -1 and Day 1 at 3-5 hours post-injection. Seventy-two subjects completed the study. Pasireotide was well tolerated with no serious adverse events observed at any dose. Transient elevations in blood glucose levels were observed 2-6 hours after administration of pasireotide at doses between 200 µg and 1200 µg, but this resolved without intervention by 23 hours post-dosing. The maximum tolerable dose was not established within the tested range. Pasireotide demonstrated a favorable PK profile with fast absorption (t(max): 0.25-0.5 hours), low clearance (CL/F: 8-13 L/hour), long effective elimination half-life (mean t(½,ß): 7-11 hours), and a proportional dose-exposure relationship. GH suppression of 79%-96% was observed at single pasireotide doses between 200 µg and 1200 µg. In conclusion, pasireotide demonstrated favorable safety, tolerability, and PK profiles, as well as promising activity in suppressing the release of GH. The efficacy and safety of pasireotide is currently being evaluated in patients with acromegaly, Cushing's disease, NET, and various non-neuroendocrine disorders.

Multiple once-daily subcutaneous doses of pasireotide were well tolerated in healthy male volunteers: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over, Phase I study.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over, dose-escalating, single-center study was conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of multiple once-daily (qd) subcutaneous (sc) doses of pasireotide in healthy male subjects. Subjects received pasireotide 50, 200, or 600 µg sc qd for 14 days and placebo in separate sequences. Thirty-three subjects were randomized. The most frequently reported drug-related adverse events were injection-site reactions (n = 18), diarrhea (n = 14) and nausea (n = 10), which were mostly mild or moderate in intensity. Pasireotide 600 µg sc was associated with pre- and post-prandial elevations in glucose levels relative to placebo; however, this effect was less pronounced on day 14 compared with day 1. PK steady state appeared to be achieved after 3 days of dosing and PK exposures had a moderate accumulation of 20-40 % across doses. Pasireotide demonstrated fast absorption (T(max,ss): 0.25-0.5 h), low clearance (CL/F(ss): 8.10-9.03 L/h), long effective half-life (T(½,eff): ~12 h, on average between 9.7 and 13.1 h for 50, 200, and 600 µg sc qd), and large volume of distribution (V(z)/F(ss): 251-1,091 L) at steady state. Dose proportionality was confirmed for C(max,ss); other PK parameters (C(max), AUC(0-24 h) and AUC(tau)) were approximately dose proportional. Growth hormone inhibition was observed with pasireotide 200 and 600 µg sc qd. Gallbladder volume increased post-prandially with pasireotide 200 and 600 µg sc qd, which appeared to correlate with reduced levels of cholecystokinin at these doses. Pasireotide was generally well tolerated up to the tested dose of 600 µg qd, with a linear and time-independent PK profile after sc qd dosing in healthy subjects.

Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of a single dose of pasireotide long-acting release in healthy volunteers: a single-center Phase I study.

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PKs) of different doses of a long-acting release (LAR) formulation of pasireotide in healthy subjects. DESIGN: Single-center, open-label, randomized Phase I study. METHODS: Twelve healthy male subjects received a single s.c. dose of pasireotide 300 µg followed by a washout period of 7 days (or at least 5 days), before receiving an i.m. injection of pasireotide -LAR 40 mg (n=5) or 60 mg (n=7). Assessments included adverse events (AEs), PKs, and glucose, insulin, glucagon, and HbA1c levels. RESULTS: Pasireotide LAR showed an extended-release profile over 1 month with two concentration peaks observed 1 and around 20 days after injection. The area under curve exposure of pasireotide LAR was dose proportional when the dose levels were compared, and the bioavailability of the LAR relative to the s.c. formulation was complete. Administration of pasireotide LAR resulted in an increase in fasting and postprandial glucose levels; however, an attenuation of the hyperglycemic effect was observed after 15 days. The most frequently reported AEs were mild-to-moderate diarrhea, abdominal pain, and flatulence. Only gastrointestinal AEs and injection site reactions were suspected to be drug related. CONCLUSIONS: Pasireotide LAR was generally well tolerated with mostly mild AEs at doses up to 60 mg and showed a dose-proportional, extended-release profile in healthy subjects. Based on the favorable results of this study, further clinical development of pasireotide LAR is under way, which will give insight into the PKs, efficacy, and safety of pasireotide LAR in patient populations.

Tolerability and dose proportional pharmacokinetics of pasireotide administered as a single dose or two divided doses in healthy male volunteers: a single-center, open-label, ascending-dose study.

BACKGROUND: Pasireotide is a multireceptor-targeted somatostatin analogue with high binding affinity for somatostatin receptor subtypes SST 1, 2, 3, and 5. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety profile, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic profile of pasireotide in single- and divided-dose regimens in healthy volunteers. METHODS: A single-center, open-label, ascending-dose study was performed in healthy volunteers. Pasireotide, 900, 1200, and 1500 µg SC, was administered as either a single dose or as two divided doses given 12 hours apart, with a 7-day washout period between treatments. RESULTS: Seventeen men (median age, 26 years) were enrolled. Their median weight was 81 kg, and 65% were white. One participant dropped out because of a grade 2 adverse event; most other adverse events were mild and affected the gastrointestinal tract. Blood glucose concentration increased after pasireotide administration, but returned to normal within 10 hours. After single-dose administration, pasireotide plasma concentration peaked rapidly at 15 minutes to 1 hour after dosing, followed by a tri-exponential (α, ß, and γ phases) decline over time. Mean t(½) values during the α, ß, and γ phases were approximately 2 to 3, 12 to 17, and 54 to 97 hours, respectively. In the single-dose cohort, the mean (SD) AUC(∞) was 110 (29), 149 (42), and 188 (52) h · ng/mL in the 900-, 1200-, and 1500-µg groups, respectively. Time to reach C(max) was 0.69 (0.41), 0.59 (0.38), and 0.56 (0.18) hours in the 900-, 1200-, and 1500-µg groups, respectively. AUC(∞) values were similar in the single-dose and divided-dose cohorts. Mean total body clearance was 8 to 9 L/h across the dosage groups and dosing regimens, indicating a linear pharmacokinetic profile between doses. CONCLUSIONS: When administered as a single- or divided-dose regimen, pasireotide had a favorable tolerability profile in this selected group of healthy male volunteers. Its pharmacokinetic profile indicated rapid absorption, low clearance, high volume of distribution, and a long terminal half-life.

Effect of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of pasireotide (SOM230): results from a multicenter phase I study.

Pasireotide is a novel, multireceptor-targeted somatostatin analogue with high affinity for sst(1,2,3) and sst(5) under clinical evaluation in tumors of neuroendocrine origin, including Cushing's disease, acromegaly, and neuroendocrine tumors. In this phase I, open-label, multicenter study, the pharmacokinetics and safety of a single subcutaneous (SC) injection of pasireotide 600 µg were evaluated in adults with normal hepatic function (n = 15) and mild (n = 6), moderate (n = 7), or severe hepatic impairment (n = 6). Following a single dose of pasireotide SC 600 µg, there were no significant differences in the plasma exposure of pasireotide between participants with normal hepatic function or mild hepatic impairment. Subjects with moderate and severe hepatic impairment showed an increase in AUC(∞) by 56% and 42%, respectively; this increase was 60% and 79% respectively, after adjusting for differences in age, BMI, and baseline serum albumin level between treatment groups. The incidence and severity of adverse events were similar across cohorts, with no clinically relevant differences in type or frequency of adverse events between cohorts. In conclusion, a single dose of pasireotide SC 600 µg was well tolerated in subjects with hepatic impairment. Drug exposure in subjects with mild hepatic impairment was similar to that seen in healthy volunteers, whereas subjects with moderate and severe hepatic impairment experienced higher exposure to pasireotide. Adjustment of the pasireotide dose may be required for patients with moderate and severe hepatic impairment.

Pasireotide (SOM230), a novel multireceptor-targeted somatostatin analogue, is well tolerated when administered as a continuous 7-day subcutaneous infusion in healthy male volunteers.

Pasireotide is a novel multireceptor-targeted somatostatin analogue that has shown efficacy in patients with acromegaly and Cushing's disease when administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection. This study assessed the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of a continuous infusion of pasireotide in healthy volunteers. In this single-center, open-label, dose escalation study, healthy male volunteers received a 7-day continuous SC infusion of pasireotide in sequential ascending-dose cohorts. Single and/or 8-hour blood samples were taken on days 1 to 10 to assess PK and on days 1, 2, and 7 and a control day to assess glucose metabolism. Adverse events were evaluated throughout. Forty-four participants were enrolled into 8 cohorts: pasireotide 450, 900, 1350, 1800 (3 cohorts were enrolled at this dose level), 2250, and 2025 µg/d. Doses were well tolerated up to 2025 µg/d. Adverse events were generally mild and gastrointestinal. Pasireotide steady-state clearance was reduced at high doses, and plasma concentrations increased disproportionately with increasing dose. Blood glucose levels increased after initiation of pasireotide infusion with attenuation by day 7. Insulin and glucagon levels decreased after pasireotide infusion, with insulin levels exhibiting a greater degree of suppression. Pasireotide has the potential to be administered as a long-acting release formulation, and future studies are warranted.