Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 45(1): 26-34, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26359548

RESUMEN

This study assessed quality of life (QoL), depression, and anxiety before and after orthognathic surgery and identified risk factors for poorer postoperative outcome. This multicentre prospective study included 140 patients from five French medical centres. We assessed patients before surgery (T1), 3 months after surgery (T2), and 12 months after surgery (T3). We assessed the severity of the orofacial deformity, physical, psychological, social, and environmental QoL (WHOQOL-BREF), and depression and anxiety (GHQ-28). Risk factors for poorer outcome were identified using linear mixed models. Between baseline and 12 months, there was significant improvement in psychological and social QoL and in depression (although below the norms reported in the general population), but not in anxiety. Physical QoL was poorer in patients who were younger, who had a mild orofacial deformity, and who were depressed. Psychological QoL was poorer in younger patients and in depressed patients. Social QoL was poorer in patients who were single, who had a mild orofacial deformity, and who were depressed. Although orthognathic surgery provides a moderate improvement in psychological and social QoL, the systematic screening and treatment of depression could further improve QoL after surgery because it is a major predictor of poor QoL in this population.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad/psicología , Trastorno Depresivo/prevención & control , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Anomalías Maxilofaciales/psicología , Anomalías Maxilofaciales/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ortognáticos , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Trastornos de Ansiedad/prevención & control , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Masculino , Estado Civil , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
Respir Med ; 108(1): 195-202, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24361163

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The present survey coordinated by the French expert centres for rare pulmonary diseases investigated French pulmonologists' current diagnostic and therapeutic practice for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). METHODS: From December 7, 2011 to February 18, 2012, all French pulmonologists (n = 2608) were contacted. Those who reported following up at least one IPF patient (n = 509) were administered a 26-item questionnaire by phone or e-mail. RESULTS: 509 pulmonologists (41% of responders, 20% of French pulmonologists) were involved in the management of IPF patients. Of those, 36% discussed the cases with radiologists and pathologists. Out of 406 community pulmonologists practicing outside of reference or competence (e.g. expert) centres, 141 (35%) indicated referring patients to those centres. The 2011 international guidelines for IPF were known by 67% of pulmonologists involved in IPF, 84% of whom considered them appropriate for practice. About 58% of patients were diagnosed with mild to moderate IPF as defined by percentage predicted forced vital capacity ≥50% and percentage predicted diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide ≥35%. Management resulted from multidisciplinary discussion in 36% of the cases. By the end of December 2011, 49% of patients with mild to moderately severe IPF were treated with oral corticosteroids, and 27% received no treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Despite correct awareness of international IPF guidelines, modalities of multidisciplinary discussion and of early diagnosis and management need to be improved through the network of expert centres.


Asunto(s)
Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática/diagnóstico , Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumología , Administración Oral , Diagnóstico Precoz , Francia , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática/fisiopatología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Capacidad de Difusión Pulmonar , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento , Capacidad Vital
4.
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac ; 113(1): 36-8, 2012 Feb.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22177627

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The causes of postoperative dissatisfaction in orthognathic surgery are difficult to grasp. The aims of our study are to analyze the effects of orthognathic surgery on self-esteem, body image, psychological morbidity, and quality of life. We also want to assess the combined effects of these factors on postoperative dissatisfaction, and to study the interest of personality assessment (especially neuroticism) as a predictive factor of dissatisfaction. METHOD: Three hundred patients candidates for maxillo-mandibular osteotomy will be included in the study. They will answer a questionnaire assessing self-esteem, body image, psychological morbidity, quality of life, and personality. The evaluation will be conducted preoperatively and postoperatively at 3 months and at 1 year. The degree of satisfaction will be measured postoperatively. EXPECTED RESULTS: The results should help evaluate the psychological effects of orthognathic surgery and identify predictors of postoperative dissatisfaction, and especially the role of neuroticism.


Asunto(s)
Diseño de Investigaciones Epidemiológicas , Cirugía Ortognática , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/psicología , Adaptación Psicológica/fisiología , Imagen Corporal , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Cirugía Ortognática/estadística & datos numéricos , Periodo Posoperatorio , Autoimagen , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
6.
Orthod Fr ; 69(1): 93-100, 1998.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9643038

RESUMEN

The aim of this study is to know the repercussions of modified sagittal ramus split osteotomy of the mandible on the anamnesic symptoms of cranio-mandibular disorders in 89 patients. The sample was divided into different groups according to the surgery type: mandibular advancement or mandibular retrusion with or without maxillary surgery. The anamnesic approach allows to evaluate the felt symptoms. All had a surgery by the same surgeon and with the same technique: mandibular sagittal bilateral surgery according to the modificated Obwegeser osteotomy. The statistical analysis shows some differences between groups.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Craneomandibulares/etiología , Mandíbula/cirugía , Osteotomía/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Trastornos Craneomandibulares/fisiopatología , Dolor Facial/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Avance Mandibular/efectos adversos , Maxilar/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sonido
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...