RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The objective was to compare the risk of malignancies in real-world settings between exclusive immunosuppressant (IS) and immunomodulator (IM) use in multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: A nested case-control study was designed within a new-user cohort of all patients with MS who initiated a first IM or IS between 2008 and 2014, and without cancer history, using the information of the SNDS nationwide French claims database. Incident cancer cases were matched with up to six controls on year of birth, sex, initiation date, and disease risk score of cancer. A conditional logistic regression (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]) was used to compare exclusive IS versus IM use during follow-up and according to three use durations. RESULTS: From 28 720 newly treated patients with MS, 407 incident cancers were observed during the follow-up with 2324 matched controls. A significant increase in cancer risk was observed for IS compared with IM (1.36 [1.05, 1.77]), with similar increases for the first 2 years of use but not for ≥2 years (1.06 [0.65, 1.75]). Similar increase was also observed for IS with indications other than MS (1.37 [1.04, 1.81]) but not for IS indicated only in MS (1.03 [0.45, 2.34]). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with IM, a 37% increase in cancer risk was observed for IS with indications other than MS and used for a short duration (≤2 years) but not for IS indicated only in MS. The absence of risk for prolonged exposure of IS with indications other than MS is not in favor of a causal relation with these drugs.
Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple , Neoplasias , Humanos , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Esclerosis Múltiple/epidemiología , Esclerosis Múltiple/inducido químicamente , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Factores Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Neoplasias/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Riesgo , Adyuvantes InmunológicosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: We previously reported an increased risk of being small for gestational age (SGA) and a decreased risk of being large for gestational age (LGA) after in utero exposure to metformin compared with insulin exposure. This follow-up study investigated if these observations remain when metformin exposure (henceforth, metformin cohort) is compared with non-pharmacological antidiabetic treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM; naïve cohort), instead of insulin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSâ¯: This was a Finnish population register-based cohort study from singleton children born during 2004-2016. Birth outcomes from metformin cohort (n=3964) and the naïve cohort (n=82 675) were used in the main analyses. Additional analyses were conducted in a subcohort, restricting the metformin cohort to children of mothers with GDM only (n=2361). Results were reported as inverse probability of treatment weighted OR (wOR), with the naïve cohort as reference. RESULTSâ¯â¯: No difference was found for the outcome of SGA between the cohorts in the main analyses (wOR 0.97, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.27) or in the additional analyses (wOR 1.01, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.37). No difference between the cohorts was found for the risk of LGA (wOR 0.91, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.11) in the main analyses but a decreased risk was observed in the additional analyses (wOR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.92). CONCLUSIONSâ¯: This follow-up study found no increase in the risk of SGA or LGA after in utero exposure to metformin, compared with drug-naïve GDM. The decreased risk of LGA in mothers with GDM may suggest residual confounding. The lack of increased SGA risk aligns with findings from studies using metformin in non-diabetic pregnancies. In contrast, lower birth weight and increased SGA birth risk were observed in GDM pregnancies for metformin versus insulin. Metformin should be avoided with emerging growth restriction in utero. The interplay of intrauterine hyperglycemia and pharmacological treatments needs further assessment.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Gestacional , Metformina , Recién Nacido , Niño , Femenino , Embarazo , Humanos , Metformina/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios de Seguimiento , Diabetes Gestacional/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiología , Insulina Regular Humana , Insulina/efectos adversos , Aumento de PesoRESUMEN
Objective: Metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MaLA) occurs rarely and is thus difficult to study. We analysed 4241 individual case safety reports of lactic acidosis (LA) that implicated metformin as a suspected drug reported to the pharmacovigilance database of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. The primary objective was to review reports for quality and completeness of data to support diagnoses of MaLA. We also explored the correlations between reported biomarkers, and associations between biomarkers and outcomes. Research Design and Methods: Records were analysed for completeness in supporting diagnoses of LA or metformin-associated LA (MaLA), against commonly used diagnostic criteria. Correlations between indices of exposure to metformin and biomarkers of LA and mortality were investigated. Results: Missing data was common, especially for plasma metformin. Clinical/biomarker evidence supported a diagnosis of LA in only 33% of cases (LA subpopulation) and of MaLA in only 9% (MaLA subpopulation). The metformin plasma level correlated weakly with plasma lactate (positive) and pH (negative). About one-fifth (21.9%) of cases reported a fatal outcome. Metformin exposure (plasma level or dose) was not associated with increased mortality risk (there was a suggestion of decreased risk at higher levels of exposure to metformin). Plasma lactate was the only variable associated with increased risk of mortality. Examination of concomitant risk factors for MaLA identified renal dysfunction (including of iatrogenic origin) as a potential driver of mortality in this population. Conclusion: Despite the high frequency of missing data, this is the largest analysis of cases of MaLA supported by measurements of circulating metformin, and lactate, and pH, to date. Plasma lactate, and not metformin dose or plasma level, appeared to be the main driver of mortality in the setting of LA or MaLA. Further research with more complete case reports is required.
RESUMEN
Aim: The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of beta-blockers with other antihypertensive classes in reducing all-cause mortality, cardiovascular-related mortality and the risk of cerebrocardiovascular events. Methods: This noninterventional study was conducted within the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Hypertensive patients who initiated antihypertensive monotherapy were allocated to one of five cohorts: beta-blockers; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi); angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB); calcium channel blockers (CCB); and diuretics. Differences in outcomes were assessed using Cox proportional hazard models with competing risks. Results: A total of 44,404 patients were prescribed beta-blockers (75% atenolol), 132,545 ACEi, 12,018 ARB, 91,731 CCB, and 106,547 diuretics. At baseline, patients in the beta-blocker cohort presented more frequently with angina, arrhythmia, and atrial fibrillation. The risk of all-cause mortality was lower for those treated with ACEi, ARB, and CCB, and no difference was observed compared with diuretics (adjusted hazard ratio versus beta-blockers (98.75% CI), for ACEi 0.71 (0.61, 0.83), ARB 0.67 (0.51, 0.88), CCB 0.76 (0.66, 0.88), diuretics 1.06 (0.93, 1.22)). No differences were seen in the risk of cardiovascular mortality for patients treated with beta-blockers, ARB, CCB, and diuretics, while a lower risk in patients treated with ACEi was observed (ACEi 0.63 (0.43, 0.91), ARB 0.64 (0.32, 1.28), CCB 0.71 (0.49, 1.03), diuretics 0.97 (0.69, 1.37)). Conclusions: These data add to the limited pool of evidence from real-world studies exploring the effectiveness of beta-blockers versus other antihypertensive classes. Discrepancies to previously published studies might be partly explained by differences in the selected populations and in the follow-up time.
Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos , Hipertensión , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio/uso terapéutico , Diuréticos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
This study estimated the incidence of malignancy in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) versus a matched general population cohort in the Netherlands. Adults with a diagnosis of MS between 2006 and 2014 in the General Practitioner (GP) Database of the PHARMO Database Network with ≥ 1 year of patient history were matched to four non-MS individuals based on year of birth, sex, and GP practice. Patients were followed-up until the earliest malignancy diagnosis, death, or end of data collection. Age-adjusted incidence rates (IR) were measured overall and by cancer type. Standardized incidence ratios (SIR) were calculated as the ratio of stratification-specific IRs in the MS and non-MS cohorts. A total of 1,692 MS patients were matched to 6,768 non-MS patients. Age-adjusted IR of any malignancy, excluding non-melanoma skin cancer (n = 27), in the MS cohort was 48.3 (95%CI:30.1-66.5) per 10,000 PY. An increased incidence of any malignancy was observed in the MS cohort versus the non-MS cohort (SIR 1.8 [95%CI:1.1-2.5]). The most commonly observed malignancies in the MS cohort were breast cancer (n = 8; IR 20.4 [95%CI:6.3-34.5] per 10,000 PY) and melanoma (n = 6; IR 14.8 [95%CI:3.0-26.7] per 10,000 PY). The corresponding SIR observed between cohorts was 1.4 (95%CI:0.4-2.4) and 3.4 (95%CI:0.7-6.2), respectively. While the small increased incidence of malignancy in the MS cohort could be an artefact created by a different distribution of risk factors, an increased incidence of malignancy in MS patients in the Netherlands cannot be excluded.
Asunto(s)
Melanoma , Esclerosis Múltiple , Neoplasias , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Incidencia , Países Bajos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Real-world data (RWD) reflecting patient treatment in routine clinical practice can be used to develop external control groups for single-arm trials. External controls can provide valuable benchmark results on potential comparator drug effectiveness, particularly in rare indications when randomized controlled trials are either infeasible or unethical. This paper describes lessons learned from a descriptive real-world external control cohort study conducted to provide benchmark data for a single-arm clinical trial in a rare oncology biomarker driven disease. Conducting external control cohort studies to evaluate treatment effectiveness in rare indications likely will present data and analysis challenges as seen in the example study. However, there are mitigating measures that can be applied in the study design, identification of RWD sources, and data analysis. The lessons learned and reported here with a proposal of an external control study framework can provide guidance for future research in this area, and may be applicable as well in other rare indications. Taking these learnings into consideration, the use of real-world external controls to contextualize treatment effectiveness in rare indications is a valuable approach and warrants further application in the future.
Asunto(s)
Oncología Médica , Proyectos de Investigación , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Aim: To compare blood pressure (BP) and safety outcomes in patients with hypertension initiating bisoprolol, versus other ß-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers or diuretics. Materials & methods: New user cohort study. Patients initiating bisoprolol were matched with up to four patients, in each comparator cohort using propensity score. BP outcomes were compared using linear mixed models and safety outcomes using Cox proportional hazards. Results: Differences in average systolic and diastolic BP variation were ≤3 mmHg between bisoprolol versus the compared classes. No difference was observed in risk of diabetes, obesity or erectile dysfunction. An increased dyslipidemia risk was only observed versus diuretics (hazard ratio: 0.76; 98.75% CI: 0.58, 0.99). Conclusion: No differences in BP variation and safety outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos , Bisoprolol , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/efectos adversos , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Bisoprolol/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Diuréticos , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To develop algorithms to identify number of lines of anti-neoplastic therapy per patient based on the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR) and identify which algorithm has the highest percentage agreement with a reference standard of documentation in medical records. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 179 patients diagnosed between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2016, with stage II, III, or IV urothelial cell carcinoma or stage III or IV epithelial ovarian cancer, gastric adenocarcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We developed two algorithms for number of lines of anti-neoplastic therapy based on dates and treatment codes (eg, "treatment with cisplatin" or "cytostatic treatment") in the DNPR. First, to denote a change in line of therapy the "Time-based algorithm" used the number of days between consecutive administrations. Second, the "Drug-based algorithm" used information on drug names if available or the number of days between consecutive administrations if no drug names were specified. We calculated the percentage agreement between the algorithms setting the number of allowed days between consecutive administrations from 28 to 50 and the reference standard - information on anti-neoplastic therapy drugs abstracted from medical records and subsequently coded according to lines of anti-neoplastic therapy. RESULTS: For the "Time-based algorithm", the highest percentage agreement with the reference standard was found when using <45 days between consecutive administrations (67.6%; 95% CI: 60.1-73.8%). However, the percentage agreement was higher for the "Drug-based algorithm" using <45 days between consecutive administrations for registrations where the drug name was unspecified (90.5%; 95% CI: 85.0-93.7%). CONCLUSION: The algorithm for number of lines of anti-neoplastic therapy that had the highest percentage agreement with the reference standard (medical records) incorporated both registration of specific drug names and <45 days between consecutive administrations if the drug name was unspecified in routinely recorded data from DNPR.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate if maternal pregnancy exposure to metformin is associated with increased risk of long-term and short-term adverse outcomes in the child. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSâ¯: This register-based cohort study from Finland included singleton children born 2004-2016 with maternal pregnancy exposure to metformin or insulin (excluding maternal type 1 diabetes): metformin only (n=3967), insulin only (n=5273) and combination treatment (metformin and insulin; n=889). The primary outcomes were long-term offspring obesity, hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, diabetes, hypertension, polycystic ovary syndrome, and challenges in motor-social development. In a sensitivity analysis, the primary outcomes were investigated only among children with maternal gestational diabetes. Secondary outcomes were adverse outcomes at birth. Analyses were conducted using inverse- probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), with insulin as reference. RESULTSâ¯â¯: Exposure to metformin or combination treatment versus insulin was not associated with increased risk of long-term outcomes in the main or sensitivity analyses. Among the secondary outcomes, increased risk of small for gestational age (SGA) was observed for metformin (IPTW-weighted OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.34); increased risk of large for gestational age, preterm birth and hypoglycemia was observed for combination treatment. No increased risk was observed for neonatal mortality, hyperglycemia, or major congenital anomalies. CONCLUSIONSâ¯: This study found no increased long-term risk associated with pregnancy exposure to metformin (alone or in combination with insulin), compared with insulin. The increased risk of SGA associated with metformin versus insulin suggests caution in pregnancies with at-risk fetal undernutrition. The increased risks of adverse outcomes at birth associated with combination treatment may reflect confounding by indication or severity.
Asunto(s)
Metformina , Nacimiento Prematuro , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversos , Recién Nacido , Insulina/efectos adversos , Metformina/efectos adversos , Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Studies have not yet found conclusive results on the risk of cancer in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). This study aimed to compare the incidence of all cancers and of specific types of cancer between MS patients and the general population by age and by sex. METHODS: All prevalent MS patients identified between 2008 and 2014 in the nationwide French health care database (Système National des Données de Santé) and without history of malignancy were included in a cohort study and followed up until cancer occurrence, date of death, or 31 December 2015, whichever came first. MS patients were matched based on sex and year of birth to non-MS controls from the general population without cancer before index date. Incidence rate was reported per 100,000 person-years (PY), and risk of cancer was estimated by type of cancer, age, and sex using a Cox model (hazard ratio [HR] and its 95% confidence interval [CI]). RESULTS: Overall, 576 cancers per 100,000 PY were observed in MS patients versus 424 per 100,000 PY in the control population. The risk of cancer was higher among MS patients than among population controls whether considered overall (HR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.29-1.43) or for prostate (HR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.68-2.58), colorectal and anal (HR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.16-1.58), trachea, bronchus, and lung (HR = 2.36, 95% CI = 1.96-2.84), and to a lesser extent, breast cancer (HR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.03-1.23). CONCLUSIONS: MS patients were associated with increased risk of cancer compared to population controls.
Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple , Neoplasias , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Esclerosis Múltiple/complicaciones , Esclerosis Múltiple/epidemiología , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The association between multiple sclerosis and malignancy is controversial and a current appraisal is needed. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of malignancy in patients with multiple sclerosis compared with the general population and in relation to disease-modifying therapy. METHODS: Patients with multiple sclerosis (1995 - 2015) were matched by birth year and sex to individuals without multiple sclerosis in the general population. Patients with multiple sclerosis initiating disease-modifying therapy were evaluated using landmark period analysis. Malignancy risk was assessed by incidence rates, incidence rate ratios, and standardised incidence ratios. RESULTS: The standardised incidence ratio of any malignancy (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) in patients with multiple sclerosis (n = 10,557) was 0.96 (95% CI 0.88 - 1.06), and there was no increased incidence of specific malignancy types compared with the general population cohort (n = 103,761). At the 48-month landmark period, the age-adjusted incidence per 100,000 person-years of any malignancy (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) was 436.7 (95% CI 361.0 - 512.4) in patients newly treated with immunomodulator-only and 675.1 (95% CI 130.4 - 1219.9) in patients newly treated with immunosuppressant-only. CONCLUSIONS: There was no increased incidence of malignancy overall or by type in patients with multiple sclerosis compared neither with the general population nor in relation to disease-modifying therapy.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Few studies have described real-world treatment patterns and survival before the widespread use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We aimed to describe anti-cancer treatment including the use of programmed cell death-1 and ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) ICIs and overall survival (OS) in advanced cancer patients as a benchmarking real-world standard before widespread use of ICIs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using nationwide Danish medical registries, we assembled cohorts of Danish patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (n=12,283), urothelial carcinoma (n=2504), epithelial ovarian cancer (n=1466), gastric adenocarcinoma (n=1457), and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (n=1261) diagnosed between 1/1/2013 and 31/12/2017. We describe anti-cancer treatment and OS using proportions, medians, and Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: Between 9% (ovarian cancer) and 25% (gastric adenocarcinoma) of patients did not receive anti-cancer treatment. The remaining patients received surgery, radiation therapy, and/or medical therapy. Chemotherapy was the most frequent medical therapy in all cohorts except for RCC (tyrosine kinase inhibitors). PD-L1/PD-1 ICIs were used in 7-8% of the NSCLC and RCC cohorts-mainly as second or higher line treatments. OS was longest in patients starting treatment with surgery (eg 25.6 months [95%-confidence interval (CI)=21.9-29.4] for NSCLC and 21.4 months [95%-CI=19.8-23.5] for urothelial carcinoma) and shortest for radiation therapy (eg 3.9 months [95%-CI=3.6-4.2] for NSCLC and 12.6 months [95%-CI=9.2-17.5] for urothelial carcinoma). NSCLC patients starting with medical therapy had OS between these limits. Median OS for NSCLC patients starting treatment with PD-L1/PD-1 ICIs was 21.4 months (95%-CI=13.9-not estimable). CONCLUSION: Most patients with advanced NSCLC, urothelial carcinoma, epithelial ovarian cancer, gastric adenocarcinoma and RCC had poor OS in an era where only a minority received PD-L1/PD-1 ICIs. This information on treatment patterns and survival is important as a benchmarking real-world standard before widespread use of ICIs.
RESUMEN
Background: It is thought that older patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) may present with a different clinical disease phenotype, and therefore respond to subcutaneous interferon beta-1a (sc IFN ß-1a) differently to younger patients. However, few real-world data are available concerning the effectiveness of sc IFN ß-1a according to age. Using data from US claims databases, this cohort analysis aimed to determine the differences in relapse rates, healthcare utilization, treatment adherence, and discontinuation according to pre-defined age groups. Methods: Patient data were pooled from the IBM® MarketScan® Commercial Claims Database and Medicare Supplemental Database. Patients with a confirmed MS diagnosis who initiated treatment with sc IFN ß-1a between July 01, 2010 and December 31, 2015, along with at least 6 months continuous enrolment in a healthcare plan, were followed from first prescription (index date) until date of discontinuation, treatment switch, or end of observation period (1 year after index date). Results: Of the 5,340 patients included in the analysis, there was a high proportion of patients free from relapse across all age groups (range: 94.1-95.4%), with a numerical decrease in the number of MRI performed by age (mean: 0.25, 18-30 years; 0.20, 31-40 years; 0.16, 41-50 years; 0.14, ≥51 years). Adherence (≥80%) was seen to increase with age (77.6%, 18-30 years; 79.6%, 31-40 years; 81.3%, 41-50 years; 84.0%, ≥51 years), at the same time as a non-significant decrease in discontinuation (incidence rate: 79.91, 73.01, 71.75, 68.71%). Conclusion: The effectiveness of sc IFN ß-1a does not appear reduced as a consequence of age in this real-world setting. Older patients had lower discontinuation rates and reduced disease activity, reflected in lower relapse rates and fewer MRI scans compared with younger patients.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To describe characteristics, treatment and outcomes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with MET alterations (MET exon 14 [METex14] skipping or MET amplification [METamp]) in real-world clinical care. METHODS: This non-interventional cohort study used real-world data extracted from electronic medical records from academic oncology sites in Israel, The Netherlands, Taiwan, and the USA. Patients had confirmed diagnosis of advanced (Stage IIIB-IV) NSCLC harboring MET alterations (date of diagnosis = index date) between 1 Jan 2010 and 30 Sept 2018. Medical history was assessed prior to and at the index date (baseline period), and outcomes from first date of treatment to death, loss to follow-up, or end of study period. RESULTS: A total of 117 patients were included (METex14 n = 70; METamp n = 47); testing methods were heterogeneous. Concomitant oncogenic mutations were more common in the METamp cohort than METex14. Patients in the METex14 cohort were older than those in METamp, and a larger proportion were never smokers. Anticancer first-line therapies received by patients (METex14; METamp) included chemotherapy only (44%; 41%), MET inhibitors (33%; 29%), immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) mono-(12%; 15%) and combination-therapy (8%; 3%). Second-line therapies included chemotherapy (35%; 30%) and MET inhibitors (30%; 39%). In the METex14 cohort, objective response rate (ORR) was generally low (first-line 28%; second-line 30%); no patients who received ICIs had a response. In the METamp cohort, ORR was 36% in first-line and 22% in second-line. Median (95% confidence interval) overall survival from start of first-line therapy was 12.0 months (6.8, 19.2) in the METex14 cohort and 22.0 months (9.8, 31.2) in METamp. CONCLUSIONS: Heterogeneous treatments reflect the changing landscape and availability of new treatments, as well as the high unmet medical need in older, METex14 patients who had more advanced disease at diagnosis. MET-targeted therapies could be beneficial in patients with these rare MET alterations.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Anciano , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/epidemiología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/genética , Estudios de Cohortes , Exones , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , MutaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study compared the effectiveness of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone alfa (r-hFSH-alfa; GONAL-f®) with urinary highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG HP; Menogon HP®), during assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments in Germany. METHODS: Data were collected from 71 German fertility centres between 01 January 2007 and 31 December 2012, for women undergoing a first stimulation cycle of ART treatment with r-hFSH-alfa or hMG HP. Primary outcomes were live birth, ongoing pregnancy and clinical pregnancy, based on cumulative data (fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfers), analysed per patient (pP), per complete cycle (pCC) and per first complete cycle (pFC). Secondary outcomes were pregnancy loss (analysed per clinical pregnancy), cancelled cycles (analysed pCC), total drug usage per oocyte retrieved and time-to-live birth (TTLB; per calendar week and per cycle). RESULTS: Twenty-eight thousand six hundred forty-one women initiated a first treatment cycle (r-hFSH-alfa: 17,725 [61.9%]; hMG HP: 10,916 [38.1%]). After adjustment for confounding variables, treatment with r-hFSH-alfa versus hMG HP was associated with a significantly higher probability of live birth (hazard ratio [HR]-pP [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 1.10 [1.04, 1.16]; HR-pCC [95% CI]: 1.13 [1.08, 1.19]; relative risk [RR]-pFC [95% CI]: 1.09 [1.05, 1.15], ongoing pregnancy (HR-pP [95% CI]: 1.10 [1.04, 1.16]; HR-pCC [95% CI]: 1.13 [1.08, 1.19]; RR-pFC [95% CI]: 1.10 [1.05, 1.15]) and clinical pregnancy (HR-pP [95% CI]: 1.10 [1.05, 1.14]; HR-pCC [95% CI]: 1.14 [1.10, 1.19]; RR-pFC [95% CI]: 1.10 [1.06, 1.14]). Women treated with r-hFSH-alfa versus hMG HP had no statistically significant difference in pregnancy loss (HR [95% CI]: 1.07 [0.98, 1.17], were less likely to have a cycle cancellation (HR [95% CI]: 0.91 [0.84, 0.99]) and had no statistically significant difference in TTLB when measured in weeks (HR [95% CI]: 1.02 [0.97, 1.07]; p = 0.548); however, r-hFSH-alfa was associated with a significantly shorter TTLB when measured in cycles versus hMG HP (HR [95% CI]: 1.07 [1.02, 1.13]; p = 0.003). There was an average of 47% less drug used per oocyte retrieved with r-hFSH-alfa versus hMG HP. CONCLUSIONS: This large (> 28,000 women), real-world study demonstrated significantly higher rates of cumulative live birth, cumulative ongoing pregnancy and cumulative clinical pregnancy with r-hFSH-alfa versus hMG HP.
Asunto(s)
Hormona Folículo Estimulante Humana/administración & dosificación , Hormonas Glicoproteicas de Subunidad alfa/administración & dosificación , Infertilidad Femenina/tratamiento farmacológico , Infertilidad Femenina/epidemiología , Menotropinas/administración & dosificación , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas , Adulto , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Infertilidad Femenina/sangre , Nacimiento Vivo/epidemiología , Menotropinas/orina , Embarazo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Aim: To compare healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and healthcare costs (HC) for every-2-week (Q2W) versus weekly (Q1W) cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients & methods: Patients with mCRC receiving cetuximab plus chemotherapy in a line-agnostic setting. Cohort study of patients with mCRC treated with cetuximab and chemotherapy in IBM MarketScan. Analyses were weighted by inverse probability of treatment based on propensity score. Results: HRU was numerically lower with the Q2W versus Q1W regimen (weighted mean, 8.1 vs 9.5 encounters per-patient-per-month). The weighted average of HC was $17,653 and $16,469 per-patient-per-month for the Q2W and Q1W regimens, respectively; the difference between regimens decreased when restricting to CRC-related claims. Conclusion: HRU was lower and HC were similar between the Q2W and Q1W regimens.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Cetuximab/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Costos de la Atención en Salud , HumanosRESUMEN
Aim: To test the noninferiority of cetuximab administered every 2 weeks (Q2W) versus once weekly (Q1W) in treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with regard to overall survival (OS). Patients: Patients receiving cetuximab plus chemotherapy for mCRC in a line-agnostic setting. Methods: This cohort study in IBM MarketScan followed patients from initiation of cetuximab for mCRC until the end of the data availability period, proxy-based death or loss of insurance coverage for >30 days. Results: The hazard ratio for OS was 0.94 (0.85-1.03), and the inferiority hypothesis was rejected at p < 0.001. No significant differences were noted in rates of safety events between Q2W and Q1W. Conclusion: Our real-world study confirmed the noninferiority of cetuximab administered Q2W versus Q1W for OS.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Cetuximab/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Cetuximab/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
AIMS: To examine the characteristics of patients with newly-diagnosed Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), analyze their treatment patterns and comorbidities after diagnosis, and evaluate the economic burden on the MCC patient population in the US. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This observational, non-interventional cohort study identified patients with MCC that were newly-diagnosed between January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2014, and whose data were either in the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters (CCAE) or Medicare Supplemental and Coordination of Benefits databases. Standard descriptive statistics were used to describe patient demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment regimens, and healthcare resource use (HRU) and cost. RESULTS: Following MCC diagnosis, most patients in the study population (n = 2,177) received only surgery (34.5%) or surgery and radiotherapy without chemotherapy (22.0%), while 14.5% of patients received none of these treatments; 27.5% of patients received at least one line of chemotherapy as part of their treatment. Mean total healthcare costs per patient per year (PPPY), as well as mean inpatient, outpatient, and pharmacy costs, were significantly greater for patients who received chemotherapy compared with those who received other or no treatments. Higher HRU and mean costs were associated with increasing patient comorbidity burden, ranging from $62,401 PPPY in Deyo Charlson Comorbidity Index level 1 to $109,690 in level ≥3. LIMITATIONS: The study used claims databases that were limited to patients who are covered by large employer-sponsored insurance and/or Medicare and did not provide information regarding the rationale for treatment choice or resource use. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of treatment is a major factor in determining healthcare costs associated with MCC, with the highest costs in patients receiving chemotherapy. Patients with MCC often exhibit comorbidities, and both HRU and healthcare costs increase significantly with each comorbidity level.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/economía , Carcinoma de Células de Merkel/terapia , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células de Merkel/economía , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Recursos en Salud/economía , Humanos , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/estadística & datos numéricos , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/clasificación , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Econométricos , Características de la Residencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Neoplasias Cutáneas/economía , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Early-onset atopic dermatitis (AD) is a particular phenotype that may convey a risk of developing multiple sensitizations to allergens but little is known about the pathway of sensitization. The aims of this study were to describe the natural history of sensitization to allergens for this phenotype and to identify the most predictive marker associated with the risk of developing sensitization to inhaled allergens in a well-selected cohort of infants with AD. METHODS: Infants with active AD were enrolled and prospectively explored for biological markers of atopy every year until the age of 6 yr. Allergic sensitization was defined as the presence of positive specific IgEs to allergens and multiple sensitizations as being sensitized to ≥2 allergens. Elevated blood eosinophilia was defined as an eosinophil blood count ≥470 eosinophils/mm(3) and elevated total IgE as a serum IgE level ≥45 kU/l. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-nine infants were included. Elevated blood eosinophilia was observed at baseline in 60 children (26.2%) and elevated total IgE in 85 (37.1%). When elevated at baseline, eosinophilia and IgE levels remained significantly higher during the follow-up period. Sensitization to food allergens decreased from 58% to 34%, whereas sensitization to inhaled allergens increased over time from 17% to 67%. Initial multiple sensitizations to food allergens were the most predictive factor for the risk of developing sensitization to inhaled allergens at 6 yr (OR 3.72 [1.68-8.30] p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the early-onset AD phenotype, multiple sensitization to food allergens conveys a higher risk of sensitization to inhaled allergens than single sensitization.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica/epidemiología , Eosinofilia/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/epidemiología , Edad de Inicio , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Alérgenos/inmunología , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Dermatitis Atópica/inmunología , Eosinofilia/inmunología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Alimentos/efectos adversos , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/inmunología , Humanos , Inmunización , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Anamnesis , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: ICU admission is required in more than 25% of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) at some time during the course of the disease. However, only limited information is available on how physicians communicate with COPD patients about ICU admission. METHODS: COPD patients and relatives from 19 French ICUs were interviewed at ICU discharge about their knowledge of COPD. French pulmonologists self-reported their practices for informing and discussing intensive care treatment preferences with COPD patients. Finally, pulmonologists and ICU physicians reported barriers and facilitators for transfer of COPD patients to the ICU and to propose invasive mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: Self-report questionnaires were filled in by 126 COPD patients and 102 relatives, and 173 pulmonologists and 135 ICU physicians were interviewed. For 41% (n = 39) of patients and 54% (n = 51) of relatives, ICU admission had never been expected prior to admission. One half of patients were not routinely informed by their pulmonologist about possible ICU admission at some time during the course of COPD. Moreover, treatment options (that is, non-invasive ventilation, intubation and mechanical ventilation or tracheotomy) were not explained to COPD patients during regular pulmonologist visits. Pulmonologists and ICU physician have different perceptions of the decision-making process pertaining to ICU admission and intubation. CONCLUSIONS: The information provided by pulmonologists to patients and families concerning the prognosis of COPD, the risks of ICU admission and specific care could be improved in order to deliver ICU care in accordance with the patient's personal values and preferences. Given the discrepancies in the decision-making process between pulmonologists and intensivists, a more collaborative approach should probably be discussed.