RESUMEN
An optimal approach to MRI fusion targeted prostate biopsy (PBx) remains unclear (number of cores, inter-core distance, Gleason grading (GG) principle). The aim of this study was to develop a precise pixel-wise segmentation diagnostic AI algorithm for tumor detection and GG as well as an algorithm for virtual prostate biopsy that are used together to systematically investigate and find an optimal approach to targeted PBx. Pixel-wise AI algorithms for tumor detection and GG were developed using a high-quality, manually annotated dataset (slides n=442) after fast-track annotation transfer into segmentation style. To this end, a virtual biopsy algorithm was developed that can perform random biopsies from tumor regions in whole-mount whole-slide images with pre-defined parameters. A cohort of 115 radical prostatectomy (RP) patient cases with clinically significant, MRI-visible tumors (n=121) was used for systematic studies of the optimal biopsy approach. Three expert genitourinary (GU) pathologists participated in the validation. The tumor detection algorithm (aware version sensitivity/specificity 0.99/0.90, balanced version 0.97/0.97) and GG algorithm (quadratic kappa range vs pathologists 0.77-0.78) perform on par with expert GU pathologists. In total, 65,340 virtual biopsies were performed to study different biopsy approaches with the following results: 1) four biopsy cores is the optimal number for a targeted PBx, 2) cumulative GG strategy is superior to using maximal Gleason score for single cores, 3) controlling for minimal inter-core distance does not improve the predictive accuracy for the RP Gleason score, 4) Using tertiary Gleason pattern principle (for AI tool) in cumulative GG strategy might allow better predictions of final RP Gleason score. The AI algorithm (based on cumulative GG strategy) predicted the RP Gleason score of the tumor better than 2 of the 3 expert GU pathologists. In this study, using an original approach of virtual prostate biopsy on the real cohort of patient cases, we find the optimal approach to the biopsy procedure and the subsequent Gleason grading of a targeted PBx. We publicly release two large datasets with associated expert pathologists' GG and our virtual biopsy algorithm.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Oesophagectomy is an operation with a high risk of postoperative complications. The aim of this single-centre retrospective study was to apply machine-learning methods to predict complications (Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa or higher) and specific adverse events. METHODS: Patients with resectable adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction who underwent Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy between 2016 and 2021 were included. The tested algorithms were logistic regression after recursive feature elimination, random forest, k-nearest neighbour, support vector machine, and neural network. The algorithms were also compared with a current risk score (the Cologne risk score). RESULTS: 457 patients had Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa or higher complications (52.9 per cent) versus 407 patients with Clavien-Dindo grade 0, I, or II complications (47.1 per cent). After 3-fold imputation and 3-fold cross-validation, the overall accuracies were: logistic regression after recursive feature elimination, 0.528; random forest, 0.535; k-nearest neighbour, 0.491; support vector machine, 0.511; neural network, 0.688; and Cologne risk score, 0.510. For medical complications, the results were: logistic regression after recursive feature elimination, 0.688; random forest, 0.664; k-nearest neighbour, 0.673; support vector machine, 0.681; neural network, 0.692; and Cologne risk score, 0.650. For surgical complications, the results were: logistic regression after recursive feature elimination, 0.621; random forest, 0.617; k-nearest neighbour, 0.620; support vector machine, 0.634; neural network, 0.667; and Cologne risk score, 0.624. The calculated area under the curve of the neural network was 0.672 for Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa or higher, 0.695 for medical complications, and 0.653 for surgical complications. CONCLUSION: The neural network scored the highest accuracies compared with all of the other models for the prediction of postoperative complications after oesophagectomy.
The human gullet or stomach can develop tumours. Surgery can help to cure patients with these tumours. But the operation is risky because sometimes adverse events can happen afterwards. So far, there is no reliable prediction model. It may help to predict the risk of adverse events accurately. For example, patients with a high risk could be observed more thoroughly. Patients with a low risk may not need unnecessary procedures. The information of all patients with an operation at a specialized hospital was collected. Machine learning is a complex mathematical method and was used in this study. It is able to analyse big data sets of information. One machine-learning method called neural network was best in predicting adverse events. Right now, the performance may not be strong enough to fully rely on the prediction. However, refinement of the prediction and more data could improve the neural network in the future.
