Blinatumomab infusion interruptions in pediatric patients rarely lead to readmission.

Blinatumomab is a bispecific T-cell engager administered as a 28-day continuous infusion. Infusions can be associated with interruptions requiring support from clinical staff, but the frequency of interventions with outpatient blinatumomab has not been characterized. This study is a single-center, retrospective review of patients who received blinatumomab between December 3, 2014 and October 31, 2021 to determine frequency and type of interventions. Forty patients received blinatumomab for 69 cycles. Clinical staff intervention was required in 31 (45%) cycles, only six (8.7%) cycles needed readmission. Management of outpatient blinatumomab infusions requires education and training of clinical staff and caregivers to quickly troubleshoot interruptions.

Pharmacist Effect on Discharge Follow-Up Education in Pediatric Oncology Outpatient Clinics: A Quality Improvement Study.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe the effect of education provided by a clinical pharmacy specialist at a patient's follow-up appointment after discharge, and to assess caregiver satisfaction. METHODS: A single-center, quality improvement study was conducted. A standardized data collection tool was created to characterize interventions made by clinical pharmacy specialists during an outpatient clinic appointment scheduled shortly after discharge. Pediatric patients with cancer who met the following criteria were included: 1) initial diagnosis without receiving chemotherapy, 2) first course of chemotherapy after initial diagnosis or relapsed disease, and 3) post-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or cellular therapy. A survey was provided to families after the follow-up discharge appointment to assess the caregiver's satisfaction of the new process. RESULTS: From January to May 2021, a total of 78 first-time discharge appointments were completed. The most common reason for follow-up was discharge after first course of chemotherapy (77%). The average duration of each appointment was 20 minutes (range, 5-65). The clinical pharmacy specialist made an intervention during 85% of appointments. The most common intervention made during the visit was reinforcement of medications (31%). Thirteen surveys were completed by caregivers; 100% of the caregivers reported the follow-up appointment was helpful. Additionally, they reported the most useful resource provided at discharge was the medication calendar (85%). CONCLUSIONS: Investing clinical pharmacy specialist time with patients and caregiver after discharge appears to have a meaningful effect on patient care. Caregivers report this process is helpful in better understanding their child's medications.

Preferential expansion of CD8+ CD19-CAR T cells postinfusion and the role of disease burden on outcome in pediatric B-ALL.

T cells expressing CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptors (CD19-CARs) have potent antileukemia activity in pediatric and adult patients with relapsed and/or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). However, not all patients achieve a complete response (CR), and a significant percentage relapse after CD19-CAR T-cell therapy due to T-cell intrinsic and/or extrinsic mechanisms. Thus, there is a need to evaluate new CD19-CAR T-cell products in patients to improve efficacy. We developed a phase 1/2 clinical study to evaluate an institutional autologous CD19-CAR T-cell product in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory B-ALL. Here we report the outcome of the phase 1 study participants (n = 12). Treatment was well tolerated, with a low incidence of both cytokine release syndrome (any grade, n = 6) and neurotoxicity (any grade, n = 3). Nine out of 12 patients (75%) achieved a minimal residual disease-negative CR in the bone marrow (BM). High disease burden (≥40% morphologic blasts) before CAR T-cell infusion correlated with increased side effects and lower response rate, but not with CD19-CAR T-cell expansion. After infusion, CD8+ CAR T cells had a proliferative advantage over CD4+ CAR T cells and at peak expansion, had an effector memory phenotype with evidence of antigen-driven differentiation. Patients that proceeded to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (AlloHCT) had sustained, durable responses. In summary, the initial evaluation of our institutional CD19-CAR T-cell product demonstrates safety and efficacy while highlighting the impact of pre-infusion disease burden on outcomes. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03573700.

Evaluation of Aminophylline for the Treatment of Acute Kidney Injury in Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare acute kidney injury (AKI)-related outcomes of patients who received aminophylline in addition to standard of care with matched historical controls who received standard of care alone. METHODS: This was a single center, retrospective, historical control cohort study that included patients treated for AKI. Patients who received aminophylline from January 2017 to June 2018 were matched for age, sex, primary diagnosis, and hematopoietic cell transplant history in a 1:2 ratio to historical controls treated for AKI from July 2015 to September 2016. The primary outcome was improvement in AKI stage at 5 and 10 days from treatment initiation. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients who received aminophylline were matched to 54 historical controls. Fifty-eight patients (72%) had recently undergone hematopoietic cell transplant. At day 5, improvement in AKI stage was observed in 56% of patients in each group (p = 1.0); at day 10, improvement in AKI stage was observed in 75% of patients in the aminophylline group vs 70% of historical controls (p = 0.76). By day 10, serum creatinine levels had returned to baseline in 21% of patients in the aminophylline group and 34% of patients in the control group (p = 0.37). CONCLUSIONS: Findings of this study demonstrated no difference in the rate of AKI resolution or in the proportion of patients with resolved AKI when aminophylline was added to standard of care for the treatment of AKI in this pediatric hematology/oncology population.

Experience using intravenous posaconazole in paediatric and young adult oncology patients.

BACKGROUND: Posaconazole exhibits broad-spectrum antifungal activity. An IV formulation became available in 2014. Few studies describing the use of this formulation exist in patients under the age of 18 years. This study describes our experience using IV posaconazole in paediatric and young adult cancer patients. METHODS: This single-centre retrospective chart review evaluated patients who received IV posaconazole and had at least one posaconazole plasma concentration obtained after five or more days with a consistent dosage. Relationships between doses required to achieve a plasma concentration of ≥1 µg/mL and patient age, weight and body surface area (BSA) were evaluated. The clinical record was reviewed to identify descriptions of any adverse events. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were analysed, with a median age of 10.5 years (range 1.9-22.9 years; 92% were <18 years). All patients were able to achieve a posaconazole plasma concentration ≥1 µg/mL during their treatment course. The daily mg/kg/day dose required to achieve the target concentration decreased significantly with increasing age of the patient (P = 0.018). Assessment of dosage based on BSA suggested a requirement of 225 mg/m2/day across all age groups <18 years. Adverse events documented in the clinical record were consistent with those described with the oral formulations. No CNS toxicities were observed with use of IV posaconazole. CONCLUSIONS: Concentrations ≥1 µg/mL are achievable and a BSA-based dosing approach may allow a consistent empirical dose for patients <18 years of age. Therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended to ensure patients achieve therapeutic concentrations.

Pentamidine for Prophylaxis against Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia in Pediatric Oncology Patients Receiving Immunosuppressive Chemotherapy.

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia is a life-threatening opportunistic infection in children receiving immunosuppressive chemotherapy. Without prophylaxis, up to 25% of pediatric oncology patients receiving chemotherapy will develop Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is the preferred agent for prophylaxis against Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia. Pentamidine may be an acceptable alternative for pediatric patients unable to tolerate trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. A retrospective review was conducted of pediatric oncology patients who received ≥1 dose of pentamidine for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia prophylaxis between January 2007 and August 2014. Electronic medical records were reviewed to determine the incidence of breakthrough Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia or discontinuation of pentamidine associated with adverse events. A total of 754 patients received pentamidine prophylaxis during the period. There were no cases of probable or proven Pneumocystis pneumonia, and 4 cases (0.5%) of possible Pneumocystis pneumonia. The incidence of possible breakthrough Pneumocystis pneumonia was not significantly different between subgroups based on age (<12 months [1.7%] versus ≥12 months [0.4%], P = 0.3), route of administration (aerosolized [0%] versus intravenous [1.0%], P = 0.2), or hematopoietic stem cell transplant status (transplant [0.4%] versus no transplant [0.8%], P = 0.6). Pentamidine was discontinued due to an adverse drug event in 23 children (3.1%), more frequently for aerosolized than for intravenous administration (7.6% versus 2.2%, respectively, P = 0.004). Intravenous or inhaled pentamidine may be a safe and effective second-line alternative for prophylaxis against Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in children with cancer receiving immunosuppressive chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.