RESUMEN
Sea urchin injuries are common following accidental contact with sharp sea urchin spines. Immediate manifestations of injury include local erythema, pain, and myalgia. Failure to remove the spines from the skin may result in delayed systemic reactions, secondary infection, granulomas, and-if joint spaces are involved-inflammatory or infectious synovitis and arthritis. The majority of severe complications can be avoided if the spines are fully removed from the skin soon after injury, which can be difficult. This article aims to bring awareness to the myriad complications from sea urchin injuries as well as the mechanisms for successful spine removal.
Asunto(s)
Erizos de Mar , Animales , Humanos , Piel/lesiones , Piel/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Diffractive microscopy creates contrast within samples that are otherwise uniform under bright light. This technique can highlight subtle differences in refractive indices within birefringent samples containing varying amounts of mature collagen. Dermatofibroma (DF) and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) possess differences in their mature collagen content and, therefore, may be distinguishable using diffractive microscopy. METHODS: Two hundred forty-two DF and 85 DFSP hematoxylin-eosin (H&E)-stained specimens were analyzed using diffractive microscopy. Data regarding the distribution pattern and strength of refractility was recorded. RESULTS: DFSP was more frequently found to be focally, weakly, or non-refractile (82.9%; n = 68) under diffractive microscopy, while DF more often showed diffusely bright refractility (52.9%; n = 128). DFSP samples with diffuse refractility in portions of the lesion (17.1%; n = 14) also exhibited a unique checkerboard pattern distinct from that which was seen in DF samples. CONCLUSIONS: The absence of diffuse refractility was more closely associated with DFSP, as was the presence of a unique checkerboard diffraction pattern. Despite high sensitivity (Sn = 82.9%), absent refractility was not a specific test (Sp = 52.9%), with 47.1% (n = 114) of DF samples sharing this feature. The distinction between DF and DFSP is often diagnosed using H&E alone. In difficult cases, examination of collagen under diffractive microscopy may be useful in distinguishing DFSP from DF and provide an alternative cost-effective tool to immunohistochemical staining.
Asunto(s)
Dermatofibrosarcoma , Histiocitoma Fibroso Benigno , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Dermatofibrosarcoma/diagnóstico , Dermatofibrosarcoma/patología , Histiocitoma Fibroso Benigno/diagnóstico , Histiocitoma Fibroso Benigno/patología , Microscopía , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Colágeno , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cytologic atypia encompasses several features of abnormal cellular morphology. We sought to quantify these features in benign and premalignant/malignant squamous cell lesions to better characterize criteria for malignancy. METHODS: We conducted a rater-blinded observational study in which histopathology slides were evaluated under light microscopy, and the presence and relative quantity of 24 distinct cytological features were recorded, along with respective diagnoses. Each slide was evaluated, and the ratings were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: The most helpful findings, whose presence in high numbers indicates an increased likelihood that the tissue sample is premalignant/malignant, were: (1) pleomorphic parakeratosis; (2) pleomorphic nuclei in the epithelium; (3) irregular nuclei; (4) thick refractile nuclear envelope; (5) presence of nuclear hyperchromasia (dark gray); (6) peripheral nucleoli; and (7) nucleolar stems. Higher values of round or oval nuclear shape and vesicular nuclei increase the likelihood that the tissue sample is benign. CONCLUSIONS: Certain nuclear features have a higher association with premalignancy/malignancy and may guide histologic evaluation of a given lesion. These findings can be used in combination with architectural features and clinical history to add to a complete diagnostic picture.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Paraqueratosis , Lesiones Precancerosas , Humanos , Núcleo Celular/patología , Lesiones Precancerosas/patología , Paraqueratosis/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologíaRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: The locally invasive soft-tissue sarcoma, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSPs), shares certain histologic features of the much more common and benign dermatofibroma (DF). While immunohistochemical stains, specifically cluster of differentiation 34 and Factor XIIIa, can be used to distinguish the 2 entities using microscopy, these markers are not entirely sensitive nor specific. Three-dimensionally, DFSP nuclei resemble a "puck" or "coin"-like shape. As hematoxylin/eosin-stained slides are prepared, these "puck" nuclei are fixed in an infinite number of orientations depending on their current position in rotation about their axes within the tumor cells. Under histological examination, this random nuclear positioning produces the appearance of 2 predominate morphologies: an ovoid "disk" shape (en face) and a narrow spindled shape (side view), which distribute in a roughly 50:50 ratio throughout the tumor sample slide. Nuclear morphology was analyzed in 324 DFSP and DF samples at high magnification (×400) to determine the presence or absence of a predominant morphology in which nuclei appear to alternate between an ovoid (en face) and spindled (side view) throughout most of the tumor sample. An alternating ovoid-spindled nuclear morphology was the predominant cytology in 98% of DFSP and was not predominant in 100% of DF samples (P < 0.001). This morphology was found to be highly specific (Sp = 1) and sensitive (Sn = 0.98) for DFSP. This unique nuclear morphology may be a more sensitive and specific diagnostic tool in identifying DFSP from DF in comparison with costly immunohistochemical stains.