Perceived Stress and Inflammatory Arthritis: A Prospective Investigation in the Studies of the Etiologies of Rheumatoid Arthritis Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the association of perceived stress with incident inflammatory arthritis (IA) defined as having at least 1 joint consistent with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-like synovitis based on examination. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study in the Studies of the Etiologies of Rheumatoid Arthritis cohort. Participants without IA were recruited if they were a first-degree relative of an RA proband or screened positive for anti-citrullinated protein antibody. Perceived stress was measured using the Perceived Stress Scale-14 (PSS-14), in which scores can range from 0 to 56, and a higher score indicates greater perceived stress. The total PSS-14 score, as well as 2 subscores indicative of perceived distress and self-efficacy, were averaged across all study visits until development of IA or the last follow-up. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) of IA associated with average PSS-14 scores were obtained using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: The mean total PSS-14 score was 20.4. We found that a 1-point increase in the perceived distress score was significantly associated with a 10-percent increase in the risk of IA (adjusted HR 1.10 [95% CI 1.02-1.19]). Total PSS-14 and self-efficacy were not associated with IA risk (adjusted HR 1.05 [95% CI 0.99-1.10] and 1.04 [95% CI 0.91-1.18], respectively). CONCLUSION: An association between perceived distress and incident IA was observed in this at-risk cohort. Replication of this finding in other preclinical and at-risk RA populations is needed.

The association between omega-3 fatty acid biomarkers and inflammatory arthritis in an anti-citrullinated protein antibody positive population.

Objectives: Higher circulating omega-3 fatty acids (n-3 FAs) are associated with a lower prevalence of anti-CCP antibodies and RF in subjects without RA. We examined whether, in anti-CCP+ subjects, n-3 FAs also play a role in development of inflammatory arthritis (IA). Methods: At Colorado-based health fairs from 2008 to 2014, participants without a previous diagnosis of RA who were anti-CCP3+ (n = 47) were recruited into a follow-up study; symptom assessments and joint examinations were conducted every 6 months for the determination of IA. We measured n-3 FAs as a percentage of total lipids in red blood cell membranes (n-3 FA%) at each visit. Results: We detected IA in 10 anti-CCP3+ subjects (21%) at the baseline visit. Increased total n-3 FA% in red blood cell membranes [odds ratio (OR) = 0.09, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.76], specifically docosapentaenoic acid (OR = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.83) and docosahexaenoic acid (OR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.06, 0.86), was associated with a lower odds of IA at the baseline visit, adjusting for n-3 FA supplement use, current smoking, RF+, elevated CRP+ and shared epitope. We followed 35 of the anti-CCP3+ subjects who were IA negative at baseline and detected 14 incident IA cases over an average of 2.56 years of follow-up. In a time-varying survival analysis, increasing docosapentaenoic acid significantly decreased risk of incident IA (hazard ratio = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.27, 0.98), adjusting for age at baseline, n-3 FA supplement use, RF+, CRP+ and shared epitope. Conclusion: n-3 FAs may potentially lower the risk of transition from anti-CCP positivity to IA, an observation that warrants further investigation.

Identification of undiagnosed inflammatory arthritis in a community health fair screen.

OBJECTIVE: To identify individuals with undiagnosed inflammatory arthritis (IA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a community health fair screen, and to establish in a health fair setting the diagnostic accuracy of combinations of the Connective Tissue Disease Screening Questionnaire (CSQ) and autoantibody testing for IA. METHODS: Screening for IA/RA was performed at health fair sites using a combination of the CSQ, joint examination, rheumatoid factor, and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibody testing. IA was defined as > or =1 swollen joint suggestive of synovitis on joint examination by a trained clinician. RESULTS: Six hundred one subjects were screened; 51.0% participated because of joint symptoms (pain, stiffness, or swelling). Eighty-four subjects (14.0%) had > or =1 swollen joint, designated as IA on joint examination. Of the 601 subjects screened, 9 (1.5%) had IA and met > or =4 of 7 American College of Rheumatology criteria for RA but had no prior diagnosis of RA, and 15 (2.5%) had IA and RF and/or anti-CCP positivity, suggesting early RA. The diagnostic accuracy of combinations of the CSQ and autoantibody testing for the identification of IA yielded maximal sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 95.3%, 99.2%, 71.4%, and 97.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Health fair screening may be an effective approach for the identification of individuals with undiagnosed IA/RA. A combination of the CSQ and autoantibody testing alone has clinically useful diagnostic accuracy for the detection of IA. Decisions regarding which methodology to use for future health fair IA/RA screening will depend on goals of screening and funding.