RESUMEN
Despite enormous recent advances in stage IV melanoma treatment, it continues to have a significant mortality. Five-years survival is below 50% even when granted full access to effective therapeutic regimens. Considering the real world, mostly with low or medium-income countries like Brazil, where 75% of population depends on public health system receiving ineffective Dacarbazine chemotherapy, more than 95% of stage IV patients are dead before 5 years. Knowing the survival process of melanoma end-of-life time is imperative to help physicians to establish better symptoms control and improve the quality of death of these patients. METHODS: Relative caregiver of melanoma end of life patients were invited to participate in a specific interview answering questions for the purpose of gathering information regarding symptoms and patients' complaints at the last 30 days, 7 days and at the day of death. RESULTS: Although melanoma has a highest propensity for brain dissemination, seizure and focal neurological deficits were not a major complaint. Most of dying melanoma symptoms are shared among other solid terminality tumor process and get worse from 30 days to 7 days, but the majority of symptoms kept unchanged from 7 days till time to death. Wound bleeding and bad odor were the only complaints that got worse during the whole terminality process and could be improved with better commitment of assistant team. CONCLUSIONS: although a strong effort is made to control brain metastasis, local and regional open wound metastasis represents a major remediable complaint that should receive more attention at end-of-life melanoma patients.
RESUMEN
The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The name of "Carolina Ledsham" is now corrected in the author group of this article.
RESUMEN
The early diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma provides less aggressive treatment reducing mortality. General practitioners are responsible for cancer diagnoses in the Brazilian Public Health System and therefore play a crucial role in the prevention and early detection of melanoma. To assess the melanoma knowledge of a primary healthcare physician, the general practitioner, compared to a dermatologist. General practitioners and dermatologists answered a questionnaire about melanoma and the management of suspected cases. The results of both groups were compared. The sample consisted of 80 specialists and 160 general practitioners. When asked about the "ABCDE" rule, 96.2% of the dermatologists knew about it, compared to 34.4% of the general practitioners. The percentage of dermatologists who examined the whole skin of the patient at high risk for melanoma was 90% vs. 24.5% amongst general practitioners. The most cited reasons for the absence of the examination of patients at risk for melanoma were lack of time at the consultations (17.6% specialists, 66.1% generalists) and an excessive number of patients (17.6% specialists, 61.5% generalists). General practitioner has less knowledge about melanoma compared to the dermatologists and presents deficient behaviors about patients at risk or who have suspicious lesions, indicating the need for training and continuing education.
