RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The SPYRAL HTN-ON MED (Global Clinical Study of Renal Denervation With the Symplicity Spyral Multi-electrode Renal Denervation System in Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension in the Absence of Antihypertensive Medications)trial showed significant office and nighttime systolic blood pressure (BP) reductions in patients with hypertension following renal denervation (RDN) compared with sham-control patients, despite similar 24-hour BP reductions. We compared antihypertensive medication and BP changes among prespecified subpopulations. METHODS: The multicenter, randomized, sham-controlled, blinded SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial (n=337) evaluated BP changes after RDN compared with a sham procedure in patients with hypertension prescribed 1 to 3 antihypertensive drugs. Most patients (n=187; 54%) were enrolled outside the United States, while 156 (46%) US patients were enrolled, including 60 (18%) Black Americans. RESULTS: Changes in detected antihypertensive drugs were similar between RDN and sham group patients in the outside US cohort, while drug increases were significantly more common in the US sham group compared with the RDN group. Patients from outside the United States showed significant reductions in office and 24-hour mean systolic BP at 6 months compared with the sham group, whereas BP changes were similar between RDN and sham in the US cohort. Within the US patient cohort, Black Americans in the sham control group had significant increases in medication burden from baseline through 6 months (P=0.003) but not in the RDN group (P=0.44). CONCLUSIONS: Patients enrolled outside the United States had minimal antihypertensive medication changes between treatment groups and had significant office and 24-hour BP reductions compared with the sham group. Increased antihypertensive drug burden in the US sham cohort, especially among Black Americans, may have diluted the treatment effect in the combined trial population. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02439775.
Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos , Hipertensión , Humanos , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Riñón , Presión Sanguínea/fisiología , Desnervación/métodos , Simpatectomía/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Survivors of acute kidney injury (AKI) are at high risk of adverse outcomes. Monitoring of kidney function, screening for proteinuria, use of statins and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors, and nephrology follow-up among survivors have not been fully characterized. We examined these processes of care after discharge in survivors of hospitalized AKI. STUDY DESIGN: Population-based retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Adults in Alberta, Canada, admitted to the hospital between 2009 and 2017, then followed from their discharge date until 2019 for a median follow-up of 2.7 years. EXPOSURE: Hospital-acquired AKI diagnostically conforming to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) serum creatinine criteria for stage 2 or stage 3 disease, or the need for acute dialysis. OUTCOME: Outcomes after hospital discharge included the proportion of participants who had evaluation of kidney function, were seen by a specialist or general practitioner, and received postdischarge prescriptions for recommended medications for chronic kidney disease (CKD). ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Cumulative incidence curves to characterize the proportion of participants who received each process of care outcome within the first 90 days and subsequent 1-year follow-up period after hospital discharge. To avoid risks associated with multiple hypothesis testing, differences were not statistically compared across groups. RESULTS: The cohort (n=23,921) included 50.2% men (n=12,015) with a median age of 68.1 [IQR, 56.9-78.8] years. Within 90 days after discharge, 21.2% and 8.6% of patients with and without pre-existing CKD, respectively, were seen by a nephrologist; 60.1% of AKI survivors had at least 1 serum creatinine measured, but only 25.5% had an assessment for albuminuria within 90 days after discharge; 52.7% of AKI survivors with pre-existing CKD, and 51.6% with de novo CKD were prescribed a RAAS inhibitor within 4-15 months after discharge. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective data were collected as part of routine clinical care. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of patients receiving optimal care after an episode of AKI in Alberta was low and may represent a target for improving long-term outcomes for this population. PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY: A study in Alberta, Canada, examined the care received by patients with acute kidney disease (AKI) during hospitalization and after discharge between 2007 and 2019. The results showed that a low proportion of patients with moderate to severe AKI were seen by a kidney specialist during hospitalization or within 90 days after discharge. Fewer than 25% of AKI patients had their kidney function monitored with both blood and urine tests within 90 days of discharge. Additionally, about half of AKI survivors with chronic kidney disease (CKD) were prescribed guideline recommended medications for CKD within 15 months after discharge. There is potential to improve health care delivery to these patients both in hospital and after hospital discharge.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Masculino , Adulto , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Alta del Paciente , Cuidados Posteriores , Creatinina , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Alberta/epidemiología , Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Lesión Renal Aguda/terapia , Lesión Renal Aguda/complicaciones , Sobrevivientes , HospitalesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Renal denervation (RDN) reduces blood pressure (BP) in patients with uncontrolled hypertension in the absence of antihypertensive medications. OBJECTIVES: This trial assessed the safety and efficacy of RDN in the presence of antihypertensive medications. METHODS: SPYRAL HTN-ON MED is a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled, patient- and assessor-blinded trial enrolling patients from 56 clinical centers worldwide. Patients were prescribed 1 to 3 antihypertensive medications. Patients were randomized to radiofrequency RDN or sham control procedure. The primary efficacy endpoint was the baseline-adjusted change in mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP at 6 months between groups using a Bayesian trial design and analysis. RESULTS: The treatment difference in the mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP from baseline to 6 months between the RDN group (n = 206; -6.5 ± 10.7 mm Hg) and sham control group (n = 131; -4.5 ± 10.3 mm Hg) was -1.9 mm Hg (95% CI: -4.4 to 0.5 mm Hg; P = 0.12). There was no significant difference between groups in the primary efficacy analysis with a posterior probability of superiority of 0.51 (Bayesian treatment difference: -0.03 mm Hg [95% CI: -2.82 to 2.77 mm Hg]). However, there were changes and increases in medication intensity among sham control patients. RDN was associated with a reduction in office systolic BP compared with sham control at 6 months (adjusted treatment difference: -4.9 mm Hg; P = 0.0015). Night-time BP reductions and win ratio analysis also favored RDN. There was 1 adverse safety event among 253 assessed patients. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference between groups in the primary analysis. However, multiple secondary endpoint analyses favored RDN over sham control. (SPYRAL HTN-ON MED Study [Global Clinical Study of Renal Denervation With the Symplicity Spyral Multi-electrode Renal Denervation System in Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension in the Absence of Antihypertensive Medications]; NCT02439775).
Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos , Hipertensión , Humanos , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Antihipertensivos/farmacología , Teorema de Bayes , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Riñón , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión/cirugía , Presión Sanguínea , Simpatectomía/métodos , Monitoreo Ambulatorio de la Presión Arterial , Desnervación/métodosRESUMEN
Elevated morning and nighttime blood pressures (BP) are associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events such as stroke and myocardial infarction. We compared the long-term changes in morning and nighttime BP in patients with uncontrolled hypertension (office systolic BP between 150 and <180 mmHg/diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg; mean ambulatory systolic BP (SBP) between 140 and <170 mmHg; 1-3 prescribed antihypertensive medications). Eighty patients were randomized to RDN or sham control. In patients taking at least 3 antihypertensive medications at 36 months (N = 23 RDN group; N = 23 sham group), the 24 h ambulatory SBP as well as morning (7:00-9:00AM) and nighttime (1:00-6:00AM) ambulatory SBP were significantly lower for the RDN group compared to sham control (24 h SBP: -20.2 vs. -10.2, p = 0.0087; morning SBP: -23.9 vs. -8.0 mmHg, p = 0.029; nighttime SBP: -20.8 vs. -7.2 mmHg, p = 0.0011). At 36 months, 24 h SBP was controlled to <130 mmHg in 40% of RDN patients in the morning compared to 6% for the sham group; P = 0.021 and in 80% of the RDN patients at night compared to 39% in the sham group; P = 0.019. Major adverse events through 36 months were rare in both groups, and there were no renal artery re-interventions or vascular complications. Morning and nighttime SBP were significantly lower in patients prescribed at least 3 antihypertensive medications at 36 months in the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial for RDN compared with sham control. The results suggest RDN has significant benefit when the risk of cardiovascular events is highest.
Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos , Hipertensión , Humanos , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Antihipertensivos/farmacología , Presión Sanguínea , Monitoreo Ambulatorio de la Presión Arterial , Desnervación/métodos , Riñón , Simpatectomía/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: With improved survival among children after transplantation, our understanding of the risk for developing other comorbidities is improving, yet little is known about the long-term risk of cardiovascular events and mortality after solid organ transplantation. METHODS: In a cohort study using health administrative data, we compared cardiovascular events in children (n = 615) with liver, lung, kidney, small bowel, or multi-organ transplant at the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada, with asthmatic children (n = 481,697) between 1996 and 2014. Outcomes included non-fatal cardiovascular events, cardiovascular death, all-cause mortality, and a composite of non-fatal and fatal cardiovascular events. Time-stratified Cox proportional hazards models were used. RESULTS: Among 615 children, 317 (52%) were recipients of kidneys, 253 (41%) of livers, and the remaining 45 (7%) had lung, small bowel, or multi-organ transplants. Median follow-up was 12.1 [7.2, 16.7] years. Non-fatal incident cardiovascular events were 34 times higher among solid organ transplant recipients than non-transplanted children (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 34.4, 95% CI: 25.5, 46.4). Among transplant recipients, the cumulative incidence of non-fatal and fatal cardiovascular events was 2.3% and 13.0%, 5 and 15 years after transplantation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Increased rate of cardiovascular events in children after transplantation highlights the need for surveillance during transition into adulthood and beyond. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Trasplante de Órganos , Niño , Humanos , Incidencia , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Receptores de Trasplantes , Trasplante de Órganos/efectos adversos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Aspirin reduces the incidence of various gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of regular aspirin use on the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with chronic liver disease. METHODS: Electronic reference databases were searched for studies in patients with chronic liver disease exposed to aspirin. The primary outcome was the incidence of HCC in regular aspirin users compared to non-users. The secondary outcome was the incidence of major GI bleeding events in both groups. The propensity score (PS) and non-PS-adjusted pooled hazard ratio (HR) were calculated using random-effects models. RESULTS: Six observational studies with 71,211 subjects were included. The median duration of follow-up ranged from 2.7 to 7.9 years. Four studies included patients with viral hepatitis; five studies used aspirin 100 mg/day. All six studies reported the non-PS-matched HR, and there was a 54% reduction in the incidence of HCC among regular aspirin users [HR (95% CI): 0.46(0.31-0.67), p < 0.001]. Four studies reported on the PS-matched HR; this showed a 46% reduced incidence of HCC in those using aspirin [HR (95% CI): 0.54(0.38-0.79), p < 0.001]. Subgroup analysis on studies restricted to viral hepatitis (n = 4) showed a 28% reduction in HCC incidence in aspirin users [HR (95% CI): 0.72(0.64-0.80), p < 0.001]. Four studies reported the incidence of major GI bleeds, there was no significant difference between the two groups [HR (95% CI: 1.00(0.69-1.45), p = 0.90]. All outcome analysis, except the subgroup analysis, had significant inter-study heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: Regular aspirin use in chronic liver disease is associated with reduced incidence of HCC without increasing the risk of major GI bleeding.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Hepatitis Viral Humana , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/epidemiología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/prevención & control , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/etiología , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/prevención & control , Neoplasias Hepáticas/complicaciones , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/prevención & control , Incidencia , Hepatitis Viral Humana/complicacionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The risk of cardiovascular events after Kawasaki disease (KD) remains uncertain. Our objective was to determine the risk of cardiovascular events and mortality after KD. METHODS: Population-based retrospective cohort study using Ontario health administrative databases (0-18 years; 1995-2018). EXPOSURE: pediatric KD hospitalizations. Each case was matched to 100 non-exposed controls. PRIMARY OUTCOME: major adverse cardiac events (MACE; cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke composite). SECONDARY OUTCOMES: composite cardiovascular events and mortality. We determined incidence rates and adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) using multivariable Cox models. RESULTS: Among 4597 KD survivors, 79 (1.7%) experienced MACE, 632 (13.8%) composite cardiovascular events, and 9 (0.2%) died during 11-year median follow-up. The most frequent cardiovascular events among KD survivors were ischemic heart disease (4.6 events/1000 person-years) and arrhythmias (4.5/1000 person-years). KD survivors were at increased risk of MACE between 0-1 and 5-10 years, and composite cardiovascular events at all time periods post-discharge. KD survivors had a lower mortality risk throughout follow-up (aHR 0.36, 95% CI 0.19-0.70). CONCLUSION: KD survivors are at increased risk of post-discharge cardiovascular events but have a lower risk of death, which justifies enhanced cardiovascular disease surveillance in these patients. IMPACT: Among 4597 Kawasaki disease (KD) survivors, 79 (1.7%) experienced major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and 632 (13.8%) had composite cardiovascular events during 11-year median follow-up. KD survivors had significantly higher risks of post-discharge MACE and cardiovascular events versus non-exposed children. Only nine KD survivors (0.2%) died during follow-up, and the risk of mortality was significantly lower among KD survivors versus non-exposed children. Childhood KD survivors should receive preventative counseling and cardiovascular surveillance, aiming to mitigate adult cardiovascular disease.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Síndrome Mucocutáneo Linfonodular , Adulto , Humanos , Niño , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Síndrome Mucocutáneo Linfonodular/complicaciones , Cuidados Posteriores , Alta del Paciente , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The SYMPLICITY HTN-3 (Renal Denervation in Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension) trial showed the safety but not efficacy of the Symplicity system (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) at 6 months follow-up in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension. This final report presents the 36-month follow-up results. METHODS: SYMPLICITY HTN-3 was a single-blind, multicentre, sham-controlled, randomised clinical trial, done in 88 centres in the USA. Adults aged 18-80 years, with treatment-resistant hypertension on stable, maximally tolerated doses of three or more drugs including a diuretic, who had a seated office systolic blood pressure of 160 mm Hg or more and 24 h ambulatory systolic blood pressure of 135 mm Hg or more were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive renal artery denervation using the single electrode (Flex) catheter or a sham control. The original primary endpoint was the change in office systolic blood pressure from baseline to 6 months for the renal artery denervation group compared with the sham control group. Patients were unmasked after the primary endpoint assessment at 6 months, at which point eligible patients in the sham control group who met the inclusion criteria (office blood pressure ≥160 mm Hg, 24 h ambulatory systolic blood pressure ≥135 mm Hg, and still prescribed three or more antihypertensive medications) could cross over to receive renal artery denervation. Changes in blood pressure up to 36 months were analysed in patients in the original renal artery denervation group and sham control group, including those who underwent renal artery denervation after 6 months (crossover group) and those who did not (non-crossover group). For comparisons between the renal artery denervation and sham control groups, follow-up blood pressure values were imputed for patients in the crossover group using their most recent pre-crossover masked blood pressure value. We report long-term blood pressure changes in renal artery denervation and sham control groups, and investigate blood pressure control in both groups using time in therapeutic blood pressure range analysis. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of all-cause mortality, end stage renal disease, significant embolic event, renal artery perforation or dissection requiring intervention, vascular complications, hospitalisation for hypertensive crisis unrelated to non-adherence to medications, or new renal artery stenosis of more than 70% within 6 months. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01418261. FINDINGS: From Sep 29, 2011, to May 6, 2013, 1442 patients were screened, of whom 535 (37%; 210 [39%] women and 325 [61%] men; mean age 57·9 years [SD 10·7]) were randomly assigned: 364 (68%) patients received renal artery denervation (mean age 57·9 years [10·4]) and 171 (32%) received the sham control (mean age 56·2 years [11·2]). 36-month follow-up data were available for 219 patients (original renal artery denervation group), 63 patients (crossover group), and 33 patients (non-crossover group). At 36 months, the change in office systolic blood pressure was -26·4 mm Hg (SD 25·9) in the renal artery denervation group and -5·7 mm Hg (24·4) in the sham control group (adjusted treatment difference -22·1 mm Hg [95% CI -27·2 to -17·0]; p≤0·0001). The change in 24 h ambulatory systolic blood pressure at 36 months was -15·6 mm Hg (SD 20·8) in the renal artery denervation group and -0·3 mm Hg (15·1) in the sham control group (adjusted treatment difference -16·5 mm Hg [95% CI -20·5 to -12·5]; p≤0·0001). Without imputation, the renal artery denervation group spent a significantly longer time in therapeutic blood pressure range (ie, better blood pressure control) than patients in the sham control group (18% [SD 25·0] for the renal artery denervation group vs 9% [SD 18·8] for the sham control group; p≤0·0001) despite a similar medication burden, with consistent and significant results with imputation. Rates of adverse events were similar across treatment groups, with no evidence of late-emerging complications from renal artery denervation. The rate of the composite safety endpoint to 48 months, including all-cause death, new-onset end-stage renal disease, significant embolic event resulting in end-organ damage, vascular complication, renal artery re-intervention, and hypertensive emergency was 15% (54 of 352 patients) for the renal artery denervation group, 14% (13 of 96 patients) for the crossover group, and 14% (10 of 69 patients) for the non-crossover group. INTERPRETATION: This final report of the SYMPLICITY HTN-3 trial adds to the totality of evidence supporting the safety of renal artery denervation to 36 months after the procedure. From 12 months to 36 months after the procedure, patients who were originally randomly assigned to receive renal artery denervation had larger reductions in blood pressure and better blood pressure control compared with patients who received sham control. FUNDING: Medtronic.
Asunto(s)
Hipertensión , Arteria Renal , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Presión Sanguínea/fisiología , Catéteres , Desnervación/métodos , Diuréticos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hipertensión/cirugía , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Riñón/cirugía , Riñón/irrigación sanguínea , Arteria Renal/cirugía , Método Simple Ciego , Simpatectomía/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Renal denervation has been shown to lower blood pressure in the presence of antihypertensive medications; however, long-term safety and efficacy data from randomised trials of renal denervation are lacking. In this pre-specified analysis of the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED study, we compared changes in blood pressure, antihypertensive drug use, and safety up to 36 months in renal denervation versus a sham control group. METHODS: This randomised, single-blind, sham-controlled trial enrolled patients from 25 clinical centres in the USA, Germany, Japan, the UK, Australia, Austria, and Greece, with uncontrolled hypertension and office systolic blood pressure between 150 mm Hg and 180 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or higher. Eligible patients had to have 24-h ambulatory systolic blood pressure between 140 mm Hg and less than 170 mm Hg, while taking one to three antihypertensive drugs with stable doses for at least 6 weeks. Patients underwent renal angiography and were randomly assigned (1:1) to radiofrequency renal denervation or a sham control procedure. Patients and physicians were unmasked after 12-month follow-up and sham control patients could cross over after 12-month follow-up completion. The primary endpoint was the treatment difference in mean 24-h systolic blood pressure at 6 months between the renal denervation group and the sham control group. Statistical analyses were done on the intention-to-treat population. Long-term efficacy was assessed using ambulatory and office blood pressure measurements up to 36 months. Drug surveillance was used to assess medication use. Safety events were assessed up to 36 months. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02439775; prospectively, an additional 260 patients are currently being randomly assigned as part of the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED Expansion trial. FINDINGS: Between July 22, 2015, and June 14, 2017, among 467 enrolled patients, 80 patients fulfilled the qualifying criteria and were randomly assigned to undergo renal denervation (n=38) or a sham control procedure (n=42). Mean ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure were significantly reduced from baseline in the renal denervation group, and were significantly lower than the sham control group at 24 and 36 months, despite a similar treatment intensity of antihypertensive drugs. The medication burden at 36 months was 2·13 medications (SD 1·15) in the renal denervation group and 2·55 medications (2·19) in the sham control group (p=0·26). 24 (77%) of 31 patients in the renal denervation group and 25 (93%) of 27 patients in the sham control group adhered to medication at 36 months. At 36 months, the ambulatory systolic blood pressure reduction was -18·7 mm Hg (SD 12·4) for the renal denervation group (n=30) and -8·6 mm Hg (14·6) for the sham control group (n=32; adjusted treatment difference -10·0 mm Hg, 95% CI -16·6 to -3·3; p=0·0039). Treatment differences between the renal denervation group and sham control group at 36 months were -5·9 mm Hg (95% CI -10·1 to -1·8; p=0·0055) for mean ambulatory diastolic blood pressure, -11·0 mm Hg (-19·8 to -2·1; p=0·016) for morning systolic blood pressure, and -11·8 mm Hg (-19·0 to -4·7; p=0·0017) for night-time systolic blood pressure. There were no short-term or long-term safety issues associated with renal denervation. INTERPRETATION: Radiofrequency renal denervation compared with sham control produced a clinically meaningful and lasting blood pressure reduction up to 36 months of follow-up, independent of concomitant antihypertensive medications and without major safety events. Renal denervation could provide an adjunctive treatment modality in the management of patients with hypertension. FUNDING: Medtronic.
Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos , Hipertensión , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Presión Sanguínea , Monitoreo Ambulatorio de la Presión Arterial , Desnervación/métodos , Humanos , Hipertensión/cirugía , Riñón , Método Simple Ciego , Simpatectomía/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: In 2014 the wait-time calculation for deceased donor kidney transplantation in the United States was changed from the date of first waitlisting to the date of first maintenance dialysis treatment with the aim of minimizing disparities in access to transplantation. This study examined the impact of this policy on access to transplantation, patient survival, and transplant outcomes among patients treated with maintenance dialysis for a prolonged duration before waitlisting. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Patients identified in the US Renal Data System between 2008 and 2018 aged 18-70 years and in the 95th percentile of dialysis treatment duration (≥6.5 years) before waitlisting. EXPOSURE: Waitlisting for transplantation before versus after implementation of the policy. OUTCOME: Time from date of waitlisting to deceased donor transplantation and death, and from date of transplantation to all cause graft loss. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Univariate and multivariable time to event analyses. RESULTS: Patients waitlisted after the policy change had a higher likelihood of deceased donor transplantation (HR, 3.12 [95% CI, 2.90-3.37]) and lower risk of death (HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.63-0.87]). The risk of graft loss was lower in the post-kidney allocation system (KAS) cohort (HR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.55-0.80]). The proportion of adult patients treated with dialysis ≥6.5 years who were never waitlisted for transplantation remained high (73%) and did not decrease after the policy implementation. LIMITATIONS: Cannot determine causality in this observational study. CONCLUSIONS: The policy change was associated with an increase in deceased donor transplantation and marked improvement in patient survival for patients waitlisted after long periods of dialysis treatment without decreasing the utility of available deceased donor kidney supply. The policy was not associated with increased waitlisting of this disadvantaged population.
Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico , Trasplante de Riñón , Adulto , Humanos , Riñón , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Diálisis Renal , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Listas de EsperaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The optimal induction treatment in low-immune risk kidney transplant recipients is uncertain. We therefore investigated the use and outcomes of induction immunosuppression in a low-risk cohort of patients who were well matched with their donor at HLA-A, -B, -DR, -DQB1 on the basis of serologic typing. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Our study was an observational study of first adult kidney-only transplant recipients in the United States recorded by the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network. RESULTS: Among 2976 recipients, 57% were treated with T cell-depleting antibodies, 28% were treated with an IL-2 receptor antagonist, and 15% were treated without induction. There was no difference in allograft survival, death-censored graft survival, or death with function between patients treated with an IL-2 receptor antagonist and no induction therapy. In multivariable models, patients treated with T cell-depleting therapy had a similar risk of graft loss from any cause, including death (hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.98 to 1.45), compared with patients treated with an IL-2 receptor antagonist or no induction. The findings were consistent in subgroup analyses of Black recipients, patients grouped by calculated panel reactive antibody, and donor source. The incidence of acute rejection at 1 year was low (≤5%) and did not vary between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Use of induction therapy with T cell-depleting therapy or IL-2 receptor antagonists in first kidney transplant recipients who are well matched with their donor at the HLA-A, -B, -DR, -DQB1 gene loci is not associated with improved post-transplant outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Terapia de Inmunosupresión , Quimioterapia de Inducción , Trasplante de Riñón , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Selección de Paciente , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Limited data exist on the incidence and clinical outcomes of neutropenia among kidney transplant recipients. Our study included 572 adults who received a kidney transplant at the University of California, San Francisco Medical Center between 2012 and 2018, and were CMV-mismatched or had a PRA ≥ 80%. Recipients with HIV, Hepatitis B and C, and primary non-function were excluded. Participants were followed for at least 1 year after transplantation. Neutropenia was defined as absolute neutrophil count < 1000 cells/µl. Cox proportional hazards regression models using neutropenia as a time-varying predictor were used to determine the risk of mycophenolic acid and valganciclovir changes, rejection, hospitalizations and use of granulocyte colony stimulating factor. Models were adjusted for demographics and transplant characteristics. Mean follow-up was 3.7 (SD, 1.8) years. The mean age of the cohort was 50.4 (13.1) years, and 57.5% were female. A total of 208 (36.3%) participants had neutropenia. Neutropenia was associated with an increased risk of valganciclovir or MPA dose reductions or discontinuations [adjusted hazard ratio, aHR: 7.78, 95% CI: 4.73-12.81], rejection [aHR 2.00, 95% CI: 1.10-3.64] and hospitalizations [aHR 3.32, 95% CI: 2.12-5.19]. Neutropenia occurs frequently after kidney transplantation and leads to more medication changes and adverse clinical outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Citomegalovirus , Trasplante de Riñón , Neutropenia , Adulto , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/complicaciones , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/etiología , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/tratamiento farmacológico , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neutropenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Neutropenia/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Receptores de Trasplantes , Valganciclovir/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Work integrated learning in the space of nursing informatics is a new concept in Australian nursing curriculum. This study examined nursing students' experiences in the pilot nursing informatics clinical placement centered on electronic medical records, their use in patient care and clinical decision making. Students completed reflective diaries of their learning during the four-week placement. Data was explored by thematic analysis. Emergent themes included: importance of adequate training in using EMR; impact of EMR on nursing workflow and patient care; shaping future career choices; forming rewarding relationships; and potential for improvements. These themes will be used to enhance teaching and learning opportunities as this pilot placement evolves into permeant part of the nursing curriculum.
Asunto(s)
Informática Aplicada a la Enfermería , Estudiantes de Enfermería , Australia , Humanos , Aprendizaje , Proyectos PilotoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED Pivotal trial demonstrated that RDN was efficacious compared to a sham control. The underlying model was an extension of the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model, adjusted for baseline blood pressure (BP), and allowed borrowing of information from the previously reported feasibility study using a novel Bayesian method. Fundamental to the estimation of a treatment effect for efficacy are a multitude of statistical modelling assumptions, including the role of outliers, linearity of the association between baseline BP and outcome, and parallelism of the treatment effect difference over the baseline BP range. In this report, we examine the validity of these assumptions to verify the robustness of the treatment effect measured. METHODS: We examined the requisite modelling assumptions of the ANCOVA model fitted to the SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED Pivotal trial using Bayesian methods. To address outliers, we fit a robust regression model (with heavy tailed errors) to the data with diffuse weakly informative prior distributions on the parameters. To address linearity, we replaced the linear baseline term by a natural spline term with 4 degrees of freedom. To address parallelism, we refit the ANCOVA model with an interaction term for treatment arm and baseline BP. RESULTS: ANCOVA models were fitted to the trial data (pooled across the feasibility and pivotal cohorts) using Bayesian methodology with diffuse (non-informative) prior distributions. The modelling assumptions inherent to the ANCOVA models were shown to be broadly satisfied. A robust ANCOVA model yielded a posterior treatment effect of -4.1 mmHg (95% credible interval: -6.3 to -1.9) indicating the influence of outlier values was small. There was moderate evidence of an interaction term effect between baseline BP and treatment, but no evidence of gross violation of linearity in baseline BP. CONCLUSION: The posterior treatment effect estimate is shown to be robust to underlying model assumptions, thus further supporting the evidence of RDN to be an efficacious treatment for resistant hypertension.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There has recently been considerable interest in better understanding how blood pressure should be managed after an episode of hospitalized AKI, but there are scant data regarding the associations between blood pressure measured after AKI and subsequent adverse outcomes. We hypothesized that among AKI survivors, higher blood pressure measured three months after hospital discharge would be associated with worse outcomes. We also hypothesized these associations between blood pressure and outcomes would be similar among those who survived non-AKI hospitalizations. METHODS: We quantified how systolic blood pressure (SBP) observed three months after hospital discharge was associated with risks of subsequent hospitalized AKI, loss of kidney function, mortality, and heart failure events among 769 patients in the prospective ASSESS-AKI cohort study who had hospitalized AKI. We repeated this analysis among the 769 matched non-AKI ASSESS-AKI enrollees. We then formally tested for AKI interaction in the full cohort of 1538 patients to determine if these associations differed among those who did and did not experience AKI during the index hospitalization. RESULTS: Among 769 patients with AKI, 42 % had subsequent AKI, 13 % had loss of kidney function, 27 % died, and 18 % had heart failure events. SBP 3 months post-hospitalization did not have a stepwise association with the risk of subsequent AKI, loss of kidney function, mortality, or heart failure events. Among the 769 without AKI, there was also no stepwise association with these risks. In formal interaction testing using the full cohort of 1538 patients, hospitalized AKI did not modify the association between post-discharge SBP and subsequent risks of adverse clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to our first hypothesis, we did not observe that higher stepwise blood pressure measured three months after hospital discharge with AKI was associated with worse outcomes. Our data were consistent with our second hypothesis that the association between blood pressure measured three months after hospital discharge and outcomes among AKI survivors is similar to that observed among those who survived non-AKI hospitalizations.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Hipertensión , Efectos Adversos a Largo Plazo , Medición de Riesgo , Lesión Renal Aguda/complicaciones , Lesión Renal Aguda/diagnóstico , Lesión Renal Aguda/terapia , Presión Sanguínea , Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea/métodos , Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/etiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Hipertensión/etiología , Efectos Adversos a Largo Plazo/diagnóstico , Efectos Adversos a Largo Plazo/etiología , Efectos Adversos a Largo Plazo/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad , América del Norte/epidemiología , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Pronóstico , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , SobrevivientesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Kawasaki disease (KD) is a childhood vasculitis with conflicting reported North American trends in incidence and patient characteristics. OBJECTIVES: (1) determine KD incidence between 1995 and 2017; (2) compare patient characteristics by era and age group; (3) determine complication and cardiovascular follow-up rates. METHODS: We used population-based health administrative data to identify children (0-18 yr) hospitalized with KD in Ontario, Canada between 1995 and 2017. We excluded children with prior KD diagnosis or incomplete records. We determined the annualized incidence and follow-up trends. RESULTS: KD was diagnosed in 4,346 children between 1995 and 2017. Annual KD incidence was 22.0 (<5 yr), 6.1 (5-9 yr), and 0.6 (10-18 yr) per 100,000 children. KD incidence increased significantly for all age groups, including from 18.4 to 25.0 cases per 100,000 children <5 yr. Ninety-day mortality occurred in ≤5 children (≤0.1%). Coronary artery aneurysm (CAA) occurred in 106 children (2.4%, 95% confidence interval 2.0-2.9) during admission and 151 (3.5%, 95% confidence interval 3.0-4.1) during 11-year median follow-up. Children 10-18 yr had longer hospitalizations (4.3 vs. 3.5 days, p = 0.003) and more CAA (7.4% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.007). By 1-year post-diagnosis, 3970 (91.3%) and 2576 (59.3%) children had echocardiography and cardiology follow-up, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: KD incidence is increasing in Ontario, with greater healthcare utilization from hospitalizations and subsequent follow-up. IMPACT: 4346 children were hospitalized for Kawasaki disease over 22 years in Ontario, and Kawasaki disease incidence increased significantly for all age groups, males and females. Older children (10-18 years) had longer hospital length of stay, more PICU admissions and more frequent coronary artery aneurysms. Nearly all children with Kawasaki disease had follow-up echocardiography within 1 year.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Mucocutáneo Linfonodular/epidemiología , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Síndrome Mucocutáneo Linfonodular/terapia , Ontario/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Transplant candidates may gain an advantage by traveling to receive care at a transplant center that may have more favorable characteristics than their local center. Factors associated with longer travel distance for transplant care and whether the excess travel distance (ETD) is associated with access to transplantation or with graft failure are unknown. METHODS: This study of adults in the United States wait-listed for kidney transplantation in 1995-2015 used ETD, defined as distance a patient traveled beyond the nearest transplant center for initial waiting list registration. We used linear regression to examine patient and center characteristics associated with ETD and Fine-Gray models to examine the association between ETD (modeled as a spline) and time to deceased or living donor transplantation or graft failure. RESULTS: Of 373,365 patients, 11% had an ETD≥50 miles. Traveling excess distance was more likely among patients who were of non-Black race or those whose nearest transplant center had lower annual living donor transplant volume. At an ETD of 50 miles, we observed a lower likelihood of deceased donor transplantation (subhazard ratio [SHR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.84 to 0.87) but higher likelihood of living donor transplantation (SHR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.16) compared with those who received care at their nearest center. ETD was weakly associated with higher risk of graft failure. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who travel excess distances for transplant care have better access to living donor but not deceased donor transplantation and slightly higher risk of graft failure. Traveling excess distances is not clearly associated with better outcomes, especially if living donors are unavailable.
Asunto(s)
Supervivencia de Injerto , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Enfermedades Renales/cirugía , Trasplante de Riñón , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/organización & administración , Viaje , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedades Renales/complicaciones , Enfermedades Renales/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados Unidos , Listas de EsperaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The risk-benefit ratio of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker therapy after AKI may be altered due to concerns regarding recurrent AKI. We evaluated, in a prospective cohort, the association between use (versus nonuse) of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and the subsequent risk of AKI and other adverse outcomes after hospitalizations with and without AKI. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We studied 1538 patients recently discharged from the hospital who enrolled in the multicenter, prospective ASSESS-AKI study, with approximately half of patients experiencing AKI during the index hospitalization. All participants were seen at a baseline visit 3 months after their index hospitalization and were categorized at that time on whether they were using angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers or not. We used multivariable Cox regression, adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, eGFR, urine protein-creatinine ratio, and use of other medications, to examine the association between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker use and subsequent risks of AKI, death, kidney disease progression, and adjudicated heart-failure events. RESULTS: The use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers was 50% (386/769) among those with AKI during the index hospitalization and 47% (362/769) among those without. Among those with AKI during the index hospitalization, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker use was not associated with a higher risk of recurrent hospitalized AKI (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.69 to 1.13). Associations between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker use and death, kidney disease progression, and adjudicated heart-failure events appeared similar in study participants who did and did not experience AKI during the index hospitalization (all interaction P values >0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The risk-benefit ratio of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker therapy after hospital discharge appears to be similar regardless of whether AKI occurred during the hospitalization.