Endoscopic Versus Traditional Thoracic Discectomy: A Multicenter Retrospective Case Series and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Surgical treatment for symptomatic thoracic disc herniations (TDH) involves invasive open surgical approaches with relatively high complication rates and prolonged hospital stays. Although advantages of full endoscopic spine surgery (FESS) are well-established in lumbar disc herniations, data are limited for the endoscopic treatment of TDH despite potential benefits regarding surgical invasiveness. The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive evaluation of potential benefits of FESS for the treatment of TDH. METHODS: PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus were systematically searched for the term "thoracic disc herniation" up to March 2023 and study quality appraised with a subsequent meta-analysis. Primary outcomes were perioperative complications, need for instrumentation, and reoperations. Simultaneously, we performed a multicenter retrospective evaluation of outcomes in patients undergoing full endoscopic thoracic discectomy. RESULTS: We identified 3190 patients from 108 studies for the traditional thoracic discectomy meta-analysis. Pooled incidence rates of complications were 25% (95% CI 0.22-0.29) for perioperative complications and 7% (95% CI 0.05-0.09) for reoperation. In this cohort, 37% (95% CI 0.26-0.49) of patients underwent instrumentation. The pooled mean for estimated blood loss for traditional approaches was 570 mL (95% CI 477.3-664.1) and 7.0 days (95% CI 5.91-8.14) for length of stay. For FESS, 41 patients from multiple institutions were retrospectively reviewed, perioperative complications were reported in 4 patients (9.7%), 4 (9.7%) required revision surgery, and 6 (14.6%) required instrumentation. Median blood loss was 5 mL (IQR 5-10), and length of stay was 0.43 days (IQR 0-1.23). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that full endoscopic thoracic discectomy is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with symptomatic TDH. When compared with open surgical approaches, FESS dramatically diminishes invasiveness, the rate of complications, and need for prolonged hospitalizations. Full endoscopic spine surgery has the capacity to alter the standard of care for TDH treatment toward an elective outpatient surgery.

An investigation into the quality of life improvements after vertebral osteomyelitis depending on the status of pathogen detection.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare clinical characteristics and quality of life (QoL) after vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) based on the status of pathogen detection in microbiological sampling. METHODS: We conducted a post hoc data analysis from a prospective single-center study in a tertiary referral hospital, including VO patients from 2008 to 2020. Data were collected preoperatively (T0) and 1-year post surgery (T1). The primary outcome was QoL, assessed with the Oswestry Disability Index and Core Outcome Measures Index. RESULTS: Data from 133 patients with surgically treated thoracic or lumbar VO were evaluated. The pathogen was detected from cultured intraoperative samples in 100 (75.2%) patients (group 1). Culture remained negative in 33 (24.8%) patients (group 2). Quality of life did not differ significantly between the groups at T1. We observed higher preoperative C-reactive protein values and higher rates of spinal empyema at T0 in group 1. CONCLUSION: Quality of life improved significantly for all patients at T1, but scores remained comparable to those reported by patients with chronic back pain. Quality of life was not affected by pathogen detection. However, attempts to detect pathogens are still indicated due to the concomitant findings, including bacteremia and epidural abscesses, along with the advantages of targeted antibiotic therapy. The most critical step for detection may be avoiding pre-sampling antibiotic administration. Cite this article as: Beyer F, Wenk B, Jung N, Bredow J, Eysel P, Yagdiran A. An investigation into quality of life improvements after vertebral osteomyelitis depending on the status of pathogen detection. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc., 2024; 10.5152/j.aott.2024.23073 [Epub Ahead of Print].

[Slipped vertebrae (Spondylolysis): the underestimated weak point of the (pre)professional football player-an algorithm]. / Der Gleitwirbel: unterschätzte Schwachstelle des (prä)professionellen Fußballspielers ­ ein Algorithmus.

BACKGROUND: Isthmic spondylolysis represents the most common cause of spinal pain in adolescent athletes. This article provides an overview of the classification, diagnosis, and treatment options for these conditions, including conservative and operative measures. It also provides a treatment pathway to how young athletes with spondylolysis should be treated. DIAGNOSTICS: Diagnostic imaging techniques are essential for an accurate diagnosis, with CT scans providing additional information for surgical planning. TREATMENT: Conservative treatment focuses on activity modification and physiotherapy, with a phased approach tailored to individual patient needs. Operative intervention may be considered if conservative measures fail, with minimally invasive techniques such as Buck's screw fixation showing promising results. The decision between conservative and operative management should consider factors of the patients' individual profile. In this paper, we present the first treatment algorithm for the treatment of isthmic spondylolysis. Long-term prognosis varies, with most athletes able to return to sport following treatment.

Economic Implications of Dural Tears in Lumbar Microdiscectomies: A Retrospective, Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE: Dural tears (DTs) are a frequent complication after lumbar spine surgery. We sought to determine the incidence of DTs and the related impact on health care expenditures after lumbar discectomies. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, all patients with first-time single-level lumbar discectomies at our institution who underwent minimally invasive surgery from 2015 to 2019 were reviewed. Age, sex, weight, height, body mass index, costs, revenues, length of stay, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and operative time (OT) were assessed. Exclusion criteria were age <18 years, previous spine surgery, multiple or traumatic disc herniations, and malignant and infectious diseases. RESULTS: The follow-up time was at least 12 months postoperatively. Of 358 patients identified with lumbar discectomies, 230 met the inclusion criteria. Incidence of DTs was 3.5%. Mean costs (P < 0.001), economic loss (P < 0.01), and OT (P < 0.0001) were found to be significantly higher in the DT group compared with the control group of patients without a DT. The revenues were not statistically different between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Further analysis of the control group by profit and loss revealed significantly higher body mass index (P < 0.05), length of stay (P < 0.0001), and OT (P < 0.0001) in the loss group. CONCLUSIONS: DTs represent a significant socioeconomic burden in lumbar spine surgery and cause severe secondary complications. The impact of DTs on health care expenses is primarily based on significantly higher OT and a higher mean length of stay.

How Preoperative Closed Reduction and Time to Surgery Impact Postoperative Palmar Inclination in Distal Radius Fractures.

Background: The anatomical reconstruction of the wrist is the aim when treating distal radius fractures. Current literature on the importance of preoperative reduction in fractures that are treated operatively is limited. Methods: This study investigated the effect of the preoperative closed reduction of distal radius fractures on the day of trauma and the time to surgery on postoperative palmar inclination. A total of eighty patients (48 females and 32 males, mean age 55.6 years) were studied retrospectively. All patients were treated with an open reduction and internal fixation. The palmar inclination angle was measured using X-rays by two investigators, and the interobservers and pre- and post-reduction parameters were compared. Results: When the surgical management of closed distal radius fractures is required, neither initial repositioning nor a delay of up to 14 days to the surgical treatment influences postoperative palmar inclination. Conclusions: The significance of preoperative reduction of distal radius fractures without neurovascular or extensive soft tissue damage is limited and is not leading to improved outcomes. When surgery is about to be performed, surgeons should carefully consider if reduction is really vital preoperatively. Level of evidence: III.

Smartphone applications for remote patient monitoring reduces clinic utilization after full-endoscopic spine surgery.

INTRODUCTION: The rising number of outpatient spine surgeries creates challenges in postoperative management and care. Telemedicine offers a unique opportunity to reduce in-person clinic visits and improve resource allocation. We aimed to investigate the impact of a validated smartphone application on clinic utilization following full-endoscopic spine surgery (FESS). METHODS: We evaluated patients undergoing FESS from 2020 to 2022 and a pre-COVID control group (CG) from 2018 to 2019. Subsequently, we divided the patients into three groups: one using the application (intervention group, IG), and two CGs (2020-2022, CG and 2018-2019, historical control group (HG)). We analyzed the post-surgical hospitalization rate, all follow-ups, and virtually transmitted patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 115 patients were included in the IG. The CG consisted of 137 and the HG of 202 patients (CG and HG in the following). Group homogeneity was satisfactory regarding patient age (p = 0.9), sex (p = 0.88), and body mass index (p = 0.99). IG patients were treated as outpatients significantly more often [14.78% vs. 29.2% vs. 37.62% (p < 0.001)]. Additionally, IG patients showed significantly higher follow-up compliance [74.78% vs. 40.14% vs. 37.13% (p < 0.001)] 3-month post-surgery and fewer in-patient follow-up visits [(0.5 ± 0.85 vs. 1.32 ± 0.8 vs. 1.33 ± 0.7 (p < 0.001)]. CONCLUSION: Our results underline the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of remote patient monitoring following FESS. Furthermore, they highlight the opportunity to implement a virtual wound checkup, and to substantially improve postoperative follow-up compliance via telemedicine.

Pain alleviation and functional improvement: ultra-early patient-reported outcome measures after full endoscopic spine surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Questions regarding anticipated pain improvement and functional recovery postsurgery are frequently posed in preoperative consultations. However, a lack of data characterizing outcomes for the first postoperative days only allows for anecdotal answers. Hence, the assessment of ultra-early patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is essential for patient-provider communication and patient satisfaction. The aim of this study was to elucidate this research gap by assessing and characterizing PROMs for the first days after full endoscopic spine surgery (FESS). METHODS: This multicenter study included patients undergoing lumbar FESS from March 2021 to July 2023. After informed consent was provided, data were collected prospectively through a smartphone application. Patients underwent either discectomy or decompression. Analyzed parameters included demographics, surgical details, visual analog scale scores for both back and leg pain, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score. Data were acquired daily for the 1st postoperative week, as well as after 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 182 patients were included, of whom 102 underwent FESS discectomy and 80 underwent FESS decompression. Significant differences between the discectomy and decompression groups were found for age (mean 50.45 ± 15.28 years and 63.85 ± 13.25 years, p < 0.001; respectively), sex (p = 0.007), and surgery duration (73.45 ± 45.23 minutes vs 98.05 ± 46.47 minutes, p < 0.001; respectively). Patients in both groups reported a significant amelioration of leg pain on the 1st postoperative day (discectomy group VAS score: 6.2 ± 2.6 vs 2.4 ± 2.9, p < 0.001; decompression group: 5.3 ± 2.8 vs 1.9 ± 2.2, p < 0.001) and of back pain within the 1st postoperative week (discectomy group VAS score: 5.5 ± 2.8 vs 2.8 ± 2.2, p < 0.001; decompression group: 5.2 ± 2.7 vs 3.1 ± 2.4, p < 0.001). ODI score improvement was most pronounced at the 3-month time point (discectomy group: 21.7 ± 9.1 vs 9.3 ± 9.1, p < 0.001; decompression group: 19.3 ± 7.8 vs 9.9 ± 8.3, p < 0.001). For both groups, pain improvement within the 1st week after surgery was highly predictive of later benefits. CONCLUSIONS: Ultra-early PROMs reveal an immediate pain improvement after FESS. While the benefits in pain reduction plateaued within the 1st postoperative week for both groups, functional improvements developed over a more extended period. These results illustrate a biphasic rehabilitation process wherein initial pain alleviation transitions into functional improvement over time.

Assessing the impact of obesity on full endoscopic spine surgery: surgical site infections, surgery durations, early complications, and short-term functional outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: An increasing number of obese patients undergoing elective spine surgery has been reported. Obesity has been associated with a substantially higher number of surgical site infections and a longer surgery duration. However, there is a lack of research investigating the intersection of obesity and full endoscopic spine surgery (FESS) in terms of functional outcomes and complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate wound site infections and functional outcomes following FESS in obese patients. METHODS: Patients undergoing lumbar FESS at the participating institutions from March 2020 to March 2023 for degenerative pathologies were included in the analysis. Patients were divided into obese (BMI > 30 kg/m2) and nonobese (BMI 18-30 kg/m2) groups. Data were collected prospectively using an approved smartphone application for 3 months postsurgery. Parameters included demographics, surgical details, a virtual wound checkup, the visual analog scale for back and leg pain, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) as a functional outcome measure. RESULTS: A total of 118 patients were included in the analysis, with 53 patients in the obese group and 65 in the nonobese group. Group homogeneity was satisfactory regarding patient age (obese vs nonobese: 55.5 ± 14.7 years vs 59.1 ± 17.1 years, p = 0.25) and sex (p = 0.85). No surgical site infection requiring operative revision was reported for either group. No significant differences for blood loss per level (obese vs nonobese: 9.7 ± 16.8 ml vs 8.0 ± 13.3 ml, p = 0.49) or duration of surgery per level (obese vs nonobese: 91.2 ± 57.7 minutes vs 76.8 ± 39.2 minutes, p = 0.44) were reported between groups. Obese patients showed significantly faster improvement regarding ODI (-3.0 ± 9.8 vs 0.7 ± 11.3, p = 0.01) and leg pain (-4.4 ± 3.2 vs -2.9 ± 3.7, p = 0.03) 7 days postsurgery. This effect was no longer significant 90 days postsurgery for either ODI (obese vs nonobese: -11.4 ± 11.4 vs -9.1 ± 9.6, p = 0.24) or leg pain (obese vs nonobese: -4.3 ± 3.9 vs -3.5 ± 3.8, p = 0.28). CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight the effectiveness and safety of lumbar FESS in obese patients. Unlike with open spine surgery, obese patients did not experience significant increases in surgery time or postoperative complications. Interestingly, obese patients demonstrated faster early recovery, as indicated by significantly greater improvements in ODI and leg pain at 7 days after surgery. However, there was no difference in improvement between the groups at 90 days after surgery.

Spinal Deformity, Surgery at the Cervicothoracic Junction, and American Society of Anesthesiologists Class Increase the Risk of Post-surgical Intensive Care Unit Treatment after Dorsal Spine Surgery: A Single-Center Multivariate Analysis of 962 Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective multivariate analysis of preoperative risk factors leading to intensive care unit (ICU) admissions in patients undergoing elective or acute dorsal spine surgery. PURPOSE: Numerous studies have predicted a substantial increase in spine surgeries within the next decades, potentially overwhelming hospitals' resources, including ICU occupancy. Accurate estimates of whether patients need postsurgical ICU treatment are pivotal for both resource allocation and patient safety. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Risk factors leading to ICU admissions after dorsal spine surgery have been extensively examined for lumbar elective surgery. Studies including other anatomical segments of the spine and nonelective surgery regarding postsurgical ICU treatment probability are lacking. METHODS: This study was designed to be a single-center multivariate analysis of data retrospectively collected from a tertiary care university hospital. Patients undergoing dorsal spine surgery from 2009 to 2019 were included in this study. The patients' demographic data were analyzed to determine potential preoperative risk factors for ICU admission after surgery using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: In our cohort, 962 patients with a mean age of 71.1±0.55 years were included. Surgeries involved 3.24±0.08 spinal levels on average. The incidence of ICU treatment after surgery was 30.4% (n=292). Multivariate logistic regression showed a markedly increased odds ratio (OR) for patients undergoing surgery of the cervicothoracic junction (OR, 8.86) and those undergoing surgery for spinal deformity treatment (OR, 7.7). Additionally, cervical procedures (OR, 3.29), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 3-4 (OR, 2.74), spondylodiscitis (OR, 2.47), fusion of ≥3 levels (OR, 1.94), and age >75 years (OR, 1.33) were associated with an increased risk of postsurgical ICU admission. CONCLUSIONS: The findings highlight the relevance of anatomical location, preoperative diagnosis, ASA class, and length of surgery regarding the predictability of postoperative ICU admission. Our data allowed for more sophisticated estimates regarding the need for ICU treatment after dorsal spine surgery, guiding the surgeon through patient selection, communication, and ICU admission predictability.

Quality of Life with Respect to Surgically Treated Vertebral Osteomyelitis and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis. / Vergleich der Lebensqualität nach operativer Therapie einer vertebralen Osteomyelitis und degenerativer Spondylolisthesis.

Vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) and degenerative spondylolisthesis (SL) are 2 commonly treated spinal conditions. Therefore, in the presented work, the quality of life after surgical therapy of these 2 entities is compared using established scores.In a monocentric study, all patients with VO and SL were prospectively enrolled using the Spine Tango Registry. Surgical procedures included one- or two-stage fusion of the affected segments. Quality of life was assessed using the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at time points t0 (0 months), t1 (12 months), and t2 (24 months). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS. The level of significance was set at 5%.52 patients with VO and 48 patients with SL were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences in age and gender distribution. The length of stay in the SL group was significantly shorter (p < 0.001). ODI at time t0 was significantly higher in the VO group (p < 0.001), whereas COMI scores did not differ significantly (p = 0.155). At time points t1 and t2, the differences between the VO and SL groups were not significantly different for either the ODI score (p = 0.176; p = 0.250) or the COMI score (p = 0.682; p = 0.640).Postoperative quality of life scores after lumbar fusion surgery in SL and VO are comparable despite different indications and medical conditions. In both groups, similar quality of life with in patient with chronic back pain was achieved. This should be considered for the preoperative assessment, as well as for the indication for surgery in SL.

Determining threshold values for success after surgical treatment of lumbar spondylodiscitis using quality of life scores.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine threshold values of validated quality of life (QoL) scores, including Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI), for predicting a successful outcome following surgical treatment of lumbar spondylodiscitis (LS). METHODS: Patients with lumbar spondylodiscitis (LS) undergoing surgery in a tertiary referral hospital were included prospectively from 2008-2019. Data were collected both before surgery (T0) and one year after surgery (T1). QoL was measured using ODI and COMI. The successful clinical outcome was defined by the combination of the following four criteria: no recurrence of spondylodiscitis, back pain ≤4 on visual analogue scale or relief of ≥3 points, absence of LS-related neurological deficit, and radiological fusion of the affected segment. For subgroup analysis, group 1 consisted of patients with a favorable treatment outcome (meeting all four criteria), while group 2 included patients with unfavorable treatment outcome (meeting ≤3 criteria). RESULTS: Ninety-two LS patients (median age = 66 years; age range = 57-74) were analyzed. QoL scores improved significantly. Threshold values for the ODI and COMI were calculated at 35 and 4.2 points, respectively. The area under curve for the ODI was 0.856 (95%-CI 0.767- 0.945; P<0.001) and 0.839 (95% CI-0.749-0.928; P<0.001) for the COMI score. Eighty percent of patients achieved a favorable outcome. CONCLUSION: Objective measurement and evaluation of successful surgical treatment of spondylodiscitis require defined thresholds of quality of life scores. We were able to define such thresholds for Oswestry Disability Index and Core Outcome Measures Index. These can be useful to assess clinically relevant changes and therefore allow a more precise estimation of the post-surgical outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, Prognostic study.

Lessons learned? Increasing injury severity of electric-scooter accidents over a period of one year: a monocentric follow-up study at a level 1 trauma center.

PURPOSE: After major COVID-19 lockdown measures were suspended in 2021, E-scooter mobility regrew rapidly. In the meantime, multiple studies were published on the potential risks for e-scooter drivers and the necessity for wearing protective equipment. But did the drivers learn their lessons? METHODS: We observed data of E-scooter-related accidents admitted to the emergency department of a level 1 German trauma center in the year 2021 and compared the data with our previous report (July 2019-July 2020). RESULTS: N = 97 E-scooter-related accidents were included, marking a 50% increase when compared to the previous observation. Most patients were young adults (28.18 ± 1.13 years) with a notable shift towards a male population (25 vs. 63, p = 0.007). While the injury pattern remained unchanged, injury severity, reflected by a significant increase in shock room treatments (p = 0.005), hospital admissions (p = 0.45), and ICU admissions (p = 0.028), increased. Lastly, we report a higher injury severity of patients driving under the influence of alcohol, expressed by significant differences in hospital admissions, shock room treatments, ICU admissions, intracerebral bleeding (p < 0.0001), and injuries requiring surgery (p = 0.0017). CONCLUSION: The increase in injury severity and especially the substantial number of accidents due to driving under the influence of alcohol, are alarming for both trauma- and neurosurgeons. As the controversy surrounding the general use of E-scooters will continue, we urge representatives to intensify their efforts regarding prevention campaigns focusing on the potential dangers of E-scooters, especially when driving under the influence of alcohol.

Remote patient monitoring following full endoscopic spine surgery: feasibility and patient satisfaction.

OBJECTIVE: The utilization of telemedicine in healthcare has increased dramatically during the recent COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility to perform remote patient monitoring after full endoscopic spine surgery via a smartphone application that also allows communication with patients. METHODS: A smartphone application (SPINEhealthie) was designed at the University of Washington and used to collect patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and to provide chat communication between patients and their care team. A total of 71 patients were included in the study and prospectively followed for 3 months postoperatively. Patient demographic characteristics, compliance with surveys, and frequency of chat utilization were recorded. The ease of use, the participants' experiences with the app interface design, and the usefulness of the app were assessed by using the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ). RESULTS: Of all eligible patients, 71/78 (91.0%) agreed to participate. Of these, 60 (85%) patients provided at least 1 postoperative PROM. There was good coverage of the immediate postoperative period with 45 (63.4%) patients providing ≥ 5 PROMs within the 1st week after surgery. The authors observed a 33.2% increase in patient compliance in postoperative PROMs and a 45.7% increase in chat function utilization between the first and last of the three enrollment periods of the study, during which continuous updates were made to improve the app's functionality. Sixty-two (87.3%) patients responded to the user satisfaction survey after using the app for at least 40 days. The MAUQ results revealed excellent rates of satisfaction for ease of use (78.6% of the maximum score), app interface design (71.4%), and usefulness (71.4%), resulting in a total mean MAUQ score of 110 (74.8%). Communication with the doctor (38 votes) was found to be the top feature of the app. Additionally, physical therapy instructions (33 votes) and imaging review (29 votes) were the top two features that patients would like to see in future app versions. Lastly, the authors have presented a case example of a 68-year-old man who used the app for postoperative monitoring and communication after undergoing a two-level lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative remote patient monitoring and communication after full endoscopic surgery is feasible using the SPINEhealthie app. Importantly, patients were willing to share their medical information using a mobile device, and they were eager to use it postoperatively as a supplementary tool.

Full-endoscopic spine surgery diminishes surgical site infections - a propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Surgical site infections (SSI) are one the most frequent and costly complications following spinal surgery. The SSI rates of different surgical approaches need to be analyzed to successfully minimize SSI occurrence. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to define the rate of SSIs in patients undergoing full-endoscopic spine surgery (FESS) and then to compare this rate against a propensity score-matched cohort from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. DESIGN: This is a retrospective multicenter cohort study using a propensity score-matched analysis of prospectively maintained databases. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 1277 noninstrumented FESS cases between 2015 and 2021 were selected for analysis. In the nonendoscopic NSQIP cohort we selected data of 55,882 patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: The occurrence of any SSI was the primary outcome. We also collected any other perioperative complications, demographic data, comorbidities, operative details, history of smoking, and chronic steroid intake. METHODS: All FESS cases from a multi-institutional group that underwent surgery from 2015 to 2021 were identified for analysis. A cohort of cases for comparison was identified from the NSQIP database using Current Procedural Terminology of nonendoscopic cervical, thoracic, and lumbar procedures from 2015 to 2019. Trauma cases as well as arthrodesis procedures, surgeries to treat pathologies affecting more than 4 levels or spine tumors that required surgical treatment were excluded. In addition, nonelective cases, and patients with wounds worse than class 1 were also not included. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and operative details were analyzed for propensity matching. RESULTS: In the nonpropensity-matched dataset, the endoscopic cohort had a significantly higher incidence of medical comorbidities. The SSI rates for nonendoscopic and endoscopic patients were 1.2% and 0.001%, respectively, in the nonpropensity match cohort (p-value <.011). Propensity score matching yielded 5936 nonendoscopic patients with excellent matching (standard mean difference of 0.007). The SSI rate in the matched population was 1.1%, compared to 0.001% in endoscopic patients with an odds ratio 0.063 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.009-0.461, p=.006) favoring FESS. CONCLUSIONS: FESS compares favorably for risk reduction in SSI following spinal decompression surgeries with similar operative characteristics. As a consequence, FESS may be considered the optimal strategy for minimizing SSI morbidity.

A decrease in the neuroprotective effects of acute spinal cord decompression according to injury severity: introducing the concept of a ceiling effect.

OBJECTIVE: Acute traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) is followed by a prolonged period of secondary neuroglial cell death. Neuroprotective interventions, such as surgical spinal cord decompression, aim to mitigate secondary injury. In this study, the authors explore whether the effect size of posttraumatic neuroprotective spinal cord decompression varies with injury severity. METHODS: Seventy-one adult female Long Evans rats were subjected to a thoracic tSCI using a third-generation spinal contusion device. Moderate and severe tSCI were defined by recorded impact force delivered to the spinal cord. Immediately after injury (< 15 minutes), treatment cohorts underwent either a decompressive durotomy or myelotomy. Functional recovery was documented using the Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan locomotor scale, and tissue sparing was documented using histological analysis. RESULTS: Moderate and severe injuries were separated at a cutoff point of 231.8 kdyn peak impact force based on locomotor recovery at 8 weeks after injury. Durotomy improved hindlimb locomotor recovery 8 weeks after moderate trauma (p < 0.01), but not after severe trauma (p > 0.05). Myelotomy led to increased tissue sparing (p < 0.0001) and a significantly higher number of spared motor neurons (p < 0.05) in moderate trauma, but no such effect was noted in severely injured rats (p > 0.05). Within the moderate injury group, myelotomy also resulted in significantly more spared tissue when compared with durotomy-only animals (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the neuroprotective effects of surgical spinal cord decompression decrease with increasing injury severity in a rodent tSCI model.

Endoscopic Facet Joint Denervation on the Lumbar Spine: A Retrospective Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: This single-center retrospective study analyzed patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) who underwent endoscopic facet joint denervation (EFJD) between April 2018 and May 2019. PURPOSE: This study was designed to investigate the effectiveness of EFJD in treating CLBP. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: CLBP is a challenging burden to healthcare systems worldwide. As up to 45% of cases originate from the lumbar facet joints, sufficient therapy strategies must be developed. EFJD offers a precise depiction of the dorsal medial ramus and the facet joint capsule. METHODS: In this study, 64 patients who underwent EFJD were included. The main outcome of interest was patients' Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score, which was recorded at 3-time points (i.e., before operation and 6 weeks and 12 months after surgery). RESULTS: EFJD effectively reduced the VAS pain scores by 58% in the short term (6 weeks) and 38% in the long term (12 months). Patients with isolated facet joint osteoarthritis benefited more (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: EFJD is a good treatment alternative for CLBP originating from the facet joints, particularly in patients with isolated facet joint osteoarthritis. Moreover, this method can address not only the dorsal medial ramus but also the surrounding tissue (e.g., facet joint capsule, facet joint effusion, and osteophytes) as the origin of CLBP.

The influence of orthopedic surgery on the incidence of post-operative delirium in geriatric patients: results of a prospective observational study.

Background: Postoperative delirium (PD) is a major concern in geriatric patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. This prospective observational study aims to examine the incidence of PD, to identify intervention-specific risk factors and to investigate the influence of orthopedic surgery on delirium. Methods: From 2019 to 2020, 132 patients ≥70 years of age with endoprosthetic (Group E) or spinal surgery (Group S) were included. Upon admission, the ISAR score, the Nursing Delirium Screening Scale, potential risk factors, the ASA score, duration of surgery, type of anesthesia, blood loss, and hemoglobin drop were recorded. For risk factor analysis patients were grouped into Group D (delirium) and Group ND (no delirium). Primary endpoint was the occurrence of PD. Results: Of 132 patients, 50 were included in Group E and 82 in Group S. Mean age and ISAR score were not significantly different between groups. Delirium rate in Group E and S was 12% vs. 18% (p = 0.3). Differences could be observed between Group D and ND in duration of surgery (173 min vs. 112 min, p = 0.02), postoperative hemoglobin drop (3.2 g/dl vs. 2.3 g/dl; p = 0.026), history of PD (23% vs. 11%, p = 0.039) and use of isoflurane (6 vs. 2). Type of surgery was not an independent risk factor (p = 0.26). Conclusion: Specific type of orthopedic surgery is not an independent risk factor for PD. Prevention of PD should focus on duration of surgery and blood loss, particularly in patients with a history of PD. A possible delirogenic potential of isoflurane should be further studied.

Long-term Radiological and Clinical Outcome after Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery in Patients with Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Prospective 6-Year Follow-up Study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess which radiological alignment parameters are associated with a satisfactory long-term clinical outcome after performing lumbar spinal fusion for treating degenerative spondylolisthesis. METHODS: This single-center prospective study assessed the relation between radiological alignment parameters measured on standing lateral lumbar spine radiographs and the patient-reported outcome using four different questionnaires (COMI, EQ-5D, ODI and VAS) as primary outcome measures (level of evidence: II). The following spinopelvic alignment parameters were used: gliding angle, sacral inclination, anterior displacement, sagittal rotation, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, pelvic tilt and pelvic incidence. Furthermore, the length of stay and perioperative complications were documented. Only cases from 2013 to 2015 of low-grade degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (Meyerding grades I and II) were considered. The patients underwent open posterior lumbar fusion surgery by pedicle screw instrumentation and cage insertion. The operative technique was either a posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) or a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) performed by three different senior orthopedic surgeons. Exclusion criteria were spine fractures, minimally invasive techniques, underlying malignant diseases or acute infections, previous or multisegmental spine surgery as well as preoperative neurologic impairment. Of 89 initially contacted patients, 17 patients were included for data analysis (11 males, six females). RESULTS: The data of 17 patients after mono- or bisegmental lumbar fusion surgery to treat low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis and with a follow-up time of least 72 months were analyzed. The mean age was 66.7 ± 11.3 years. In terms of complications two dural tears and one intraoperative bleeding occurred. The average body mass index (BMI) was 27.6 ± 4.4 kg/m2 and the average inpatient length of stay was 12.9 ± 3.8 days (range: 8-21). The long-term clinical outcome correlated significantly with the change of the pelvic tilt (rs  = -0.515, P < 0.05) and the sagittal rotation (rs  = -0.545, P < 0.05). The sacral slope was significantly associated with the sacral inclination (rs  = 0.637, P < 0.01) and the pelvic incidence (rs  = 0.500, P < 0.05). In addition, the pelvic incidence showed a significant correlation with the pelvic tilt (rs  = 0.709, P < 0.01). The change of the different clinical scores over time also correlated significantly between the different questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: The surgical modification of the pelvic tilt and the sagittal rotation are the two radiological alignment parameters that can most accurately predict the long-term clinical outcome after lumbar interbody fusion surgery.

The Burden of Vertebral Osteomyelitis-An Analysis of the Workforce before and after Treatment.

Although vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) has a major impact on morbidity, functional status, and quality of life, data concerning the influence on the patient's ability to work (ATW) are lacking. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the work status after VO-treatment as well as risk factors associated with loss of the ATW. We conducted a post-hoc analysis of data from a prospective VO-registry (2008-2019) supplemented by workforce data. Primary endpoint was the work status after one year (T1). Univariate analysis comparing patients' characteristics "at-work" versus "not-at-work" at T1 was performed. Of a total of 335 VO-patients, n = 52 (16%) were part of the workforce at time of diagnosis (T0), of which 22 (42%) failed to be part of the workforce at T1. A higher number of comorbidities and a body mass index (BMI) < 25 kg/m2 were associated with a reduced ATW. VO in working age patients is a debilitating condition and associated with reduced patients' ATW. Patients engaged in heavy physical work mostly had a BMI < 25 kg/m2 and therefore were more severely affected and no longer able to keep their workforce. More support in retraining should be offered after successful treatment to maintain ATW and reduce the socio-economic burden.

Comparison of Different Approaches in Lumbosacral Spinal Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

We aimed to systematically review the literature to analyze the differences in posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), focusing on the complications, risk factors, and fusion rate of each approach. Spinal fusion surgery is a well-established surgical procedure for a variety of indications, and different approaches developed. The various approaches and their advantages, as well as approach-related pathology and complications, are well investigated in spinal surgery. Focusing only on lumbosacral fusion, the comparative studies of different approaches remain fewer in numbers. We systematically reviewed the literature on the complications associated with lumbosacral interbody fusion. Only the PLIF, ALIF, or TLIF approaches and studies published within the last decade (2007-2017) were included. The exclusion criteria in this study were oblique lumbar interbody fusion, extreme lateral interbody fusion, more than one procedure per patient, and reported patient numbers less than 10. The outcome variables were indications, fusion rates, operation time, perioperative complications, and clinical outcome by means of Visual Analog Scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association score. Five prospective, 17 retrospective, and two comparative studies that investigated the lumbosacral region were included. Mean fusion rates were 91,4%. ALIF showed a higher operation time, while PLIF resulted in greater blood loss. In all approaches, significant improvements in the clinical outcome were achieved, with ALIF showing slightly better results. Regarding complications, the ALIF technique showed the highest complication rates. Lumbosacral fusion surgery is a treatment to provide good results either through an approach for various indications as causes of lower back pain. For each surgical approach, advantages can be depicted. However, perioperative complications and risk factors are numerous and vary with ALIF, PLIF, and TLIF procedures, as well as with fusion rates.