RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Minimally invasive surgery combined with fibrinolytic therapy is a promising treatment option for patients with intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH), but a meticulous patient selection is required, because not every patient benefits from it. The ICH score facilitates a reliable patient selection for fibrinolytic therapy except for ICH-4. This study evaluated whether an additional use of other prognostic tools can overcome this limitation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A consecutive ICH patient cohort treated with fibrinolytic therapy between 2010 and 2020 was retrospectively analysed. The following prognostic tools were calculated: APACHE II, ICH-GS, ICH-FUNC, and ICH score. The discrimination power of every score was determined by ROC-analysis. Primary outcome parameters regarding the benefit of fibrinolytic therapy were the in-hospital mortality and a poor outcome defined as modified Rankin scale (mRS) > 4. RESULTS: A total of 280 patients with a median age of 72 years were included. The mortality rates according to the ICH score were ICH-0 = 0 % (0/0), ICH-1 = 0 % (0/22), ICH-2 = 7.1 % (5/70), ICH-3 = 17.3 % (19/110), ICH-4 = 67.2 % (45/67), ICH-5 = 100 % (11/11). The APACHE II showed the best discrimination power for in-hospital mortality (AUC = 0.87, p < 0.0001) and for poor outcome (AUC = 0.79, p < 0.0001). In the subgroup with ICH-4, APACHE II with a cut-off of 24.5 showed a good discriminating power for in-hospital mortality (AUC = 0.83, p < 0.001) and for poor outcome (AUC = 0.87, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: An additional application of APACHE II score increases the discriminating power of ICH score 4 enabling a more precise appraisal of in-hospital mortality and of functional outcome, which could support the patient selection for fibrinolytic therapy.
