Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab ; 48(9): 678-691, 2023 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37229779

RESUMEN

NOVELTY: Caloric restriction and exercise exert significant improvements in cardiac autonomic function as measured by HRV in overweight and obesity. Aerobic exercise training, within recommended guidelines coupled with weight loss maintenance, retains cardiac autonomic function benefits from weight loss in previously obese individuals.


Asunto(s)
Obesidad , Sobrepeso , Humanos , Sobrepeso/terapia , Pérdida de Peso , Ejercicio Físico , Corazón , Restricción Calórica
2.
Med Sci Sports Exerc ; 53(10): 2152-2163, 2021 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33867498

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Epidemiological studies suggest that sedentary behavior is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular mortality independent of meeting physical activity guidelines. However, limited evidence of this relationship is available from prospective interventions. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the combined effect of aerobic training and increasing nonexercise physical activity on body composition and cardiometabolic risk factors. METHODS: Obese adults (N = 45) were randomized to 6 months of aerobic training (AERO), aerobic training and increasing nonexercise physical activity (~3000 steps above baseline levels; AERO-PA), or a control (CON) group. The AERO and AERO-PA groups performed supervised aerobic training (3-4 times per week). The AERO-PA group wore Fitbit One accelerometers and received behavioral coaching to increase nonexercise physical activity. RESULTS: There was a larger increase in fitness in the AERO-PA group (0.27 L·min-1; confidence interval (CI), 0.16 to 0.40 L·min-1) compared with the AERO group (0.09 L·min-1; CI, -0.04 to 0.22 L·min-1) and the CON group (0.01; CI, -0.11 to 0.12 L·min-1). Although significant findings were not observed in the entire study sample, when the analysis was restricted to participants compliant to the intervention (n = 33), we observed significant reductions in waist circumference, percent weight loss, body fat, 2-h glucose, and 2-h insulin in comparison to the CON group (P < 0.05), but not the AERO group. Furthermore, linear regression models showed that change in steps was associated with 21% and 26% of the variation in percent weight loss and percent fat loss, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing nonexercise physical activity with aerobic training may represent a viable strategy to augment the fitness response in comparison to aerobic training alone and has promise for other health indicators.


Asunto(s)
Factores de Riesgo Cardiometabólico , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Obesidad/terapia , Acondicionamiento Físico Humano , Glucemia/metabolismo , Distribución de la Grasa Corporal , Femenino , Monitores de Ejercicio , Humanos , Insulina/sangre , Lípidos/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/sangre , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Conducta Sedentaria , Circunferencia de la Cintura , Pérdida de Peso
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...