Exploring geriatric assessment-driven rehabilitation referral patterns and its influence on functional outcomes and survival in older adults with advanced cancer.

BACKGROUND: Older adults with advanced cancer experience functional disability that warrants rehabilitation services; however, evidence indicates inconsistencies in referral. The purpose was to (1) identify predictors of geriatric assessment (GA)-driven referrals to rehabilitation services and (2) explore associations between referral and change in function, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and overall survival among older adults with advanced cancer. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis (NCT020107443, UG1CA189961) of a nationwide GA clinical trial. Patients were older adults with advanced cancer who had at least one GA-defined physical performance or functional status impairment. Primary outcomes were oncologist-initiated discussion about or referral to rehabilitation services after the GA (Aim 1) and decline in activities of daily living (ADL), Instrumental ADL (IADL), and HRQoL within 3 months, and overall survival at 1 year (Exploratory Aims). Analyses included multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models. Demographic and clinical factors were controlled for by using 1:1 propensity score matching. RESULTS: In total 265 patients were analyzed. After adjustment, impaired cognition (odds ratio [OR] = 2.25, p = 0.01), Karnofsky score indicating disability (OR = 2.86, p < 0.01), and receipt of monoclonal antibodies (OR = 1.95, p = 0.04) were associated with higher odds of referral. In contrast, polypharmacy was associated with lower odds of referral (OR = 0.31, p < 0.01). Referred patients were less likely to decline in ADL (OR 0.30, p = 0.07) and IADL (OR 0.64, p = 0.35), but more likely to decline in HRQoL (OR 1.20, p = 0.67) and have worse survival (HR 1.18, p = 0.62). CONCLUSIONS: Cancer treatment, polypharmacy, cognition, and disability status likely influence oncologists' decision to refer for rehabilitation. Referral was not independently associated with change in functional disability, HRQoL, or survival. Future studies should evaluate patients' utilization of rehabilitation services post-referral and determine whether dose/timing of rehabilitation services influence clinical outcomes.

Behavior change theory and behavior change technique use in cancer rehabilitation interventions: a secondary analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence depicting ways that behavioral theory and techniques have been incorporated into cancer rehabilitation interventions. Examining their use within cancer rehabilitation interventions may provide insight into the active ingredients that can maximize patient engagement and intervention effectiveness. AIM: This secondary analysis aimed to describe the use of behavior change theory and behavior change techniques (BCTs) in two previously conducted systematic reviews of cancer rehabilitation interventions. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) drawn from two systematic reviews examining the effect of cancer rehabilitation interventions on function and disability. SETTING: In-person and remotely delivered rehabilitation interventions. POPULATION: Adult cancer survivors. METHODS: Data extraction included: behavior change theory use, functional outcome data, and BCTs using the Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (BCTTv1). Based on their effects on function, interventions were categorized as "very", "quite" or "non-promising". To assess the relative effectiveness of coded BCTs, a BCT promise ratio was calculated (the ratio of promising to non-promising interventions that included the BCT). RESULTS: Of 180 eligible RCTs, 25 (14%) reported using a behavior change theory. Fifty-four (58%) of the 93 BCTs were used in least one intervention (range 0-29). Interventions reporting theory use utilized more BCTs (median=7) compared to those with no theory (median=3.5; U=2827.00, P=0.001). The number of BCTs did not differ between the very, quite, and non-promising intervention groups (H(2)=0.24, P=0.85). 20 BCTs were considered promising (promise ratio >2) with goal setting, graded tasks, and social support (unspecified) having the highest promise ratios. CONCLUSIONS: While there was a wide range of BCTs utilized, they were rarely based on theoretically-proposed pathways and the number of BCTs reported was not related to intervention effectiveness. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Clinicians should consider basing new interventions upon a relevant behavior change theory. Intentionally incorporating the BCTs of goal setting, graded tasks, and social support may improve intervention efficacy.

Systematic Review of Associations between Anxiety, Depression, and Functional/Biological aging among Cancer Survivors.

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests a mind-body component to aging, through which psychological distress from anxiety and depression drives molecular changes that promote early decline (ie, accelerated aging). Cancer survivors experience particularly high rates of anxiety and depression. Some survivors also have accelerated aging, though the relationships between anxiety/depression and aging are not clear. A synthesis of evidence is needed to understand the state of the science and impending priorities. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PsycNet databases were searched for studies that measured associations between depression, anxiety, and non-chronological aging in cancer survivors (2012 to 2022). Data were methodologically evaluated. RESULTS: Survivorship studies were included if they were peer-reviewed, published in English from 2012-2022, and measured associations between anxiety/depression and aging. 51 studies were included. Just over half were cross-sectional (53%). Foci included functional (n = 35, 69%) and biological (n = 16, 31%). Functional aging measures included frailty, sarcopenia, geriatric assessment, and cognition. Biological aging measures included telomere length, telomerase, age-related inflammatory blood-based biomarkers, renal insufficiency, anemia, and DNA methylation. 223 associations were tested. Associations between anxiety, depression and aging were generally positive, though with varying strengths. Most compelling were associations between functional aging-depression. There were concerns for selection and measurement biases. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest positive associations between anxiety, depression and aging among cancer survivors. Future work is needed to clarify temporality, develop a consensus on the operationalization of aging, and diversify cohorts.

Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics associated with rehabilitation services utilization in older women with early-stage breast cancer from SEER-Medicare 2009-2018.

PURPOSE: Rehabilitation services are recommended by clinical practice guidelines following breast cancer treatment, yet little is known about how utilization may vary by patient-level characteristics which we aimed to study using SEER-Medicare data. METHODS: Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database was used to identify non-metastatic breast cancer survivors aged ≥ 66 years diagnosed between 2011 and 2016. Rehabilitation services delivered 0-11 months post-diagnosis were identified via outpatient or physician visit claims. Descriptive statistics and associations between patient characteristics and rehabilitation services were calculated using modified Poisson models estimating relative risk (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Of 55,539 breast cancer survivors, 33% (n = 18,244) had received any type of rehabilitative services. Survivors were a mean age of 75 years (SD 6.7), 88% White, 86% urban-dwelling, and 21% Medicare/Medicaid dually enrolled. In adjusted models, patients aged > 75 vs. ≤ 75 were 6% (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.92-0.96) less likely to have received rehabilitative services. Survivors in an area with greater educational attainment vs. less educational attainment, White vs. non-White, or living in a rural vs. urban area were 26% (1.26, CI 1.22-1.30), 6% (1.06, CI 1.02-1.11), and 6% (1.06, CI 1.02-1.10) more likely to have received rehabilitative services, respectively. CONCLUSION: The largest differences in rehabilitation utilization were observed for survivors of differing educational and treatment statuses. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Further research is needed on barriers, access, and delivery of rehabilitation services, specifically for breast cancer survivors who are older-aged, non-White, or Medicare/Medicaid dual eligible.

Associations Between Rehabilitation Utilization and Out-of-Pocket Costs Among Older Adults With Breast Cancer in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between rehabilitation utilization within 12 months of breast cancer diagnosis and out-of-pocket costs in the second year (12-24mo after diagnosis). DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the 2009-2019 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare linked database. Individuals who received rehabilitation services were propensity-score matched to individuals who did not receive services. Overall and health care service-specific models were examined using generalized linear models with a gamma distribution. SETTING: Inpatient and outpatient medical facilities. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 35,212 individuals diagnosed with nonmetastatic breast cancer and were continuously enrolled in Medicare Fee-For Service (parts A, B, and D) in the 12 months before and 24 months postdiagnosis. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Individual cost responsibility, a proxy for out-of-pocket costs, which was defined as deductibles, coinsurance, and copayments during the second year after diagnosis (12-24mo postdiagnosis). RESULTS: The mean individual cost responsibility was higher in individuals who used rehabilitation than those who did not ($4013 vs $3783), although it was not a clinically meaningful difference (d=0.06). Individuals who received rehabilitative services had significantly higher costs attributed to individual provider care ($1634 vs $1476), institutional outpatient costs ($886 vs $812), and prescription drugs ($959 vs $906), and significantly lower costs attributed to institutional inpatient costs ($455 vs $504), and durable medical equipment ($81 vs $86). CONCLUSIONS: Older adults with breast cancer who received rehabilitation services had higher cost responsibility during the second year after diagnosis than those who did not. Future work is needed to examine the relationship between rehabilitation and out-of-pocket costs across longer periods of time and in conjunction with perceived benefit.

Prevalence of cancer survivors in the United States.

BACKGROUND: With aging of the population and improvements in diagnosis, treatment, and supportive care, the number of cancer survivors in the United States (US) has increased; updated prevalence estimates are needed. METHODS: Cancer prevalence on January 1, 2022 was estimated using the Prevalence Incidence Approach Model, utilizing incidence, survival, and mortality. Prevalence by age decade, sex, and time from diagnosis were calculated. The percentage of cancer survivors in the projected US population by age and sex was calculated as the ratio of the sex-specific projected prevalence to the sex-specific projected US population. RESULTS: There were an estimated 18.1 million US cancer survivors as of January 1, 2022. From 2022 to 2030, the number of US cancer survivors is projected to increase to 21.6 million; by 2040, the number is projected to be 26 million. Long-term survivors are highly prevalent; in 2022, 70% of cancer survivors survived 5 years or more after diagnosis, and 11% of cancer survivors survived 25 years or more after diagnosis. Among all US females aged 40-54, 3.6% were cancer survivors; among females aged 65-74, 14.5% were cancer survivors; among females aged 85 and older, 36.4% were cancer survivors. Among all US males aged 40-54, 2.1% were cancer survivors; among males aged 65-74, 16% were cancer survivors; among those aged 85 and older, 48.3% were cancer survivors. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer survivors are growing in number. In the US, most cancer survivors are long-term and very long-term survivors, representing a significant proportion of the US population.

National Cancer Institute-funded grants focused on synchronous telehealth cancer care delivery: a portfolio analysis.

BACKGROUND: Telehealth use increased during the COVID-19 pandemic and remains a complementary source of cancer care delivery. Understanding research funding trends in cancer-related telehealth can highlight developments in this area of science and identify future opportunities. METHODS: Applications funded by the US National Cancer Institute (NCI) between fiscal years 2016 and 2022 and focused on synchronous patient-provider telehealth were analyzed for grant characteristics (eg, funding mechanism), cancer focus (eg, cancer type), and study features (eg, type of telehealth service). Of 106 grants identified initially, 60 were retained for coding after applying exclusion criteria. RESULTS: Almost three-quarters (73%) of telehealth grants were funded during fiscal years 2020-2022. Approximately 67% were funded through R01 or R37 mechanism and implemented as randomized controlled trials (63%). Overall, telehealth grants commonly focused on treatment (30%) and survivorship (43%); breast cancer (12%), hematologic malignancies (10%), and multiple cancer sites (27%); and health disparity populations (ie, minorities, rural residents) (73%). Both audio and video telehealth were common (65%), as well as accompanying mHealth apps (20%). Telehealth services centered on psychosocial care, self-management, and supportive care (88%); interventions were commonly delivered by mental health professionals (30%). CONCLUSION: NCI has observed an increase in funded synchronous patient-provider telehealth grants. Trends indicate an evolution of awards that have expanded across the cancer control continuum, applied rigorous study designs, incorporated additional digital technologies, and focused on populations recognized for disparate cancer outcomes. As telehealth is integrated into routine cancer care delivery, additional research evidence will be needed to inform clinical practice.

Survivorship concerns among individuals diagnosed with metastatic cancer: Findings from the Cancer Experience Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Individuals with metastatic cancer experience many medical, physical, and emotional challenges due to changing medical regimens, oscillating disease states, and side effects. The purpose of this study was to describe the type and prevalence of survivorship concerns reported by individuals with metastatic cancer, and their associations with cancer diagnosis, treatment, and socio-demographic variables. METHODS: This study utilized data from the Cancer Support Community's Cancer Experience Registry. Individuals were included if they self-reported a solid tumor metastatic cancer and completed CancerSupportSource, which evaluates five domains of concerns (emotional well-being, symptom burden, body image/healthy lifestyle, healthcare team communication, and relationships/intimacy). Multivariable linear regression examined associations between independent predictors of each survivorship concern domain. RESULTS: Of the 403 included participants, individuals reported a metastatic diagnosis of breast (43%), colorectal (20%), prostate (7%), lung (7%), gynecologic cancer (6%) and other. Nearly all (96%) reported at least one survivorship concern, with the most prevalent concern about cancer progression or recurrence. Survivorship concerns were higher across multiple domains for individuals unemployed due to disability. Individuals who were less than five years since diagnosis reported higher concerns related to emotional well-being, symptom burden, and healthcare communication compared to those more than five years since diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Individuals with metastatic cancer experience a variety of moderate-to-severe survivorship concerns that warrant additional investigation. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: As the population of individuals with metastatic cancer lives longer, future research must investigate solutions to address modifiable factors associated with survivorship concerns, such as unemployment due to disability.

Financial toxicity among people with metastatic cancer: findings from the Cancer Experience Registry.

PURPOSE: This study describes financial toxicity (FT) reported by people with metastatic cancer, characteristics associated with FT, and associations between FT and compensatory strategies to offset costs. METHODS: Cancer Support Community's Cancer Experience Registry data was used to identify respondents with a solid tumor metastatic cancer who completed the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy COmprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (FACIT-COST) measure. Multivariable logistic regression analyses examined associations between respondent characteristics and FT, and FT and postponing medical visits, nonadherence to medications, and postponing supportive and/or psychosocial care. RESULTS: 484 individuals were included in the analysis; the most common cancers included metastatic breast (31%), lung (13%), gynecologic (10%), and colorectal (9%). Approximately half of participants (50.2%) reported some degree of FT. Those who were non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, or multiple races (compared to non-Hispanic Black), and who reported lower income, less education, and being less than one year since their cancer diagnosis had greater odds of reporting FT. Individuals with any level of FT were also more likely to report postponing medical visits (Adjusted Odds Ratio [OR] 2.58; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.45-4.58), suboptimal medication adherence (Adjusted OR 5.05; 95% CI 2.77-9.20) and postponing supportive care and/or psychosocial support services (Adjusted OR 4.16; 95% CI 2.53-6.85) compared to those without FT. CONCLUSIONS: With increases in the number of people living longer with metastatic cancer and the rising costs of therapy, there will continue to be a need to systematically screen and intervene to prevent and mitigate FT for these survivors.

A Systematic Review of Telehealth-Based Pediatric Cancer Rehabilitation Interventions on Disability.

Background: Telehealth is an emerging method which may overcome barriers to rehabilitation access for pediatric cancer survivors (aged ≤19 years). This systematic review aimed to examine telehealth-based rehabilitation interventions aimed at preventing, maintaining, or improving disability in pediatric cancer survivors. Methods: We performed systematic searches in Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and CINAHL Plus between 1994 and 2022. Eligible studies included telehealth-based interventions assessing disability outcomes in pediatric cancers. Results: Database searches identified 4,040 records. Nine unique interventions met the eligibility criteria. Telehealth delivery methods included telephone (n = 6), email (n = 3), mobile health applications (n = 3), social media (n = 3), videoconferencing (n = 2), text messaging (n = 2), active video gaming (n = 2), and websites (n = 2). Interventions focused on physical activity (n = 8) or self-management (n = 1). Outcomes assessing disability varied (n = 6). Three studies reported statistically and clinically significant results. Narrative synthesis of findings was constructed based on the Picker's principles for patient-centered care: (1) values, preferences, and needs; (2) involve family and friends; (3) coordination of care; (4) provide social support; (5) holistic well-being; and (6) information and communication. Conclusions: Telehealth-based rehabilitation interventions for pediatric cancer survivors is an emerging research area with potential to improve disability outcomes. Adequately powered trials with consistency in disability outcome measures are warranted. Additional research is needed to determine the effectiveness and best practices for telehealth-based pediatric cancer rehabilitation.

MeTooOT: Sexual Harassment Experiences of Occupational Therapy Academics and Recommendations for Systemic Change.

Sexual harassment is pervasive in academic health fields. Although a predominantly female profession, early career academics and trainees in occupational therapy (OT) remain vulnerable to sexual harassment. We aimed to describe experiences of sexual harassment of female-identifying academic OT practitioners. We conducted surveys and interviews using Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis to examine participants' experiences. Ten participants completed the survey and/or interview. Experiences ranged from inappropriate comments to persistent sexual assault. Four themes (blurred lines, unbalanced consequences, "how did I get here?" and "we don't talk about it") were generated based on participant responses. Power dynamics and the cultures and values of the OT profession were underlying elements of all themes. The consequences of sexual harassment were severe and affected personal and professional growth. For OT research and education to thrive, stronger support for victims and consistent, appropriate consequences for perpetrators are necessary to minimize negative outcomes for victims.

Preferences on Delivery of Cancer Rehabilitation Services for Cancer-Related Disability Among Older Individuals Surviving Breast Cancer: A Qualitative Study.

Background: Older individuals surviving breast cancer often encounter cancer-related disability as a short-term or long-term effect of cancer and related treatment. Cancer rehabilitation interventions have the potential to prevent, mitigate, or remediate cancer-related disability. However, use of these services remains limited. Understanding the priorities and perspectives of older individuals surviving breast cancer is key to developing effective and implementable cancer rehabilitation interventions. This qualitative descriptive study examined individuals' preferred and valued methods of cancer rehabilitation intervention delivery. Methods: Using a qualitative descriptive design, older individuals surviving breast cancer (n=14) completed a single telephone-based semi-structure interview. Interviews explored survivors' preferences for cancer rehabilitation service delivery. Interview transcriptions were thematically analyzed. Open codes were inductively generated and reviewed for agreement by an independent reviewer. The codes were deductively organized. Differences were resolved through consensus meetings. Results: Findings revealed preferred intervention delivery characteristics for intervention setting, mode of delivery, format, and timing. Participants predominantly preferred interventions delivered in community-based settings, with both in-person and remote components. Participants also appeared to value one-on-one interventions and those delivered post-treatment. Survivors' overarching preferences were based on desire for patient-centric care, one-on-one therapist time, complex medical schedules, and financial concerns. Discussion: Study findings provide guidance on the modification of existing and creation of new cancer rehabilitation interventions addressing cancer-related disability in older individuals surviving breast cancer. Adoption of stakeholder-driven intervention delivery characteristics may improve value and acceptability of interventions. Future intervention research should incorporate and test these characteristics to ensure their effectiveness in real-world settings.

Reporting Rigor of Cancer Rehabilitation Interventions: Application of the CReDECI-2 Guidelines.

ABSTRACT: Clear reporting of cancer rehabilitation interventions is critical for interpreting and translating research into clinical practice. This study sought to examine the completeness of intervention reporting of cancer rehabilitation interventions addressing disability and to identify which elements are most frequently missing. This was a secondary analysis of randomized controlled trials included in two systematic reviews examining effectiveness of cancer rehabilitation interventions that address cancer-related disability, including functional outcomes. Eligible trials were reviewed for intervention reporting rigor using the Criteria for Reporting the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions in Healthcare 2 checklist. Intervention descriptions for cancer rehabilitation interventions were generally incomplete. Approximately 85% ( n = 157) of trials described ≤50% of Criteria for Reporting the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions in Healthcare 2 checklist items. Commonly underreported items included description of the intervention's underlying theoretical basis, fidelity, description of process evaluation or external conditions influencing intervention delivery, and costs or required resources for intervention delivery. The findings reveal that cancer rehabilitation intervention descriptions lacked necessary detail in this body of literature. Poor descriptions limit the translation of research to clinical practice. To ensure higher-quality study design and reporting, future intervention research should incorporate an intervention reporting checklist to ensure more complete descriptions for research and practice.

Health system and patient-level factors associated with multidisciplinary care and patient education among hospitalized, older cancer survivors.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine system- and patient-level factors associated with the number of healthcare disciplines involved in delivery of patient education among hospitalized older cancer survivors. Methods: We used electronic health record (EHR) data from a single institution documenting patient education among hospitalized older patients (≥65 years) with a history of cancer between 9/1/2018 and 10/1/2019. We used parametric ordinal logistic regression to assess the number of healthcare disciplines involved in documented education activities. Results: The sample (n = 446) was predominantly male, White, and on average 74 years old. Adjusting for patient and system-level variables, men and larger department units had higher odds of receiving education from fewer healthcare disciplines. Patients with a history of breast or prostate cancer and longer lenths of stay had lower odds of receiving patient education from fewer healthcare disciplines. Conclusion: Hospital size, severity of illness, and cancer type are associated with delivery of multidisciplinary education in this sample. Innovation: EHR provides an opportunity to identify patterns in patient education among cancer survivors. Future research should investigate provider perspectives of the findings to inform provider- and system-level strategies to improve patient education.

Predictors of cancer rehabilitation medicine referral and utilization based on the Moving Through Cancer physical activity screening assessment.

PURPOSE: Cancer survivors experience high rates of physical inactivity that often go unaddressed. The My Wellness Check program (MWC) is an EHR-integrated screening and referral system that includes surveillance of physical activity and triage to cancer rehabilitation medicine services. This study examined assessment of physical activity and subsequent referrals to cancer rehabilitation medicine. METHODS: A secondary analysis was performed for survivors who completed the MWC between April 2021 and January 2022. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression modeled determinants of qualification for a physical activity referral and provider completion of referral to cancer rehabilitation medicine. Referral was based on responses to the Moving Through Cancer questionnaire. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. RESULTS: There were 1,174 survivors who completed the assessment, of which 46% (n = 540) reported physical inactivity. After controlling for group differences, individuals with moderate-severe physical dysfunction (aOR: 1.750; 95% CI: 1.137, 2.693) had higher odds, and self-reporting Hispanic or Latino ethnicity (aOR: 0.720; CI: 0.556, 0.932) had lower odds of physical inactivity. Only 31% (n = 168) received a completed physician referral to cancer rehabilitation medicine following identification of physical inactivity. No patient-level factors were associated with receiving a physician referral. Following referral, 8% (n = 13) utilized cancer rehabilitation medicine services. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-level and clinical factors may predict qualification for physical activity referrals; however, they don't appear to predict referral completion to cancer rehabilitation medicine. Future research should focus on potential provider- and organization-level factors that interact and influence access to cancer rehabilitation medicine services.

The influence of telehealth-based cancer rehabilitation interventions on disability: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To characterize delivery features and explore effectiveness of telehealth-based cancer rehabilitation interventions that address disability in adult cancer survivors. METHODS: A systematic review of electronic databases (CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Library: Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, National Health Service's Health Technology Assessment, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) was conducted in December 2019 and updated in April 2021. RESULTS: Searches identified 3,499 unique studies. Sixty-eight studies met inclusion criteria. There were 81 unique interventions across included studies. Interventions were primarily delivered post-treatment and lasted an average of 16.5 weeks (SD = 13.1). They were most frequently delivered using telephone calls (59%), administered delivered by nursing professionals (35%), and delivered in a one-on-one format (88%). Risk of bias of included studies was primarily moderate to high. Included studies captured 55 measures of disability. Only 54% of reported outcomes had data that allowed calculation of effect sizes ranging -3.58 to 15.66. CONCLUSIONS: The analyses suggest small effects of telehealth-based cancer interventions on disability, though the heterogeneity seen in the measurement of disability makes it hard to draw firm conclusions. Further research using more diverse samples, common measures of disability, and pragmatic study designs is needed to advance telehealth in cancer rehabilitation. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Telehealth-based cancer rehabilitation interventions have the potential to increase access to care designed to reduce disability across the cancer care continuum.

Development of an intervention influencing activity limitations in older breast cancer survivors: A modified Delphi study.

INTRODUCTION: Older breast cancer survivors have difficulty accessing rehabilitation interventions addressing activity limitations. Stakeholder input may improve accessibility of interventions. We sought expert consensus on intervention content and delivery features (e.g., where, mode, duration) to inform development of more accessible interventions for this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a modified Delphi process with patient, clinical, administrative, and research experts. In Round 1, experts evaluated content and delivery features according to domains of feasibility and prioritization. In Round 2, panelists were asked to re-rank or confer agreement of content and delivery features that met Round 1 consensus. Ranking was based on median score. Consensus was defined as a percentage of panelists that ranked an option within one unit of the median. For nominal data, consensus was defined as percent agreement. RESULTS: Panelists (n = 20) prioritized physical activity strategies (Median Rank: 2; Consensus: 85%) and adaptive skills training (3; 65%). Panelists also prioritized delivery through outpatient services (1; 100%), post-treatment (1; 100%), combination mode of delivery (100%), duration of three months or less (100%) and occurring one to two days per week (100%). DISCUSSION: Cancer rehabilitation interventions should be designed with input from stakeholders. The stakeholder intervention priorities identified in this study (e.g., content, setting, and mode) may improve relevance and accessibility of future cancer rehabilitation interventions. Interventions delivered in outpatient clinics and post-treatment using virtual and in-person visits may improve accessibility. Future research should examine the effectiveness and implementation of these intervention characteristics.

Impact of non-pharmacological interventions on activity limitations and participation restrictions in older breast cancer survivors: A scoping review.

Cancer-related disability is a complex problem for older breast cancer survivors. One aspect of cancer-related disability is a survivor's inability to complete meaningful daily activities and engage in life roles, referred to as activity limitations and participation restrictions respectively. There is a limited understanding of how interventions influence activity limitations and participation restrictions in this population. A scoping review was undertaken to identify and characterize nonpharmacological interventions developed to address activity limitations and participation restrictions. A systematic search of electronic databases (Ovid Medline, Embase, EBSCO CINAHL, and Ovid PsycINFO) was conducted in April 2020 and updated October 2020. Eleven studies met inclusion criteria. Most frequently observed delivery features were in-person and one-on-one format. Six interventions incorporated telehealth delivery components. Interventions were often complex and varied in content. Exercise and behavioral strategies were among the most frequently used active ingredients. Activity limitations and participation restrictions were often secondary outcomes, and measures of these outcomes were varied in content and assessment method. Study samples were not representative of the current population of older adult breast cancer survivors. Future intervention research should clarify intervention delivery, content, and dose, prioritize comprehensive measurement of activity limitations and participation restrictions, as well as recruit and involve representative study samples to enhance generalizability of findings.

Factors influencing utilization of cancer rehabilitation services among older breast cancer survivors in the USA: a qualitative study.

PURPOSE: Many older breast cancer survivors experience long-term disability due to cancer and cancer-related treatments. However, less than 20% of older breast cancer survivors utilize cancer rehabilitation services to address cancer-related disability. Further understanding of survivor experiences may reveal strategies to improve uptake cancer rehabilitation services in the USA. METHODS: Older breast cancer survivors were recruited from university-based registries, previous breast cancer research studies at our institution, community support groups, and geriatric oncology clinics. Participants completed a brief online survey to capture demographic and clinical characteristics. Semi-structured telephone-based interviews were recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed. Interviews facilitated conversation about access to rehabilitation and indications for cancer rehabilitation. RESULTS: Participants (n = 14) were, on average, 71 years old, primarily White, and an average of 36.5 months post-diagnosis. Five participants had formally received rehabilitation for a cancer-related concern. Participants described seven factors that influenced utilization of cancer rehabilitation services: (1) emerging awareness of disability; (2) coping styles; (3) comparison of cancer experience with others; (4) provider interaction; (5) perceptions of cancer diagnosis; (6) social support; and (7) cost of rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS: Older breast cancer survivors consider multiple factors when determining utilization of cancer rehabilitation services. Development of shared decision-making tools addressing the seven described factors may enhance communication and referral to cancer rehabilitation services. Intervention research should adopt frameworks that enhance healthcare accessibility to improve relevance of intervention content and delivery features for older breast cancer survivors.