Survivorship concerns among individuals diagnosed with metastatic cancer: Findings from the Cancer Experience Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Individuals with metastatic cancer experience many medical, physical, and emotional challenges due to changing medical regimens, oscillating disease states, and side effects. The purpose of this study was to describe the type and prevalence of survivorship concerns reported by individuals with metastatic cancer, and their associations with cancer diagnosis, treatment, and socio-demographic variables. METHODS: This study utilized data from the Cancer Support Community's Cancer Experience Registry. Individuals were included if they self-reported a solid tumor metastatic cancer and completed CancerSupportSource, which evaluates five domains of concerns (emotional well-being, symptom burden, body image/healthy lifestyle, healthcare team communication, and relationships/intimacy). Multivariable linear regression examined associations between independent predictors of each survivorship concern domain. RESULTS: Of the 403 included participants, individuals reported a metastatic diagnosis of breast (43%), colorectal (20%), prostate (7%), lung (7%), gynecologic cancer (6%) and other. Nearly all (96%) reported at least one survivorship concern, with the most prevalent concern about cancer progression or recurrence. Survivorship concerns were higher across multiple domains for individuals unemployed due to disability. Individuals who were less than five years since diagnosis reported higher concerns related to emotional well-being, symptom burden, and healthcare communication compared to those more than five years since diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Individuals with metastatic cancer experience a variety of moderate-to-severe survivorship concerns that warrant additional investigation. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: As the population of individuals with metastatic cancer lives longer, future research must investigate solutions to address modifiable factors associated with survivorship concerns, such as unemployment due to disability.

Exploration of patient and caregiver cancer education using electronic health records.

The objective of this short report was to describe types of education provided to older, hospitalized patients with cancer and their caregivers using electronic health record data. A total of 437 patients, representing 512 inpatient stays (admissions), met the inclusion criteria. The sample were predominately male (58%) and White (95%). The average patient age at first admission was 74 years (SD 6.21 years) and the average length of admission was 5 days (SD 3.41 days). Out of all admissions, 89% included at least one documented education session with a provider. Three important results emerged from this study 1) education on medications is commonly conveyed to cancer patients (77%), 2) nurses are primarily responsible for providing education (65%), and 3) caregivers are infrequently involved (41%) in patient education. Additional educational topics tailored to the long-term needs of older adults with cancer are warranted. These topics should be delivered by an array of interprofessional care providers with demonstrated competency. Lastly, patient education should ensure inclusion of caregivers as part of the interprofessional cancer care team to promote successful management of cancer-related concerns.

Predictive validity of the Spinal Cord Injury Pressure Ulcer Scale (SCIPUS) in acute care and inpatient rehabilitation in individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of the Spinal Cord Injury Pressure Ulcer Scale (SCIPUS) during acute care and inpatient rehabilitation following spinal cord injury (SCI) by determining critical cutoff points and assessing the ability to predict risk for pressure ulceration (PrU). DESIGN: Retrospective. METHODS: Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) for the receiver operating characteristic were determined for the scale's ability to predict PrU 2-3 and 5-7 days after administrating the SCIPUS during acute care, and 5-7 and 14-21 days after administrating the SCIPUS during inpatient rehabilitation. RESULTS: During acute hospitalization, SCIPUS's ability to assess risk for PrUs within 2-3 days was determined at cutoff score of 15 with 100% sensitivity and 75% specificity, AUC = 0.85. The scale was unable to assess PrU risk at 5-7 days, AUC < 0.6 at cutoff score of 13. During inpatient rehabilitation, the scale was unable to assess PrU risk at 5-7 and 14-21 days, AUC < 0.6 at cutoff score of 9. CONCLUSIONS: The SCIPUS could predict PrU occurring within 2-3 days following administration during acute, but unable to predict over a longer term within acute or inpatient rehabilitation. Improved PrU risk assessment following SCI may be possible with modification to the SCIPUS.