Spectroscopic view on the interaction between the psoralen derivative amotosalen and DNA.

Psoralens are eponymous for PUVA (psoralen plus UV-A radiation) therapy, which inter alia can be used to treat various skin diseases. Based on the same underlying mechanism of action, the synthetic psoralen amotosalen (AMO) is utilized in the pathogen reduction technology of the INTERCEPT® Blood System to inactivate pathogens in plasma and platelet components. The photophysical behavior of AMO in the absence of DNA is remarkably similar to that of the recently studied psoralen 4'-aminomethyl-4,5',8-trimethylpsoralen (AMT). By means of steady-state and time-resolved spectroscopy, intercalation and photochemistry of AMO and synthetic DNA were studied. AMO intercalates with a higher affinity into A,T-only DNA (KD = 8.9 × 10-5 M) than into G,C-only DNA (KD = 6.9 × 10-4 M). AMO covalently photobinds to A,T-only DNA with a reaction quantum yield of ΦR = 0.11. Like AMT, it does not photoreact following intercalation into G,C-only DNA. Femto- and nanosecond transient absorption spectroscopy reveals the characteristic pattern of photobinding to A,T-only DNA. For AMO and G,C-only DNA, signatures of a photoinduced electron transfer are recorded.

Fatal sepsis associated with a storage container leak permitting platelet contamination with environmental bacteria after pathogen reduction.

BACKGROUND: Pathogen reduction technology and enhanced bacterial culture screening promise to significantly reduce the risk of transfusion-associated septic reactions due to contaminated platelets. Recent reports suggest that these interventions lack efficacy for post-collection and processing contamination with environmental organisms if the storage bag integrity is compromised. CASE REPORT: We report a fatal septic transfusion reaction in a 63-year-old patient with chronic kidney and liver disease who received a pathogen reduced platelet transfusion in anticipation of surgery. METHODS: The residual platelet concentrate was cultured, with the detected microorganisms undergoing 16S genotype sequencing. Separate pathogen reduction studies were performed on the recovered bacteria, including assessment for amotosalen photoproducts. The storage container was subjected to pressure testing and microscopic examination. Environmental culture screening was performed at the hospital. RESULTS: Gram negative rods were detected in the platelet unit and cultures of both platelet component and the patient's blood grew Acinetobacter baumannii complex, Leclercia adecarboxylata and Staphylococcus saprophyticus. These strains were effectively inactivated with >7.2, 7.7, and >7.1 log10 kill, respectively. The platelet storage container revealed a leak visible only on pressure testing. Hospital environmental cultures were negative and the contamination source is unknown. A. baumannii complex and S. saprophyticus 16S genotyping sequences were identical to those implicated in a previously reported septic reaction. CONCLUSION: Findings are compatible with post-processing environmental contamination of a pathogen reduced platelet concentrate via a non-visible, acquired storage container leak. Efforts are warranted to actively prevent damage to, and detect defects in, platelet storage containers, and to store and transport components in clean environments.