Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 25
Filtrar
1.
PLoS One ; 19(3): e0300708, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38517926

RESUMEN

Researchers are increasingly using insights derived from large-scale, electronic healthcare data to inform drug development and provide human validation of novel treatment pathways and aid in drug repurposing/repositioning. The objective of this study was to determine whether treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis with dimethyl fumarate, an activator of the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) pathway, results in a change in incidence of type 2 diabetes and its complications. This retrospective cohort study used administrative claims data to derive four cohorts of adults with multiple sclerosis initiating dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide, glatiramer acetate or fingolimod between January 2013 and December 2018. A causal inference frequentist model averaging framework based on machine learning was used to compare the time to first occurrence of a composite endpoint of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease or chronic kidney disease, as well as each individual outcome, across the four treatment cohorts. There was a statistically significantly lower risk of incidence for dimethyl fumarate versus teriflunomide for the composite endpoint (restricted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.70 [0.55, 0.90]) and type 2 diabetes (0.65 [0.49, 0.98]), myocardial infarction (0.59 [0.35, 0.97]) and chronic kidney disease (0.52 [0.28, 0.86]). No differences for other individual outcomes or for dimethyl fumarate versus the other two cohorts were observed. This study effectively demonstrated the use of an innovative statistical methodology to test a clinical hypothesis using real-world data to perform early target validation for drug discovery. Although there was a trend among patients treated with dimethyl fumarate towards a decreased incidence of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease relative to other disease-modifying therapies-which was statistically significant for the comparison with teriflunomide-this study did not definitively support the hypothesis that Nrf2 activation provided additional metabolic disease benefit in patients with multiple sclerosis.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Crotonatos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Hidroxibutiratos , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente , Esclerosis Múltiple , Nitrilos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Toluidinas , Adulto , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Dimetilfumarato/uso terapéutico , Esclerosis Múltiple/complicaciones , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Esclerosis Múltiple/epidemiología , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Incidencia , Factor 2 Relacionado con NF-E2 , Clorhidrato de Fingolimod/uso terapéutico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico
2.
Rheumatol Ther ; 10(6): 1575-1595, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37755648

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: RA-BE-REAL is a 3-year, multinational, prospective, observational study of adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) evaluating time to discontinuation of initial RA treatment along with patient baseline characteristics. This study's primary objective was to assess the time to discontinuation of initial baricitinib, any other targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (tsDMARD), or any biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) treatment for all causes (excluding sustained clinical response) over 24 months in a European population. METHODS: Patients initiated treatment with baricitinib (cohort A) or any bDMARD or tsDMARD (cohort B) for the first time. This study's primary objective was to assess the time to discontinuation of initial baricitinib, any other targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (tsDMARD), or any biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) treatment for all causes (excluding sustained clinical response) over 24 months in a European population. Comparative effectiveness analyses, over 24 months, included time to treatment discontinuation for all causes (excluding sustained clinical response), percentage of patients achieving Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission or low disease activity (LDA), as well as mean changes from baseline for CDAI, pain visual analogue scale, and the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). For this European subpopulation, comparative analyses were performed using a frequentist model averaging (FMA) framework based on a data-driven machine learning causal inference approach to compare time to discontinuation, effectiveness, rates of remission or LDA, and patient-reported outcomes over 24 months comparing baricitinib with TNFi, as well as non-TNFi and tsDMARD grouped as other mechanism of action (OMA) drugs. RESULTS: In the European sample of RA-BE-REAL, patients with RA treated with baricitinib experienced fewer discontinuations in comparison to those treated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors or OMA. Overall, patients naïve to b/tsDMARDs achieved a higher rate of LDA and remission compared with experienced patients. A significantly greater proportion of patients treated with baricitinib achieved LDA compared with b/tsDMARDs. CONCLUSION: This real-world data can better inform clinicians about baricitinib effectiveness and drug survival when prescribing treatment for patients with RA across different subpopulations.

3.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 39(6): 843-853, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37139823

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Insulin pump use is increasing among people with type 2 diabetes (T2D), albeit at a slower rate compared to people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Factors associated with insulin pump initiation among people with T2D in the real-world are understudied. METHODS: This retrospective, nested case-control study aimed to identify predictors of insulin pump initiation among people with T2D in the United States (US). Adults with T2D who were new to bolus insulin use were identified from the IBM MarketScan Commercial database (2015-2020). Candidate variables of pump initiation were entered into conditional logistic regression (CLR) and penalized CLR models. RESULTS: Of the 32,104 eligible adults with T2D, 726 insulin pump initiators were identified and matched to 2,904 non-pump initiators using incidence density sampling. Consistent predictors of insulin pump initiation across the base case, sensitivity, and post hoc analyses included continuous glucose monitor (CGM) use, visiting an endocrinologist, acute metabolic complications, higher count of HbA1c tests, lower age, and fewer diabetes-related medication classes. CONCLUSIONS: Many of these predictors could represent a clinical indication for treatment intensification, greater patient engagement in diabetes management, or proactive management by healthcare providers. Improved understanding of predictors for pump initiation may lead to more targeted efforts to improve access and acceptance of insulin pumps among persons with T2D.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Adulto , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Glucemia/metabolismo , Aprendizaje Automático
4.
Diabetes Ther ; 13(1): 131-144, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34850355

RESUMEN

AIM: To compare the real-world effectiveness of once-weekly dulaglutide 1.5 mg with insulin in injectable-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: A non-interventional, non-randomised, observational, single-site retrospective chart review enrolled 150 patients, 75 receiving dulaglutide or insulin. Data were collected from electronic medical records of patients with T2DM who were initiated on insulin between October 2010 and May 2017, and patients initiated on dulaglutide between May 2018 and October 2019. A doubly robust approach was used to adjust for potential selection bias with augmented inverse probability weights used to estimate the average treatment effect. RESULTS: HbA1c favoured dulaglutide with an average change of - 1.6% vs - 0.8% for insulin, with an average treatment effect difference of 0.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4-1.2%) at 3 months. At 6 months, 58.7% of the dulaglutide group reached a target HbA1c of ≤ 7% compared with 20.0% of the insulin group: average treatment effect difference of 21.3% (95% CI 2.7-43.1). The dulaglutide group lost 2.4 kg compared to the insulin group which gained 2.0 kg: average difference of 4.4 kg (95% CI 2.6-7.3) at 6 months. The incidence of hypoglycaemic events was 12 (16.0%) occurrences in the dulaglutide group compared to 33 (44.0%) in the insulin group. CONCLUSION: Once-weekly dulaglutide demonstrated greater HbA1c reduction, weight loss and reduced hypoglycaemia compared to insulin, in a real-world practice setting.

5.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 37(8): 1331-1339, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33904362

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the longitudinal societal costs and burden of community-dwelling patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and their caregivers in Japan. METHODS: GERAS-J was an 18-month, prospective, longitudinal, observational study. Using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), patients routinely visiting memory clinics were stratified into groups based on AD severity at baseline (mild, moderate, and moderately severe/severe [MS/S]). Healthcare resource utilization and caregiver burden were assessed using the Resource Utilization in Dementia and Zarit "Caregiver" Burden Interview questionnaires, respectively. Total monthly societal costs were estimated using Japan-specific unit costs of services and products (patient direct healthcare use, patient social care use, and informal caregiving time). RESULTS: Overall, 553 patients (156 mild; 209 moderate; 188 MS/S) were enrolled. MMSE scores declined (1.73, 1.38, and 0.95 points for the mild, moderate, and MS/S AD groups, respectively) and caregiver burden and resource utilization increased over 18 months in each of the AD severity groups. Cumulative total societal costs per patient over 18 months were 3.1, 3.8, and 5.3 million Japanese yen (29,006, 35,662, and 49,725 USD) for mild, moderate, and MS/S AD, respectively. Both patient social care costs and caregiver informal care costs increased with baseline disease severity, with >50% of total costs due to caregiver informal care in each disease severity subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Total treatment costs increased with AD severity over 18 months due to increases in both patient social care costs and caregiver informal care costs. Our data suggest current social care services in Japan are insufficient to alleviate the negative impact of AD on caregiver burden.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/terapia , Cuidadores , Costo de Enfermedad , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Vida Independiente , Japón , Estudios Prospectivos
6.
Pharm Stat ; 19(5): 532-540, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32115845

RESUMEN

In health technology assessment (HTA), beside network meta-analysis (NMA), indirect comparisons (IC) have become an important tool used to provide evidence between two treatments when no head-to-head data are available. Researchers may use the adjusted indirect comparison based on the Bucher method (AIC) or the matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC). While the Bucher method may provide biased results when included trials differ in baseline characteristics that influence the treatment outcome (treatment effect modifier), this issue may be addressed by applying the MAIC method if individual patient data (IPD) for at least one part of the AIC is available. Here, IPD is reweighted to match baseline characteristics and/or treatment effect modifiers of published data. However, the MAIC method does not provide a solution for situations when several common comparators are available. In these situations, assuming that the indirect comparison via the different common comparators is homogeneous, we propose merging these results by using meta-analysis methodology to provide a single, potentially more precise, treatment effect estimate. This paper introduces the method to combine several MAIC networks using classic meta-analysis techniques, it discusses the advantages and limitations of this approach, as well as demonstrates a practical application to combine several (M)AIC networks using data from Phase III psoriasis randomized control trials (RCT).


Asunto(s)
Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Proyectos de Investigación , Evaluación de la Tecnología Biomédica/métodos , Humanos , Metaanálisis en Red , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 74(1): 127-138, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31985460

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: As the Japanese population ages, caring for people with Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia is becoming a major socioeconomic issue. OBJECTIVE: To determine the contribution of patient and caregiver costs to total societal costs associated with AD dementia. METHODS: Baseline data was used from the longitudinal, observational GERAS-J study. Using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score, patients routinely visiting memory clinics were stratified into three groups based on AD severity. Health care resource utilizationwas recorded using the Resource Utilization in Dementia questionnaire. Total monthly societal costs were estimated using Japan-specific unit costs of services and products (patient direct health care use, patient social care use, and informal caregiving time). Uncertainty around mean costs was estimated using bootstrapping methods. RESULTS: Overall, 553 community-dwelling patients withADdementia (28.3% mild[MMSE21-26], 37.8% moderate[MMSE 15-20], and 34.0% moderately severe/severe [MMSE < 14]) and their caregivers were enrolled. Patient characteristics were: mean age 80.3 years, 72.7% female, and 13.6% living alone. Caregiver characteristics were: mean age 62.1 years, 70.7% female, 78.8% living with patient, 49.0% child of patient, and 39.2% sole caregiver. Total monthly societal costs of AD dementia (Japanese yen) were: 158,454 (mild), 211,301 (moderate), and 294,224 (moderately severe/severe). Informal caregiving costs comprised over 50% of total costs. CONCLUSION: Baseline results of GERAS-J showed that total monthly societal costs associated with AD dementia increased with AD severity. Caregiver-related costs were the largest cost component. Interventions are needed to decrease informal costs and decrease caregiver burden.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer/economía , Vida Independiente/economía , Actividades Cotidianas , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cuidadores/economía , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Japón , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Pruebas de Estado Mental y Demencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores Socioeconómicos
8.
Bipolar Disord ; 21(2): 142-150, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29926533

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: In the clinical setting, the nocebo phenomenon is where clinical worsening or adverse events occur as a response to a treatment, in a situation in which conditioning from previous treatment exposure and/or expectations of sickness or symptoms lead to sickness and symptoms in a conditioned or expectant individual. The nocebo response may thus be a confounder in clinical treatment and clinical research. There is a need to know how to predict if an individual is likely to be a nocebo responder, and how significant and commonplace the nocebo effect might be. METHODS: An analysis was conducted on nine placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials of olanzapine for the treatment of bipolar disorder using data from placebo-treated study participants only. Data were analysed to identify participant or study characteristics associated with a nocebo event, defined as any treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) or an increase in score from baseline to endpoint for primary measures of clinical symptoms. RESULTS: A total of 1185 participants were randomized to placebo, of whom 806 (68%) reported a TEAE. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) data were only available for 649 placebo-treated participants, of whom 321 (49.5%) demonstrated worsening. Nocebo events were significantly associated with: not being treatment-naïve, younger age, being located in the USA, being a participant in an earlier study, and being classified as obese compared with normal weight. CONCLUSIONS: A pattern to identify nocebo responders did not emerge, although some prognostic variables were associated with a greater probability of nocebo response. There was some evidence to support the role of expectancy as a cause of nocebo reactions.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Olanzapina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Efecto Nocebo , Placebos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
9.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 35(6): 1041-1049, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30474449

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe the study design and baseline patient characteristics of the Asia and Latin America Fracture Observational Study (ALAFOS) to better understand the profile of patients receiving teriparatide during the course of routine clinical practice in Asia, Latin America, the Middle East and Russia. METHODS: Prospective, observational, non-interventional study in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who are prescribed teriparatide for up to 24 months, according to local medical standards, with a 12 month post-treatment follow-up. MEASURES: Demographics, risk factors for osteoporosis and fractures, history of fracture, prior osteoporosis medications, comorbidities, physical function, back pain and quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: In total 3031 postmenopausal women (mean age 72.5 years) recruited at 152 sites in 20 countries were analyzed; 62.9% had a history of fragility fracture after age 40 (33.0% of patients with spinal, 14.2% with hip fractures). The mean (SD) bone mineral density T-scores at baseline were -3.06 (1.40) and -2.60 (1.05) at the lumbar spine and femoral neck, respectively. At entry, 43.7% of patients were naïve to prior osteoporosis treatments; 40.5% of patients reported ≥1 fall in the past year. The median (Q1; Q3) EuroQoL Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS) for perceived overall health status was 60 (50; 80). The mean (SD) worst back pain Numeric Rating Scale in the last 24 hours was 4.6 (3.3). CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicates that patients who were prescribed teriparatide in the ALAFOS participant countries had severe osteoporosis, high prevalence of fractures, disabling back pain and poor QoL. The frequency of patients receiving prior osteoporosis medications was lower than in previous observational studies conducted in other locations.


Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/tratamiento farmacológico , Teriparatido/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Densidad Ósea , Femenino , Fracturas Óseas/epidemiología , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/psicología , Posmenopausia , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida
10.
Value Health Reg Issues ; 9: 49-56, 2016 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27881259

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of both lifestyle-related metabolic disorders and osteoporosis is increasing in Asia. OBJECTIVES: To conduct a systematic review of the published literature to identify studies examining disorders of glucose and lipid metabolism (type 2 diabetes, hyperglycemia, hypercholesterolemia, hyperlipidemia, dyslipidemia, metabolic syndrome [MetS], and atherosclerosis) as risk factors for osteoporosis and fracture in Asian populations. Studies examining the relationship between metabolic disorders and bone mineral density (BMD) were also included. METHODS: EMBASE (including MEDLINE) and the Cochrane Library were searched. Studies conducted only within Asia, which reported multivariate analysis with a sample size of 200 or more subjects, were included. RESULTS: A total of 32 studies were included. All six studies examining diabetes and fracture found that subjects with diabetes had a significantly higher risk of fracture than did subjects without diabetes (risk estimate range 1.26-4.73). Two studies found that subjects with atherosclerosis had a significantly higher risk of fracture (risk estimate range 1.10-2.52). Studies consistently reported that MetS is likely associated with osteoporosis or decreased BMD in men but not women. No consistent association was found for diabetes and BMD, with studies reporting contrasting results. There was limited evidence investigating lipid metabolism and hyperglycemia and risk of fracture or bone loss in Asian populations. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that diabetes is a risk factor for fracture in Asian populations. MetS may be associated with bone loss in Asian men and atherosclerosis associated with increased fractures; however, caution is needed interpreting these findings given limitations in study design.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Óseas/epidemiología , Estilo de Vida , Enfermedades Metabólicas/epidemiología , Osteoporosis/epidemiología , Asia , Densidad Ósea , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Riesgo
11.
Value Health Reg Issues ; 9: 72-77, 2016 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27881264

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Asia-Pacific Burden of Respiratory Diseases is a cross-sectional, observational study examining the burden of disease in adults with respiratory diseases across six countries. The aim of this study was to describe health care resource use (HCRU), work impairment, cost burden, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) associated with respiratory disease in the Asia-Pacific. METHODS: Consecutive participants aged 18 years or older with a primary diagnosis of asthma, allergic rhinitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or rhinosinusitis were enrolled. Participants completed a survey detailing respiratory symptoms, HCRU, work productivity and activity impairment, and HRQOL. Locally sourced unit costs for each country were used in the calculation of total costs. RESULTS: The study enrolled 5250 patients. Overall, the mean annual cost for patients with a respiratory disease was US $4191 (SGD 8489) per patient. For patients who reported impairment at work, the mean annual cost was US $7315 (SGD 10,244), with productivity loss being the highest cost component for all four diseases (US $6310 [SGD 9100]). On average, patients were impaired for one-third of their time at work and 5% of their work time missed because of respiratory disease, which resulted in a 36% reduction in productivity. Patients with a primary diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease had the greatest impact on HRQOL. CONCLUSIONS: In the Asia-Pacific, respiratory diseases have a significant impact on HCRU and associated costs, along with work productivity. Timely and effective management of these diseases has the potential to reduce disease burden and health care costs and improve work productivity and HRQOL.


Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Calidad de Vida , Trastornos Respiratorios/economía , Adolescente , Asia , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Trastornos Respiratorios/complicaciones , Trastornos Respiratorios/terapia
12.
Allergy Asthma Proc ; 37(2): 131-40, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26802834

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Respiratory diseases represent a significant impact on health care. A cross-sectional, multicountry (India, Korea, Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan, and Thailand) observational study was conducted to investigate the proportion of adult patients who received care for a primary diagnosis of asthma, allergic rhinitis (AR), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or rhinosinusitis. OBJECTIVE: To determine the proportion of patients who received care for asthma, AR, COPD, and rhinosinusitis, and the frequency and main symptoms reported. METHODS: Patients ages ≥18 years, who presented to a physician with symptoms that met the diagnostic criteria for a primary diagnosis of asthma, AR, COPD, or rhinosinusitis were enrolled. Patients and physicians completed a survey that contained questions related to demographics and respiratory symptoms. RESULTS: A total of 13,902 patients with a respiratory disorder were screened, of whom 7030 were eligible and 5250 enrolled. The highest percentage of patients who received care had a primary diagnosis of AR (14.0% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 13.4-14.6%]), followed by asthma (13.5% [95% CI, 12.9-14.1%]), rhinosinusitis (5.4% [95% CI, 4.6-5.3%]), and COPD (4.9% [95% CI, 5.0-5.7%]). Patients with a primary diagnosis of COPD (73%), followed by asthma (61%), rhinosinusitis (59%), and AR (47%) most frequently reported cough as a symptom. Cough was the main reason for seeking medical care among patients with a primary diagnosis of COPD (43%), asthma (33%), rhinosinusitis (13%), and AR (11%). CONCLUSION: Asthma, AR, COPD, and rhinosinusitis represent a significant proportion of respiratory disorders in patients who presented to health care professionals in the Asia-Pacific region, many with concomitant disease. Cough was a prominent symptom and the major reason for patients with respiratory diseases to seek medical care.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Respiratorios/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Asia/epidemiología , Asia/etnología , Comorbilidad , Tos/diagnóstico , Tos/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vigilancia en Salud Pública , Trastornos Respiratorios/diagnóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Autoinforme
13.
Value Health ; 17(5): 561-9, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25128049

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy with "Low Glucose Suspend" (LGS) functionality versus standard pump therapy with self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 1 diabetes who have impaired awareness of hypoglycemia. METHODS: A clinical trial-based economic evaluation was performed in which the net costs and effectiveness of the two treatment modalities were calculated and expressed as an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The clinical outcome of interest for the evaluation was the rate of severe hypoglycemia in each arm of the LGS study. Quality-of-life utility scores were calculated using the three-level EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire. Resource use costs were estimated using public sources. RESULTS: After 6 months, the use of sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy with LGS significantly reduced the incidence of severe hypoglycemia compared with standard pump therapy (incident rate difference 1.85 [0.17-3.53]; P = 0.037). Based on a primary randomized study, the ICER per severe hypoglycemic event avoided was $18,257 for all patients and $14,944 for those aged 12 years and older. Including all major medical resource costs (e.g., hospital admissions), the ICERs were $17,602 and $14,289, respectively. Over the 6-month period, the cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained was $40,803 for patients aged 12 years and older. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the Australian experience evaluating new interventions across a broad range of therapeutic areas, sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy with LGS may be considered a cost-effective alternative to standard pump therapy with self-monitoring of blood glucose in hypoglycemia unaware patients with type 1 diabetes.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoglucemia/inducido químicamente , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Sistemas de Infusión de Insulina , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Australia , Glucemia/efectos de los fármacos , Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea/métodos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/economía , Humanos , Hipoglucemia/diagnóstico , Hipoglucemiantes/administración & dosificación , Hipoglucemiantes/economía , Incidencia , Insulina/administración & dosificación , Insulina/economía , Calidad de Vida , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
14.
J Affect Disord ; 146(1): 146-9, 2013 Mar 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22898470

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: In some individuals, recovery from episodes of mental illness may be impeded by maladaptive illness beliefs and behaviors. For individuals with chronic illness, acceptance of its presence and consequences is necessary to seek appropriate treatment, adjust their lifestyle, and adhere to recommended management strategies. Some have difficulty adjusting out of the sick role or develop a degree of illness investment. The Illness Cognitions Scale (ICS) is a 17-item validated scale that measures cognitive factors associated with the sick role. We conducted analyses to test the hypothesis that there may be an association between illness cognitions and clinical and functional measures. METHODS: The ICS was administered to 89 participants at the final study visit of a 24-month observational study involving patients with bipolar I disorder or schizoaffective disorder. RESULTS: Higher scores on the ICS were correlated with more severe depression (p<0.0001), worse general health (p=0.0002), worse functioning (p=0.0001), and worse scores in psychosocial measures including the State Hope Scale (p=0.0082), the Social Provisions Scale (p=0.0054) and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (p=0.0025). CONCLUSIONS: Illness cognitions and behavior may be a neglected factor that could influence treatment outcomes in bipolar disorder. The ICS might be useful for identifying individuals whose recovery may be facilitated by targeted psychological intervention that addresses these factors.


Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Salud , Trastorno Bipolar/psicología , Trastorno Bipolar/terapia , Rol del Enfermo , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Cognición , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Trastornos Psicóticos/psicología , Trastornos Psicóticos/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
BMC Psychiatry ; 12: 228, 2012 Dec 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23244301

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Bipolar Comprehensive Outcomes Study (BCOS) is a 2-year, prospective, non-interventional, observational study designed to explore the clinical and functional outcomes associated with 'real-world' treatment of participants with bipolar I or schizoaffective disorder. All participants received treatment as usual. There was no study medication. METHODS: Participants prescribed either conventional mood stabilizers (CMS; n = 155) alone, or olanzapine with, or without, CMS (olanzapine ± CMS; n = 84) were assessed every 3 months using several measures, including the Young Mania Rating Scale, 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Clinical Global Impressions Scale - Bipolar Version, and the EuroQol Instrument. This paper reports 24-month longitudinal clinical, pharmacological, functional, and socioeconomic data. RESULTS: On average, participants were 42 (range 18 to 79) years of age, 58%; were female, and 73%; had a diagnosis of bipolar I. Polypharmacy was the usual approach to pharmacological treatment; participants took a median of 5 different psychotropic medications over the course of the study, and spent a median proportion of time of 100%; of the study on mood stabilizers, 90%; on antipsychotics, 9%; on antidepressants, and 5%; on benzodiazepines/hypnotics. By 24 months, the majority of participants had achieved both symptomatic and syndromal remission of both mania and depression. Symptomatic relapse rates were similar for both the CMS alone (65%;) and the olanzapine ± CMS (61%;) cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Participants with bipolar I or schizoaffective disorder in this study were receiving complex medication treatments that were often discordant with recommendations made in contemporary major treatment guidelines. The majority of study participants demonstrated some clinical and functional improvements, but not all achieved remission of symptoms or syndrome.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Pacientes Ambulatorios/psicología , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Psicóticos/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Antidepresivos/administración & dosificación , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Antimaníacos/administración & dosificación , Antimaníacos/uso terapéutico , Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Australia , Benzodiazepinas/administración & dosificación , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Carbamazepina/administración & dosificación , Carbamazepina/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Combinada/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Carbonato de Litio/administración & dosificación , Carbonato de Litio/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Olanzapina , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Estudios Prospectivos , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Recurrencia , Ácido Valproico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Valproico/uso terapéutico
16.
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract ; 15(2): 80-90, 2011 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22121855

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In randomised controlled trials, the frequency of treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction (TESD) in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) at week 8 was lower with duloxetine than selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) therapy. METHODS: This 6-month, prospective, observational study compared the frequency of TESD (using the Arizona Sexual Experience [ASEX] scale) in MDD patients treated with duloxetine or SSRI monotherapy in the first 8 weeks in normal clinical practice. RESULTS: Physician-assessed TESD frequency at week 8 was comparable with duloxetine and SSRI monotherapy (23.9 and 26.2%, respectively; P = 0.545). Improvements in Clinical Global Impressions of Severity (CGI-S), 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (Self-Report) (QIDS-SR(16)), Integral Inventory for Depression (IID) total scores and remission rates were statistically significantly greater with duloxetine than SSRI monotherapy (P < 0.001, 0.010, <0.001, and 0.002, respectively), but TESD attenuated improvements in quality of life measures (EuroQoL questionnaire-5 dimensions [EQ-5D] and Sheehan Disability Scale [SDS] scores: ≤0.012). Several factors were significantly (P ≤ 0.05) associated with TESD at week 8 in this study. CONCLUSIONS: TESD rates with duloxetine and SSRIs at week 8 were comparable, however, significant differences in effectiveness were observed in favour of duloxetine. Antidepressant tolerability with respect to TESD must be managed to maximize remission of depressed patients.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Captación Adrenérgica/efectos adversos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/efectos adversos , Disfunciones Sexuales Psicológicas/inducido químicamente , Tiofenos/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Captación Adrenérgica/farmacología , Adulto , Clorhidrato de Duloxetina , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/farmacología , Tiofenos/farmacología
17.
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract ; 15(4): 242-54, 2011 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22121997

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate frequencies of treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction (TESD) in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) treated with duloxetine or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) monotherapy for up to 6 months in a prospective, observational study. METHODS: Sexually active MDD patients without sexual dysfunction at entry were enrolled from twelve countries (N = 1,647). TESD was assessed over the study period using the Arizona sexual experience (ASEX) scale. A priori-specified secondary 6-month clinical endpoints were also examined. RESULTS: The frequency of TESD at 6 months with duloxetine was comparable to that with SSRI monotherapy (23.4 and 28.7%, respectively; P = 0.087). Improvements in Clinical Global Impressions of Severity (CGI-S), 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (QIDS-SR(16)), Integral Inventory for Depression (IID) total scores, remission and sustained remission rates were statistically significantly greater with duloxetine than SSRI monotherapy at 6 months (P < 0.001 for each), but TESD attenuated improvements in quality of life measures. Four factors were consistently significantly (P ≤ 0.05) associated with TESD at week 8 and 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Six-month TESD rates were comparable between duloxetine and SSRIs, with greater MDD effectiveness in favour of duloxetine. Improved recognition and management of TESD may improve quality of life for MDD patients in usual clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/efectos adversos , Disfunciones Sexuales Psicológicas/inducido químicamente , Tiofenos/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Captación Adrenérgica/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Captación Adrenérgica/farmacología , Adulto , Clorhidrato de Duloxetina , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/farmacología , Tiofenos/farmacología
18.
Compr Psychiatry ; 51(5): 504-9, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20728008

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Tobacco smoking is more prevalent among people with mental illnesses, including bipolar disorder, than in the general community. Most data are cross-sectional, and there are no prospective trials examining the relationship of smoking to outcome in bipolar disorder. The impact of tobacco smoking on mental health outcomes was investigated in a 24-month, naturalistic, longitudinal study of 240 people with bipolar disorder or schizoaffective disorder. METHOD: Participants were interviewed and data recorded by trained study clinicians at 9 interviews during the study period. RESULTS: Comparisons were made between participants who smoked daily (n = 122) and the remaining study participants (n = 117). During the 24-month study period, the daily smokers had poorer scores on the Clinical Global Impressions-Depression (P = .034) and Clinical Global Impressions-Overall Bipolar (P = .026) scales and had lengthier stays in hospital (P = .012), compared with nonsmokers. LIMITATIONS: Smoking status was determined by self-report. Nicotine dependence was not measured. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that smoking is associated with poorer mental health outcomes in bipolar and schizoaffective disorder.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar/terapia , Trastornos Psicóticos/terapia , Fumar/epidemiología , Adulto , Edad de Inicio , Trastorno Bipolar/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Análisis de los Mínimos Cuadrados , Masculino , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Trastornos Psicóticos/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Victoria/epidemiología
19.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci ; 63(4): 399-407, 2008 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18426964

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain sufferers and caregivers share the risk of higher levels of psychological distress and adverse effects on well-being. This study examined the joint impact of chronic pain and primary caregiving on older people. METHODS: Data came from the New South Wales (NSW) Older People's Health Survey 1999, a state-wide general health survey of over 9000 NSW residents 65 years old or older. Using survey logistic regression modeling, we examined the relationship between chronic pain with different levels of disability, caregiving status, self-reported physical functioning, and two dependent variables--poor/fair self-rated health and psychological distress. RESULTS: Caregivers with chronic pain reported more psychological distress and poorer self-rated health than caregivers without pain, when both were compared to noncaregivers without pain (age-adjusted and sex-adjusted odds ratios [ORs] for caregivers with pain were 3.4 and 2.8, respectively, both p <.001). Caregivers with pain and noncaregivers with pain had similar patterns of results. Physical function significantly declined for both caregivers and noncaregivers with pain when compared with noncaregivers without pain. CONCLUSIONS: Older people coping with caregiving and chronic pain are a potentially vulnerable group. Chronic pain status should be ascertained in older people who are caregivers, with particular attention to the issue of caregiver psychological distress and physical well-being.


Asunto(s)
Cuidadores/psicología , Cuidadores/estadística & datos numéricos , Dolor/epidemiología , Dolor/psicología , Actividades Cotidianas , Adaptación Psicológica , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Evaluación Geriátrica , Estado de Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Nueva Gales del Sur , Estrés Psicológico
20.
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract ; 11(2): 129-39, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24937558

RESUMEN

Objective. Painful physical symptoms occur frequently in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), and although numerous studies report the effect of antidepressants on emotional aspects of depression, few focus on their effect on physical symptoms. This observational study was conducted, in a clinical practice setting, to determine antidepressant treatment decisions and their outcome on the physical and emotional symptoms of MDD. Methods. Patients with a mean score ≥2 for pain-related items on the Somatic Symptom Inventory (SSI) were classified with painful physical symptoms (PPS +) and differentiated from the remaining patients (PPS -). Severity of depression and physical pain were determined using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD17) and Clinical Global Impressions of Severity Scale (CGI-S), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS), respectively. Results. At baseline, 72.6% of patients were PPS+. Compared to PPS- patients, PPS +patients were, on average, significantly more depressed at baseline (mean difference [95% CI]: HAMD17 4.6 [3.6, 5.5] and CGI-S 0.3 [0.2, 0.4]; all p<0.0001), and remained more depressed and in greater pain at endpoint (HAMD17p=0.0074, CGI-S P =0.0151, and VAS P <0.0001). In addition, fewer PPS+ patients (65.8%) achieved remission (total HAMD17≤7) compared to PPS- patients (74.6%, P =0.0180). Conclusions. Painful physical symptoms are prevalent in MDD patients, highlighting the importance of addressing both the physical and emotional symptoms of depression.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA