RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Identifying high-risk patients for transfusion after cardiac operations would alter postoperative management. The aim of this study was to investigate closure time (CT) measured by platelet function analyzer (PFA) for prediction of bleeding and transfusions. METHODS: 66 patients were scheduled for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and 30 patients for valve repair and replacement (non-CABG). Measurements of PFA-100® CT for collagen and adenosine diphosphate (cADP) and collagen and epinephrine (cEPI) were performed 15 min after protamine administration. Blood loss was measured, and the amount of transfusion products was recorded postoperatively. RESULTS: The study demonstrated significant differences between CABG patients with cADP-CT ≥ 118 s and those with cADP-CT < 118 s with regard to blood loss for 24 h (p = 0.001) and blood loss for 25-48 h (p = 0.003) as well as fresh frozen plasma (p = 0.015), platelet (p > 0.001) and red blood cell (p = 0.002) units given in 48 postoperative h. There were no differences cardiopulmonary bypass when was applied. In non-CABG patients, there were no differences in blood loss and transfusion requirements with respect to cADP-CT and cEPI-CT. CONCLUSION: Postoperative platelet dysfunction measured by a prolonged cADP-CT was significant predictor of blood loss and transfusion in CABG patients.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is a lack of data concerning diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with new or increasing microcalcifications. PURPOSE: To evaluate suspicious microcalcifications by using comparison mammography, MRI, and a combination of both methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our study group consisted of 55 patients with mammographically detected BI-RADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System) 3-5 microcalcifications for whom comparison mammograms were available. All patients underwent breast MRI before SVAB (stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy). Diagnostic performances of comparison mammography and MRI were evaluated, as well as the combination of the respective imaging findings. RESULTS: Of the 55 microcalcification cases, 35 showed progression and 20 were stable between interval screenings. The negative predictive value (NPV) of comparison mammography was 100%, whereas the NPV of MRI was 92%. However, the specificity of combination of findings was 97%, significantly higher than the 42% specificity of comparison mammography (P < 0.001). Additionally, the positive predictive value of combination of findings was 93% versus 44% of comparison mammography (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: A biopsy is recommended when MRI positive lesion corresponding the area of new or increasing mammographic microcalcifications is detected. Patients with stable microcalcifications can continue follow-up mammography, regardless of MRI result.
