Comparing Australian health worker and student attitudes and concerns about providing care to people living with hepatitis B.

ISSUE ADDRESSED: Hepatitis B (HBV) is a major public health issue with over 250 million people chronically infected worldwide. In Australia, prevalence is higher among migrant communities and these groups may be reticent to attend health care services due to concerns about experiencing stigma and discrimination. The way health workers perceive their clients, particularly those of migrant backgrounds, may influence the way they treat these clients and the quality of care provided. This study investigated and compared the attitudes and concerns health workers and health students have towards working with clients living with HBV. METHODS: Health workers (n = 551) and students (n = 199) completed an online survey which investigated attitudes towards people living with HBV, comfort with providing care for these clients and concerns they have about working with them. RESULTS: Health students expressed less comfort (U = 47 611, z = -2.73, P = .006) and reported more concerns about working with people with HBV than qualified health workers (U = 61611.50, z = 2.64, P = .008). Students' concerns were centred around their own ability to provide care rather than issues related to clients. There were no differences in overall attitudes towards people living with HBV between health workers and students. CONCLUSION: To address concerns that health workers and students may have in working with people living with HBV, particularly those from migrant communities, and to ensure that health workers feel comfortable and confident, HBV workforce development should be included in undergraduate and postgraduate training programmes as well as in continuing professional education. SO WHAT?: This will assist the health workforce to develop competency in the treatment of people living with HBV, with the ultimate aim of providing best quality, non-judgemental care to all people living with HBV.

Health service utilization and experiences of stigma amongst people who inject drugs in Melbourne, Australia.

Whilst the testing and treatment of people who inject drugs (PWID) in Australia is a priority for local hepatitis C (HCV) elimination efforts, perceived stigma related to injecting drug use (IDU) has been identified as a major barrier for PWID engaging in health services. We used data from the EC Experience cohort study to explore associations between IDU-related perceived stigma and the number of different health services accessed by PWID in Melbourne, Australia. Data from the baseline questionnaire were used. Primary outcome was self-reported experience of stigma due to IDU (never, rarely, sometimes, often, always) in the previous 12 months. An ordinal logistic regression model assessed the association between stigma experienced and the number of different health services used (1-2, 3-4, 5-6, 7-10 different services) adjusted for recent IDU and key socio-demographics. Between September 2018 and February 2020, 281 participants were recruited from four health services. Sixty-nine per cent were male, median age was 42, 83% reported past-month IDU, 34% had never tested/tested >12 months, 8% tested negative <12 months, 43% were HCV-positive but not treated and 16% had been treated. Those accessing 5-6 services had 2.2 times greater odds of experiencing stigma (95% CI 0.86-6.65) compared with those using <5 services and those reporting 7-10 services had 2.43 times greater odds of experiencing stigma (95% CI 0.85-6.92) compared with those accessing <7 services. In conclusion, experiences of stigma may not necessarily be a barrier for PWID to access health services, but high rates of health service use may further expose, exacerbate or exaggerate stigma amongst PWID. Further examination of how stigma may be in/directly impact on hepatitis C treatment uptake is important and place-based interventions aimed at reducing stigma experienced by PWID may be needed.

Sustained, Low Prevalence of Undiagnosed HIV Among Gay and Bisexual Men in Sydney, Australia Coincident With Increased Testing and Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use: Results From Repeated, Bio-Behavioral Studies 2014-2018.

BACKGROUND: Gay and bisexual men with undiagnosed HIV contribute disproportionately to HIV transmission in Australia. METHODS: In 2014 and 2018, we recruited men at gay venues and events in Sydney. Participants self-completed surveys and provided oral fluid samples for HIV testing. We calculated the prevalence of HIV and undiagnosed infection, and assessed changes in behavior, HIV testing, and the use of pre-exposure prophylaxis. We weighted the samples to adjust for differences in where participants were recruited between rounds. Two-sample tests of proportion were used to compare prevalence estimates and χ tests to assess differences between the samples. RESULTS: In 2014, 944 men were recruited, and 890 men were recruited in 2018. In 2014, the weighted estimate of HIV prevalence was 6.1% [95% confidence intervals (CI): 4.6 to 7.6], of which 13.8% (95% CI: 5.0 to 22.7) was undiagnosed. In 2018, weighted HIV prevalence was 6.4% (95% CI: 4.8 to 8.0), of which 5.3% (95% CI: 0.5 to 11.1) was undiagnosed. Between 2014 and 2018 among all participants, men reporting at least 10 recent casual partners increased from 22.3% to 27.7% (P = 0.008), condomless anal intercourse with casual partners in the previous 6 months increased from 23.9% to 37.3% (P < 0.001), and sexually transmitted infection diagnoses in the previous year increased from 14.4% to 27.5% (P < 0.001). HIV testing and the use of pre-exposure prophylaxis in the previous 6 months increased from 49.6% to 56.3% (P = 0.004) and 2.0%-21.0% (P < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated, bio-behavioral surveillance suggests the prevalence of undiagnosed HIV remains low in Sydney, despite gay and bisexual men reporting more casual sex partners, condomless sex, and sexually transmitted infections.

HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Cascades to Assess Implementation in Australia: Results From Repeated, National Behavioral Surveillance of Gay and Bisexual Men, 2014-2018.

BACKGROUND: HIV prevention cascades can assist in monitoring the implementation of prevention methods like preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). We developed 2 PrEP cascades for Australia's primary HIV-affected population, gay and bisexual men. METHODS: Data were drawn from 2 national, repeated, cross-sectional surveys (the Gay Community Periodic Surveys and PrEPARE Project). One cascade had 3 steps, and the other had 7 steps. Trends over time were assessed using logistic regression. For the most recent year, we identified the biggest drop between steps in each cascade and compared the characteristics of men between the 2 steps using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Thirty-nine thousand six hundred and seventy non-HIV-positive men participated in the Periodic Surveys during 2014-2018. PrEP eligibility increased from 28.1% (1901/6762) in 2014 to 37.3% (2935/7878) in 2018 (P < 0.001), awareness increased from 29.6% (563/1901) to 87.1% (2555/2935; P < 0.001), and PrEP use increased from 3.7% (21/563) to 45.2% (1155/2555; P < 0.001). Of 1038 non-HIV-positive men in the PrEPARE Project in 2017, 54.2% (n = 563) were eligible for PrEP, 97.2% (547/563) were aware, 67.6% (370/547) were willing to use PrEP, 73.5% (272/370) had discussed PrEP with a doctor, 78.3% (213/272) were using PrEP, 97.2% (207/213) had recently tested, and 75.8% (157/207) reported reduced HIV concern and increased pleasure because of PrEP. The break point analyses indicated that PrEP coverage was affected by geographical availability, education level, employment, and willingness to use PrEP. CONCLUSIONS: PrEP eligibility, awareness, and use have rapidly increased among Australian gay and bisexual men. The cascades identify disparities in uptake by eligible men as a result of socioeconomic factors and PrEP's acceptability.