Repeat Placental Growth Factor-Based Testing in Women With Suspected Preterm Preeclampsia: A Stratified Analysis of the PARROT-2 Trial.

BACKGROUND: PlGF (placental growth factor)-based testing reduces severe maternal adverse outcomes. Repeat PlGF-based testing is not associated with improved perinatal or maternal outcomes. This planned secondary analysis aimed to determine whether there is a subgroup of women who benefit from repeat testing. METHODS: Pregnant individuals with suspected preterm preeclampsia were randomized to repeat revealed PlGF-based testing, compared with usual care where testing was concealed. Perinatal and maternal outcomes were stratified by trial group, by initial PlGF-based test result, and by PlGF-based test type (PlGF or sFlt-1 [soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1]/PlGF ratio). RESULTS: A total of 1252 pregnant individuals were included. Abnormal initial PlGF-based test identified a more severe phenotype of preeclampsia, at increased risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Repeat testing was not significantly associated with clinical benefit in women with abnormal initial results. Of women with a normal initial result, 20% developed preeclampsia, with the majority at least 3 to 4 weeks after initial presentation. Repeat test results were more likely to change from normal to abnormal in symptomatic women (112/415; 27%) compared with asymptomatic women (163/890; 18%). A higher proportion of symptomatic women who changed from normal to abnormal were diagnosed with preeclampsia, compared with asymptomatic women. CONCLUSIONS: Our results do not demonstrate evidence of the clinical benefit of repeating PlGF-based testing if the initial result is abnormal. Judicious use of repeat PlGF-based testing to stratify risk may be considered at least 2 weeks after a normal initial test result, particularly in women who have symptoms or signs of preeclampsia. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN85912420; Unique identifier: ISRCTN85912420.

Repeat placental growth factor-based testing in women with suspected preterm pre-eclampsia (PARROT-2): a multicentre, parallel-group, superiority, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Placental growth factor (PlGF)-based testing has high diagnostic accuracy for predicting pre-eclampsia needing delivery, significantly reducing time to diagnosis and severe maternal adverse outcomes. The clinical benefit of repeat PlGF-based testing is unclear. We aimed to determine whether repeat PlGF-based testing (using a clinical management algorithm and nationally recommended thresholds) reduces adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnant individuals with suspected preterm pre-eclampsia. METHODS: In this multicentre, parallel-group, superiority, randomised controlled trial, done in 22 maternity units across England, Scotland, and Wales, we recruited women aged 18 years or older with suspected pre-eclampsia between 22 weeks and 0 days of gestation and 35 weeks and 6 days of gestation. Women were randomly assigned (1:1) to revealed repeat PlGF-based testing or concealed repeat testing with usual care. The intervention was not masked to women or partners, or clinicians or data collectors, due to the nature of the trial. The trial statistician was masked to intervention allocation. The primary outcome was a perinatal composite of stillbirth, early neonatal death, or neonatal unit admission. The primary analysis was by the intention-to-treat principle, with a per-protocol analysis restricted to women managed according to their allocation group. The trial was prospectively registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN 85912420. FINDINGS: Between Dec 17, 2019, and Sept 30, 2022, 1253 pregnant women were recruited and randomly assigned treatment; one patient was excluded due to randomisation error. 625 women were allocated to revealed repeat PlGF-based testing and 627 women were allocated to usual care with concealed repeat PlGF-based testing (mean age 32·3 [SD 5·7] years; 879 [70%] white). One woman in the concealed repeat PlGF-based testing group was lost to follow-up. There was no significant difference in the primary perinatal composite outcome between the revealed repeat PlGF-based testing group (195 [31·2%]) of 625 women) compared with the concealed repeat PlGF-based testing group (174 [27·8%] of 626 women; relative risk 1·21 [95% CI 0·95-1·33]; p=0·18). The results from the per-protocol analysis were similar. There were four serious adverse events in the revealed repeat PlGF-based testing group and six in the concealed repeat PlGF-based testing group; all serious adverse events were deemed unrelated to the intervention by the site principal investigators and chief investigator. INTERPRETATION: Repeat PlGF-based testing in pregnant women with suspected pre-eclampsia was not associated with improved perinatal outcomes. In a high-income setting with a low prevalence of adverse outcomes, universal, routine repeat PlGF-based testing of all individuals with suspected pre-eclampsia is not recommended. FUNDING: Tommy's Charity, Jon Moulton Charitable Trust, and National Institute for Health and Care Research Guy's and St Thomas' Biomedical Research Centre.

Pregnancy-associated changes in urinary uromodulin excretion in chronic hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy involves major adaptations in renal haemodynamics, tubular, and endocrine functions. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are a leading cause of maternal mortality and morbidity. Uromodulin is a nephron-derived protein that is associated with hypertension and kidney diseases. Here we study the role of urinary uromodulin excretion in hypertensive pregnancy. METHODS: Urinary uromodulin was measured by ELISA in 146 pregnant women with treated chronic hypertension (n = 118) and controls (n = 28). We studied non-pregnant and pregnant Wistar Kyoto and Stroke Prone Spontaneously Hypertensive rats (n = 8/strain), among which a group of pregnant Stroke-Prone Spontaneously Hypertensive rats was treated with either nifedipine (n = 7) or propranolol (n = 8). RESULTS: In pregnant women, diagnosis of chronic hypertension, increased maternal body mass index, Black maternal ethnicity and elevated systolic blood pressure at the first antenatal visit were significantly associated with a lower urinary uromodulin-to-creatinine ratio. In rodents, pre-pregnancy urinary uromodulin excretion was twofold lower in Stroke-Prone Spontaneously Hypertensive rats than in Wistar Kyoto rats. During pregnancy, the urinary uromodulin excretion rate gradually decreased in Wistar Kyoto rats (a twofold decrease), whereas a 1.5-fold increase was observed in Stroke-Prone Spontaneously Hypertensive rats compared to pre-pregnancy levels. Changes in uromodulin were attributed by kidney injury in pregnant rats. Neither antihypertensive changed urinary uromodulin excretion rate in pregnant Stroke-Prone Spontaneously Hypertensive rats. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, we demonstrate pregnancy-associated differences in urinary uromodulin: creatinine ratio and uromodulin excretion rate between chronic hypertensive and normotensive pregnancies. Further research is needed to fully understand uromodulin physiology in human pregnancy and establish uromodulin's potential as a biomarker for renal adaptation and renal function in pregnancy.

Trends in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and vaccine antibody prevalence in a multi-ethnic inner-city antenatal population: A cross-sectional surveillance study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) seroprevalence in pregnancy in an inner-city setting and assess associations with demographic factors and vaccination timing. DESIGN: Repeated cross-sectional surveillance study. SETTING: London maternity centre. SAMPLE: A total of 906 pregnant women attending nuchal scans, July 2020-January 2022. METHODS: Blood samples were tested for IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N) and spike (S) proteins. Self-reported vaccination status and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection were recorded. Multivariable regression models determined demographic factors associated with seroprevalence and antibody titres. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Immunoglobulin G N- and S-protein antibody titres. RESULTS: Of the 960 women, 196 (20.4%) were SARS-CoV-2 seropositive from previous infection. Of these, 70 (35.7%) self-reported previous infection. Among unvaccinated women, women of black ethnic backgrounds were most likely to be SARS-CoV-2 seropositive (versus white adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 1.88, 95% CI 1.35-2.61, p < 0.001). Women from black and mixed ethnic backgrounds were least likely to have a history of vaccination with seropositivity to S-protein (versus white aRR 0.58, 95% CI 0.40-0.84, p = 0.004; aRR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34-0.92, p = 0.021, respectively). Double vaccinated, previously infected women had higher IgG S-protein antibody titres than unvaccinated, previously infected women (mean difference 4.76 fold-change, 95% CI 2.65-6.86, p < 0.001). Vaccination timing before versus during pregnancy did not affect IgG S-antibody titres (mean difference -0.28 fold-change, 95% CI -2.61 to 2.04, p = 0.785). CONCLUSIONS: This cross-sectional study demonstrates high rates of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection with women of black ethnic backgrounds having higher infection risk and lower vaccine uptake. SARS-CoV-2 antibody titres were highest among double-vaccinated, infected women.

Planned delivery for pre-eclampsia between 34 and 37 weeks of gestation: the PHOENIX RCT.

BACKGROUND: In women with late preterm pre-eclampsia (i.e. at 34+0 to 36+6 weeks' gestation), the optimal delivery time is unclear because limitation of maternal-fetal disease progression needs to be balanced against infant complications. The aim of this trial was to determine whether or not planned earlier initiation of delivery reduces maternal adverse outcomes without substantial worsening of perinatal or infant outcomes, compared with expectant management, in women with late preterm pre-eclampsia. METHODS: We undertook an individually randomised, triple non-masked controlled trial in 46 maternity units across England and Wales, with an embedded health economic evaluation, comparing planned delivery and expectant management (usual care) in women with late preterm pre-eclampsia. The co-primary maternal outcome was a maternal morbidity composite or recorded systolic blood pressure of ≥ 160 mmHg (superiority hypothesis). The co-primary short-term perinatal outcome was a composite of perinatal deaths or neonatal unit admission (non-inferiority hypothesis). Analyses were by intention to treat, with an additional per-protocol analysis for the perinatal outcome. The primary 2-year infant neurodevelopmental outcome was measured using the PARCA-R (Parent Report of Children's Abilities-Revised) composite score. The planned sample size of the trial was 900 women; the trial is now completed. We undertook two linked substudies. RESULTS: Between 29 September 2014 and 10 December 2018, 901 women were recruited; 450 women [448 women (two withdrew consent) and 471 infants] were allocated to planned delivery and 451 women (451 women and 475 infants) were allocated to expectant management. The incidence of the co-primary maternal outcome was significantly lower in the planned delivery group [289 (65%) women] than in the expectant management group [338 (75%) women] (adjusted relative risk 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.79 to 0.94; p = 0.0005). The incidence of the co-primary perinatal outcome was significantly higher in the planned delivery group [196 (42%) infants] than in the expectant management group [159 (34%) infants] (adjusted relative risk 1.26, 95% confidence interval 1.08 to 1.47; p = 0.0034), but indicators of neonatal morbidity were similar in both groups. At 2-year follow-up, the mean PARCA-R scores were 89.5 points (standard deviation 18.2 points) for the planned delivery group (290 infants) and 91.9 points (standard deviation 18.4 points) for the expectant management group (256 infants), both within the normal developmental range (adjusted mean difference -2.4 points, 95% confidence interval -5.4 to 0.5 points; non-inferiority p = 0.147). Planned delivery was significantly cost-saving (-£2711, 95% confidence interval -£4840 to -£637) compared with expectant management. There were nine serious adverse events in the planned delivery group and 12 in the expectant management group. CONCLUSION: In women with late preterm pre-eclampsia, planned delivery reduces short-term maternal morbidity compared with expectant management, with more neonatal unit admissions related to prematurity but no indicators of greater short-term neonatal morbidity (such as need for respiratory support). At 2-year follow-up, around 60% of parents reported follow-up scores. Average infant development was within the normal range for both groups; the small between-group mean difference in PARCA-R scores is unlikely to be clinically important. Planned delivery was significantly cost-saving to the health service. These findings should be discussed with women with late preterm pre-eclampsia to allow shared decision-making on timing of delivery. LIMITATIONS: Limitations of the trial include the challenges of finding a perinatal outcome that adequately represented the potential risks of both groups and a maternal outcome that reflects the multiorgan manifestations of pre-eclampsia. The incidences of maternal and perinatal primary outcomes were higher than anticipated on the basis of previous studies, but this did not limit interpretation of the analysis. The trial was limited by a higher loss to follow-up rate than expected, meaning that the extent and direction of bias in outcomes (between responders and non-responders) is uncertain. A longer follow-up period (e.g. up to 5 years) would have enabled us to provide further evidence on long-term infant outcomes, but this runs the risk of greater attrition and increased expense. FUTURE WORK: We identified a number of further questions that could be prioritised through a formal scoping process, including uncertainties around disease-modifying interventions, prognostic factors, longer-term follow-up, the perspectives of women and their families, meta-analysis with other studies, effect of a similar intervention in other health-care settings, and clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of other related policies around neonatal unit admission in late preterm birth. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was prospectively registered as ISRCTN01879376. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research ( NIHR ) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in Health Technology Assessment. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Prevention of gestational diabetes in pregnant women with obesity: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Obesity in pregnancy increases the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and associated adverse outcomes. Despite metabolic differences, all pregnant women with obesity are considered to have the same risk of developing GDM. Improved risk stratification is required to enable targeted intervention in women with obesity who would benefit the most. The aim of this study is to identify pregnant women with obesity at higher risk of developing GDM and, in a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT), test feasibility and assess the efficacy of a lifestyle intervention and/or metformin to improve glycaemic control. METHODS: Women aged 18 years or older with a singleton pregnancy and body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30kg/m2 will be recruited from one maternity unit in London, UK. The risk of GDM will be assessed using a multivariable GDM prediction model combining maternal age, mid-arm circumference, systolic blood pressure, glucose, triglycerides and HbA1c. Women identified at a higher risk of developing GDM will be randomly allocated to one of two intervention groups (lifestyle advice with or without metformin) or standard antenatal care. The primary feasibility outcomes are study recruitment, retention rate and intervention adherence and to collect information needed for the sample size calculation for the definitive trial. A process evaluation will assess the acceptability of study processes and procedures to women. Secondary patient-centred outcomes include a reduction in mean glucose/24h of 0.5mmol/l as assessed by continuous glucose monitoring and changes in a targeted maternal metabolome, dietary intake and physical activity. A sample of 60 high-risk women is required. DISCUSSION: Early risk stratification of GDM in pregnant women with obesity and targeted intervention using lifestyle advice with or without metformin could improve glucose tolerance compared to standard antenatal care. The results from this feasibility study will inform a larger adequately powered RCT should the intervention show trends for potential effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study has been approved by the NHS Research Ethics Committee (UK IRAS integrated research application system; reference 18/LO/1500). EudraCT number 2018-000003-16 .

A prognostic model to guide decision-making on timing of delivery in late preterm pre-eclampsia: the PEACOCK prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Pre-eclampsia affects around 2-3% of all pregnancies, and is associated with potential serious complications for the woman and the baby. Once diagnosed, progression of the syndrome can be unpredictable, and decisions around timing of delivery need to take into account evolving maternal complications and perinatal morbidity. Novel prognostic models and blood biomarkers for determination of need for delivery in pregnancies with pre-eclampsia are now emerging. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to establish a prognostic model to inform optimal timing of delivery in women with late preterm pre-eclampsia (34+ 0 to 36+ 6 weeks' gestation), comparing novel candidate biomarkers (e.g. placental growth factor) with clinical and routinely collected blood/urinary parameters [incorporated into the PREP-S (Prediction models for Risk of Early-onset Pre-eclampsia - Survival) model] to determine clinically indicated need for delivery for pre-eclampsia (or related complications) within 7 days of assessment. METHODS: Prospective recruitment of women in whom blood samples for placental growth factor and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 testing was obtained, alongside clinical data, for use within the PREP-S model. Candidate variables were compared using standard methods (sensitivity, specificity, receiver operator curve areas). Estimated probability of early delivery from PREP-S was compared with actual event rates by calibration. SETTING: The PEACOCK (Prognostic indicators of severe disEAse in women with late preterm pre-eClampsia tO guide deCision maKing on timing of delivery) study was a prospective cohort study, nested within the PHOENIX (Pre-eclampsia in HOspital: Early iNductIon or eXpectant management) trial. PARTICIPANTS: Women between 34+ 0 and 36+ 6 weeks' gestation, with a diagnosis of pre-eclampsia, in whom a plasma (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) blood sample for placental growth factor testing was obtained, alongside clinical data for the assessment of variables in a prognostic model. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinically indicated need for delivery for pre-eclampsia within 7 days of assessment. Statistical analysis: both PREP-S and placental growth factor were assessed and compared using standard methods (sensitivity and specificity for placental growth factor thresholds of 100 pg/ml and < 12 pg/ml, and receiver operating characteristic areas for continuous measurements). The estimated probability of early delivery from PREP-S was compared with actual event rates for women with similar probabilities by calibration. Calibration using logistic regression was also used. RESULTS: Between 27 April 2016 and 24 December 2018, 501 women were recruited to the study. Although placental growth factor testing had high sensitivity (97.9%) for delivery within 7 days, the negative predictive value was only 71.4% and the specificity was low (8.4%). The area under the curve for the clinical prediction model (PREP-S) and placental growth factor in this cohort in determining need for delivery within 7 days was 0.64 (standard error 0.03) and 0.60 (standard error 0.03), respectively, and 0.65 (standard error 0.03) in combination. LIMITATIONS: A high proportion of women in this cohort already had low placental growth factor concentrations at the time of confirmed diagnosis, which reduced the ability of the biomarker to further predict adverse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In this group of women with late preterm pre-eclampsia, placental growth factor measurement is not likely to add to the current clinical assessment to help plan care for late preterm pre-eclampsia regarding timing of delivery. Existing models developed in women with early-onset pre-eclampsia to predict complications cannot be used to predict clinically indicated need for delivery in women with late preterm pre-eclampsia. FUTURE WORK: Further statistical modelling and subgroup analysis is being considered to assess if improved model performance in the whole cohort or a subgroup can be achieved. Addition of other biomarkers to the model may also be of use and will be explored. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN01879376. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 30. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

WHY DID WE DO THIS STUDY?: Pre-eclampsia is a condition occurring in pregnancy. The condition can affect the health of the woman and the baby, often affecting the woman's kidneys and liver and the baby's growth. In severe cases, babies can be stillborn. Once pre-eclampsia is diagnosed, the only cure is to deliver the baby. It is often not possible to identify women and babies at high risk of the severe complications of pre-eclampsia who would benefit from early delivery. We wanted to see if we could improve the way that women with pre-eclampsia are assessed to work out who needs to be delivered early to prevent complications. WHAT DID WE DO?: A total of 501 women affected by pre-eclampsia took part in our study and we measured substances in their blood. We used these results, along with other clinical measures, to see if we could improve the way that we try and tell which women need delivery soon. WHAT DID WE FIND?: The blood markers were not able to tell us which women needed delivery within 7 days, and they were not able to improve our detection rate of women who need delivery to prevent complications. WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR WOMEN WITH PRE-ECLAMPSIA?: These methods cannot be recommended to plan care for women and babies affected by pre-eclampsia between 34 and 37 weeks' gestation to help tell us when the baby should be born. We need to find better tests to help find out which women and babies are most at risk of the complications of pre-eclampsia.

Prognostic indicators of severe disease in late preterm pre-eclampsia to guide decision making on timing of delivery: The PEACOCK study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic performance of angiogenic biomarkers in determining need for delivery in seven days in women with late preterm preeclampsia. STUDY DESIGN: In a prospective observational cohort study in 36 maternity units across England and Wales, we studied the diagnostic accuracy of placental growth factor (PlGF) and sFlt-1 in determining the risk of complications requiring delivery in late preterm (34+0 to 36+6 weeks' gestation) preeclampsia. Angiogenic biomarkers were measured using the Quidel (PlGF) and Roche (sFlt-1:PlGF ratio) assays. Additional clinical data was obtained for use within the established 'Prediction of complications in early-onset pre-eclampsia' (PREP)-S prognostic model. Biomarkers were assessed using standard methods (sensitivity, specificity, Receiver Operator Curve areas). Estimated probability of early delivery from PREP-S was compared to actual event rates. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinically indicated need for delivery for pre-eclampsia within seven days. RESULTS: PlGF (Quidel) testing had high sensitivity (97.9%) for delivery within seven days, but negative predictive value was only 71.4%, with low specificity (8.4%), with similar results from sFlt-1/PlGF assay. The area under the curve for PlGF was 0.60 (SE 0.03), and 0.65 (0.03), and 0.64 (0.03) for PREP-S in combination with PlGF, and sFlt-1:PlGF, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Angiogenic biomarkers do not add to clinical assessment to help determine need for delivery for women with late preterm pre-eclampsia. Existing models developed in women with early-onset pre-eclampsia to predict complications cannot be used to predict clinically indicated need for delivery in women with late preterm pre-eclampsia.

Placental and endothelial biomarkers for the prediction of superimposed pre-eclampsia in chronic kidney disease.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate PlGF, sFlt-1, and novel endothelial biomarkers hyaluronan and vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM), for the prediction of superimposed pre-eclampsia in women with chronic kidney disease (CKD). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study of pregnant women with CKD in UK. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes including superimposed pre-eclampsia were based on predetermined criteria. Test performances of plasma PlGF, serum sFlt-1:PlGF, hyaluronan and VCAM concentrations were evaluated as area under the receiver-operating curve and at established and exploratory threshold concentrations. RESULTS: There were 232 pregnancies in 221 women with CKD. One third (76/232) developed superimposed pre-eclampsia. From 21 to 37 weeks' gestation, plasma PlGF was decreased among women that developed superimposed preeclampsia. Plasma PlGF levels < 150 pg/ml had the highest sensitivity (79% 95% CI: 58-91%) and negative predictive value (97%, 95% CI: 93-99%) for the prediction of delivery with superimposed pre-eclampsia within 14 days. Predictive performances of hyaluronan and VCAM were lower than for plasma PlGF. Low plasma PlGF, high hyaluronan and high VCAM concentrations had lower predictive performance in women with pre-pregnancy CKD stages 3-5 compared to stages 1-2. sFlt-1:PlGF > 38 did not usefully predict the need to deliver in women with CKD when measured in serum. CONCLUSIONS: Increased surveillance for the need for delivery should take place in women with CKD and plasma PlGF below 150 pg/ml after 20 weeks' gestation, with awareness that predictive value is reduced as excretory kidney function declines. Maternal endothelial dysfunction may alter the PlGF threshold at which superimposed pre-eclampsia manifests in women with CKD.

Iodine status of pregnant women with obesity from inner city populations in the United Kingdom.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Iodine is essential for foetal neurodevelopment and growth. Requirements increase in pregnancy to support increased thyroid hormone synthesis for maternal and foetal requirements, and for foetal transfer. Iodine deficiency in pregnancy is widely reported, and obesity has been associated with sub-optimal thyroid function. We evaluated iodine status and its relation with birthweight in a secondary analysis of pregnant women with obesity from multi-ethnic inner-city settings who participated in the UK Pregnancies Better Eating and Activity trial (UPBEAT). SUBJECTS/METHODS: Iodine and creatinine concentrations were evaluated in spot urine samples in the second (15+0-18+6 weeks, n = 954) trimester of pregnancy. We assessed iodine status as urinary iodine concentration (UIC) and urinary iodine-to-creatinine ratio (UI/Cr) and applied WHO/UNICEF/IGN population threshold of median UIC > 150 µg/L for iodine sufficiency. Relationships between iodine status and birthweight were determined using linear and logistic regression with appropriate adjustment, including for maternal BMI and gestational age. RESULTS: Median (IQR) UIC and UI/Cr in the second trimester of pregnancy were 147 µg/L (99-257) and 97 µg/g (59-165), respectively. An UI/Cr <150 µg/g was observed in 70% of women. Compared to women with UI/Cr >150 µg/g, there was a trend for women with UI/Cr <150 µg/g to deliver infants with a lower birthweight (ß = -60.0 g; 95% CI -120.9 to -1.01, P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Iodine status of pregnant women with obesity from this cohort of UK women was suboptimal. Lower iodine status was associated with lower birthweight.

Rule-in thresholds for DELFIA Xpress PlGF 1-2-3 test for suspected pre-eclampsia.

We aimed to establish a rule-in threshold for the DELFIA Xpress placental growth factor (PlGF) 1-2-3 test. Plasma EDTA samples from 305 women presenting with suspected pre-eclampsia before 35 weeks' gestation were analysed using three different PlGF-based tests: PlGF 1-2-3 test (Perkin Elmer); Triage PlGF test (Quidel); Elecsys immunoassay sFlt-1/PlGF ratio (Roche). The rule-in threshold for PlGF 1-2-3 test created with equivalent specificity of the Quidel and Roche tests was 50 pg/ml. This can be used as a rule-in test for diagnosis of preterm pre-eclampsiarequiring delivery within 14 days (specificity 95.0% (95% CI 91.7-97.2%), positive predictive value50 (95% CI 30.6-69.4%), positive likelihood ratio 10.7 (5.8-20).