RESUMEN
Biopsychosocial factors are associated with disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) and exacerbate gastrointestinal symptoms. The mechanisms underlying pathophysiological alterations of stress remain unclear. Corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) is a central regulator of the hormonal stress response and has diverse impact on different organ systems. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of peripheral CRH infusion on meal-related gastrointestinal symptoms, gastric electrical activity, and gastric sensorimotor function in healthy volunteers (HVs). In a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study, we evaluated the effects of CRH on gastric motility and sensitivity. HVs were randomized to receive either peripheral-administered CRH (100 µg bolus + 1 µg/kg/h) or placebo (saline), followed by at least a 7-day washout period and assignment to the opposite treatment. Tests encompassed saliva samples, gastric-emptying (GE) testing, body surface gastric mapping (BSGM, Gastric Alimetry; Alimetry) to assess gastric myoelectrical activity with real-time symptom profiling, and a gastric barostat study to assess gastric sensitivity to distention and accommodation. Twenty HVs [13 women, mean age 29.2 ± 5.3 yr, body mass index (BMI) 23.3 ± 3.8 kg/m2] completed GE tests, of which 18 also underwent BSGM measurements during the GE tests. The GE half-time decreased significantly after CRH exposure (65.2 ± 17.4 vs. 78.8 ± 24.5 min, P = 0.02) with significantly increased gastric amplitude [49.7 (34.7-55.6) vs. 31.7 (25.7-51.0) µV, P < 0.01], saliva cortisol levels, and postprandial symptom severity. Eleven HVs also underwent gastric barostat studies on a separate day. However, the thresholds for discomfort during isobaric distensions, gastric compliance, and accommodation did not differ between CRH and placebo.NEW & NOTEWORTHY In healthy volunteers, peripheral corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) infusion accelerates gastric-emptying rate and increases postprandial gastric response, accompanied by a rise in symptoms, but does not alter gastric sensitivity or meal-induced accommodation. These findings underscore a significant link between stress and dyspeptic symptoms, with CRH playing a pivotal role in mediating these effects.
Asunto(s)
Hormona Liberadora de Corticotropina , Estudios Cruzados , Vaciamiento Gástrico , Voluntarios Sanos , Estómago , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Hormona Liberadora de Corticotropina/metabolismo , Hormona Liberadora de Corticotropina/administración & dosificación , Hormona Liberadora de Corticotropina/farmacología , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Estómago/efectos de los fármacos , Estómago/fisiología , Vaciamiento Gástrico/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto Joven , Saliva/metabolismoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBIs) have a complex pathophysiology that is often characterized by a relationship between food ingestion and triggering of symptoms. Understanding of the underlying mechanisms and the role of nutrients as a therapeutic target are rapidly evolving. AIMS AND METHODS: We performed a narrative review of the literature using the following keywords, their acronyms, and their associations: nutrients, disorders of gut-brain interaction; functional dyspepsia; malabsorption; irritable bowel syndrome; diarrhea; constipation. RESULTS: Functional dyspepsia displayed a significant correlation between volume, fat and/or wheat abundance, chemical composition of ingested food and symptoms of early satiety, fullness and weight loss. Carbohydrate malabsorption is related to enzyme deficiency throughout the GI tract. Food composition and richness in soluble vs. non-soluble fibers is related to constipation and diarrhea. The elimination of fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAPs) has a significant and non-unidirectional impact on irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Food volume, nutritive and chemical composition, and its malabsorption are associated with symptom generation in DGBIs. Further multicenter, randomized-controlled clinical trials are needed to clarify the underlying pathophysiology.
Asunto(s)
Encefalopatías , Dispepsia , Síndrome del Colon Irritable , Síndromes de Malabsorción , Humanos , Encéfalo , Diarrea , Estreñimiento , Estudios Multicéntricos como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Rome Foundation carried out a worldwide epidemiology study on DGBI according to the Rome IV criteria in 33 countries, including Belgium. DGBI prevalence varied between continents and countries, but prevalence differences within language groups in a single country have not yet been described. METHODS: We analyzed the prevalence rates of 18 DGBI and their psychosocial impact in Belgium in the French and Dutch language groups. KEY RESULTS: DGBI prevalence was similar in the French-speaking and Dutch-speaking population. Having one or more DGBI was negatively associated with psychosocial well-being. The scores for depression were lower in the Dutch-speaking participants with one or more DGBI compared to the French-speaking participants. Interestingly, we also found significantly lower scores in the general Dutch-speaking versus the French-speaking population for depression and non-gastrointesinal somatic symptoms, and higher global physical health and mental health quality-of-life component scores. In the Dutch-speaking group, medication use for gastric acid was lower, but use of prescribed analgesics was more common. Nevertheless, the use of non-prescribed pain medication was higher in the French-speaking group. Anxiety and sleep medication use was also higher in the latter group. CONCLUSIONS & INTERFERENCES: The results of this first in-depth analysis of Rome IV DGBI in Belgium show a higher prevalence for some DGBI in the French-speaking cohort, and a larger associated disease burden. These differences between language/culture groups in the same country support the psychosocial pathophysiological model of DGBI.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome del Colon Irritable , Lenguaje , Humanos , Bélgica/epidemiología , Ciudad de Roma , Encéfalo , Prevalencia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/diagnósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: For decades, mint has been used worldwide for its relieving effects against gastrointestinal disturbances. Peppermint is a perennial herb common in Europe and North America. The active ingredient of peppermint oil is menthol and has various gastroenterological and non-gastroenterological uses, especially in the context of functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs). METHODS: We conducted a literature search on the main medical databases for original articles, reviews, meta-analyses, randomized clinical trials, and case series using the following keywords and acronyms and their associations: peppermint oil, gastro-intestinal motility, irritable bowel syndrome, functional dyspepsia, gastrointestinal sensitivity and gastrointestinal endoscopy. RESULTS: Peppermint oil and its constituents exert smooth muscle relaxant and anti-spasmodic effects on the lower esophageal sphincter, stomach, duodenum, and large bowel. Moreover, peppermint oil can modulate visceral and central nervous system sensitivity. Taken together, these effects suggest using peppermint oil both for improved endoscopic performance and for treating functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome. Importantly, peppermint oil has an attractive safety profile compared to classical pharmacological treatments, especially in FGIDs. CONCLUSION: Peppermint oil is a safe herbal medicine therapy for application in gastroenterology, with promising scientific perspectives and rapidly expanding use in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Dispepsia , Gastritis , Gastroenterología , Síndrome del Colon Irritable , Humanos , Dispepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/tratamiento farmacológico , Aceites de Plantas/farmacología , Aceites de Plantas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The European consensus defined gastroparesis as a condition characterised by delayed gastric emptying (GE) in the absence of mechanical obstruction, with a symptom pattern of predominant nausea and/or vomiting and overlapping postprandial distress syndrome (PDS). The distinction between patients with gastroparesis and those with functional dyspepsia (FD), another gastrointestinal condition characterised by predominant PDS or epigastric pain syndrome symptoms, is ongoing. AIM: To investigate the extent that symptom patterns may differentiate gastroparesis from FD. METHODS: This retrospective study included 637 patients from Leuven University Hospital in 2006-2021 who had upper gastrointestinal symptoms, underwent a GE test, and completed the Dyspepsia Symptom Severity (DSS) questionnaire. Patients were identified as with gastroparesis-like symptoms (GPLS; i.e., moderate to severe nausea with moderate to severe PDS) or FD symptoms (not fitting GPLS). We excluded patients aged <18 years, and those with diabetes, organic gastrointestinal disease or a history of abdominal surgeries. Demographic and clinical variables were compared. RESULTS: Among 545 patients, 238 reported GPLS and 307 reported FD symptoms. Those with GPLS had a significantly higher prevalence of delayed GE (half emptying time (T1/2) ≥109 min) and lower body mass index than those with FD (33.2% vs 17.6%, p < 0.01; 19.9 vs 21.2, p < 0.01, respectively). Among GPLS patients, those with delayed GE had higher DSS than those without (13.0 vs 12.0, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In tertiary care patients who reported gastroparesis or FD symptoms, the presence of delayed GE was associated with GPLS. In patients with GPLS, delayed GE was associated with higher symptom severity.
Asunto(s)
Dispepsia , Gastroparesia , Humanos , Dispepsia/diagnóstico , Dispepsia/epidemiología , Dispepsia/complicaciones , Dolor Abdominal/diagnóstico , Dolor Abdominal/epidemiología , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Gastroparesia/diagnóstico , Gastroparesia/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Prevalencia , Náusea/epidemiología , Náusea/etiología , Vaciamiento GástricoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Different peripheral pathways are implicated in the regulation of the food ingestion-digestion cycle. METHODS: Narrative review on gastrointestinal mechanisms involved in satiety and hunger signalling. RESULTS: Combined mechano- and chemoreceptors, peripherally released peptide hormones and neural pathways provide feedback to the brain to determine sensations of hunger (increase energy intake) or satiation (cessation of energy intake) and regulate the human metabolism. The gastric accommodation reflex, which consists of a transient relaxation of the proximal stomach during food intake, has been identified as a major determinant of meal volume, through activation of tension-sensitive gastric mechanoreceptors. Motilin, whose release is the trigger of gastric Phase 3, has been identified as the major determinant of return of hunger after a meal. In addition, the release of several peptide hormones such as glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), cholecystokinin as well as motilin and ghrelin contributes to gut-brain signalling with relevance to control of hunger and satiety. A number of nutrients, such as bitter tastants, as well as pharmacological agents, such as endocannabinoid receptor antagonists and GLP-1 analogues act on these pathways to influence hunger, satiation and food intake. CONCLUSION: Gastrointestinal mechanisms such as gastric accommodation and motilin release are key determinants of satiety and hunger.