Residual ß-Cell Function Is Associated With Longer Time in Range in Individuals With Type 1 Diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: Little is known about the influence of residual islet function on glycemic control in type 1 diabetes (T1D). We investigated the associations between residual ß-cell function and metrics of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in individuals with T1D. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional cohort comprising 489 individuals (64% female, age 41.0 ± 14.0 years), T1D duration was 15.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 6.0-29.0) years. Individuals had a time in range (TIR) of 66% (IQR 52-80%) and a urinary C-peptide-to-creatinine ratio (UCPCR) of 0.01 (IQR 0.00-0.41) nmol/mmol. To assess ß-cell function, we measured UCPCR (detectable >0.01 nmol/mmol), and to assess α-cell function, fasting plasma glucagon/glucose ratios were measured. CGM was used to record TIR (3.9-10 mmol/L), time below range (TBR) (<3.9 mmol/L), time above range (TAR) (>10 mmol/L), and glucose coefficient of variance (CV). For CGM, 74.7% used FreeStyle Libre 2, 13.8% Medtronic Guardian, and 11.5% Dexcom G6 as their device. RESULTS: The percentage of patients with T1D who had a detectable UCPCR was 49.4%. A higher UCPCR correlated with higher TIR (r = 0.330, P < 0.05), lower TBR (r = -0.237, P < 0.05), lower TAR (r = -0.302, P < 0.05), and lower glucose CV (r = -0.356, P < 0.05). A higher UCPCR correlated negatively with HbA1c levels (r = -0.183, P < 0.05) and total daily insulin dose (r = -0.183, P < 0.05). Glucagon/glucose ratios correlated with longer TIR (r = 0.234, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Significantly longer TIR, shorter TBR and TAR, and lower CV were observed in individuals with greater UCPCR-assessed ß-cell function. Therefore, better CGM-derived metrics in individuals with preserved ß-cell function may be a contributor to a lower risk of developing long-term complications.

Quantitative classification and radiomics of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in indeterminate thyroid nodules.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether quantitative [18F]FDG-PET/CT assessment, including radiomic analysis of [18F]FDG-positive thyroid nodules, improved the preoperative differentiation of indeterminate thyroid nodules of non-Hürthle cell and Hürthle cell cytology. METHODS: Prospectively included patients with a Bethesda III or IV thyroid nodule underwent [18F]FDG-PET/CT imaging. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed for standardised uptake values (SUV) and SUV-ratios, including assessment of SUV cut-offs at which a malignant/borderline neoplasm was reliably ruled out (≥ 95% sensitivity). [18F]FDG-positive scans were included in radiomic analysis. After segmentation at 50% of SUVpeak, 107 radiomic features were extracted from [18F]FDG-PET and low-dose CT images. Elastic net regression classifiers were trained in a 20-times repeated random split. Dimensionality reduction was incorporated into the splits. Predictive performance of radiomics was presented as mean area under the ROC curve (AUC) across the test sets. RESULTS: Of 123 included patients, 84 (68%) index nodules were visually [18F]FDG-positive. The malignant/borderline rate was 27% (33/123). SUV-metrices showed AUCs ranging from 0.705 (95% CI, 0.601-0.810) to 0.729 (0.633-0.824), 0.708 (0.580-0.835) to 0.757 (0.650-0.864), and 0.533 (0.320-0.747) to 0.700 (0.502-0.898) in all (n = 123), non-Hürthle (n = 94), and Hürthle cell (n = 29) nodules, respectively. At SUVmax, SUVpeak, SUVmax-ratio, and SUVpeak-ratio cut-offs of 2.1 g/mL, 1.6 g/mL, 1.2, and 0.9, respectively, sensitivity of [18F]FDG-PET/CT was 95.8% (95% CI, 78.9-99.9%) in non-Hürthle cell nodules. In Hürthle cell nodules, cut-offs of 5.2 g/mL, 4.7 g/mL, 3.4, and 2.8, respectively, resulted in 100% sensitivity (95% CI, 66.4-100%). Radiomic analysis of 84 (68%) [18F]FDG-positive nodules showed a mean test set AUC of 0.445 (95% CI, 0.290-0.600) for the PET model. CONCLUSION: Quantitative [18F]FDG-PET/CT assessment ruled out malignancy in indeterminate thyroid nodules. Distinctive, higher SUV cut-offs should be applied in Hürthle cell nodules to optimize rule-out ability. Radiomic analysis did not contribute to the additional differentiation of [18F]FDG-positive nodules. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02208544 (5 August 2014), https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02208544 .

SUGAR-DIP trial: oral medication strategy versus insulin for diabetes in pregnancy, study protocol for a multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: In women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) requiring pharmacotherapy, insulin was the established first-line treatment. More recently, oral glucose lowering drugs (OGLDs) have gained popularity as a patient-friendly, less expensive and safe alternative. Monotherapy with metformin or glibenclamide (glyburide) is incorporated in several international guidelines. In women who do not reach sufficient glucose control with OGLD monotherapy, usually insulin is added, either with or without continuation of OGLDs. No reliable data from clinical trials, however, are available on the effectiveness of a treatment strategy using all three agents, metformin, glibenclamide and insulin, in a stepwise approach, compared with insulin-only therapy for improving pregnancy outcomes. In this trial, we aim to assess the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and patient experience of a stepwise combined OGLD treatment protocol, compared with conventional insulin-based therapy for GDM. METHODS: The SUGAR-DIP trial is an open-label, multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. Participants are women with GDM who do not reach target glycaemic control with modification of diet, between 16 and 34 weeks of gestation. Participants will be randomised to either treatment with OGLDs, starting with metformin and supplemented as needed with glibenclamide, or randomised to treatment with insulin. In women who do not reach target glycaemic control with combined metformin and glibenclamide, glibenclamide will be substituted with insulin, while continuing metformin. The primary outcome will be the incidence of large-for-gestational-age infants (birth weight >90th percentile). Secondary outcome measures are maternal diabetes-related endpoints, obstetric complications, neonatal complications and cost-effectiveness analysis. Outcomes will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Utrecht University Medical Centre. Approval by the boards of management for all participating hospitals will be obtained. Trial results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR6134; Pre-results.

Retrospective Analysis of an Insulin-to-Liraglutide Switch in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

INTRODUCTION: Insulin and the GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide are both effective in reaching glycemic targets. The efficacy of an insulin-to-liraglutide switch in an obese population with concurrent use of sulfonylurea and metformin is unknown. We assessed the efficacy and determinants of success of an insulin-to-liraglutide switch in these patients. METHODS: In a retrospective study we analyzed all patients that underwent an insulin-to-liraglutide switch during routine medical care (January 2009-February 2015). It was assessed if patients still continued liraglutide 12 months after the switch or discontinued because of poor glycemic control or side effects. Baseline characteristics were compared between the groups to establish determinants of success. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients made an insulin-to-liraglutide switch (43% male; mean age 57.2 ± 9.9 years; mean BMI 39.8 ± 5.4 kg/m2). Sixty patients still continued liraglutide after 12 months (58%) whereas 37 patients discontinued treatment because of poor glycemic control within 12 months (36%) and seven patients discontinued liraglutide because of intolerable side effects (7%). Insulin dose and insulin frequency at baseline were significantly lower in patients that continued liraglutide. Patients reaching HbA1c ≤ 7% (53 mmol/mol) showed lower baseline HbA1c levels, shorter duration of diabetes, and shorter duration of insulin therapy. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients continued liraglutide after a switch from insulin therapy with on average no change in glycemic control and decrease of body weight. HbA1c levels at baseline, duration of insulin therapy, and duration of diabetes were predictive of reaching glycemic control on liraglutide alone. In current practice this also indicates which patients on insulin can reduce their insulin dose after adding a GLP-1 receptor agonist. Plain language summary available for this article.