Acute care bundles should be used for patients with intracerebral haemorrhage: An expert consensus statement.

PURPOSE: Intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is the most devastating form of stroke and a major cause of disability. Clinical trials of individual therapies have failed to definitively establish a specific beneficial treatment. However, clinical trials of introducing care bundles, with multiple therapies provided in parallel, appear to clearly reduce morbidity and mortality. Currently, not enough patients receive these interventions in the acute phase. METHODS: We convened an expert group to discuss best practices in ICH and to develop recommendations for bundled care that can be delivered in all settings that treat acute ICH, with a focus on European healthcare systems. FINDINGS: In this consensus paper, we argue for widespread implementation of formalised care bundles in ICH, including specific metrics for time to treatment and criteria for the consideration of neurosurgical therapy. DISCUSSION: There is an extraordinary opportunity to improve clinical care and clinical outcomes in this devastating disease. Substantial evidence already exists for a range of therapies that can and should be implemented now.

Haematoma evacuation in cerebellar intracerebral haemorrhage: systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines regarding recommendations for surgical treatment of spontaneous cerebellar intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) differ. We aimed to systematically review the literature to assess treatment strategies and outcomes. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Embase between 1970 and 2019 for randomised or otherwise controlled studies and observational cohort studies. We included studies according to predefined selection criteria and assessed their quality according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and risk of bias according to a predefined scale. We assessed case fatality and functional outcome in patients treated conservatively or with haematoma evacuation. Favourable functional outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2 or a Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 4-5. RESULTS: We included 41 observational cohort studies describing 2062 patients (40% female) with spontaneous cerebellar ICH. A total of 1171 patients (57%) underwent haematoma evacuation. Ten studies described a cohort of surgically treated patients (n=533) and 31 cohorts with both surgically and conservatively treated patients (n=638 and n=891, respectively). There were no randomised clinical trials nor studies comparing outcome between the groups after adjustment for differences in baseline characteristics. The median NOS score (IQR) was 5 (4-6) out of 8 points and the bias score was 2 (1-3) out of 8, indicative of high risk of bias. Case fatality at discharge was 21% (95% CI 17% to 25%) after conservative treatment and 24% (95% CI 19% to 29%) after haematoma evacuation. At ≥6 months after conservative treatment, case fatality was 30% (95% CI 25% to 30%) and favourable functional outcome was 45% (95% CI 40% to 50%) and after haematoma evacuation, case fatality was 34% (95% CI 30% to 38%) and 42% (95% CI 37% to 47%). CONCLUSIONS: Controlled studies on the effect of neurosurgical treatment in patients with spontaneous cerebellar ICH are lacking, and the risk of bias in published series is high. Due to substantial differences in patient characteristics between conservatively and surgically treated patients, and high variability in treatment indications, a meaningful comparison in outcomes could not be made. There is no good published evidence to support treatment recommendations and controlled, preferably randomised studies are warranted in order to formulate evidence-based treatment guidelines for patients with cerebellar ICH.