RESUMEN
The COVID 19 pandemic has had a tremendous impact on nursing and health care delivery systems. Recent research demonstrates a correlation between the stress of providing complex health care and the decline of nurse well-being. Investing in the well-being of nurses can benefit the entire health care system. Educational institutions can play a role in enhancing nurse well-being by incorporating holistic nursing education principles into the curriculum, including reflective practice methods to promote self-awareness and self-care. This may be challenging for some nursing programs, but the Power of Nursing course can help close this gap. This noncommercial course incorporates key elements of holistic nursing including authenticity, empathy, compassion, unconditional acceptance, and self-care; elements not always emphasized in a traditional curriculum. Power of Nursing, offered as an elective in nursing schools or part of nursing residency programs, provides attendees with tools and strategies to boost resilience, strengthen personal commitment to nursing, and increase well-being preparing them to thrive in any health care environment.
RESUMEN
Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by clearly marginated silvery plaques that affect men and women equally. Symptoms can vary among individuals; typically, it presents on the scalp, elbows, and knees. We present two cases of patients initially diagnosed with tinea pedis who showed no improvement with medical treatment. The first patient is an African American male in his 50s who arrived at a free clinic for unhoused persons with lesions to both feet initially diagnosed as tinea pedis. Although the patient was compliant with applying topical formulations of tolnaftate and clotrimazole, there was no discernible improvement in his symptoms and the skin lesions. After a thorough examination of the skin throughout the entire body, the diagnosis of psoriasis was considered. The patient started treatment with steroidal cream with improvement of the symptoms and lesions. The second patient is a Caucasian male in his 20s who also presented initially with complaints of a dry, intensely pruritic, and scaly rash on the dorsum of both his feet, as well as in between the digits of his feet for which an initial diagnosis of tinea pedis was also made. The patient remained non-compliant with treatment and, after reevaluation of his lesions along with an extensive survey of his body, was deemed to have psoriasis and prescribed topical hydrocortisone. The patient continued to remain non-compliant with his therapeutic regimen and subsequently developed cellulitis which is yet to resolve with treatment.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether initial epinephrine administration by endotracheal tube (ET) in newly born infants receiving chest compressions and epinephrine in the delivery room (DR) is associated with lower rates of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) than newborns receiving initial intravenous (IV) epinephrine. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective review of neonates receiving chest compressions and epinephrine in the DR from the AHA Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry from October 2013 through July 2020. Neonates were classified according to initial route of epinephrine (ET vs IV). The primary outcome of interest was ROSC in the DR. RESULTS: In total, 408 infants met inclusion criteria; of these, 281 (68.9%) received initial ET epinephrine and 127 (31.1%) received initial IV epinephrine. The initial ET epinephrine group included those infants who also received subsequent IV epinephrine when ET epinephrine failed to achieve ROSC. Comparing initial ET with initial IV epinephrine, ROSC was achieved in 70.1% vs 58.3% (adjusted risk difference 10.02; 95% CI 0.05-19.99). ROSC was achieved in 58.3% with IV epinephrine alone, and 47.0% with ET epinephrine alone, with 40.0% receiving subsequent IV epinephrine. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that initial use of ET epinephrine is reasonable during DR resuscitation, as there were greater rates of ROSC compared with initial IV epinephrine administration. However, administration of IV epinephrine should not be delayed in those infants not responding to initial ET epinephrine, as almost one-half of infants who received initial ET epinephrine subsequently received IV epinephrine before achieving ROSC.
Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Salas de Parto , Epinefrina , Intubación Intratraqueal , Humanos , Epinefrina/administración & dosificación , Recién Nacido , Estudios Retrospectivos , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Femenino , Masculino , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Paro Cardíaco/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Intravenosa , Bases de Datos Factuales , Retorno de la Circulación Espontánea , Sistema de Registros , Vasoconstrictores/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
Background: Sleep disturbances, including insomnia, sleep-disordered breathing, and circadian rhythm disorders with potential consequences including excessive daytime somnolence and worsening fatigue, are prevalent yet largely under-measured and therefore under-managed problems in people receiving palliative care. This has the potential to negatively affect the person's functioning and quality of life. Objectives: We aimed to review the current practice of assessment and management of sleep disturbances in people with life-limiting illnesses in Australian and New Zealand palliative care settings, and to define areas for improvement in assessment and management of sleep disturbances and further research. Design: A cross-sectional, online survey was conducted with palliative care health professionals (PCHPs) to explore current approaches to routine assessment of sleep disturbances and PCHPs' awareness of, and perceived access to, evidence-based resources for assessing and managing sleep disturbances in their local settings. Results: Fifty-four PCHPs responded to the survey, including allied health professionals (44%), palliative care nurses (26%), and physicians (19%). Over 70% of PCHPs endorsed routine verbal screening of sleep symptoms, and >90% recommended management with basic behavioral strategies. However, none of PCHPs used validated patient-reported outcome measures for sleep, and <10% of PCHPs demonstrated awareness or use of sleep-specific interventions (including medications). Only 40% reported they had access to sleep specialist services for patients. Conclusion: Our findings provide a useful snapshot of current approaches to managing sleep disturbances in palliative care. Gaps in current practice are highlighted, including the lack of structured, clinical assessment, referral pathways, and PCHPs' perceived lack of access to targeted interventions for sleep disturbances.
Asunto(s)
Cuidados Paliativos , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Australia , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/terapia , Nueva Zelanda , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , AncianoRESUMEN
New treatments for ovarian cancer are available that require trade-offs between progression-free survival and quality of life. The aim of this study was to develop a decision aid for patients with homologous recombinant proficient (HRP) tumors, as the benefit-harm ratio of niraparib needs consideration. This decision aid was created with a systematic and iterative development process based on the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. The decision aid was user-tested for acceptability, usability, and comprehensibility using a survey completed by a sample of patients with ovarian cancer and oncologists. This decision aid follows the International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) criteria in its development. User-test respondents (n = 13 patients; 13 physicians) reported that the decision aid used language that was easy to follow (69% patients; 85% physicians), was an appropriate length (69% patients; 62% physicians) and provided the right amount of information (54% patients; 54% physicians). Most respondents (92% patients; 62% physicians) would recommend this decision aid for HRP patients considering niraparib. This is the first decision aid for patients with HRP ovarian cancers who are considering niraparib maintenance therapy. It is available on-line and is being further evaluated in a pragmatic clinical trial in Saskatchewan.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Ováricas , Piperidinas , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Técnicas de Apoyo para la DecisiónRESUMEN
Objective: To describe the harms in all arms of six consecutive multi-site, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised clinical trials. Background: Controversies surround conduct of phase III clinical trials in palliative care. Concerns include risks to participants' safety, use of placebo arms, participants' burden, and justification when therapies are already widely used. Methods: This study collates safety data of the first six studies of the Australian national Palliative Care Clinical Studies Collaborative. On an intention-to-treat basis, all harms are described using standard international definitions, their severity, outcomes, and level of attribution. Results: Studies recruited 1,232 participants: 65/1,232 (5.3%) participants had serious adverse events of which none had a definite (blinded) attribution, all of which settled with ceasing the intervention; 49/1,232 (4.0%) participants had adverse events. No participants on placebo arms had adverse or serious adverse events with definite (blinded) attribution. Discussion: These studies are safe for participants and generate knowledge to support informed patient decision making.
Asunto(s)
Hospitales para Enfermos Terminales , Cuidados Paliativos , Humanos , Australia , Método Doble CiegoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: We simulated an on-site, multi-hospital mass casualty incident (MCI) to educate emergency medicine providers in the principles of trauma resuscitation and collaboration with administration and staff during an MCI. METHODS: We implemented high-fidelity manikins, inflatable manikins, and actors to simulate a sarin gas bombing. Learners triaged patients at a decontamination tent using the simple triage and rapid treatment (START) tool, or they participated in a simulation in a resuscitation bay. RESULTS: Forty participants anonymously rated the learning impact of the exercise, the clinical relevance to emergency medicine, and the effectiveness of the faculty facilitation and debriefing on a 1-5 Likert scale. The average responses to all questions were 4.45 or greater, and 98% of respondents recommended adding the scenario to the standard curriculum. DISCUSSION: We successfully executed a novel, multi- hospital, MCI drill that was rated to be a better alternative to sequential simulation in a simulation center.
Asunto(s)
Medicina de Emergencia , Incidentes con Víctimas en Masa , Humanos , Sarín , Curriculum , HospitalesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Only 5-10% of emergency medical services (EMS) patients are children, and most pediatric encounters are low-acuity. EMS chart review has been used to identify adverse safety events (ASEs) in high-acuity and high-risk pediatric encounters. The objective of this work was to evaluate the frequency, type, and potential harm of ASEs in varied acuity pediatric EMS encounters. METHODS: This cross-sectional study evaluated pediatric (ages 0-18 years) prehospital records from 15 EMS agencies among three states (Colorado, Connecticut, and Rhode Island) between November 2019 and October 2021. Research associates used a previously validated tool to analyze electronic EMS and hospital records. Adverse safety events were recorded in six care categories, grouped into four levels for analysis: assessment/diagnosis/clinical decision-making, procedures, medication administration (including O2), and fluid administration, and defined across five types of ASEs: Unintended injuries or consequences, Near misses, Suboptimal actions, Errors, and Management complications (UNSEMs). Type and frequency of ASEs in each category were rated in three harm severities: Harm Unlikely, Mild/Temporary, or Permanent/Severe. Three physicians verified ASEs determined by research associates. Frequency of ASEs and harm likelihood are reported. RESULTS: Records for 508 EMS patients were reviewed, with 63 (12.4%) transported using lights and sirens. At least one clinical intervention beyond assessment/diagnosis/clinical decision-making was documented for 183 (36.1%, 95% CI: 31.8, 40.4) patients. A total of 162 ASEs were identified for 112 patients (22.1%, 95% CI: 18.5, 25.7). Suboptimal actions were the most frequent UNSEM (n = 66, 40.7%; 95% CI: 33.1, 48.3). For ASEs, (n = 162), the most frequent associations were with procedures 39.5% (95% CI: 32.0, 47.0) or assessment/diagnosis/clinical decision making, 32.1%, (95% CI: 24.9, 39.3). Among care categories, fluid administration was associated with significantly more UNSEMs (58.1%, 95% CI:53.8, 62.4). Most ASEs were determined to be 'Harm Unlikely' 62.4% (95% CI: 54.4, 70.4), with assessment/diagnosis/clinical decision making having significantly fewer ASEs with documented harm (22.4%, 95% CI: 10.7, 34.1) compared to other care categories. CONCLUSION: Over 20% of pediatric EMS encounters had an identified ASE, and most were unlikely to cause harm. Most frequent ASEs were likely to be associated with procedures and assessment/diagnosis/clinical decision-making.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study asked consumers (patients, carers) and healthcare professionals (HCPs) to identify the most important symptoms for adults with cancer and potential treatment interventions. METHODS: A modified Delphi study was conducted involving two rounds of electronic surveys based on prevalent cancer symptoms identified from the literature. Round 1 gathered information on participant demographics, opinions and/or experience on cancer symptom frequency and impact, and suggestions for interventions and/or service delivery models for further research to improve management of cancer symptoms. In Round 2, respondents ranked the importance of the top ten interventions identified in Round 1. In Round 3, separate expert panels of consumers and healthcare professionals (HCPs) attempted to reach consensus on the symptoms and interventions previously identified. RESULTS: Consensus was reached for six symptoms across both groups: fatigue, constipation, diarrhoea, incontinence, and difficulty with urination. Notably, fatigue was the only symptom to reach consensus across both groups in Round 1. Similarly, consensus was reached for six interventions across both groups. These were the following: medicinal cannabis, physical activity, psychological therapies, non-opioid interventions for pain, opioids for breathlessness and cough, and other pharmacological interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Consumers and HCPs prioritise differently; however, the symptoms and interventions that reached consensus provide a basis for future research. Fatigue should be considered a high priority given its prevalence and its influence on other symptoms. The lack of consumer consensus indicates the uniqueness of their experience and the need for a patient-centred approach. Understanding individual consumer experience is important when planning research into better symptom management.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Humanos , Adulto , Técnica Delphi , Nueva Zelanda , Australia , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/terapia , Proyectos de Investigación , Fatiga/etiología , Fatiga/terapiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To describe the quality of pediatric resuscitative care in general emergency departments (GEDs) and to determine hospital-level factors associated with higher quality. METHODS: Prospective observational study of resuscitative care provided to 3 in situ simulated patients (infant seizure, infant sepsis, and child cardiac arrest) by interprofessional GED teams. A composite quality score (CQS) was measured and the association of this score with modifiable and nonmodifiable hospital-level factors was explored. RESULTS: A median CQS of 62.8 of 100 (interquartile range 50.5-71.1) was noted for 287 resuscitation teams from 175 emergency departments. In the unadjusted analyses, a higher score was associated with the modifiable factor of an affiliation with a pediatric academic medical center (PAMC) and the nonmodifiable factors of higher pediatric volume and location in the Northeast and Midwest. In the adjusted analyses, a higher CQS was associated with modifiable factors of an affiliation with a PAMC and the designation of both a nurse and physician pediatric emergency care coordinator, and nonmodifiable factors of higher pediatric volume and location in the Northeast and Midwest. A weak correlation was noted between quality and pediatric readiness scores. CONCLUSIONS: A low quality of pediatric resuscitative care, measured using simulation, was noted across a cohort of GEDs. Hospital factors associated with higher quality included: an affiliation with a PAMC, designation of a pediatric emergency care coordinator, higher pediatric volume, and geographic location. A weak correlation was noted between quality and pediatric readiness scores.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In Oregon in 2019, only 261 students were eligible for special education under the traumatic brain injury (TBI) category. Many students with TBIs are not treated by a medical provider, so the requirement for a medical statement could prevent eligible youth from receiving special education services. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated barriers to using a medical statement to establish special education eligibility for TBI, support for using a guided credible history interview (GCHI), and training needs around GCHI. RESULTS: Among participants, 84% reported difficulty obtaining a medical statement for TBI eligibility determination, and 87% favored the GCHI as an alternative, though they reported a need for training in TBI and GCHI. CONCLUSION: The results support the use of GCHI to establish special education eligibility for TBI and informed Oregon's addition of GCHI to TBI special education eligibility determination.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Determinación de la Elegibilidad , Adolescente , Humanos , Estudiantes , Educación Especial/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Treatment options for patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are desperately needed. Allogeneic human umbilical cord derived mesenchymal stromal cells (hCT-MSCs) have potential therapeutic benefits in these critically ill patients, but feasibility and safety data are lacking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this phase I multisite study, 10 patients with COVID-19-related ARDS were treated with 3 daily intravenous infusions of hCT-MSCs (1 million cells/kg, maximum dose 100 million cells). The primary endpoint assessed safety. RESULTS: Ten patients (7 females, 3 males; median age 62 years (range 39-79)) were enrolled at 2 sites and received a total of 30 doses of study product. The average cell dose was 0.93 cells/kg (range 0.56-1.45 cells/kg and total dose range 55-117 million cells) with 5/30 (17%) of doses lower than intended dose. Average cell viability was 85% (range 63%-99%) with all but one meeting the >70% release criteria. There were no infusion-related reactions or study-related adverse events, 28 non-serious adverse events in 3 unique patients, and 2 serious adverse events in 2 unique patients, which were expected and unrelated to the study product. Five patients died: 3 by day 28 and 5 by day 90 of the study (median 27 days, range 7-76 days). All deaths were determined to be unrelated to the hCT-MSCs. CONCLUSION: We were able to collect relevant safety outcomes for the use of hCT-MSCs in patients with COVID-19-related ARDS. Future studies to explore their safety and efficacy are warranted.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trasplante de Células Madre Mesenquimatosas , Células Madre Mesenquimatosas , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , COVID-19/terapia , COVID-19/etiología , Estudios de Factibilidad , Trasplante de Células Madre Mesenquimatosas/efectos adversos , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/etiología , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cancer cachexia (CC) is a debilitating syndrome severely impacting patients' quality of life and survivorship. We aimed to investigate the health care professionals' (HCPs') experiences of dealing with CC. METHODS: Survey questions entailed definitions and guidelines, importance of CC management, clinician confidence and involvement, screening and assessment, interventions, psychosocial and food aspects. The online survey was disseminated through Australian and New Zealand palliative care, oncology, allied health and nursing organisations. Frequencies were reported using descriptive statistics accounting for response rates. Associations were examined between variables using Fisher's exact and Pearson's chi-square tests. RESULTS: Over 90% of the respondents (n = 192) were medical doctors or nurses. Over 85% of the respondents were not aware of any guidelines, with 83% considering ≥ 10% weight loss from baseline indicative of CC. CC management was considered important by 77% of HCPs, and 55% indicated that it was part of their clinical role to assess and treat CC. In contrast, 56% of respondents were not confident about managing CC, and 93% believed formal training in CC would benefit their clinical practice. Although formal screening tools were generally not used (79%), 75% of respondents asked patients about specific symptoms. Antiemetics (80%) and nutritional counselling (86%) were most prescribed or recommended interventions, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study underlines the deficiencies in knowledge and training of CC which has implications for patients' function, well-being and survival. HCP training and a structured approach to CC management is advocated for optimal and continued patient care.
Asunto(s)
Caquexia , Neoplasias , Humanos , Caquexia/etiología , Caquexia/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Australia , Personal de Salud/educación , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/terapiaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Many patients experience unrelieved neuropathic cancer-related pain. Most current analgesic therapies have psychoactive side effects, lack efficacy data for this indication and have potential medication-related harms. The local anaesthetic lidocaine (lignocaine) has the potential to help manage neuropathic cancer-related pain when administered as an extended, continuous subcutaneous infusion. Data support lidocaine as a promising, safe agent in this setting, warranting further evaluation in robust, randomised controlled trials. This protocol describes the design of a pilot study to evaluate this intervention and explains the pharmacokinetic, efficacy and adverse effects evidence informing the design. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A mixed-methods pilot study will determine the feasibility of an international first, definitive phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an extended continuous subcutaneous infusion of lidocaine for neuropathic cancer-related pain. This study will comprise: a phase II double-blind randomised controlled parallel-group pilot of subcutaneous infusion of lidocaine hydrochloride 10% w/v (3000 mg/30 mL) or placebo (sodium chloride 0.9%) over 72 hours for neuropathic cancer-related pain, a pharmacokinetic substudy and a qualitative substudy of patients' and carers' experiences. The pilot study will provide important safety data and help inform the methodology of a definitive trial, including testing proposed recruitment strategy, randomisation, outcome measures and patients' acceptability of the methodology, as well as providing a signal of whether this area should be further investigated. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Participant safety is paramount and standardised assessments for adverse effects are built into the trial protocol. Findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences. This study will be considered suitable to progress to a phase III study if there is a completion rate where the CI includes 80% and excludes 60%. The protocol and Patient Information and Consent Form have been approved by Sydney Local Health District (Concord) Human Research Ethics Committee 2019/ETH07984 and University of Technology Sydney ETH17-1820. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ANZCTR ACTRN12617000747325.
Asunto(s)
Dolor en Cáncer , Neoplasias , Neuralgia , Humanos , Lidocaína , Proyectos Piloto , Dolor en Cáncer/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neuralgia/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como AsuntoRESUMEN
Introduction: Efficiently locating critical equipment and prompt defibrillator usage are crucial steps when managing a critically ill patient or a code. However, resident experience in this area is limited. This workshop focused on the identification of critical care equipment in the pediatric code cart and transport bag along with timely, appropriate, and effective use of the defibrillator when needed. Methods: The workshop utilized a combination of traditional didactics and hands-on skills stations to instruct learners on the location of pediatric critical care equipment and the proper use of a defibrillator. It was designed for residents across all levels of training who care for pediatric patients (including pediatrics, medicine-pediatrics, triple board [pediatrics, psychiatry, and child psychiatry], family medicine, and emergency medicine residents) and can be adapted for different session durations and group sizes. Results: This workshop was conducted at two separate institutions, with a total of 95 resident participant encounters. Participants strongly agreed that the workshop was effective in teaching our learning objectives. Residents reported high levels of confidence in their ability to recognize and identify the location of critical care equipment in the code cart and transport bags and to appropriately use the defibrillator for both defibrillation and synchronized cardioversion. Discussion: This workshop provided residents with instruction and practice in locating and utilizing pediatric critical care equipment. The structure and timetable of this curriculum can be adapted to the needs of individual institutions' programs and different numbers of workshop participants.
Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia , Pediatría , Niño , Comunicación , Cuidados Críticos , Humanos , LiderazgoAsunto(s)
Anafilaxia , Entrenamiento Simulado , Humanos , Simulación por Computador , Escolaridad , EpinefrinaRESUMEN
Objectives: To describe the presence and persistence of neurological and neuropsychological sequelae among children with acquired Zika virus infection and assess whether those sequelae were more common in children infected with Zika virus compared to uninfected children. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of children with and without Zika virus infection in León, Nicaragua, using a standard clinical assessment tool and questionnaire to collect data on symptoms at three visits, about 6 months apart, and a battery of standardized instruments to evaluate neurocognitive function, behavior, depression, and anxiety at the last two visits. Results: Sixty-two children were enrolled, with no significant differences in demographics by infection group. Children infected with Zika virus had a range of neurological symptoms, some of which persisted for 6 to 12 months; however, no consistent pattern of symptoms was observed. At baseline a small percentage of children infected with Zika virus had an abnormal finger-to-nose test (13%), cold touch response (13%), and vibration response (15%) versus 0% in the uninfected group. Neurocognitive deficits and behavioral problems were common in both groups, with no significant differences between the groups. Children infected with Zika virus had lower cognitive efficiency scores at the 6-month visit. Anxiety and depression were infrequent in both groups. Conclusions: Larger studies are needed to definitively investigate the relationship between Zika virus infection and neurological symptoms and neurocognitive problems, with adjustment for factors affecting cognition and behavior, including mood and sleep disorders, home learning environment, history of neuroinvasive infections, and detailed family history of neuropsychological problems.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the current study was to examine (1) physician trainee interventions when confronted with a situation in which corporal punishment (CP) occurs in a simulated medical setting and (2) their knowledge, comfort, and experiences shared during a semistructured debriefing. METHODS: Themes were developed from simulation sessions from 2018 to 2019, where a convenience sample of training physicians was invited to participate. The simulation involved a medical visit where a caregiver becomes increasingly aggravated, eventually striking her child on the back of the head. There were a total of 7 simulations with one trainee participating while others observed. All trainees subsequently participated in a debriefing and educational session. RESULTS: A total of 37 physician trainees participated. Themes of not having the wording to address CP, not knowing the distinction between CP and physical abuse, previous negative experiences discussing discipline with families, and fear of offending families negatively impacted trainees' ability to intervene during the simulation. Trainees were interested in future education including simulated medical encounters to improve their responses to CP in the future. CONCLUSIONS: Trainees felt uncomfortable with intervening when CP was observed and did not know how to provide appropriate guidance to families on discipline. Moreover, performance during the simulation and discussions during the debriefings revealed knowledge gaps regarding the difference between CP and physical abuse, how to word recommendations about CP to caregivers, and what resources should be provided. These data suggest the need for education on CP and discipline to be integrated into pediatric training.
Asunto(s)
Médicos , Castigo , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Abuso FísicoRESUMEN
Observational studies are needed to demonstrate real-world vaccine effectiveness (VE) against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) outcomes. Our objective was to conduct a review of published SARS-CoV-2 VE articles, supplemented by preprints, during the first 6 months of COVID-19 vaccine availability. This review compares the effectiveness of completing the primary COVID-19 vaccination series against multiple SARS-CoV-2 disease presentations and disease severity outcomes in three population groups (general population, frontline workers, and older adults). Four hundred and seventy-one published articles and 47 preprints were identified. After title and abstract screening and full article review, 50 studies (28 published articles, 22 preprints) were included. VE results were reported for five COVID-19 vaccines and four combinations of COVID-19 vaccines. VE results for BNT162b2 were reported in 70.6% of all studies. Seventeen studies reported variant specific VE estimates; Alpha was the most common. This comprehensive review demonstrates that COVID-19 vaccination is an important tool for preventing COVID-19 morbidity and mortality among fully vaccinated persons aged 16 years and older and serves as an important baseline from which to follow future trends in COVID-19 evolution and effectiveness of new and updated vaccines.