Increased proportion of alcohol-related trauma in a South London major trauma centre during lockdown: A cohort study.

PURPOSE: Alcohol has been associated with 10%-35% trauma admissions and 40% trauma-related deaths globally. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the United Kingdom entered a state of "lockdown" on March 23, 2020. Restrictions were most significantly eased on June 1, 2020, when shops and schools re-opened. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of lockdown on alcohol-related trauma admissions. METHODS: All adult patients admitted as "trauma calls" to a London major trauma centre during April 2018 and April 2019 (pre-lockdown, n = 316), and 1st April-31st May 2020 (lockdown, n = 191) had electronic patient records analysed retrospectively. Patients' blood alcohol level and records of intoxication were used to identify alcohol-related trauma. Trauma admissions from pre-lockdown and lockdown cohorts were compared using multiple regression analyses. RESULTS: Alcohol-related trauma was present in a significantly higher proportion of adult trauma calls during lockdown (lockdown 60/191 (31.4%), vs. pre-lockdown 62/316 (19.6%); (odds ratio (OR): 0.83, 95% CI: 0.38-1.28, p < 0.001). Lockdown was also associated with increased weekend admissions of trauma (lockdown 125/191 weekend (65.5%) vs. pre-lockdown 179/316 (56.7%); OR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.79 to -0.02, p = 0.041). No significant difference existed in the age, gender, or mechanism between pre-lockdown and lockdown cohorts (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The United Kingdom lockdown was independently associated with an increased proportion of alcohol-related trauma. Trauma admissions were increased during the weekend when staffing levels are reduced. With the possibility of further global "waves" of COVID-19, the long-term repercussions of dangerous alcohol-related behaviour to public health must be addressed.

Management of septic and aseptic prepatellar bursitis: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Despite contributing to significant morbidity in working-age adults, there is no consensus on the optimal treatment for prepatellar bursitis. Much of the existing literature combines prepatellar and olecranon bursitis. This systematic review aims to determine the optimal management of prepatellar bursitis. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A primary search of electronic published and unpublished literature databases from inception to November 2019 was completed. Articles over 25 years old, case reports with less than four patients, paediatric studies, and non-English language papers were excluded. Our primary outcome was recurrence after 1 year. Comparisons included endoscopic vs open bursectomy, duration of antibiotics. Methodological quality was assessed using the Institute of Health Economics and Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias scoring systems. Meta-analyses were conducted where appropriate. RESULTS: In total 10 studies were included (N = 702). Endoscopic and open bursectomy showed no difference in recurrence after 1 year (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.05-3.53, p = 0.67), and surgical complications (OR 1.44, 95% CI 0.34-6.08, p = 0.44). 80% endoscopically-treated patients were pain free after 1 year. Patients treated with antibiotics for less than 8 days were not significantly more prone to recurrence (2/17 vs 10/114, OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.13-3.29, p = 0.64) compared to 8 days plus at minimum 1 year post injury. CONCLUSIONS: Our study represents the largest cohort of patients evaluating management strategies for prepatellar bursitis, and includes data not previously published. Endoscopic bursectomy is non-inferior to open bursectomy, enabling a shorter hospital stay. It also offers a relatively low risk of post-operative pain. Endoscopic bursectomy is a viable option to treat both septic and aseptic prepatellar bursitis. Our small cohort suggests recurrence and hospital stay are not improved with antibiotic treatment exceeding 7 days for septic prepatellar bursitis.

Systematic review of randomised controlled trials for interventions to treat injuries to the medial ligaments of the knee.

BACKGROUND: Optimal management of severe and complex injuries to the medial knee ligaments remains uncertain. This systematic review evaluates outcomes from randomised controlled trials investigating interventions for treating injuries of medial ligaments of the knee. METHODS: Randomised controlled clinical trials evaluating interventions for treating injuries of the medial knee ligaments were identified through searching EMBASE, Medline, Cochrane, WHO, and clinicaltrials.org. Comparisons were made between different non-operative interventions, surgical versus non-operative interventions, different surgical interventions, and different postoperative interventions. Primary outcome measures included patient reported outcome measures (PROM) of knee function, pain, and treatment failure. RESULTS: 412 trial records were identified; 259 were non-redundant and distinct studies, of which eight were included for analysis. No differences between operative and non-operative management strategies were found for either primary outcome: Lysholm and IKDC scores. Compared to non-operative interventions, operative interventions resulted in reduced quadriceps strength at eight weeks (mean difference (MD) 29 (% knee extension strength deficit compared with unaffected knee); 95%CI 3.89-54.11) and were associated with greater incidence of minor complications (relative risk (RR) 25; 95%CI: 1.51-421, and RR 25; 95%CI: 1.50-416.58, respectively). Quadriceps strength between 16 and 52 weeks was similar in non-operative and operative groups (MD 20; 95%CI -1.92-41.92). Functional rehabilitation was associated with reduced valgus laxity at six weeks compared to bracing ((MD) -1.40; 95%CI: -2.21-0.59). CONCLUSIONS: Non-operative interventions provided similar functional results to operative interventions for grade I-III injuries of the medial collateral ligaments. Non-operative intervention was associated with improved quadriceps strength during rehabilitation, and fewer complications, compared to operative interventions.

The effects of kinesiophobia on outcome following total knee replacement: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Kinesiophobia, the fear of physical movement and activity related to injury vulnerability, has been linked to sub-optimal outcomes following total knee replacement (TKR). This systematic review has two aims: to define the relationship between kinesiophobia and functional outcomes, pain and range of motion following TKR, and to evaluate published treatments for kinesiophobia following TKR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A primary search of electronic databases, grey literature, and trial registries was performed in March 2020. English-language studies recruiting adult primary TKR patients, using the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) were included. Outcome measures were grouped into short (< 6 months), medium (6-12 months), and long term (> 12 months). Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale for cohort or case control studies, and the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool for randomised controlled trials. RESULTS: All thirteen included papers (82 identified) showed adequately low risk of methodological bias. TSK1 (activity avoidance) correlated with WOMAC functional score at 12 months in three studies (r = 0.20 p < 0.05, R = 0.317 p = 0.001, and correlation coefficient 0.197 p = 0.005). TSK score significantly correlated with mean active range of motion (ROM) at 2 weeks [65.98 (SD = 14.51) versus 47.35 (SD = 14.48) p = 0.000], 4 weeks [88.20 (SD = 15.11) versus 57.65 (SD = 14.80) p = 0.000], and 6 months [105.33 (SD = 12.34) versus 85.53 (SD = 14.77) p = 0.000] post-operation. Three post-operative interventions improved TSK score vs control following TKR: a home-based functional exercise programme [TSK - 14.30 (SD = 0.80) versus - 2.10 (SD = 0.80) p < 0.001], an outpatient cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) programme [TSK 27.76 (SD = 4.56) versus 36.54 (SD = 3.58)], and video-based psychological treatment [TSK 24 (SD = 5) versus 29 (SD = 5) p < 0.01]. CONCLUSIONS: Kinesiophobia negatively affects functional outcomes up until 1 year post-operatively, while active ROM is reduced up to 6 months post-procedure. Post-operative functional and psychological interventions can improve kinesiophobia following TKR.

A patient-centred check sheet improves communication on the trauma ward round.

BACKGROUND: Effective communication on surgical ward rounds should clarify for patients their management plan and answer questions adequately. Pressures on time conspire against this interchange of information. A patient-centred surgical communication check sheet was devised to enable rapid two-way transfer of information between surgeon and patient. METHODS: A quality improvement project involved three cycles. Through the use of a patient survey, distributed following the daily ward round, areas for improvement in communication were highlighted in cycle one. The surgical communication check sheet was introduced in cycle two, and modified before cycle three following discussion with the orthopaedic department. The surgical communication check sheet was handed out to patients before the ward round, and its efficacy was measured by evaluating ward round communication using the survey as in cycle one. RESULTS: Initial results showed a variable standard of communication, which improved following the introduction of the surgical communication check sheet in cycle two. In cycle three, 84.7% patients felt that the check sheet aided communication on the ward round. Measures of communication improved between cycles one and three: the percentage of patients with unanswered questions fell from 21.8% to 16.7%, the number of patients unsure why a test was done fell from 25.9% to 12.7%, and average understanding of the management plan rose from 64.7% to 83.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of the surgical communication check sheet improved ward round communication, and was welcomed by almost 85% of patients. Accounts from patients indicate two benefits of the check sheet: the surgeon is immediately aware of a patient with questions or concerns, allowing these to be adequately addressed, and patients can formulate questions before the ward round which bolsters their confidence to ask them.