Ambulatory quality improvement in academic medical centers: a changing landscape.

Efforts to improve the quality of ambulatory care have received tremendous attention as bold new initiatives aimed at influencing the environment of care through financial incentives, public transparency, and information technology rapidly spread. Academic medical centers, which represent a long tradition of excellence and innovation in medical care, might be expected to lead the charge in these new arenas, but motivation for change may be mitigated by the unique complexity and multiple goals of these institutions. A survey conducted in the fall of 2006 examined the early impact of these major new influences on faculty practice plans. Respondents reported that many institutions have begun to develop key components of a quality infrastructure, but much work remains before a robust model emerges at most sites. Some academic medical centers have also embraced pay-for-performance and public reporting efforts, but many are not equipped or eager to engage in these new initiatives.

A physician's due: measuring physician billing performance, benchmarking results.

A 2008 study focused on four key performance indicators (KPIs) and staffing levels to benchmark the FYO7 performance of physician group billing operations. A comparison of the change in the KPIs from FYO3 to FYO7 for a number of these billing operations disclosed across-the-board improvements. Billing operations did not show significant changes in staffing levels during this time, pointing to the existence of obstacles that prevent staff reductions in this area.

Outpatient quality improvement in academic faculty practice plans: does it exist?

The purpose of this study was to (a) investigate the extent to which academic faculty practice plans (FPPs) are currently involved in ambulatory care quality improvement (QI), (b) describe the structure of QI initiatives at outpatient FPPs, and (c) delineate facilitators and barriers to development of FPP outpatient QI initiatives. Members of the Steering Committee of the Group Practice Council of the University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC), representing the leadership of 88 FPPs, were asked to respond to a 38-item Web-based questionnaire during February and March 2003. The survey elicited information on the organizational characteristics of FPPs, their current degree of engagement in outpatient QI activities, and factors driving interest and barriers impeding efforts to conduct outpatient QI initiatives. Descriptive statistics for all variables of interest were performed. Responses were received from 33 participants believed to represent at least 28 of the total 88 FPP members of the UHC. Nearly all respondents indicated that some types of outpatient QI initiatives were currently taking place in their FPP. However, only 12% of respondents met 4 or more of the 6 criteria deemed to be essential to having a robust outpatient QI program. Among key QI indicators, one third of respondents reported that their FPP had a separate and distinct outpatient quality committee, and some one fifth had a budget for outpatient QI or financial incentives for outpatient clinics to engage in QI (or both). The majority of respondents stated that at least some departments in their FPP were collecting quality data. Most respondents reported that patient safety and external demand for outpatient QI were the "more important" factors driving QI efforts, whereas lack of human resources and other resources were the "more significant" barriers hindering QI initiatives. The results of the study suggest that, although FPPs showed a strong interest in outpatient QI initiatives, FPPs' efforts are still in an infancy phase and lag far behind inpatient performance measurement activities. Without appropriate resources, it appears unlikely that FPPs will be able to move the agenda forward to develop a quality culture and robust program of self-assessment and improvement in the outpatient setting.

The power of collaboration: using internet-based tools to facilitate networking and benchmarking within a consortium of academic health centers.

The University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) represents a strategic alliance of 169 academic health centers and associated institutions engaged in knowledge sharing and idea-generation. The use of the Internet as a tool in the delivery of UHC's products and services has increased dramatically over the past year and will continue to increase during the foreseeable future. This paper examines the current state of UHC-member institution driven tools and services that utilize the Web as a fundamental component in their delivery. The evolution of knowledge management at UHC, its management information and reporting tools, and expansion of e-commerce provide real world examples of Internet use in health care delivery and management. Health care workers are using these Web-based tools to help manage rising costs and optimize patient outcomes. Policy, technical, and organizational issues must be resolved to facilitate rapid adoption of Internet applications.

Benchmarking the billing office.

Benchmarking data related to human and financial resources in the billing process allows an organization to allocate its resources more effectively. Analyzing human resources used in the billing process helps determine cost-effective staffing. The deployment of human resources in a billing office affects timeliness of payment and ability to maximize revenue potential. Analyzing financial resource helps an organization allocate those resources more effectively.