Idarucizumab in major trauma patients: a single centre real life experience.

INTRODUCTION: Trauma care providers are facing an increasing number of elderly patients on direct oral anticoagulants prior to injury. For dabigatran etexilate (DAB), the specific antagonist idarucizumab (IDA) has been approved since 2015 as a reversal agent. However, only limited data regarding the use of IDA in trauma patients are available. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of trauma patients under DAB for whom IDA administration was deemed necessary to reverse DAB's antithrombotic effect. RESULTS: A total of 15 (9 male) patients were treated with IDA during the study period. The mean age was 81 ± 10 years. Intracranial haemorrhage (n = 7) and long bone fractures (n = 5) were the most common types of injury. Three patients were diagnosed as polytrauma. In all but one patient, atrial fibrillation was the indication for DAB intake. The median dose of IDA was 2.5 g (IQR 2.5-5). IDA administration decreased DAB plasma levels from 112.4 (IQR 73.4-123.4) to 5 (IQR 4-12) ng/mL (p = 0.031), thrombin time from 114.8 ± 48.3 to 16.2 ± 0.5 s (p < 0.0001) and activated partial thromboplastin time form 45.4 ± 11.3 to 34.2 ± 7.0 s (p = 0.0025). No thromboembolic events or side effects attributed to IDA were observed. All patients survived until hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: In trauma patients under DAB prior to injury, IDA decreased DAB plasma levels and normalized coagulation parameters. IDA appears to be safe, and no serious side effects were observed in this small cohort of patients.

Impact of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Hip Fractures.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) intake compared with Coumadin (COU) in patients suffering hip fractures (HFs). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING: Level 1 Trauma Center. INTERVENTION: Timing of surgical hip fixation. PATIENTS: Three-hundred twenty patients 65 years of age or older with isolated HF were enrolled into the study: 207 (64.7%) without any antithrombotic therapy (no-ATT), 59 (18.4%) on COU, and 54 (16.9%) on DOACs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Time to surgery, blood loss, mortality, hospital length of stay, red blood cell transfusion, use of reversal agents, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. RESULTS: Patients on COU and DOACs had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index compared with the no-ATT group (P < 0.0001). Despite the fact that significantly more patients received reversal agents in the COU group compared with DOAC medication (P < 0.0001), percentage of transfused patients were similar (54.2% vs. 53.7%). Time to surgery was significantly shorter in the no-ATT group when compared with DOAC patients (12-29.5 hours, respectively). No difference in postoperative hemorrhage, intensive care unit length of stay, and mortality was observed between groups. CONCLUSIONS: DOAC medication in HF patients caused long elapse time until surgical repair. We found no evidence of higher bleeding rates in HF patients on DOACs compared with COUs. Earlier HF fixation might be indicated in DOAC patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The impact of direct oral anticoagulants in traumatic brain injury patients greater than 60-years-old.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the leading cause of death among trauma patients. Patients under antithrombotic therapy (ATT) carry an increased risk for intracranial haematoma (ICH) formation. There is a paucity of data about the role of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) among TBI patients. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we investigated all TBI patients ≥60-years-old who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) from January 2014 until May 2017. Patients were grouped into those receiving vitamin K antagonists (VKA), platelet inhibitors (PI), DOACs and no antithrombotic therapy (no-ATT). RESULTS: One-hundred-eighty-six, predominantly male (52.7%) TBI patients with a median age of 79 years (range: 70-85 years) were enrolled in the study. Glasgow Coma Scale and S-100ß were not different among the groups. Patients on VKA and DOACs had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index compared to the PI group and no-ATT group (p = 0.0021). The VKA group received reversal agents significantly more often than the other groups (p < 0.0001). Haematoma progression in the follow-up cranial computed tomography (CCT) was lowest in the DOAC group. The number of CCT and surgical interventions were low with no differences between the groups. No relevant differences in ICU and hospital length of stay were observed. Mortality in the VKA group was significantly higher compared to DOAC, PI and no-ATT group (p = 0.047). DISCUSSION: Data from huge registry studies displayed higher efficacy and lower fatal bleeding rates for DOACs compared to VKAs. The current study revealed comparable results. Despite the fact that TBI patients on VKAs received reversal agents more often than patients on DOACs (84.4% vs. 24.2%, p < 0.001), mortality rate was significantly higher in the VKA group (p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: In patients ≥60 years suffering from TBI, anticoagulation with DOACs appears to be safer than with VKA. Anti-thrombotic therapy with VKA resulted in a worse outcome compared to DOACs and PI. Further studies are warranted to confirm this finding.