A2 /A2 B to B Renal Transplantation: Past, Present, and Future Directions.

One component of the new national kidney allocation system (KAS) in the United States that was implemented on December 4, 2014, was the allocation of kidneys from A2 and A2 B (A, non-A1 and AB, non-A1 B) deceased donors into blood group B candidates (A2 /A2 B → B). In so far as this is an important component of the new KAS that has the potential to further increase the access to transplantation for blood group B candidates on the waiting list, most of whom are minority candidates, we will review the body of evidence and historical perspectives that led to its inclusion in the new KAS. This review will also describe prospects for more widespread use of A2 /A2 B → B transplantation and a novel mechanism of humoral immunosuppression in B patients before and after transplantation with an A2 or A2 B kidney.

First Report on the OPTN National Variance: Allocation of A2 /A2 B Deceased Donor Kidneys to Blood Group B Increases Minority Transplantation.

In 2002, the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) Minority Affairs Committee (MAC) implemented a national, prospective, "variance of practice" to allow deceased donor, ABO blood group incompatible, A2 antigen, kidney transplantation into blood group B recipients; outcomes of this cohort were compared to ABO compatible recipients. The goal of the variance was to increase the number of transplants to B candidates without negatively impacting survival or compromising system equity. Only B recipients with low anti-A IgG titers (<1:8) were eligible to receive these kidneys. Across eight participating Donation Service Areas (DSA), there were 101 A2 /A2 B to B transplants through 12/31/11, of which the majority of the recipients (61%) were ethnic minorities. At 12, 24, and 36 months, Kaplan-Meier graft survival rates for the B recipients of A2 /A2 B kidneys were 95.0%, 90.6%, and 85.4%, respectively, comparable to outcomes for B recipients of B kidneys, 92.6%, 87.9%, and 82.5%, respectively (p-value = 0.48). Five DSAs increased the proportion of B transplants during 41 months postvariance, with a lesser proportional decrease in blood group A transplants. The data support the proposition that this allocation algorithm may provide a robust mechanism to increase access of blood group B minority candidates to kidney transplantation.

Blood group A isoagglutinins in A(2) → O simultaneous liver/kidney transplantation may not influence kidney function.

We simultaneously transplanted a liver and kidney (SLK) into a 55-year-old woman with end-stage liver disease secondary to recurrent primary biliary cirrhosis. The patient was blood group O, the donor was A(2) (A, non-A1) and the patient's A isoagglutinin titer was 512. Good renal function was evident by normalization of her creatinine values following transplantation. Recovery was unremarkable and she was discharged on post op day 9. The patient has not experienced an episode of rejection in either organ during the 6 months of follow-up. This case is important because high A IgG isoagglutinin levels (8 or higher) in kidney alone A(2) → O transplantation are detrimental to outcome but do not affect outcome in liver alone A(2) → O transplants; however, no such anti-A titer data have been published for A(2) → O (or B) SLK transplantation.

Long-term survival of kidneys transplanted from live A2 donors to O and B recipients.

The long-term outcome of kidneys transplanted from blood group A(2) live donors into blood group O or B candidates is not known. From 1986 through 2006, we transplanted eight blood group O patients and one blood group B patient with kidneys from blood group A(2) live donors. Immunosuppression was no different for these patients than for ABO-compatible recipients. All patients received methylprednisolone, cyclosporine or tacrolimus and azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil with or without antibody induction (monoclonal or polyclonal). Of the nine live-donor A(2) to O and B transplants performed, seven grafts remain functioning. One of those seven was lost to follow-up at 9.2 years with a functioning kidney. Of the remaining six patients, length of follow-up is 10.4, 6.5, 5.3, 4, 2.1 and 1 years. Of the two patients who lost their grafts, one died with a functioning graft (DWFG) at 8.8 years and one lost his graft at 13.2 years due to noncompliance with immunosuppression. These data show that good long-term graft survival can be expected in live-donor A(2) to O and B transplantation despite some of those patients experiencing the type of clinical problems seen with ABO-compatible transplants.

Point-of-care testing in an organ procurement organization donor management setting.

PURPOSE: Our organ procurement organization (OPO) evaluated the clinical and financial efficacy of point-of-care testing (POCT) in management of our deceased organ donors. METHODS: Before we implemented point-of care testing with the i-STAT into routine clinical donor management, we compared the i-STAT result with the result from the respective donor hospital lab (DHL) for certain analytes on 15 consecutive donors in our OPO from 26 March to 14 May 2001. The financial impact was studied by reviewing 77 donors from July 2001 to March 2002. RESULTS: There was a strong correlation for each analyte between the POC and DHL test results with r-values as follows: pH 0.86; PCO2 = 0.96; PO2 = 0.98; sodium = 0.98; potassium = 0.95; chloride = 0.94; BUN = 0.98; glucose = 0.92; haematocrit = 0.87 and creatinine = 0.95. Since our OPO coordinators began using i-STAT in their routine clinical management of organ donors, they can now more quickly maximize oxygenation and fluid management of the donor and make extra-renal placement calls sooner. Finally, since we are no longer being billed for the testing performed on the i-STAT, average financial savings to our OPO are US dollars 733 per case. CONCLUSIONS: Point-of-care testing in management of our OPO donors provides a result that is equivalent to that of the donor hospital lab, has quicker turn-around time than the donor hospital laboratory, allowing more immediate clinical management decisions to be made so that extra-renal offers may begin sooner.

Cold ischemia time: an independent predictor of increased HLA class I antibody production after rejection of a primary cadaveric renal allograft.

BACKGROUND: Cadaveric kidneys experiencing longer cold ischemia time (CIT) are associated with higher levels of delayed graft function, acute rejection, and early graft loss. One mechanism to explain these results is that ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury makes the allograft more immunogenic by upregulating molecules involved in the immune response (e.g., HLA Class I/II). METHODS: We evaluated the influence of CIT on the production of HLA Class I antibody level, measured by an antihuman globulin panel reactive antibody (AHG PRA) level, in 90 unsensitized recipients of primary cadaveric renal transplants (from a total of 1442 between 1985 and 1997) who rejected their kidneys. RESULTS: By multivariate analysis, a CIT of 15 hr or more (vs. < 15 hr) independently increased the risk of the AHG Class I PRA level being > or = 20% after unsensitized patients rejected their first kidneys (relative risk=3.57; 95% confidence interval=1.26 to 10.14; P=0.01), despite the same degree of Class I/II mismatch between the two CIT groups. The overall mean peak PRA level after primary kidney rejection was significantly lower for the CIT < 15 hr group (25.9%+/-33.9; n=24) compared with the CIT > or = 15 hr group (46.3%+/-36.5; n=66) (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Longer CIT induces a humorally more immunogenic kidney.

The influence of age, gender and ethnicity on cadaveric organ recovery rate.

In view of the influence of donor factors such as age on graft outcome and the performance standards that measure OPO productivity by the number of organs recovered and transplanted, it is important to understand the relationship of certain donor factors on organ recovery for transplantation from cadaveric donors. We examined the influence of donor age, gender and ethnicity on the number and type of transplanted organs recovered from 598 consecutive cadaveric donors in our OPO between 1994 and July 1999. The highest number of organs/donor ocurs in the 11-20 donor age range and declines significantly with each age range. The type of organ recovered is also influenced by age, but the least effect is on liver recovery. No difference was seen in the number of organs recovered/donor by race. When the data were re-analyzed with regard to renal and extra-renal organs transplanted/million donor population, 78% of the kidneys (n=781/1006) were from the 11-50 age range and 81% of the extra-renal organs (n=822/1,192) were from that age range. Stepwise regression yielded a model where donor age significantly influenced (P=0.001) the number of organs recovered. Finally, the incidence of recovered and transplanted organs was significantly higher in males compared with females for hearts [51% (187/360) vs. 40% (86/214); P<0.006] and pancreata [18% (66/360) vs. 11% (24/214); P<0.02]. The number of organs recovered and transplanted from cadaveric organ donors is influenced predominantly by the age of the donor, with the exception being liver donors. Increasing organ recovery and transplantation of organs from donors from the two age extremes results in less gain in the number of organs/million population than recovery from the 11-50 age range.

IgM antibodies identified by a DTT-ameliorated positive crossmatch do not influence renal graft outcome but the strength of the IgM lymphocytotoxicity is associated with DR phenotype.

A positive crossmatch that is rendered negative by treating the serum with the IgM-reducing agent dithiothreitol (DTT) is generally reported not to influence short-term renal graft outcome. Its effect on long-term (> or = 3 years) cadaveric and live-donor transplant function, however, is less clear. We evaluated the effect of IgM antibodies in a DTT-ameliorated positive crossmatch (DTT-APXM) on long-term renal graft outcome in 1,290 consecutive cadaveric renal transplants (8-year survival) and 384 live-donor renal transplants (7-year survival) from patients transplanted between 1990 and 1999. The data show that 1- and 8-year graft survival for cadaveric renal transplants in patients with IgM antibodies (n=72) (DWFG censored = 91% and 65%; DWFG not censored = 90% and 60%) was not significantly different from the group without IgM antibodies (n = 1,218) (DWFG censored = 92% and 71%; DWFG not censored = 87% and 55%) (log-rank = 0.25 for DWFG censored, log-rank = 0.92 for DWFG not censored). The one- and seven-year graft survival for live-donor renal transplants in patients with IgM antibodies seen in a DTT-APXM (n = 22) (DWFG censored = 95% and 83%; DWFG not censored = 95% and 66%) was not significantly different from the group without IgM antibodies (n = 362) (DWFG censored = 94% and 81%; DWFG not censored = 92% and 73%) (log-rank = 0.61 for DWFG censored, log-rank = 0.89 for DWFG not censored). DR phenotype was found to be associated with the strong (>40% cell death) IgM reactivity in both black and white patients. In white patients, DR2 was more frequently seen with a strong IgM crossmatch (48.2%) than in molecularly typed controls (28.5%) (P < 0.03) and concomitant with that DR increase, DR4 was decreased in white patients (6.8%) compared with controls (25.5%) (P < 0.02). In black patients with strong IgM reactivity, DR6 was increased in patients (46.1%) compared with controls (20.5%) (P = 0.07) and concomitant with that DR6 increase, DR5 was decreased in frequency in black patients (7.6%) compared with controls (41%) (P < 0.03). These data show that long-term graft survival in renal transplantation is not negatively influenced by the presence of donor-reactive lymphocytotoxic antibodies in the crossmatch ameliorated by serum DTT treatment. They also suggest that the strength of the IgM antibody response is regulated in part by certain gene (s) of the DR region.

HLA-B*4012: a new allele with unique serological features.

We have defined the new allele HLA-B*4012, which had been isolated from a black individual. It was initially recognized as a serologically unique allele when typing her father for renal transplantation. The HLA class I phenotype was A*0201,*6602; B*4001,*4012; Bw6; Cw*0304,*1505. Sequencing from exon 1 through intron 3 of B*4012 was performed. B*4012 is identical to B*4001 and B*4010 in exon 3, and in the 3' part of exon 2, but it is unique in that exon 1 and the 5' part of exon 2 are identical to B*1503, B*1509, B*1510, B*1518, B*1523, and B*1529. The generation of this allele is best explained by a recombination event in exon 2 (break point between nucleotides 205 and 222 from the beginning of the coding region) of B*4001 or B*4010 with one of these B*15 variants as a donor allele. Its unique serological feature (B48, B60, B70, and B72 reactivity) is consistent with the sequence data of its donor alleles.

Successful cadaveric renal transplantation of patients highly sensitized to HLA Class I antigens.

The purpose of our investigation was to evaluate long-term graft survival and the role of histocompatibility in patients who were highly sensitized to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) Class I antigens and received a cadaveric renal transplant. Our multi-institutional study evaluated 7-yr graft outcomes and the histocompatibility requirements of 61 (6.1%) highly sensitized (anti-human globulin panel reactive antibody [AHG PRA], > or = 80%) cadaveric renal transplantation patients, transplanted between 1988 and 1997, among 999 consecutive cadaveric renal transplants. One- and 7-yr graft survival in the high PRA group (n = 61) was 76 and 59%, and was not significantly different from that in the low PRA group (n = 938), 86 and 59% (Wilcoxon = 0.11; log-rank = 0.45) (died with a functioning graft [DWFG] not censored). When those data were divided into primary and regrafts, 1- and 7-yr graft outcomes for high and low PRA groups were not significantly different [(primary, 1- and 7-yr survival: high PRA = 83 and 74%, n = 30, and low PRA = 87 and 61%, n = 825; log-rank = 0.37 for DWFG not censored) (regrafts, 1- and 7-yr survival: high PRA = 70 and 42%, n = 31, and low PRA = 80 and 43%, n = 113; log-rank = 0.36 for DWFG not censored)]. We did observe a subgroup of the high PRA patient group that had inferior graft outcomes. Graft outcome at 1 and 6 yr in the high PRA group for patients who had one to two DR mismatches (65 and 50%, n = 41) was significantly worse than for high PRA patients who had zero DR mismatches with their donors (100 and 78%, n = 20) (log-rank = 0.01 for DWFG not censored). Furthermore, the mean number of HLA-A and -B mismatches was significantly greater in the high PRA/DR-mismatched group (1.7 +/- 1.2, n = 41) compared with the high PRA/zero DR-mismatched group (0.5 +/- 1.1, n = 19) (p < 0.001). Overall, these data suggest that the patient who is highly sensitized to HLA Class I antigens has a long-term graft outcome that is equivalent to less sensitized patients, but that HLA-DR mismatching and a higher degree of Class I mismatching may be poor prognostic indicators in such patients.

Influence of the Rh (D) blood group system on graft survival in renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The Rh (D) blood group system has not traditionally been considered to be a clinically relevant histocompatibility barrier in transplantation since conflicting results of its clinical importance have been reported. METHODS: We analyzed 786 consecutive primary cadaveric renal transplants performed by transplant centers in our Organ Procurement Organization (OPO) between 1990 and 1997. We also analyzed United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data on 26,469 kidney transplants done from April 1994 to June 1996. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis revealed that Rh identity between the recipient and donor was significantly related to better graft outcome (risk ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.30 to 0.61; P=0.0001). Multivariate analysis of the UNOS data revealed that the Rh -/- group may have a positive influence on graft survival with a risk ratio of 0.43 (P=0.14). CONCLUSION: Multivariate analysis of primary cadaveric renal allografts performed within the Midwest Organ Bank OPO indicates that Rh (D) is a clinically relevant histocompatibility barrier that influences 7-year graft survival.

Ten-year experience in transplantation of A2 kidneys into B and O recipients.

BACKGROUND: This article summarizes our 10-year multicenter experience with transplantation of 50 blood group A2 and A2B kidneys into B and O patients. METHODS: Since 1986, we have transplanted kidneys from 46 cadaver donors and 4 living donors who were blood group A2 (47 donors) or A2B (3 donors) into 19 B and 31 O patients. In 1991, we began allocating these kidneys preferentially to B and O recipients who were selected based on a history of low (< or =4) anti-A IgG isoagglutinin titers. Immunosuppression was no different from that used in ABO-compatible grafts. RESULTS: The 1-month function rate before thus selecting the patients was 68% (19/28), but is now 94% (17/18). Two-year cadaver-donor graft survival with this selection method is 94%, compared with 88% for 640 concurrent and consecutive ABO-compatible transplants (log-rank, 0.15). All four living-related transplants are still functioning, with a mean follow-up of 71 months. Since we began allocating A2 kidneys preferentially to B and O recipients, the percentage of the B patients who received A2 or A2B kidneys has increased from 29% (8/28) to 55% (10/18). CONCLUSIONS: Transplantation of A2 or A2B kidneys into B and O patients is clinically equivalent to that of ABO-compatible transplantation when recipients are selected by low pretransplant anti-A titer histories. This approach increases access of blood group B recipients to kidneys.

ABO-mismatched renal transplantation in children: a report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study (NAPRTCS) and the Midwest Organ Bank (MOB).

Successful ABO-mismatched renal transplantation (RT) (blood group A2 donor to blood group B or O recipient) has occurred in adults in the setting of a low titer (< or =4) natural isoagglutinin (anti-A) level in the recipient of the mismatched organ. Similar experiences have rarely occurred in children. Between 1986-1996, 11 pediatric patients (6 male and 5 female) received 11 ABO-mismatched kidneys [7 cadaveric (CAD) and 4 living related donor (LRD)]. There were 8 O recipients/A2 donor pairs, 2 B recipients/A2 donor pairs and 1 B recipient/A2B donor pair. Recipient age at the time of RT was 14.7+/-3.0 yr (mean +/- SD). Prior to RT, 2 recipients underwent splenectomy and none received donor-specific transfusions. Induction and early maintenance immunosuppression consisted of corticosteroids (11 pts), ALG/ATG (6 pts), OKT3 (3 pts), azathioprine (11 pts) and cyclosporine (8 pts). The mean 30-d cyclosporine dosage was 10.6+/-4.0 mg/kg/d. Eight patients suffered > or =1 acute rejection episodes, the initial episode occurring within the first 31 d post-transplant in 7 of them. Five grafts (45.4%) failed secondary to vascular thrombosis (1), acute rejection (2) and chronic rejection (2). The remaining grafts (54.5%) all functioned for >1000 d (range: 1023-3746 d). The pre-transplant anti-A titer was determined in 6 pts; in 4 it was low (2) and in 2 it was high (8). Graft survival in all but one of these patients (whose titer was 8 and who suffered a non-rejection-related vascular thrombosis) was > or =2 yr. In summary, ABO-mismatched RT in pediatric patients is an uncommon practice. However, the adult experience and our preliminary pediatric experience suggests that evaluation of recipient isoagglutinin levels in this setting may be helpful in the selection of donor/recipient pairs in whom mismatched transplantation can be successful.

Transplantation rate of the blood group B waiting list is increased by using A2 and A2B kidneys.

BACKGROUND: We have increased the transplantation rate for blood group B cadaveric waiting list candidates by transplanting them with A2 and A2B kidneys. METHODS: Since 1991, five of the seven renal transplant programs in our organ procurement organization service area have preferentially transplanted blood group A2 and A2B cadaveric kidneys to B blood group waiting list candidates with histories of low anti-A isoagglutinin titers. RESULTS: Between 1991 and 1997, these five centers performed transplantations on 71 patients from the B cadaveric waiting list. Of those 71 patients, 29% (21 of 71) underwent transplantation with either A2 (n=18) or A2B (n=3) cadaveric kidneys. In 1997 alone, 48% (11 of 23) of the B patient transplant recipients received A2 or A2B kidneys. CONCLUSIONS: Transplantation of A2 and A2B kidneys into B waiting list patients has successfully increased access of B patients to kidneys. Such an allocation algorithm implemented nationally may similarly increase the transplantation rate of B waiting list candidates.

Long-term graft survival is improved in cadaveric renal retransplantation by flow cytometric crossmatching.

BACKGROUND: Cadaveric renal retransplantation is associated with a higher risk of early graft failure than primary grafts. A large proportion of those graft losses is likely attributable to donor-directed HLA class I antibodies, detectable by flow cytometry cross-matching but not by conventional crossmatching techniques. METHODS: Long-term graft survival in a group of 106 recipients of consecutive cadaveric renal regrafts between 1990 and 1997, in whom a negative flow T-cell IgG crossmatch was required for transplantation, was compared with two other groups of cadaveric transplant recipients. The first group consisted of 174 cadaveric regrafts transplanted between 1985 and 1995 using only a negative anti-human globulin (AHG) T-cell IgG crossmatch. The second group was primary cadaveric transplants done concurrently with the flow group (1990 to 1997) using only the AHG T-cell IgG crossmatch. RESULTS: The long-term (7 year) graft survival rate of flow crossmatch-selected regraft recipients (68%; n= 106) was significantly improved over that of regraft recipients who were selected for transplantation by only the AHG crossmatch technique (45%; n=174; log-rank=0.001; censored for patients dying with a functioning graft). Graft outcome for the flow cross-matched regraft recipients was not significantly different from that of primary cadaveric patients (72%; n=889; log-rank=0.2; censored for patients dying with a functioning graft). Finally, a positive B-cell IgG flow cytometric crossmatch had no influence on long-term regraft outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the flow T-cell IgG cross-match as the exclusion criterion for cadaveric renal retransplantation yields an improved long-term graft outcome over that obtained when only the AHG cross-match is used and has improved survival of regraft recipients to the level of our primary cadaveric renal transplant population.

HLA-DR and DQ typing by polymerase chain reaction using sequence-specific primer mixes reduces the incidence of phenotypic homozygosity (blanks) over serology.

Because of the inherent difficulties in allele assignment with HLA-DR serological typing, in 1993 our organ procurement organization-based HLA laboratory replaced serology with the molecular method of polymerase chain reaction using sequence-specific primer mixes (PCR-SSP) to type for DR and DQ at a resolution level equivalent to that of serologically defined antigens. In this study, we compared the incidence of DR blanks, where allocative homozygosity occurred, and graft outcome during our serology epoch (1987-1993) with that of our molecular epoch (1993-1996). The incidence of DR blanks by PCR-SSP (17.0%; 138/1101) was significantly lower (P<0.005) than in the serology epoch (21.5%; 569/2647). Although DQ is not a component of the allocation algorithm, the incidence of blanks in the molecular era (21.9%; 196/895) was 46% lower (P<0.001) than in the serology epoch (40.8%; 931/2277). Graft survival in 163 cadaveric renal transplant recipients for whom molecular DR allocation occurred (patient and donor were molecularly typed) showed that PCR-SSP typing had no significant effect on 2.5-year graft survival for patients mismatched for 0 (97%), 1 (90%), or 2 (94%) HLA-DR antigens (P=0.4; log-rank). In conclusion, molecular typing lowered the rate of DR and DQ blanks, but molecular matching for HLA DR and DQ did not influence graft outcome at 2.5 years.

Improved graft survival in cadaveric renal retransplantation by flow crossmatching.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of flow cytometry cross-matching on graft survival in patients undergoing cadaveric renal retransplantation compared with our conventional antihuman globulin cytotoxic crossmatch. DESIGN: In 1990, 6 of 7 transplantation centers in 1 organ procurement organization service area began performing cadaveric renal retransplantation only if the flow T-cell IgG crossmatch was negative. During that period, 1 center continued to use only the antihuman globulin T-cell IgG crossmatch. Prior to 1990, all centers used only the antihuman globulin T-cell IgG crossmatch as their crossmatch selection criterion for retransplantation. Regraft survival was compared between those centers by crossmatch selection criteria. PATIENTS: Patient selection and immunosuppression decisions were made at the transplantation center. SETTING: All flow cytometry crossmatches for all 7 centers participating in the evaluation were performed at the Histocompatibility Laboratory of the Midwest Organ Bank Inc, Westwood, Kan. RESULTS: Graft survival is significantly better (P = .03 [logrank test]) in regrafts when the flow crossmatch is used to select patients for transplantation. CONCLUSION: Flow crossmatching improves graft survival in cadaveric renal retransplantation by identifying a subset of patients with donor-directed HLA class I antibodies that are not detectable by our conventional antihuman globulin crossmatch.