Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Aust Health Rev ; 42(5): 491-500, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30122160

RESUMEN

Objective The aim of this study is to describe the experience of developing key performance indicators (KPIs) for Sydney Children's Hospital Network (SCHN), the largest paediatric healthcare entity in Australia. Methods Beginning with a published methodology, the process of developing KPIs involved five phases: (1) identification of potential KPIs referencing the organisational strategic plan and pre-existing internal and external documents; (2) consolidation into a pragmatic set; (3) analysis of potential KPIs against selection criteria; (4) mapping these back against the strategic plan and management structure; and (5) presentation to key stakeholders to ensure suitability and traction. Consistent with the strategic plan, a subset of indicators was selected to address quality of care for children from priority populations. Results A pragmatic list of 60 mandated and 50 potential KPIs was created from the 328 new and 397 existing potentially relevant KPIs generated by the executive team. Of these, 20 KPIs were selected as the most important; 65% were process measures. The majority of mandated KPIs were process measures. Of the KPIs selected to highlight inequities, there were proportionately more outcome measures (44% outcome, 27% process). Less than one-third could currently be measured by the organisation and were thus aspirational. Conclusion Developing a KPI suite requires substantial time, effort and organisational courage. A structured approach to performance measurement and improvement is needed to ensure a balanced suite of KPIs that can be expected to drive an organisation to improve child health outcomes. Future directions for SCHN include a systematic approach to implementation beyond the mandated KPIs, including KPIs that reflect equity and improved outcomes for priority populations, development of meaningful measures for the aspirational KPIs, adding structure KPIs and measurement of changes in child health outcomes related to the development of this KPI process. What is known about the topic? Health services are increasingly required to demonstrate accountability through KPIs. There is a body of literature on both theoretical frameworks for measuring performance and a long list of possible measures, however developing a meaningful suite of KPIs remains a significant challenge for individual organisations. What does this paper add? This paper describes lessons learned from the practical, pragmatic application of a published methodology to develop a suite of KPIs for the largest paediatric healthcare entity in Australia. It provides a select list of the highest-level KPIs selected by the organisation to stimulate further discussion among similar organisations in relation to KPI selection and implementation. What are the implications for practitioners? Developing and implementing a suite of meaningful KPIs for a large organisation requires courage, an understanding of health informatics, stakeholder engagement, stamina and pragmatism. The process we describe can be replicated and/or modified as needed, with discussion of key lessons learned to help practitioners plan ahead.


Asunto(s)
Hospitales Pediátricos/normas , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Centros de Atención Terciaria/normas , Australia , Niño , Humanos , Objetivos Organizacionales , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas
2.
J Paediatr Child Health ; 42(9): 528-32, 2006 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16925539

RESUMEN

AIM: We aimed to determine the rate of Internet use for obtaining medical information by health-care patients at a tertiary paediatric hospital, whether the Internet may influence patients' attitudes to health-care services and health-care providers and whether patients would prefer the assistance of a professional informatics officer. METHODS: An anonymous questionnaire randomly distributed to 450 subjects at Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, Australia. RESULTS: A total of 294 (65%) questionnaires were returned. Overall Internet use for medical information was 64% (189/294). Most (97%; 183/189) respondents reported 'wanting to know more' as the reason they sought information on the Internet. Eighty-eight per cent (167/189) of respondents reported that they trust their doctor more than the Internet. Twenty-one per cent (39/189) had presented their doctor with information about which he/she was unaware and 18% (34/189) had altered a health-care decision because of information found on the Internet. The Internet had influenced questions asked of doctors in 83% (156/189). Eighty-six per cent (252/294) of all respondents were in favour of professional assistance to obtain medical information. CONCLUSION: A large number of patients use the Internet to find information that influences their attitudes to health care. The services of a medical informatics professional would likely benefit both patients and doctors.


Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Salud , Servicios de Información/estadística & datos numéricos , Internet/estadística & datos numéricos , Informática Médica , Padres/educación , Adulto , Australia , Niño , Educación en Salud/métodos , Hospitalización , Hospitales Pediátricos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
Am J Med Qual ; 20(2): 83-9, 2005.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15851386

RESUMEN

Clinical pathways are useful tools in improving the quality of care of patients treated in hospitals. Gastroenteritis is a short, self-limiting, but common illness of childhood associated with significant costs to the community. The authors assessed the impact of a clinical pathway on investigation ordering in children with gastroenteritis. A retrospective analysis of 2 cohorts of children was performed before (n=1498) and after (n=1252) the introduction of a clinical pathway. Children admitted to hospital with a diagnosis of gastroenteritis were assessed as to the type of pathology tests ordered. Further outcomes measured were rates of admission, emergency department presentations, average length of stay, and direct costs. Subset analysis was undertaken on the initial cohort of patients who had a full blood count as part of their initial assessment. Full blood count was more likely to be performed prior to the introduction of the pathway(77.1%) than after pathway introduction (66.8%; P<.004). Urine microscopy and culture also was significantly decreased from 56.3% to 40.4% (P<.0005). Median patient costs were reduced from $1228 to $752 following pathway introduction (P<.0001); however, rates of admission were increased from 18.6% to 28.8% (P<.0001). Length of stay decreased but was not statistically significant. Full blood count results in the subset analysis revealed that the measurement of a full blood count had no impact on management. Thus, a clinical pathway contributed to more rational ordering of pathology tests and lowered the costs to a hospital of caring for patients with this common illness.


Asunto(s)
Vías Clínicas/normas , Gastroenteritis/diagnóstico , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Preescolar , Vías Clínicas/economía , Femenino , Gastroenteritis/sangre , Gastroenteritis/fisiopatología , Hospitalización , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Nueva Gales del Sur , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
Med Educ Online ; 10(1): 4385, 2005 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28253144

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of postgraduate pediatric training is a complex yet critical task. We aimed to review pediatric trainees' attitudes to clinical decision-making, levels of supervision and end of life issues in a tertiary pediatric teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia. METHOD: A questionnaire was devised and distributed to all trainees at Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick. All responses were anonymous. Results were independently analyzed using SPSS statistical software. RESULTS: Forty percent of trainees spent three hours or less per week face to face with more senior colleagues and 14% spent greater than 10 hours per week with more senior colleagues. Seventy-five percent of trainees spent three hours or less on the phone with more senior colleagues while 10% spent five hours or more on the phone with more senior colleagues. There was no association (or correlation) (p>0.05) between seniority of trainee and the number of times a trainee met face to face or phoned a more senior colleague to discuss a management plan. One in three trainees felt that they made less than 10% of clinical decisions on their own and 54% felt that they made less than half of decisions on their own. There was a statistically significant difference between seniority of training and the percentage of important clinical decisions made (p<0.01). Nearly half the trainees (47.7%) have not had the occasion to inform families of the death or impending death of a child. There was a statistically significant difference between seniority of training and the opportunity of informing families of a death of a child (p<0.01).Greater than two thirds of trainees feel that they have not received formal training in clinical decision-making. At the completion of four years of pediatric training only half the trainees considered themselves to be making the majority of clinical decisions. CONCLUSION: There is a need for closer supervision of pediatric trainees by senior colleagues, who themselves, may require additional ongoing training to supervise appropriately. There should be a balanced environment where trainees can make safe, independent decisions. The perceived absence of clinical decision making training suggests a deficiency in the training program.

5.
Med Educ Online ; 9(1): 4361, 2004 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28253128

RESUMEN

Orientating new junior medical staff can be a complex and time consuming task. Traditional models have typically involved a day or longer of lectures. This involves a large number of senior staff being available on the first day of term. It also means that junior staff not present on the first day had any access to an orientation program at all. Evaluation of our program confirmed the belief that the day was dull and that there was simply too much information for new staff to absorb. As a result of this feedback we extensively updated our orientation program. Pre-reading of the junior staff manual became compulsory. We departed from the traditional lecture style program and devised a new ten- station scenario based interactive program. The stations were designed to cover aspects of the hospital's mandatory education and key educational requirements in order to function effectively on our campus. Station leaders were selected and trained in the goals of the new process. Several of our secondment sites were engaged in the development of the project topics. We hoped that our secondment sites would be relieved of some orientation responsibility if core material was delivered centrally. The strength of the new orientation is that it is portable, reproducible and uniform. It is also available via video conferencing. A single person can educate new staff in three hours if the need arises. Most importantly all new staff will have access to the program within a week of starting a term at our hospital. Key words: medical orientation; junior staff; interactive.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...