Design and Realization of Polymeric Waveguide/Microring Structures for Telecommunication Domain.

Polymer-based micro-optical components are very important for applications in optical communication. In this study, we theoretically investigated the coupling of polymeric waveguide and microring structures and experimentally demonstrated an efficient fabrication method to realize these structures on demand. First, the structures were designed and simulated using the FDTD method. The optical mode and loss in the coupling structures were calculated, thereby giving the optimal distance for optical mode coupling between two rib waveguide structures or for optical mode coupling in a microring resonance structure. Simulations results then guided us in the fabrication of the desired ring resonance microstructures using a robust and flexible direct laser writing technique. The entire optical system was thus designed and manufactured on a flat base plate so that it could be easily integrated in optical circuits.

Effect of the MDM2 antagonist RG7112 on the P53 pathway in patients with MDM2-amplified, well-differentiated or dedifferentiated liposarcoma: an exploratory proof-of-mechanism study.

BACKGROUND: We report a proof-of-mechanism study of RG7112, a small-molecule MDM2 antagonist, in patients with chemotherapy-naive primary or relapsed well-differentiated or dedifferentiated MDM2-amplified liposarcoma who were eligible for resection. METHODS: Patients with well-differentiated or dedifferentiated liposarcoma were enrolled at four centres in France. Patients received up to three 28-day neoadjuvant treatment cycles of RG7112 1440 mg/m(2) per day for 10 days. If a patient progressed at any point after the first cycle, the lesion was resected or, if unresectable, an end-of-study biopsy was done. The primary endpoint was to assess markers of RG7112-dependent MDM2 inhibition and P53 pathway activation (P53, P21, MDM2, Ki-67, macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 [MIC-1], and apoptosis). All analyses were per protocol. This trial is registered with EudraCT, number 2009-015522-10. RESULTS: Between June 3, and Dec 14, 2010, 20 patients were enrolled and completed pretreatment and day 8 biopsies. 18 of 20 patients had TP53 wild-type tumours and two carried missense TP53 mutations. 14 of 17 assessed patients had MDM2 gene amplification. Compared with baseline, P53 and P21 concentrations, assessed by immunohistochemistry, had increased by a median of 4·86 times (IQR 4·38-7·97; p=0·0001) and 3·48 times (2·05-4·09; p=0·0001), respectively, at day 8 (give or take 2 days). At the same timepoint, relative MDM2 mRNA expression had increased by a median of 3·03 times (1·23-4·93; p=0·003) that at baseline. The median change from baseline for Ki-67-positive tumour cells was -5·05% (IQR -12·55 to 0·05; p=0·01). Drug exposure correlated with blood concentrations of MIC-1 (p<0·0001) and haematological toxicity. One patient had a confirmed partial response and 14 had stable disease. All patients experienced at least one adverse event, mostly nausea (14 patients), vomiting (11 patients), asthenia (nine patients), diarrhoea (nine patients), and thrombocytopenia (eight patients). There were 12 serious adverse events in eight patients, the most common of which were neutropenia (six patients) and thrombocytopenia (three patients). DISCUSSION: MDM2 inhibition activates the P53 pathway and decreases cell proliferation in MDM2-amplified liposarcoma. This study suggests that it is feasible to undertake neoadjuvant biopsy-driven biomarker studies in liposarcoma. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Efficacy and safety of motesanib, an oral inhibitor of VEGF, PDGF, and Kit receptors, in patients with imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

PURPOSE: This multicenter phase 2 study assessed the tolerability and efficacy of motesanib, an oral inhibitor of Kit, platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), and vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFR), in patients with imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). METHODS: Patients with advanced GIST who failed imatinib mesylate after ≥8 weeks of treatment with ≥600 mg daily received motesanib 125 mg orally once daily continuously for 48 weeks or until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression occurred. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective tumor response per RECIST and independent review. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP); objective response by (18)FDG-PET and by changes in tumor size and/or density (Choi criteria); pharmacokinetics and safety. RESULTS: In the patients evaluable for response (N = 102), the objective response rate was 3%; 59% of patients achieved stable disease, with 14% achieving durable stable disease ≥24 weeks; 38% had disease progression. Higher objective response rates were observed per (18)FDG-PET (N = 91) (30%) and Choi criteria (41%). The median PFS was 16 weeks (95% CI = 14-24 weeks); the median TTP was 17 weeks (95% CI = 15-24 weeks). The most common motesanib treatment-related grade 3 adverse events included hypertension (23%), fatigue (9%), and diarrhea (5%). Motesanib did not accumulate with daily dosing. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of patients with imatinib-resistant GIST, motesanib treatment resulted in acceptable tolerability and modest tumor control as evident in the proportion of patients who achieved stable disease and durable stable disease.

Discontinuation of imatinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours after 3 years of treatment: an open-label multicentre randomised phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: The effect of imatinib discontinuation on progression-free survival and overall survival in long-lasting responders with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) is unknown. We assessed treatment interruption in patients with non-progressive disease according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors criteria after 3 years of imatinib in a randomised trial. METHODS: In this open-label national multicentre phase 3 study in France, patients with GIST free of progression after 3 years of imatinib 400 mg/day were randomly assigned to continue or interrupt imatinib. Randomisation was done centrally and independently from other study procedures with computer-generated permuted blocks of two and four patients stratified by participating centre and presence or absence of residual disease on CT scan. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. An interim analysis was planned after the first 50 randomly assigned patients. Analysis was done according to the intention-to-treat principle-ie, all patients randomly assigned to a study group were included. This study is registered with ClinicalTrial.gov, number NCT00367861. FINDINGS: 434 patients were enrolled in this trial between May 27, 2002, and May 5, 2009. Between June 13, 2005, and May 30, 2007, 50 patients with non-progressive disease who had received 3 years of treatment with imatinib were randomly assigned to continue or interrupt their treatment, 25 patients in each group. By Dec 7, 2009, after a median follow-up of 35 months (95% CI 33-38) after random assignment, 2-year progression-free survival was 80% (95% CI 58-91) in the continuation group and 16% (5-33) in the interruption group (p < 0·0001). There was no difference in adverse events grade 3 or greater (oedema and asthenia) between the two groups. INTERPRETATION: Imatinib interruption after 3 years in responders results in a high risk of rapid progression in patients with advanced GIST. Discontinuation of imatinib is not recommended outside clinical trials unless patients experience significant toxic effects. FUNDING: Conticanet, the Ligue Contre Le Cancer du Rhone, and Novartis.

Phase II study of oral masitinib mesilate in imatinib-naïve patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastro-intestinal stromal tumour (GIST).

BACKGROUND: Masitinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with greater in vitro activity and selectivity for the wild-type c-Kit receptor and its juxtamembrane mutation than imatinib, without inhibiting kinases of known toxicities. This phase II study evaluated masitinib as a first-line treatment of advanced GIST. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Imatinib-naïve patients with advanced GIST received oral masitinib at 7.5mg/kg/d. Efficacy end-points included response rate (RR) at 2 months, best response according to RECIST, metabolic response rate, disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival rate (OS). RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled with a median follow-up of 34 months. The most frequent grade 3-4 toxicities were rash (10%) and neutropaenia (7%). Two patients withdrew due to treatment-related adverse events. At 2 months, RR was 20% according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST) and 86% according to FDG-PET response criteria. Best responses were a complete response in 1/30 patient (3.3%), partial response in 15/30 patients (50%), stable disease in 13/30 patients (43.3%) and progressive disease in 1/30 patient (3.3%); (DCR: 96.7%). Median time-to-response was 5.6 months (0.8-23.8 months). Estimated median PFS was 41.3 months with PFS rate of 59.7% [37.9; 76.0] and 55.4 [33.9; 72.5] at 2 and 3 years, respectively. The OS at 2 and 3 years was stable at 89.9% [71.8; 96.6]. CONCLUSIONS: Masitinib appears to be effective as a first-line treatment of advanced GIST with comparable results to imatinib in terms of safety and response. PFS and in particular OS data show promise that masitinib may provide sustainable benefits. There is sufficient compelling evidence to warrant a phase III clinical trial.

Phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel for unresectable angiosarcoma: the ANGIOTAX Study.

PURPOSE: The objective of this phase II trial was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of weekly paclitaxel for patients with metastatic or unresectable angiosarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients were entered onto the study from April 2005 through October 2006. Paclitaxel was administered intravenously as a 60-minute infusion at a dose of 80 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 4-week cycle. The primary end point was the nonprogression rate after two cycles. RESULTS: The progression-free survival rates after 2 and 4 months were 74% and 45%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 8 months, the median time to progression was 4 months and the median overall survival was 8 months. The progression-free survival rate was similar in patients pretreated with chemotherapy and in chemotherapy-naïve patients (77% v 71%). Three patients with locally advanced breast angiosarcoma presented partial response, which enabled a secondary curative-intent surgery with complete histologic response in two cases. One toxic death occurred as a result of a thrombocytopenia episode. Six patients presented with grade 3 toxicities and one patient presented with a grade 4 toxicity. Anemia and fatigue were the most frequently reported toxicities. CONCLUSION: Weekly paclitaxel at the dose schedule used in the current study was well tolerated and demonstrated clinical benefit.

[Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in sarcoma]. / Chimiothérapie néoadjuvante des sarcomes.

This document describe s the proposed clinical practices guidelines for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcomas proposed by the French Sarcoma Group.Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy remains an experimental therapeutic procedure in soft tissue sarcomas. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy may be proposed in three different types of situations: 1) a locally advanced tumor, non accessible to R0 or 1 removal of the lesion. Its objective is there to allow for R0 or R1 surgical removal of the tumor. 2) A locally advanced tumor, accessible to R0 or 1 removal of the lesion, but with a mutilating surgery (amputation). Its objective is there to allow for R0 or R1 conservative surgical removal of the tumor. In both situation, the strategy should be discussed beforehand in a multidisciplinary specialized consultation for sarcoma. 3) In the case where complete (R0 or R1) surgical removal of the tumor can be performed, neooadjuvant chemotherapy has no demonstrated role. The only randomized phase III clinical trial testing neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in this setting, i.e. the STBSG 62871 STBSG trial, failed to demonstrate any benefit in terms of overall or progression free survival. The selection of the type of chemotherapy regimen given in the neoadjuvant setting should be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting, considering the age and the general status of the patient; young patients, without associated concomittent illnesses should be proposed for a combined chemotherapy regimen, combining doxorubicin (> or = 50 mg/m2) and ifosfamide (> 5 g/m2) on the basis of randomized trials demonstrating an improvement of response rate versus single agent therapy with doxorubine. In elderly and/or frail patients, conversely, single agent doxorubicin may be the preferred option.

Phase I study and pharmacokinetic of CHS-828, a guanidino-containing compound, administered orally as a single dose every 3 weeks in solid tumours: an ECSG/EORTC study.

CHS 828 is a new guanidino-containing drug. The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the recommended dose and the toxicity of CHS 828. CHS 828 was given orally once every 3 weeks. The starting dose was 50 mg, which was escalated to 500 mg. A total of 107 courses was administered to 37 patients. At the 500-mg dose level, two of three patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) (grade 3 mucositis and grade 4 thrombocytopenia), establishing this as the MTD. One of seven patients treated at 420 mg dose experienced DLT (grade 4 leucopenia, grade 4 mucositis and grade 4 diarrhoea), and this was considered the recommended dose for phase II studies. Vomiting, haematuria, leucopenia and thrombocytopenia were other significant toxicities. The pharmacokinetics of CHS 828 showed large variations both between and within patients. No objective responses were seen. A dose of 420 mg of CHS 828 administered every 3 weeks is the recommended dose, while 500 mg is the MTD.

Management of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) in first isolated local recurrence: a retrospective study of 83 cases.

PURPOSE: To analyze the management and clinical outcome of patients treated for a first isolated local recurrence of soft tissue sarcomas (trunk or extremities) and to identify prognosis factors. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Between 1980 and 1999, 83 adult patients were included in the study. Mean age was 61 years. Mean tumor size was 6 cm. Most sarcomas were located in extremities (n=74), were deep (n=60), and proximal (n=53); 30 involved nerves or vessels. Histologic subtypes were mainly grade 2 (42%) or 3 (36%) histiocytofibrosarcomas (49%) and liposarcomas (20%). Surgical treatment of recurrences consisted in wide excision (29 cases), marginal resection (43 cases), 5 patients requiring amputation. Final results were R0 (n=33), R1 (n=47) or R2 (n=3) resection. Besides surgery, 6 patients received neo-adjuvant and 7 others adjuvant chemotherapy. Twenty three patients received post-operative external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) (mean dose 55 Gy) and 26 interstitial 192Ir low dose rate brachytherapy (BCT) (mean dose 45 Gy for BCT alone, 22 Gy when associated with EBRT), 19 patients being re-irradiated. RESULTS: Mean follow up was 13 years. Thirty-seven (45%) patients relapsed, 62% of whom presenting an isolated local recurrence. Nineteen patients developed distant metastases. Multivariate analysis showed only tumor depth (P=0.05) and re-resection for primary R1 resection (P=0.018) being independent prognosis factors for tumor control, radiotherapy (EBRT and/or BCT) being significant in univariate analysis (P=0.05). Overall survival rate was 73%, 54%, and 47% at, respectively, 3.5 and 10 years, and was 65%, 35% and 32% after a further local recurrence. Multivariate analysis showed trunk (P=0.0001) or inferior extremity locations (P=0.023), symptomatic (P=0.001), high grade (P=0.01), deep (P=0.01) tumors, and the occurrence of a further local failure (P=0.004) as unfavorable characteristics for overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: A first isolated local recurrence of STS increases mainly the risk of a subsequent local relapse. Quality of local treatment is decisive. When a conservative treatment is feasible, it should combine surgical resection and radiotherapy, BCT being the best suited in previously irradiated patients. Efforts have to be pursued to increase quality of the treatment of primary tumors, at best performed in centers that have expertise in this field.

[Surgery of recurrent soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities and the trunk wall: a comparison to primary sarcoma]. / Chirurgie des récidives locales des sarcomes des tissus mous des membres et de la paroi du tronc: une comparaison avec les sarcomes primitifs.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the place of conservative surgery in locally recurrent soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities and the trunk wall. METHODS: Retrospective data base analysis. Comparison between 32 patients with recurrent sarcoma of the extremities and the trunk wall to 105 comparable patients with primary sarcoma treated from 1996 to 1999. Tumor characteristics, quality of surgery and outcome are analyzed. Mean follow-up are respectively 63 and 61 months. RESULTS: Rates of resections R0 are 56% vs 68%, amputations 13% vs 1%, local recurrences 29% vs 9% (p < 0.01) in recurrent and primary sarcoma, respectively. Two prognostic sub-groups are identified within patients with recurrent sarcoma: good (n = 25) and bad prognosis (n = 7) with resections R0 in 64% vs 29% of patients, five year survival of 76% vs 29%, respectively. The differences are due to tumor biology, anterior treatment, especially radiotherapy, and recurrence-free interval. A decision tree is developed, taking into account precedent radiotherapy and prognosis. CONCLUSION: In recurrent sarcoma, conservative treatment remains possible in a selected group of patients, combined to new means of treatment.

Surgical resection and radiotherapy for primary retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-five patients were consecutively treated for primary retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma with surgery in combination with radiation therapy in the same institution. The median follow-up time was 53 months (7-108). RESULTS: Seventeen (38%) patients had clear microscopic margins (R0 resection), 26 patients (58%) had gross complete surgical excision (R1 resection) and two patients (4%) had a macroscopic residual disease (R2 resection). External radiotherapy doses ranged from 40.8 to 59.4 Gy (mean and median: 49 Gy). Seventeen patients underwent intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT). Moreover, 11 patients received chemotherapy. The overall 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival for all 45 patients were 93, 85 and 60%, respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year locoregional relapse-free rate for the whole group was 91, 70 and 40%, respectively. In univariate analysis, quality of surgery was the only variable to show a significant effect for overall survival (P=0.0386) and for local control (P=0.0059). Tumor size and tumor grade had no statistically significant effect. For the patients receiving IORT+external beam radiation therapy, no difference was observed for survival or locoregional control. The most frequent acute side effects treatment complications were radiation-induced nausea or vomiting (42%) and moderate enteritis (30%). Significant late morbidity was observed for two patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the feasibility of external postoperative radiotherapy with an acceptable level of toxicity. However, the high rate of local relapses (especially in field of radiation) does not demonstrate the usefulness of radiotherapy at the level of dose used and further preferably randomized studies should be planned.

[Update on soft tissue sarcomas]. / Actualités dans les sarsomes des tissus mous.

Important refinements have taken place in the diagnosis of soft tissue sarcoma with extensive use of immuno-histochemistry. New entities have been described, while malignant histiocytofibroma, the most diagnosed sarcoma type during the last two decades, has been dismembered. As for prognosis, the new UICC classification is effectively more discriminating in the definition of prognostic groups; but the usefullness of new biological or genetic markers remains to be assessed. Several breakthrough have taken place in the last years in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma. Isolated limb perfusion with TNF, hyperthermia and melphalan have proven its efficacy, and is now an alternative to preoperative chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy for limb sparing treatment of the primary tumor site or to amputation. For systemic treatments, novel cytostatic drugs have been shown to be active in sarcomas, including ecteinascidine (ET743) and Glivec (STI571). This last drug has been shown to be remarkably active in c-kit+ stromal sarcoma of the gastro-intestinal tract. It can hopefully regarded as an example for targeted therapies, which may come with a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms triggered by the fundamental, specific genetic alterations shown in sarcoma.