Inter-predictability of Neuroprognostic Modalities After Cardiac Arrest.

Introduction At present, there is an emphasis on a multi-modal approach to neuro-prognostication after cardiac arrest using clinical examination, neurophysiologic testing, laboratory biomarkers, and radiological studies. However, this necessitates significant resource utilization and can be challenging in under-resourced clinical settings. Hence, we sought to determine the inter-predictability and correlation of prognostic tests performed in patients after cardiac arrest. Methods Fifty patients were included through neurophysiology laboratory data for this retrospective study. Clinical, radiological and neurophysiological data were collected. Neurophysiological data were re-evaluated by a board-certified neurophysiologist for the purpose of the study. Chi-square testing was used to evaluate the correlation between different diagnostic modalities. Results We found that a non-reactive electroencephalogram (EEG) had a predictive value of 79% for absent bilateral cortical responses (N20) with somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP). On the other hand, absent bilateral cortical responses N20 had 87% predictive value for a non-reactive EEG. Also, absent cortical responses and non-reactive EEG had predictive values of 78% and 72% for anoxic injury on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain respectively with a non-significant difference on chi-square testing. Individually, absent bilateral N20 SSEP, a non-reactive EEG and anoxic brain injury on MRI studies were highly predictive of poor outcome [modified Rankin scale (mRS) > 4] at hospital discharge. Conclusion Neuroprognostication in a post-cardiac arrest setting is often limited by self-fulfilling prophecy. Given the lack of absolute correlation between different modalities used in post-cardiac arrest patients, the value of the multi-modal approach to neuro-prognostication is highlighted by this study.

Practice guideline update summary: Efficacy and tolerability of the new antiepileptic drugs I: Treatment of new-onset epilepsy: Report of the American Epilepsy Society and the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.

Objective: To update the 2004 American Academy of Neurology (AAN) guideline for treating new-onset focal or generalized epilepsy (GE) with second- and third-generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Methods: The 2004 AAN criteria was used to systematically review literature (January 2003 to November 2015), classify pertinent studies according to the therapeutic rating scheme, and link recommendations to evidence strength. Results: Several second-generation AEDs are effective for new-onset focal epilepsy. Data are lacking on efficacy in new-onset generalized tonic-clonic seizures, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, or juvenile absence epilepsy, and on efficacy of third-generation AEDs in new-onset epilepsy. Recommendations: Lamotrigine (LTG) should (Level B) and levetiracetam (LEV) and zonisamide (ZNS) may (Level C) be considered in decreasing seizure frequency in adults with new-onset focal epilepsy. LTG should (Level B) and gabapentin (GBP) may (Level C) be considered in decreasing seizure frequency in patients ≥60 years with new-onset focal epilepsy. Unless there are compelling adverse-effect-related concerns, ethosuximide (ETS) or valproic acid (VPA) should be considered before LTG to decrease seizure frequency in treating absence seizures in childhood absence epilepsy (Level B). No high-quality studies suggest clobazam, eslicarbazepine, ezogabine, felbamate, GBP, lacosamide, LEV, LTG, oxcarbazepine, perampanel, pregabalin, rufinamide, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, or ZNS is effective in treating new-onset epilepsy because no high-quality studies exist in adults of various ages. A recent FDA strategy allows extrapolation of efficacy across populations; therefore, for focal epilepsy, eslicarbazepine and lacosamide (oral only for pediatric use) as add-on or monotherapy in persons ≥4 years old and perampanel as monotherapy received FDA approval.

Practice guideline update summary: Efficacy and tolerability of the new antiepileptic drugs II: Treatment-resistant epilepsy: Report of the American Epilepsy Society and the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.

Objective: To update the 2004 American Academy of Neurology (AAN) guideline for managing treatment-resistant (TR) epilepsy with second- and third-generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Methods: 2004 criteria were used to systematically review literature (January 2003 to November 2015), classify pertinent studies according to the therapeutic rating scheme, and link recommendations to evidence strength. Results: Forty-two articles were included. Recommendations: The following are established as effective to reduce seizure frequency (Level A): immediate-release pregabalin and perampanel for TR adult focal epilepsy (TRAFE); vigabatrin for TRAFE (not first-line treatment; rufinamide for Lennox-Gastuat syndrome (LGS) (add-on therapy). The following should be considered to decrease seizure frequency (Level B): lacosamide, eslicarbazepine, and extended-release topiramate for TRAFE (ezogabine production discontinued); immediate- and extended-release lamotrigine for generalized epilepsy with TR generalized tonic-clonic (GTC) seizures in adults; levetiracetam (add-on therapy) for TR childhood focal epilepsy (TRCFE) (1 month to 16 years), TR GTC seizures, and TR juvenile myoclonic epilepsy; clobazam for LGS (add-on therapy); zonisamide for TRCFE (6-17 years); oxcarbazepine for TRCFE (1 month to 4 years). The text presents Level C recommendations. AED selection depends on seizure/syndrome type, patient age, concomitant medications, and AED tolerability, safety, and efficacy. This evidence-based assessment informs AED prescription guidelines for TR epilepsy and indicates seizure types and syndromes needing more evidence. A recent FDA strategy allows extrapolation of efficacy across populations; therefore, for focal epilepsy, eslicarbazepine and lacosamide (oral only for pediatric use) as add-on or monotherapy in persons ≥4 years of age and perampanel as monotherapy received FDA approval.

Practice guideline update summary: Efficacy and tolerability of the new antiepileptic drugs I: Treatment of new-onset epilepsy: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society.

OBJECTIVE: To update the 2004 American Academy of Neurology (AAN) guideline for treating new-onset focal or generalized epilepsy with second- and third-generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). METHODS: The 2004 AAN criteria were used to systematically review literature (January 2003-November 2015), classify pertinent studies according to the therapeutic rating scheme, and link recommendations to evidence strength. RESULTS: Several second-generation AEDs are effective for new-onset focal epilepsy. Data are lacking on efficacy in new-onset generalized tonic-clonic seizures, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, or juvenile absence epilepsy, and on efficacy of third-generation AEDs in new-onset epilepsy. RECOMMENDATIONS: Lamotrigine (LTG) should (Level B) and levetiracetam (LEV) and zonisamide (ZNS) may (Level C) be considered in decreasing seizure frequency in adults with new-onset focal epilepsy. LTG should (Level B) and gabapentin (GBP) may (Level C) be considered in decreasing seizure frequency in patients ≥60 years of age with new-onset focal epilepsy. Unless there are compelling adverse effect-related concerns, ethosuximide or valproic acid should be considered before LTG to decrease seizure frequency in treating absence seizures in childhood absence epilepsy (level B). No high-quality studies suggest clobazam, eslicarbazepine, ezogabine, felbamate, GBP, lacosamide, LEV, LTG, oxcarbazepine, perampanel, pregabalin, rufinamide, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, or ZNS is effective in treating new-onset epilepsy because no high-quality studies exist in adults of various ages. A recent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) strategy allows extrapolation of efficacy across populations; therefore, for focal epilepsy, eslicarbazepine and lacosamide (oral only for pediatric use) as add-on or monotherapy in persons ≥4 years old and perampanel as monotherapy received FDA approval.

Practice guideline update summary: Efficacy and tolerability of the new antiepileptic drugs II: Treatment-resistant epilepsy: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society.

OBJECTIVE: To update the 2004 American Academy of Neurology guideline for managing treatment-resistant (TR) epilepsy with second- and third-generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). METHODS: 2004 criteria were used to systemically review literature (January 2003 to November 2015), classify pertinent studies according to the therapeutic rating scheme, and link recommendations to evidence strength. RESULTS: Forty-two articles were included. RECOMMENDATIONS: The following are established as effective to reduce seizure frequency (Level A): immediate-release pregabalin and perampanel for TR adult focal epilepsy (TRAFE); vigabatrin for TRAFE (not first-line treatment); rufinamide for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) (add-on therapy). The following should be considered to decrease seizure frequency (Level B): lacosamide, eslicarbazepine, and extended-release topiramate for TRAFE (ezogabine production discontinued); immediate- and extended-release lamotrigine for generalized epilepsy with TR generalized tonic-clonic (GTC) seizures in adults; levetiracetam (add-on therapy) for TR childhood focal epilepsy (TRCFE) (1 month-16 years), TR GTC seizures, and TR juvenile myoclonic epilepsy; clobazam for LGS (add-on therapy); zonisamide for TRCFE (6-17 years); oxcarbazepine for TRCFE (1 month-4 years). The text presents Level C recommendations. AED selection depends on seizure/syndrome type, patient age, concomitant medications, and AED tolerability, safety, and efficacy. This evidence-based assessment informs AED prescription guidelines for TR epilepsy and indicates seizure types and syndromes needing more evidence. A recent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) strategy allows extrapolation of efficacy across populations; therefore, for focal epilepsy, eslicarbazepine and lacosamide (oral only for pediatric use) as add-on or monotherapy in persons ≥4 years of age and perampanel as monotherapy received FDA approval.

Effect of sleep patterns on levetiracetam induced mood changes.

A common side effect of levetiracetam is the onset of neuropsychiatric symptoms such as mood changes including depression, anxiety, agitation, and sometimes psychosis. We performed a retrospective analysis to examine the effect of sleep pattern and chronotype on individual susceptibility to levetiracetam-induced mood changes. We reviewed records of 110 adults with epilepsy presenting to our clinic during a 3-month period, and categorized them into those currently on levetiracetam, and those no longer taking it because of mood-related adverse effects. Patients were administered Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ), Beck's Depression Inventory-II, and Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory in Epilepsy. Using various statistical methods, we analyzed the comparison of these 3 different scales amongst one another and between those subjects who tolerated levetiracetam and those who did not. Of 110 patients, 74 (67%) tolerated levetiracetam and 36 (33%) did not tolerate it because of mood changes with chronotype being a significant determining factor. Of those who tolerated the drug, 62% were intermediate chronotypes and 20.3% and 17.6% were morning and evening chronotypes, respectively. For those intolerant, 86.1% were morning chronotypes, 13.9% were intermediate chronotypes, and none were evening chronotypes (p<0.001). Thirty-two percent of morning chronotypes, 100% of evening chronotypes, and 90.2% of intermediate chronotypes were tolerant of levetiracetam (p<0.001). Chronotype significantly affected toleration of levetiracetam. Chronotype, but not depression, was a significant factor in determining tolerability of mood-altering side effects of levetiracetam, via statistically significant trend for an increasing ability to tolerate levetiracetam as chronotype would shift from morning to intermediate to evening. Additional research may help establish if this is related to possible underreporting of poor mood with evening chronotypes, and morning chronotypes having more stringent sleep schedules, genetic factors, or other reasons.

Nasolacrimal system obstruction, ptosis and esotropia due to chemotherapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Eight-year-old girl was admitted to our clinic with the complaint of constant epiphora in the right eye. It was reported that this complaint began after the start of chemotherapy with a diagnosis of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) about 5 years ago. In addition, eyelid ptosis associated with esotropia also occurred during that period. We found that nasolacrimal duct obstruction did not improve with medical treatment but ptosis and esotropia improved with pyridoxine and pyridostigmine treatment during that period. Examination of the eye on admission revealed nasolacrimal duct obstruction on the right side. Other ocular findings were normal. Nasolacrimal system obstruction, ptosis and esotropia combination has not been reported previously in patients using systemic drugs or receiving chemotherapy due to ALL.

A case of levetiracetam induced bullous pemphigoid.

Bullous pemphigoid is a chronic, acquired autoimmune skin disease. Certain drugs such as furosemide, penicillins, sulfonamides, ciprofloxacins, penicillamines, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, chloroquine, and phenacetin were reported to cause bullous pemphigoid. This is a case report of a 70-year-old female, who presented with the formation of diffuse cutaneous blister in month after starting to use levetiracetam. Dermatological exam and histopathological findings were consistent with bullous pemphigoid. To the best of our knowledge this is the first case of bullous pemphigoid in the literature associated with levetiracetam use.

The correlation between vagus nerve stimulation efficacy and partial onset epilepsies.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the correlation between vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) efficacy and partial seizures originating from different brain regions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors retrospectively analyzed the data of 46 subjects with medically intractable epilepsy who had insertion of VNS between April 1999 and July 2005. The clinical outcome was assessed with Engel classification. Subjects were divided into group A (Engel I, II, and III) and group B (Engel IV) for statistical analysis. Group A was referred as a satisfactory outcome. The statistical analysis of the data was assessed whether these parameters such as age, type of seizure, age at insertion of VNS, and lengths of follow-up affect the outcome. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (41.3%) had a satisfactory outcome (Engel II, III). The analysis of VNS efficacy demonstrated that 65% of the patients with frontal lobe epilepsy and only 15% of the patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) had a satisfactory outcome. There was a statistically significant difference between these types of epilepsyand VNS outcomes (Fisher exact test, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: VNS is more effective in frontal lobe epilepsy than in temporal lobe epilepsy. Further studies are warranted to verify our findings and the correlation between types of epilepsy and VNS outcome.