RESUMEN
Background: Nitrous oxide holds promise in the treatment of major depressive disorder. Its psychotropic effects and NMDA receptor antagonism have led to comparisons with ketamine. Despite longstanding use, persistent effects of nitrous oxide on the brain have not been characterized. Methods: Sixteen healthy volunteers were recruited in a double-blind crossover study. In randomized order, individuals underwent a 1-hour inhalation of either 50% nitrous oxide/oxygen or air/oxygen mixtures. At least two 7.5-minute echo-planar resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging scans were obtained before and at 2 and 24 hours after each inhalation (average 130 min/participant). Using the time series of preprocessed, motion artifact-scrubbed, and nuisance covariate-regressed imaging data, interregional signal correlations were measured and converted to T scores. Hierarchical clustering and linear mixed-effects models were employed. Results: Nitrous oxide inhalation produced changes in global brain connectivity that persisted in the occipital cortex at 2 and 24 hours postinhalation (p < .05, false discovery rate-corrected). Analysis of resting-state networks demonstrated robust strengthening of connectivity between regions of the visual network and those of the dorsal attention network, across 2 and 24 hours after inhalation (p < .05, false discovery rate-corrected). Weaker changes in connectivity were found between the visual cortex and regions of the frontoparietal and default mode networks. Parallel analyses following air/oxygen inhalation yielded no significant changes in functional connectivity. Conclusions: Nitrous oxide inhalation in healthy volunteers revealed persistent increases in global connectivity between regions of primary visual cortex and dorsal attention network. These findings suggest that nitrous oxide inhalation induces neurophysiological cortical changes that persist for at least 24 hours.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic has precipitated widespread shortages of filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) and the creation and sharing of proposed substitutes (novel designs, repurposed materials) with limited testing against regulatory standards. We aimed to categorically test the efficacy and fit of potential N95 respirator substitutes using protocols that can be replicated in university laboratories. SETTING: Academic medical centre with occupational health-supervised fit testing along with laboratory studies. PARTICIPANTS: Seven adult volunteers who passed quantitative fit testing for small-sized (n=2) and regular-sized (n=5) commercial N95 respirators. METHODS: Five open-source potential N95 respirator substitutes were evaluated and compared with commercial National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)-approved N95 respirators as controls. Fit testing using the 7-minute standardised Occupational Safety and Health Administration fit test was performed. In addition, protocols that can be performed in university laboratories for materials testing (filtration efficiency, air resistance and fluid resistance) were developed to evaluate alternate filtration materials. RESULTS: Among five open-source, improvised substitutes evaluated in this study, only one (which included a commercial elastomeric mask and commercial HEPA filter) passed a standard quantitative fit test. The four alternative materials evaluated for filtration efficiency (67%-89%) failed to meet the 95% threshold at a face velocity (7.6 cm/s) equivalent to that of a NIOSH particle filtration test for the control N95 FFR. In addition, for all but one material, the small surface area of two 3D-printed substitutes resulted in air resistance that was above the maximum in the NIOSH standard. CONCLUSIONS: Testing protocols such as those described here are essential to evaluate proposed improvised respiratory protection substitutes, and our testing platform could be replicated by teams with similar cross-disciplinary research capacity. Healthcare professionals should be cautious of claims associated with improvised respirators when suggested as FFR substitutes.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Exposición Profesional , Dispositivos de Protección Respiratoria , Adulto , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos , Respiradores N95 , Pandemias/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos , Ventiladores MecánicosRESUMEN
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: Three-dimensional (3D) printing allows innovative solutions for personal protective equipment, particularly in times of crisis. Our goal was to generate an N95-alternative 3D-printed respirator that passed Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)-certified quantitative fit testing during the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3D printed prototypes for N95 solutions were created based on the design of commercial N95 respirators. Computed tomography imaging was performed on an anthropomorphic head phantom wearing a commercially available N95 respirator and these facial contour data was used in mask prototyping. Prototypes were generated using rigid and flexible polymers. According to OSHA standards, prototypes underwent subsequent quantitative respirator fit testing on volunteers who passed fit tests on commercial N95 respirators. RESULTS: A total of 10 prototypes were 3D printed using both rigid (nâ¯=â¯5 designs) and flexible materials (nâ¯=â¯5 designs), Prototypes generated with rigid printing materials (nâ¯=â¯5 designs) did not pass quantitative respirator fit testing. Three of the five prototypes with flexible materials failed quantitative fit testing. The final two prototypes designs passed OSHA-certified quantitative fit tests with an overall mean fit factor of 138 (passing is over 100). CONCLUSION: Through rapid prototyping, 3D printed N95 alternative masks were designed with topographical facial computed tomography data to create mask facial contour and passed OSHA-certified quantitative respiratory testing when flexible polymer was used. This mask design may provide an alternative to disposable N95 respirators in case of pandemic-related shortages. Furthermore, this approach may allow customization for those that would otherwise fail fit testing on standard commercial respirators.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos , Máscaras , Ensayo de Materiales , Respiradores N95 , Impresión Tridimensional , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
Magnetoencephalography (MEG) systems are designed to noninvasively measure magnetic fields produced by neural electrical currents. This project examines the possibility of measuring hemodynamics with an MEG system that has been modified with dc electromagnets to measure magnetic susceptibility while maintaining the capability of measuring neural dynamics. A forward model is presented that simulates the interaction of an applied magnetic field with changes in magnetic susceptibility in the brain associated with hemodynamics. Model predictions are compared with an experiment where deionized water was pumped into an inverted flask under the MEG sensor array of superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) gradiometers (R(2) = 0.98, p < 0.001). The forward model was used to simulate the SQUID readouts from hemodynamics in the scalp and brain induced by performing the Valsalva maneuver. Experimental human subject recordings (N = 10) were made from the prefrontal region during Valsalva using concurrent measurement with the modified MEG system and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). The NIRS deoxyhemoglobin signal was found to correlate significantly with the SQUID readouts (R(2) = 0.84, p < 0.01). SQUID noise was found to increase with the applied field, which will need to be mitigated in future work. These results demonstrate the potential and technical challenges of measuring cerebral hemodynamics with a modified MEG system.
Asunto(s)
Circulación Cerebrovascular , Hemodinámica , Magnetoencefalografía/métodos , Encéfalo/irrigación sanguínea , Fenómenos Electromagnéticos , Humanos , Fantasmas de Imagen , Factores de Tiempo , AguaRESUMEN
This study examines the relationship between oxygen expired and functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) measured hemoglobin levels in the brain. Analysis of these two signals during normal versus deep breathing provides insight into the dynamics of cerebral physiology. Intersubject variation suggests the existence of two distinct groups with respect to oxygen extraction and hemoglobin levels.