Patellar tendon restoration techniques: a systematic review of outcomes for repair and reconstruction methods.

PURPOSE: This systematic review aims to delineate the various methods to repair or reconstruct the patellar tendon using the available literature. METHODS: MEDLINE and PubMed electronic databases were searched for English language clinical studies involving patellar tendon rupture repair or reconstruction that reported patient-reported outcome scores (PROS) between January 1st, 1953 and June 17th, 2021. Data was extracted on full text articles to collect functional outcome scores and rupture category, including acute, chronic, post-total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). RESULTS: Twenty-three studies with a total of 738 patients were included. Of the 14 studies including acute repairs, mean postoperative Lvsholm scores ranged from 84 to 99.5. Knee Society Score (KSS) and knee range of motion (ROM) measurement were the most widely reported outcomes in the chronic setting. The average postoperative KSS scores ranged from 70 to 87.7. Of the six studies that included patellar tendon repairs/reconstructions in the setting of prior TKA, the most frequently reported outcomes were KSS scores and knee ROM measurements. The average postoperative KSS scores for the three cohorts reporting reconstruction with allograft ranged from 79 to 88 as compared to the average postoperative KSS score for reconstruction with autograft of 70. CONCLUSION: Despite this heterogeneity, we concluded: (1) in the primary setting, cerclage augmentation yields the lowest lysholm scores and should not be considered, although primary repairs with and without augmentation yield comparable postoperative lysholm scores, (2) in the chronic setting, repair with augmentation and reconstruction yielded similar results aside from in post-TKA patients where allograft reconstruction yielded superior KSS scores.

How Prominent Are Gender Bias, Racial Bias, and Score Inflation in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Recommendation Letters? A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Letters of recommendation are considered an important factor in the holistic ranking of orthopaedic residency applications. The standardized letter of recommendation (SLOR) was introduced in 2017 in response to the inherent bias and limited comparative value of traditional LORs. It includes standardized questions about an applicant's orthopaedic qualifications, designed to enable fair comparisons among candidates. However, disparate and inconsistent findings have made it difficult to draw meaningful conclusions from individual studies on the SLOR and narrative letter of recommendation. QUESTION/PURPOSES: In this systematic review we asked: (1) What is the distribution of applicant SLOR rating among nine domains and summative scores? (2) Are there applicant characteristics associated with SLOR ratings? (3) Is there gender and racial bias in the SLOR and narrative letter of recommendation? METHODS: PubMed, EBSCO, and Google Scholar electronic databases were queried on March 20, 2023, to identify all studies evaluating SLOR and narrative letter of recommendations between January 1, 2017, and March 20, 2023. Articles that evaluated orthopaedic SLOR or narrative LORs were included. Systematic reviews, case reports, duplicate studies between databases, and grey literature such as abstracts and articles on preprint servers were excluded. Eight studies including 6179 applicants and 18,987 letters of recommendation were included in the final analysis. The applicant classes ranged from years 2014 to 2020. Two reviewers independently evaluated the quality of the included studies using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tool for cross-sectional studies. The mean JBI score of included studies was 7.4 out of a maximum of 8, with higher scores indicating better quality. The primary outcome was to determine the distribution of applicant SLOR rankings in their summative score. Summative scores were separated into ranked to match, top one-third, middle one-third, lower one-third, and not a fit. Four studies reported the summative SLOR scores of applicants. Our secondary study goal was to assess applicant characteristics associated with SLOR summative scores and assess any bias present in the SLOR or narrative recommendation. Five studies compared SLOR ratings across applicant characteristics including gender, race, USMLE Step 1 score, USMLE Step 2 score, Alpha Omega Alpha (AΩA) membership, clerkship grades, and publications. Gender and racial bias were also assessed across five studies. Four studies utilized a linguistic analysis software to search letters of recommendation for differences in word category use by gender and race. RESULTS: Studies consistently found that a higher percentage of candidates were identified in the top percentile blocks than is mathematically possible. For example, the two studies that tallied the proportion of candidates ranking in the top 10% of applicants found that 36% and 42% were rated as being in the top 10%. Similarly, articles found more than 87% of applicants scored in the top one-third. Studies had mixed results, but in general, they suggested that AΩA status, higher Step 1 scores, and more research publications have a slightly positive association with increased SLOR scores. We found no evidence of gender bias against women, and in fact, most studies evaluating word choices found word choices for women candidates generally were stronger. Similarly, no consistent disparities were identified in word categories utilized in SLORs based on applicant race. CONCLUSION: Most notably, a mathematically impossible proportion of applicants were counted in the top percentiles in letters of recommendation. This compromises readers' abilities to differentiate candidates. Factors like AOA status and research publications displayed a modest positive correlation with SLOR scores. Gender bias against women or candidates from racial minority groups was not evident. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: We suggest that group SLOR authorship, with a consensus assessment by clerkship or residency directors, should be considered. We also recommend the incorporation of mean and SD scores for each letter writer (or group) alongside their letters. Furthermore, studies indicate that submitting all four SLOR letters can substantially improve an applicant's chances of success. We advise students to choose strategically and submit the maximum allowable number of SLORs.

Epidemiological Trends and Outcomes of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Among 104 Million Patients in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an alternative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for localized osteoarthritis. Recent advancements in UKA implant design and expanding patient criteria may have increased its utilization. However, few studies have examined the use of UKA in the United States. Thus, this study assessed the current and projected future trends of UKA and robotic UKA in the United States through 2035, along with postoperative outcomes. METHODS: A collaborative healthcare research network was queried to identify patients who had undergone UKA. Primary outcomes measured included prevalence (P), incidence proportion (IP), and incidence rate (IR) from 2012 to 2022. Chi-squared analyses were done to compare outcomes across categorical data. Regression modeling was performed to project UKA to the year 2035. Statistical significance was held at P < .05 for all analyses. RESULTS: In 2022, 1,662 UKAs were performed within the network, a 590% increase from 2012 (241 performed). The IP increased on an average annual basis by 41.8%, the IR by 50%, and the P by 51.3%. A year following UKA, conversion to TKA was the most common orthopaedic complication (39.9%). As of 2022, there were 68 robotic UKAs performed, a 518% increase from the 11 performed in 2012. Regression analysis for UKA through 2035 showed that IP will be 0.04%, IR will be 1.75 × 10-6 cases/person-day, and P will be 0.3%. CONCLUSIONS: These findings are consistent with prior studies indicating a higher utilization of UKA over the past decade. Reported complications were not uncommon, as nearly 40% of patients required a conversion to a TKA. Further research is needed to optimally identify criteria for appropriate patients and determine the benefits robotic UKA may provide, specifically reducing the risk of conversion to a TKA.

Women's Representation as Principal Investigators Among Pediatric Orthopaedic Clinical Trials: An Analysis of ClinicalTrials.Gov.

INTRODUCTION: Despite recent efforts to increase the participation of women in orthopaedic surgery, there remains a gender gap, particularly when compared with other medical specialties. Acting as a principal investigator (PI) in a clinical trial can give physicians notable exposure and national recognition, which can improve their chances of promotion and tenure. This study aims to assess the proportion of women serving as PIs in pediatric orthopaedic clinical trials, examine associated trial characteristics, and explore geographic distribution. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of clinical trials was conducted using data from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry. Specific search terms were used to identify pediatric orthopaedic trials. Data on trial characteristics, including phase, status, funding source, and intervention type, were collected. PI sex was determined using Genderize.io, an application program interface that predicts the sex of individuals based on their name, and the geographic distribution of women PIs was examined. RESULTS: From 2007 to 2022, women PIs increased from zero to 26.86%. The United States saw no significant increase (ß = 1.553; P = 0.125), but international trials did (ß = 2.845; P = 0.008). Women PIs led more active/completed trials and trials with behavioral/other interventions. Geographic analysis showed higher representation in North America (38.47%), especially the Northeast (28.17%) and West (25.35%). The United States had 28.74% women PIs, with California (15.49%) leading. CONCLUSION: Progress toward gender parity in pediatric orthopaedic research is evident; however, disparities still exist. Efforts to provide additional research opportunities for women in orthopaedics may be crucial in attracting and retaining diverse talent in the field. Targeted initiatives may have potential in achieving equal representation in orthopaedics.

An In-Depth Analysis of Public and Private Research Funding in Orthopaedic Surgery from 2015 to 2021.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the trends and patterns of research funding can aid in enhancing growth and innovation in orthopaedic research. We sought to analyze financial trends in public orthopaedic surgery funding and characterize trends in private funding distribution among orthopaedic surgeons and hospitals to explore potential disparities across orthopaedic subspecialties. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of private and public orthopaedic research funding from 2015 to 2021 using the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Open Payments database and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) RePORTER through the Blue Ridge Institute for Medical Research, respectively. Institutions receiving funds from both the NIH and the private sector were classified separately as publicly funded and privately funded. Research payment characteristics were categorized according to their respective orthopaedic fellowship subspecialties. Descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, and Mann-Kendall tests were employed. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Over the study period, $348,428,969 in private and $701,078,031 in public research payments were reported. There were 2,229 unique surgeons receiving funding at 906 different institutions. The data showed that a total of 2,154 male orthopaedic surgeons received $342,939,782 and 75 female orthopaedic surgeons received $5,489,187 from 198 different private entities. The difference in the median payment size between male and female orthopaedic surgeons was not significant. The top 1% of all practicing orthopaedic surgeons received 99% of all private funding in 2021. The top 20 publicly and top 20 privately funded institutions received 77% of the public and 37% of the private funding, respectively. Private funding was greatest (31.5%) for projects exploring adult reconstruction. CONCLUSION: While the amount of public research funding was more than double the amount of private research funding, the distribution of public research funding was concentrated in fewer institutions when compared with private research funding. This suggests the formation of orthopaedic centers of excellence (CoEs), which are programs that have high concentrations of talent and resources. Furthermore, the similar median payment by gender is indicative of equitable payment size. In the future, orthopaedic funding should follow a distribution model that aligns with the existing approach, giving priority to a nondiscriminatory stance regarding gender, and allocate funds toward CoEs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Securing research funding is vital for driving innovation in orthopaedic surgery, which is crucial for enhancing clinical interventions. Thus, understanding the patterns and distribution of research funding can help orthopaedic surgeons tailor their future projects to better align with current funding trends, thereby increasing the likelihood of securing support for their work.

Are orthopedic clinical trials representative? An analysis of race and ethnicity reported in clinical trials between 2007 and 2022 : Running title: representation of clinical trials in orthopedic surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Prior studies investigating the racial and ethnic representation of orthopedic trial participants have found low rates of reporting, but these studies are dated due to the passing of the National Institutes of Health Final Rule in 2017 requiring the reporting of racial and ethnic data among clinical trials. Therefore, we evaluated the representativeness of orthopedic clinical trials before and after the Final Rule. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of orthopaedic clinical trials registered at ClinicalTrials.gov between October 1, 2007 and May 20, 2023 was conducted. After identifying and screening 23,752 clinical trials, 1564 trials were included in the analysis. Trials started before the implementation of the Final Rule on January 18, 2017 were grouped and compared to trials that began after. Odds ratios (OR) were utilized to identify trial characteristics associated with reporting race/ethnicity data. One-proportion z tests compared the representation of each racial and ethnic category to the 2020 United States Census. RESULTS: In total, 34% (544 of 1564) of orthopedic clinical trials evaluated reported the race of participants, while 28% (438 of 1564) reported ethnicity. Trials registered after the Final Rule were more likely to report racial (OR: 5.15, 95%CI: 3.72-7.13, p < 0.001) and ethnic (OR: 3.23, 95%CI: 2.41-4.33, p < 0.001) representation of participants. Compared with the distribution of race and ethnicity reported by the United States 2020 Census, orthopedic trials had 16.6% more White participants (95% CI 16.4%, 16.8%; p < 0.001), 3.2% fewer Black participants (95%CI 3.1%, 3.3%; p < 0.001), and 5.7% fewer Hispanic/Latino participants (95%CI 5.2%, 6.2%; p < 0.001). Trials with enrollment sizes over 100 participants were also more likely to report race and ethnicity, with odds increasing with increased sample size. CONCLUSIONS: The Final Rule marginally improved the reporting of race and ethnicity in orthopedic clinical trials, and underrepresentation of Black or African American, Multiracial, and Hispanic populations persists. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Comparing outcomes in revision total hip arthroplasty in inpatient versus outpatient setting: a matched cohort analysis.

BACKGROUND: As the population ages, revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) is becoming more common. However, there is a paucity of literature regarding perioperative outcomes following inpatient versus outpatient rTHA. Our study aims to compare perioperative complications and readmission rates associated with rTHA in a large national cohort. METHODS: A retrospective, propensity-matched cohort study was conducted using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2006 to 2020. Patients undergoing rTHA in the inpatient setting were propensity matched to patients receiving rTHA in the outpatient setting. Following 1:1 matching, multivariate analyses were performed to compare perioperative complications and readmission. RESULTS: A total of 207,102 patients were identified, including 181,164 outpatient primary THA, 25,466 inpatient rTHA, and 492 outpatient rTHA patients. Following propensity matching, outpatient primary THA versus outpatient rTHA had 210 patients and inpatient rTHA versus outpatient rTHA had 214 patients. Patients in the outpatient rTHA had a significantly higher operative time (132.4 ± 73.2 versus 90.9 ± 32.7, p < 0.001) and length of stay (1.6 ± 1.6 vs. 0.9 ± 1.0, p < 0.001) compared to outpatient primary THA. When comparing inpatient versus outpatient rTHA, the outpatient cohort had lower operative time (131.1 ± 70.9 vs. 145.4 ± 71.5, p = 0.038), total length of stay (1.7 ± 1.8 vs. 3.6 ± 4.1, p < 0.001), and bleeding complications (6% vs. 18%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There were no difference in the odds of complications between outpatient primary and revision THA. Additionally, rTHA performed in an outpatient setting did not show any increase in immediate compared to inpatient settings. These findings suggest that rTHA can be safely performed on certain patients.

Assessing the Readability of Clinical Trial Consent Forms for Surgical Specialties.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the readability of surgical clinical trial consent forms and compare readability across surgical specialties. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of surgical clinical trial consent forms available on ClinicalTrials.gov to quantitatively evaluate readability, word count, and length variations among different specialties. The analysis was performed between November 2022 and January 2023. A total of 386 surgical clinical trial consent forms across 14 surgical specialties were included. RESULTS: The main outcomes were language complexity (measured using Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level), number of words (measured as word count), time to read (measured at reading speeds of 240 per min), and readability (measured by Flesch Reading Ease Score, Gunning Frog Index, Simple Measures of Gobbledygook Index, FORCAST, and Automated Readability Index). The surgical consent forms were a mean (standard deviation) of 2626 (1668) words long, with a mean of 12:53 min to read at 240 words per min. None of the surgical specialties had an average readability level of sixth grade or lower across all six indices, and only 16 out of 386 (4%) clinical trials met the recommended reading level. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in reading grade level between surgical specialties based on the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level and Flesch Reading Ease indices. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that current surgical clinical trial consent documents are too long and complex, exceeding the recommended sixth-grade reading level. Ensuring readable clinical trial consent forms is not only ethically responsible but also crucial for protecting patients' rights and well-being by facilitating informed decision-making.

Photodynamic bone stabilization for traumatic and pathologic fractures: a systematic review of utilization, complications, and patient-reported outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: The photodynamic bone stabilization system (PBSS) was was developed in 2010, and in 2018 gained FDA approval in the United States. Given its relative novelty, our analysis sought to analyze the available literature exploring the indications, outcomes, and complications of the PBSS. METHODS: We performed a systematic review (PROSPERO registration of study protocol: CRD42022363065, October 8th, 2022). PubMed, EBSCOHost, and Google Scholar electronic databases were queried to identify articles evaluating PBSS in the treatment of pathologic or traumatic fractures between January 1 2010 and 15 October 2022. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies tool. RESULTS: Our initial search yielded 326 publications, which were then screened for appropriate studies that aligned with the purpose of our review. A total of thirteen studies, comprising seven case series, four case reports, and two cohort studies. The total sample size of the included studies consisted of 345 patients, with 242 females (70%) and 103 males (30%). The implants were most commonly utilized in the humerus (41%), radius (12%), and metacarpal (12%). The most common complications were related to broken implants (5%) and dislocation (1%). Most studies reported complete fracture healing and return of full strength and range of motion. CONCLUSION: Despite being a relatively novel technology, PBSS appears to be a viable option for fracture stabilization. Most studies included in our analysis reported complete fracture healing and return of function with minimal complications.

Does rickets carry an increased risk of osteomyelitis and septic arthritis? An aggregated electronic health record data study.

To investigate the prevalence of osteomyelitis and septic arthritis in pediatric patients with rickets, compared to the general population. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the TriNetX analytics network, which aggregates deidentified electronic health record data from over 105 million US patients. We queried pediatric patients with rickets, based on ICD-10-CM (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification) encounter diagnoses. Patients with any ICD-10-CM encounter diagnoses of osteomyelitis or septic arthritis were reported. We established a control cohort of pediatric patients without rickets. Of 7337 pediatric patients (≤18 years old) with a rickets diagnosis, 96 [1.31%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05%-1.57%] had a diagnosis of osteomyelitis and 28 (0.38%, 95% CI: 0.24%-0.52%) had a diagnosis of septic arthritis. In comparison, of the 17 240 604 pediatric patients without a rickets diagnosis, 16 995 (0.10%, 95% CI: 0.10%-0.10%) had a diagnosis of osteomyelitis and 8521 (0.05%, 95% CI: 0.05%-0.05%) had a diagnosis of septic arthritis. The relative risk for an osteomyelitis diagnosis in pediatric patients with a rickets diagnosis was 13.27 (95% CI: 10.86-16.23), while the relative risk for a septic arthritis diagnosis was 7.72 (95% CI: 5.33-11.18). Pediatric patients with a diagnosis of rickets have over 10- and 5-times higher relative risks for having a diagnosis of osteomyelitis and septic arthritis, respectively, compared to those without a diagnosis of rickets. This is the first study to explore musculoskeletal infections in rickets patients, highlighting the importance of clinicians being vigilant about these conditions.

Immediate plate fixation of open tibial plafond fractures does not elevate risk of infection.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if immediate plate fixation of open tibial plafond fractures has a negative effect on soft tissue complications and increases the risk of deep infection. DESIGN: This was a single-institution retrospective cohort study performed at level-1 trauma center. All patients with open OTA/AO 43C plafond fractures treated over 20-year period with follow-up until fracture union or development of deep infection. Ninety-nine of 333 identified patents met the inclusion criteria. The intervention was operative treatment of open tibial plafond fractures. The main outcome measurements were return to operating room for deep infection, nonunion, and below knee amputation. RESULTS: The overall rate of complications was 52%. Gender, body mass index, tobacco use, diabetes, ASA classification, time to OR from injury, wound location, and associated fibula fracture were not associated with deep infection. There was a significant difference in Gustilo-Anderson fracture grade among infected versus non-infected (P = 0.04). There was no significant difference in postoperative infection rates between patients treated with external fixation, external fixation and limited plate fixation, and plate fixation alone during initial surgery (P = 0.64). CONCLUSION: It is well established that open pilon fractures have a high incidence for postoperative infection and development of complications such as nonunion. As these injuries have poor clinical outcomes, any additional measures to prevent infection and soft tissue complications should be utilized. In appropriately selected cases, both immediate plate fixation and immediate limited plate fixation with external fixation at the time of I&D do not appear to elevate risk of deep infection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III.

Impact of external beam radiation on total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes: a propensity-matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: External beam radiation therapy has a number of deleterious effects on the body, and a number of post-operative complications have been reported for several surgeries including total knee arthroplasty. However, few studies have investigated the impact of external beam radiation therapy for total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Our study aimed to assess the systemic and joint complications associated with TSA in patients with prior radiation exposures, as well as evaluate the surgical outcomes of radiation patients compared to non-radiation TSA patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the TriNetX Analytics Network. A 1:1 propensity score matching function was utilized to create two cohorts with matched baseline characteristics within the TriNetX network. Comparisons of the primary and secondary outcomes between the two cohorts were made using odds ratios. A p value of < 0.05 was determined to be significant. RESULTS: A total of 75,510 patients that received TSA were identified with 1505 having a history of radiation therapy (RT) and 73,605 with no radiation therapy (non-RT). After propensity matching, both groups contained 1484 patients. RT patients were at higher risk for developing prosthetic joint infection, acute renal failure, altered mental state, cerebrovascular event, DVT, PE, pneumonia, respiratory failure, and UTI compared to non-RT patients at different time points (p < 0.5). CONCLUSION: Patients with prior history of external beam radiation undergoing TSA had a higher risk of systemic complications and prosthetic joint infection compared to patients without a prior history. These complications suggest a more complicated post-operative management course for these patients.

Less common than expected: late displacement after minimally displaced pediatric lateral condyle fractures of the elbow.

The incidence of late displacement among pediatric lateral condyle fractures has been described as 1.3-26%. However, prior studies are limited by small cohort sizes. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of late displacement and delayed union among lateral condyle fractures following immobilization in a large cohort and to establish additional radiographic criteria to help surgeons choose between immobilization and operative fixation for minimally displaced fractures. We performed a dual-center retrospective study of patients with lateral condyle fractures between 1999 and 2020. Patient demographics, injury mechanism, time to orthopedic presentation, duration of cast immobilization, and complications following casting were recorded. There were 290 patients with lateral condyle fractures included. The initial management in 61% of patients (178/290) was nonoperative, of which four had delayed displacement at follow-up and two developed delayed union requiring surgery (failure in 6/178, 3.4%). The mean displacement on the anteroposterior view was 1.3 ±â€…1.1 mm and the lateral view was 0.50 ±â€…1.0 mm in the nonoperative cohort. In the operative cohort, the mean displacement on AP was 6.6 ±â€…5.4 mm and the lateral view was 5.3 ±â€…4.1 mm. Our analysis found the rate of late displacement in patients treated with immobilization was lower than previously reported (2.5%; 4/178). The mean displacement on the lateral film in the cast immobilization cohort was 0.5 mm, suggesting that necessitating near anatomic alignment on the lateral film to consider nonoperative management may lead to a lower incidence of late displacement than previously reported. Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Is Discharge Within a Day Following Total Hip Arthroplasty Safe in the Septuagenarian and Octogenarian Population? A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exists on whether patients older than 70 can safely be discharged within a day (rapid discharge (RD)) following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to compare perioperative complications and readmission rates associated with RD in patients ≥70 years compared to longer lengths of stay following THA. METHODS: A retrospective, propensity-matched cohort study was conducted using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2006 to 2020. Patients ≥70 years undergoing RD following THA were propensity matched to patients ≥70 years who had longer hospital stays (nonrapid discharge). Sub-analyses were performed for septuagenarians and octogenarians. Following 1:1 matching, multivariate analyses were performed to compare perioperative complications and readmissions. Following propensity matching, both groups contained 2,192 patients. RESULTS: The RD patients were found to have shorter operative times (P < .001), less bleeding complications (P < .001), and were more likely to have home discharges (P < .001). The 2 cohorts did not differ in the remaining complications or 30-day postoperative period readmissions among all patients and when evaluating septuagenarians and octogenarians. CONCLUSION: Patients ≥70 years undergoing RD following THA had comparable complication and readmission rates to patients older than 70 undergoing nonrapid discharge. Furthermore, RD patients were more likely to have home discharges and have shorter operations with less bleeding complications. Septuagenarians receiving RD were more likely to have an unplanned readmission. These data suggest that RD following THA can be performed safely in select patients older than 70.

Are periprosthetic hip fractures more severe than native hip fractures? A systematic review of outcomes and resource utilization.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data comparing periprosthetic hip fracture (PPHFx) outcomes and resource utilization to native fractures. Many surgeons consider periprosthetic hip fractures to be more severe injuries than native fractures. The aim of this systematic review is to characterize the outcomes of PPHFx and assess their severity relative to native hip fractures (NHFx). METHODS: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis systematic review was conducted using Medline, Biosis, and Cinahl. Primary outcomes were time to surgery, length of stay (LOS), cost of management, disposition, complication rates, readmission rates, and mortality. RESULTS: 14 articles (13,489 patients) from 2010 to 2018 were included in the study. Study quality was generally low. Patient follow-up ranged from 1 month to 3.2 years. LOS ranged from 5.2 to 38 days. US cost of management was best estimated at $53,669 ± 19,817. Discharge to skilled nursing facilities ranged from 64.5 to 74.5%. Time to surgery ranged from 1.9 to 5.7 days. Readmission rates ranged from 12 to 32%. Per Clavien-Dindo classification, 33.9% suffered minor complications; 14.3% suffered major complications. 1 month and 1 year mortality ranged from 2.9% to 10% and 9.7% to 45%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Time to surgery and LOS were longer for PPHFx relative to NHFx. Complications' rates were higher for PPHFx compared to NHFx. There is no evidence for differences in LOS, cost, discharge, readmission rates, or mortality between PPHFx and NHFx. These results may serve as a baseline in future evaluation of PPHFx management.

Is Penicillin Allergy a Clinical Problem? A Systematic Review of Total Joint Arthroplasty Procedures With Implications for Patient Safety and Antibiotic Stewardship.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) who report penicillin allergy (PA) are frequently administered second-line antibiotics, although recent evidence suggests that this may be unnecessary and could increase infection risk. Many institutions have aimed to improve antibiotic deployment via allergy testing and screening; however, there is little standardization to this process. This review aimed to evaluate (1) antibiotic selection in patients who report PA and assess the impact of screening and testing interventions, (2) rates of allergic reactions in patients who report PA, and (3) the association between reported PA and screening or testing programs and odds of surgical site infection or periprosthetic joint infection. METHODS: PubMed, EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar electronic databases were searched on February 4, 2023 to identify all studies published since January 1, 2000 that evaluated the impact of PA on patients undergoing TJA (PROSPERO study protocol registration: CRD42023394031). Articles were included if full-text manuscripts in English were available, and the study analyzed the impact of PA and related interventions on TJA patients. There were 11 studies evaluating 1,276,663 patients included. Interventions were compared via presentation of key findings regarding rates of clinically relevant or high-risk PA reported upon screenings or testings, cephalosporin utilizations, allergic reactions, and postoperative infections (surgical site infection and periprosthetic joint infection). RESULTS: All 6 studies found that PA screening and testing markedly increase the use of first-line antibiotics. Testing showed low rates of true allergy (0.7 to 3%) and allergic reaction frequency for patients who have reported PA receiving cephalosporins was between 0% and 2%. Although there were mixed findings across studies, there was a trend toward second-line antibiotic prophylaxis being associated with a slightly higher rate of infection in PA patients. CONCLUSIONS: Using PA screening and testing can promote antibiotic stewardship by safely increasing the use of first-line antibiotics in patients who have a reported PA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Therapeutic Study.

Understanding the use of artificial intelligence for implant analysis in total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the development of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms aimed at reviewing radiographs after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). This disruptive technology is particularly promising in the context of preoperative planning for revision TJA. Yet, the efficacy of AI algorithms regarding TJA implant analysis has not been examined comprehensively. METHODS: PubMed, EBSCO, and Google Scholar electronic databases were utilized to identify all studies evaluating AI algorithms related to TJA implant analysis between 1 January 2000, and 27 February 2023 (PROSPERO study protocol registration: CRD42023403497). The mean methodological index for non-randomized studies score was 20.4 ± 0.6. We reported the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and area under the curve (AUC) for the performance of each outcome measure. RESULTS: Our initial search yielded 374 articles, and a total of 20 studies with three main use cases were included. Sixteen studies analyzed implant identification, two addressed implant failure, and two addressed implant measurements. Each use case had a median AUC and accuracy above 0.90 and 90%, respectively, indicative of a well-performing AI algorithm. Most studies failed to include explainability methods and conduct external validity testing. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the promising role of AI in recognizing implants in TJA. Preliminary studies have shown strong performance in implant identification, implant failure, and accurately measuring implant dimensions. Future research should follow a standardized guideline to develop and train models and place a strong emphasis on transparency and clarity in reporting results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

What Are the Trends in Women's Representation Among Lead Investigators of Orthopaedic Clinical Trials?

BACKGROUND: Serving as a principal investigator for a clinical trial can bring national visibility and recognition to physicians, and it can have a substantial impact on their promotion and tenure. In the field of orthopaedics, there is a well-known gender gap in terms of representation and leadership. Examining the representation of women in clinical trial leadership may help to inform and enable the design of targeted interventions and policies to foster a more inclusive and diverse environment in clinical trial leadership. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What is the proportion of women principal investigators in orthopaedic clinical trials, and has this changed over time? (2) Are there trial characteristics (trial phase, status, funding source, and intervention) associated with women principal investigators? (3) What is the geographic distribution globally and regionally within the United States of clinical trials led by women principal investigators? METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of clinical trials using the ClinialTrials.gov registry and results database provided by the NIH was performed on August 22, 2022. Trial characteristics included principal investigator names and gender, trial phase, type, funding source, intervention, and location (defined by continent and US Census region). Our primary outcome was the overall proportion of women orthopaedic principal investigators over time. We assessed this by comparing the proportion of women principal investigators from 2007 to 2022. Our secondary outcomes were trial characteristics (trial phase, status, funding source, and intervention) and geographic distribution (globally and within the United States) associated with women principal investigators. Baseline characteristics of the clinical trials were calculated using frequencies and percentages for categorical variables. Fisher exact tests were conducted to evaluate differences in gender proportions based on the included clinical trial characteristics. Univariate linear regression was applied to analyze trends in the annual proportion of women principal investigators over time. RESULTS: The overall proportion of women principal investigators was 18% (592 of 3246), and this proportion increased over the study period. Specifically, the proportion of women leading clinical trials was 13% (16 of 121) in 2007 and 22% (53 of 242) in 2022 (r2 = 0.68; p < 0.001). This trend was also observed when evaluating only US women principal investigators (r2 = 0.47; p = 0.003) and non-US women principal investigators over the study period (r2 = 0.298; p = 0.03). There was no difference in the distribution of trial phases between men and women principal investigators. Most men and women were involved in "not applicable" or Phase IV trials. Similarly, there was no difference in trial status or funding source. However, women principal investigators had a higher proportion of studies involving behavioral interventions (11% [67 of 592]) compared with men principal investigators (3% [74 of 2654]; p = 0.03). The proportion of women principal investigators over the study period by world region revealed a higher proportion of women principal investigators in Asia (23% [88 of 391]), followed by South America (24% [12 of 49]), North America (18% [306 of 1746]), and Europe (16% [136 of 833]). Among all US trials over the study period, the proportion of women principal investigators across the US Census region was Northeast (19% [62 of 329]), South (18% [90 of 488]), West (20% [97 of 492]), and Midwest (13% [22 of 168]). CONCLUSION: Although there has been a notable increase in the proportion of women principal investigators over time, the overall representation remains relatively low. The disparities observed in trial characteristics and geographic distribution of women principal investigators further emphasize the need for targeted interventions and policies to foster a more inclusive and diverse environment in clinical trial leadership. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These results underscore the importance of adopting practices and strategies that foster gender equity in the leadership of orthopaedic clinical trials. By establishing mentorship and sponsorship programs, early-career women surgeons can be connected with experienced leaders, cultivating a supportive network and offering valuable career guidance. Additionally, addressing geographic disparities in the representation of women principal investigators can involve the implementation of mentorship and sponsorship programs in regions with lower representation.

Complications in Osteonecrosis Patients Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have demonstrated high complication rates in osteonecrosis (ON) patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. However, there is a paucity of literature regarding outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in ON patients. Our study aimed to assess preoperative risk factors associated with the development of ON and determine the incidence of postoperative complications up to one year following TKA. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a large national database. Patients who had a primary TKA and ON were isolated using Current Procedural Terminology code 27447 and ICD-10-CM code M87, respectively. A total of 185,045 patients were identified, including 181,151 patients who had a TKA and 3,894 patients who had a TKA and ON. After propensity matching, both groups each contained 3,758 patients. Intercohort comparisons of primary and secondary outcomes after propensity score matching were made using the odds ratio. A P value of < .01 was determined to be significant. RESULTS: The ON patients were found to have an increased risk for prosthetic joint infection, urinary tract infection, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, wound dehiscence pneumonia, and the development of heterotopic ossification at different time points. Osteonecrosis patients had an increased risk of revision at the 1-year time point (odds ratio = 2.068, P < .0001). CONCLUSION: The ON patients had a higher risk of systemic and joint complications than non-ON patients. These complications suggest a more complicated management course for patients who have ON prior to and after TKA.