[Patients on oral anticancer drugs and coordinated pathway: CHIMORAL, feedback from care providers]. / Patients sous anticancéreux oraux et parcours coordonné : CHIMORAL, retour des acteurs de soins.

INTRODUCTION: Oral anticancer drugs have raised the question of how to follow-up these patients and how to coordinate this follow-up. The CHIMORAL study evaluated the involvement of primary care providers and a coordination by territorial health networks. Training/information tools were provided, as well as weekly nursing follow-up at home. METHODS: The operational feasibility of this model was assessed through a qualitative/quantitative analysis of territorial health network intervention and feedback from primary care providers. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty four patients received coordinated care, with nursing follow-up for 89% of them (average 6.3 weeks). One in three nurses, one in five pharmacists and one in ten doctors used the tools provided, 41% of which were used for training and 16% for the management of an adverse event. The main reasons for using the networks concerned adverse effects (34%) and came mainly from nurses (45%) and patients and their relatives (47%). Patients felt safe, with more responsive management. DISCUSSION: This intervention has strengthened the networks' links with primary care providers. The use of the community-based care system for adverse events was more frequent, with improved detection and patient awareness, with no observed impact on compliance. A proposed evolution is to maintain an in-home assessment for all patients and to define a frequency and duration of follow-up according to the patient's profile.

[Impact of a coordinated regional organization to secure the management of patients on oral anticancer drugs: CHIMORAL, a comparative trial]. / Impact d'une organisation régionale coordonnée pour sécuriser la prise en charge des patients sous anticancéreux oraux : CHIMORAL, une étude comparative.

INTRODUCTION: Oral anticancer drugs have disrupted hospital and community practices. A better coordination and patient support for medication and adverse events management by primary care providers (general practitioner, community pharmacist and liberal nurse) could improve the situation. The CHIMORAL study evaluated a model of coordination by territorial health networks. METHODS: A here and elsewhere, prospective and multicentric study, comparing coordinated care with standard care. Primary outcome was the use of the hospital structure for adverse events within 6 months of initiating treatment. RESULTS: In all, 283 patients were included. 92% had at least one adverse event, with a higher median number in the coordinated group (12.5 vs. 9.0, P=0.02). No difference in hospital use by arm (P=0.502). Increase in the use of community care for adverse events in the coordinated group (27% vs. 16%, P=0.009). No observed impact on progression rates, quality of life and treatment adherence. The overall survival rate at 6 months is numerically higher in the coordinated group (87% vs. 76%, P=0.064). DISCUSSION: This model does not show any difference on the primary endpoint. The lack of randomization, patient selection, power loss, and local initiatives to monitor these patients may have biased the analysis. A large number of uses of the healthcare system were observed. These results confirm the need for a dedicated care pathway for the patient with oral anticancer drugs.

[Care pathways of cancer patients: Modeling and risks analysis induced by oral anticancer drugs]. / Parcours de soins : modélisation et analyse des risques induits par les anticancéreux oraux.

The care pathway of cancer patients is complex and therefore difficult to define. The oral anticancers (AKPO) have shown their benefits to patients and health professionals, however, the risks induced on the care pathway remain unknown. The objective of the study is to define, quantify the risks from AKPO and their effects on the care pathway (breakdown [Ds], rupture [Rt]). From the proposed care pathway model, FMEA method is used to analyze risks. For the 3 identified processes (1 monotherapy, 2 bitherapies: 2 AKPO or 1 AKPO/1 AKIV), analysis revealed an average of 91 risks, 173 Ds, 147 Rt, increased for 1 AKPO/1 AKIV therapy. The administration and delivery are the most risky steps. The lack of training and information of patients and healthcare professionals generates 80% of Ds and Rt. This model confirms the complexity, variability of the care pathway. The development of actions to improve town-hospital coordination and exchange of information is required to optimize and secure the route, confirming the objectives of "Plan Cancer 3".