Interprofessional Image Verification Workshop for Physician and Physics Residents: A Multi-Institutional Experience.

PURPOSE: Verification of patient position through pretreatment setup imaging is crucial in modern radiation therapy. As treatment complexity increases and technology evolves, physicist-physician collaboration becomes imperative for safe and successful radiation delivery. Despite the importance of both, residency programs lack formal interprofessional education (IPE) activities or structured training for image verification. Here we show the impact of an interprofessional image verification workshop for residents in a multi-institutional setting. METHODS: The workshop included a lecture by the attending physicist and physician, and hands-on image registration practice by learners (medical physics residents, MP; and radiation oncology residents, RO). All participants filled out pre- and postactivity surveys and rated their comfort from 1 to 10 in (A) selecting what type of imaging to order for a given case and (B) independently assessing the setup quality based on imaging. A paired 1-tailed t test (α = 0.05) was used to evaluate significance; Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to assess correlation of ratings and RO postgraduate year (PGY). Surveys had free-response questions about IPE and image verification activities in residency. RESULTS: A total of 71 residents from 7 institutions participated between 2018 and 2020. Pre- and postsurveys were completed by 50 residents (38RO, 12MP) and showed an increase in (A) from 5.5 ± 2.2 to 7.1 ± 1.6 (P < .001) and in (B) from 5.1 ± 2.3 to 6.8 ± 1.5 (P < .001), with significant increases per subgroup (AΔ, RO = 1.8 ± 1.7, P < .001; BΔ, RO = 1.9 ± 1.8, P <. 001; AΔ, MP = 1.1 ± 1.4, P = .012; BΔ, MP = 1.2 ± 1.6, P = .016). RO confidence scores moderately correlated with PGY. Survey responses indicated that image verification training is mostly unstructured, with extent of exposure varying by program and attending; most with little-to-no training. Time constraints were identified as the main barrier. IPE was noted as a useful way to incorporate different perspectives into the process. CONCLUSIONS: Formal image verification training increases resident comfort with setup imaging review and provides opportunities for interprofessional collaboration in radiation oncology residency programs.

Millepora species (Fire Coral) Sting: A Case Report and Review of Recommended Management.

Fire corals (Millepora spp) are the second most common reef-forming organisms and are frequently found in tropical and subtropical waters. Fire corals are not true corals but rather hydrozoans more closely related to jellyfish and sea nettles. Rigidly affixed to the reef and with a branching structure, each fire coral is a colony of numerous individual hydrozoans forming a collective symbiotic organism. It is common for divers to accidentally make contact with fire corals. Fire coral contact is characterized by the immediate onset of burning pain caused by venom discharge from numerous tiny nematocysts located externally on the creature. Treatment consists of saltwater irrigation of the wound, nematocyst removal, and supportive care of the associated symptoms of pain, dermatitis, and pruritus. Rarely, fire coral can cause systemic toxicity. We present a case report of a 30-y-old recreational diver who experienced a fire coral sting of her left anterior thigh and review the recommended prevention and management of fire coral stings.

Dynamics of the vaginal wall dose in HDR interstitial brachytherapy for gynecological cancer: Systematic analysis of phantom vs patient case.

This study aimed to investigate the dynamics of the vaginal wall dose for interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT). A patient undergoing ISBT was selected as the patient case. The phantom case was generated to simulate the patient case in all regards with the exception of parallel needle positions. The vaginal wall was contoured as a 0.5-cm expansion around the vaginal surface of the obturator. The prescribed ISBT dose was 20 Gy in 4 fractions. Six treatment plans were generated by modifying relative dwell times and needle positions (DTNP). The volume of the vaginal wall receiving > 150% of prescription dose (V> 150%) and D2cc of the vaginal wall were compared among plans. The V> 150% was much larger in the patient case (49.3%) due to unparallel needles compared with the phantom case (14.3%) without modification (plan 1). Among the 6 plans, reduced dwell time (plan 3) and no dwell time (plans 5 and 6) on the vaginal surface needles had the lowest vaginal wall doses with the use of a central obturator needle in both cases. In comparison of patient case plans 1, 3, 5, and 6, V150% was 49.2%, 19.0%, 21.3%, and 28.7%, respectively, and D2cc was 41.15 Gy, 33.10 Gy, 36.51 Gy, and 34.37 Gy, respectively, which was limited around each loaded needle. Modification of DTNP is able to reduce the vaginal wall volume exceeding 150% of the prescription dose in the patient case. Understanding these dynamics of the vaginal wall dose will improve dose optimization of ISBT and may reduce vaginal morbidities.