Obesity and thyroid cancer risk.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review explores recent evidence assessing the relationship between obesity and thyroid cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: Consistent evidence from observational studies suggests that obesity increases the risk of thyroid cancer. The relationship persists when alternative measures of adiposity are used, but the strength of association may vary according to the timing and duration of obesity and how obesity or other metabolic parameters are defined as exposures. Recent studies have reported an association between obesity and thyroid cancers that are larger or have adverse clinicopathologic features, including those with BRAF mutations, thus providing evidence that the association is relevant for clinically significant thyroid cancers. The underlying mechanism for the association remains uncertain but may be driven by disruption in adipokines and growth-signaling pathways. SUMMARY: Obesity is associated with an increased risk of thyroid cancer, although further research is required to understand the biological mechanisms underpinning this relationship. Reducing the prevalence of obesity is predicted to lessen the future burden of thyroid cancer. However, the presence of obesity does not impact current recommendations for screening or management of thyroid cancer.

Performance of simple serum-based tests to exclude cirrhosis prior to hepatitis C treatment in non-hospital settings in Australia.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines suggest using transient elastography (TE) or aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) score <1 to exclude cirrhosis prior to commencing treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV). Recently, fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) <0.93 has been shown to have a high negative predictive value (NPV) for the presence of cirrhosis. AIMS: To assess FIB-4 and APRI in a cohort of HCV patients and to validate FIB-4 <0.93 in populations of HCV-infected individuals with differing cirrhosis prevalence, including secondary care, primary care and prisons. METHODS: From our treatment database, we identified patients with complete data (n = 793). We calculated FIB-4 and APRI and correlated this with the presence of cirrhosis, determined by TE. We analysed the performance of FIB-4 and APRI using area under the receiver operating curve analysis. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, NPV and number of patients misclassified using published cut-offs in populations with varying cirrhosis prevalence. RESULTS: FIB-4 was superior to APRI for the diagnosis of cirrhosis (area under the receiver operating curve 0.868 vs 0.802). In secondary care (cirrhosis prevalence 32%), APRI <1 had a NPV of 80% and misclassified 14% of patients. FIB-4 <0.93 had a NPV of 97% and misclassified 1%. In primary care and prison (cirrhosis prevalence 13% and 8%), the NPV for APRI <1 was 93% and 96%, respectively, but 5% of patients with cirrhosis were misclassified. FIB-4 <0.93 had excellent NPV in both primary care (97%) and prisoners (100%). CONCLUSIONS: FIB-4 <0.93 is highly efficient at ruling out cirrhosis in HCV patients and allows TE to be appropriately avoided, thereby streamlining treatment algorithms.

Facilitating treatment of HCV in primary care in regional Australia: closing the access gap.

BACKGROUND: Australia has unrestricted access to direct-acting antivirals (DAA) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment. In order to increase access to treatment, primary care providers are able to prescribe DAA after fibrosis assessment and specialist consultation. Transient elastography (TE) is recommended prior to commencement of HCV treatment; however, TE is rarely available outside secondary care centres in Australia and therefore a requirement for TE could represent a barrier to access to HCV treatment in primary care. OBJECTIVES: In order to bridge this access gap, we developed a community-based TE service across the Sunshine Coast and Wide Bay areas of Queensland. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively recorded HCV treatment database. INTERVENTIONS: A nurse-led service equipped with two mobile Fibroscan units assesses patients in eight locations across regional Queensland. Patients are referred into the service via primary care and undergo nurse-led TE at a location convenient to the patient. Patients are discussed at a weekly multidisciplinary team meeting and a treatment recommendation made to the referring GP. Treatment is initiated and monitored in primary care. Patients with cirrhosis are offered follow-up in secondary care. RESULTS: 327 patients have undergone assessment and commenced treatment in primary care. Median age 48 years (IQR 38-56), 66% male. 57% genotype 1, 40% genotype 3; 82% treatment naïve; 10% had cirrhosis (liver stiffness >12.5 kPa). The majority were treated with sofosbuvir-based regimens. 26% treated with 8-week regimens. All patients had treatment prescribed and monitored in primary care. Telephone follow-up to confirm sustained virological response (SVR) was performed by clinic nurses. 147 patients remain on treatment. 180 patients have completed treatment. SVR data were not available for 19 patients (lost to follow-up). Intention-to-treat SVR rate was 85.5%. In patients with complete data SVR rate was 95.6%. CONCLUSION: Community-based TE assessment facilitates access to HCV treatment in primary care with excellent SVR rates.