Population Pharmacokinetics of Levetiracetam in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Exhibiting Augmented Renal Clearance.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patients with severe trauma exhibit augmented renal clearance, which can alter the dosing requirement of renally eliminated drugs. This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic model for levetiracetam in patients with severe traumatic brain injury and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, and use it to describe optimal dosing regimens. METHODS: This was a prospective open-label observational study. Critically ill adult patients with severe traumatic brain injury or aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage without renal dysfunction and receiving levetiracetam were eligible. Serial levetiracetam plasma concentrations were analyzed to develop a population pharmacokinetic model and perform dosing simulations. RESULTS: A two-compartment model best described the concentration-time data from 30 patients. The mean ± standard deviation parameter estimates were bioavailability (F) of 0.8 ± 0.2, absorption rate constant of 2.4 ± 2 h-1, clearance 2.5 ± 1.1 L/h, central volume of distribution 8.9 ± 3.0 L/h, and transfer rate constraints of 1.8 ± 1.1 h-1 from central to peripheral compartments and 0.7 ± 0.3 h-1 from peripheral to central compartments. For the simulated intermittent dosing regimens, on average, the median trough concentration reduced by 50% for every 40-mL/min/1.73 m2 increase in urinary creatinine clearance. Simulated doses of at least 6 g/day were required for some levels of augmented renal clearance. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe traumatic brain injury and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage with augmented renal clearance are at risk of not achieving target levetiracetam plasma concentrations. We suggest dose titration guided by measured creatinine clearance, and/or, therapeutic drug monitoring if available, to minimize the risk of seizures.

Framework to Support the Process of Decision-Making on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU: Results of a Delphi Study.

OBJECTIVES: To develop a consensus framework that can guide the process of decision-making on continuing or limiting life-sustaining treatments in ICU patients, using evidence-based items, supported by caregivers, patients, and surrogate decision makers from multiple countries. DESIGN: A three-round web-based international Delphi consensus study with a priori consensus definition was conducted with experts from 13 countries. Participants reviewed items of the decision-making process on a seven-point Likert scale or with open-ended questions. Questions concerned terminology, content, and timing of decision-making steps. The summarized results (including mean scores) and expert suggestions were presented in the subsequent round for review. SETTING: Web-based surveys of international participants representing ICU physicians, nurses, former ICU patients, and surrogate decision makers. PATIENTS: Not applicable. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In three rounds, respectively, 28, 28, and 27 (of 33 invited) physicians together with 12, 10, and seven (of 19 invited) nurses participated. Patients and surrogates were involved in round one and 12 of 27 responded. Caregivers were mostly working in university affiliated hospitals in Northern Europe. During the Delphi process, most items were modified in order to reach consensus. Seven items lacked consensus after three rounds. The final consensus framework comprises the content and timing of four elements; three elements focused on caregiver-surrogate communication (admission meeting, follow-up meeting, goals-of-care meeting); and one element (weekly time-out meeting) focused on assessing preferences, prognosis, and proportionality of ICU treatment among professionals. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians, nurses, patients, and surrogates generated a consensus-based framework to guide the process of decision-making on continuing or limiting life-sustaining treatments in the ICU. Early, frequent, and scheduled family meetings combined with a repeated multidisciplinary time-out meeting may support decisions in relation to patient preferences, prognosis, and proportionality.

Population pharmacokinetics of total and unbound concentrations of intravenous posaconazole in adult critically ill patients.

BACKGROUND: The population pharmacokinetics of total and unbound posaconazole following intravenous administration has not yet been described for the critically ill patient population. The aim of this work was, therefore, to describe the total and unbound population pharmacokinetics of intravenous posaconazole in critically ill patients and identify optimal dosing regimens. METHODS: This was a prospective observational population pharmacokinetic study in critically ill adult patients with presumed/confirmed invasive fungal infection. A single dose of 300 mg posaconazole was administered intravenously as an add-on to standard antifungal therapy, and serial plasma samples were collected over 48 h. Total and unbound posaconazole concentrations, measured by chromatographic method, were used to develop a population pharmacokinetic model and perform dosing simulations in R using Pmetrics. RESULTS: From eight patients, 93 pairs of total and unbound concentrations were measured. A two-compartment linear model with capacity-limited plasma protein binding best described the concentration-time data. Albumin and body mass index (BMI) were included as covariates in the final model. Mean (SD) parameter estimates for the volume of the central compartment (V) and the elimination rate constant were 72 (43) L and 42.1 (23.7) h-1, respectively. Dosing simulations showed that high BMI was associated with a reduced probability of achieving target total and unbound posaconazole concentrations. Low serum albumin concentration was associated with a reduced probability of attaining target total but not unbound posaconazole concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: An important clinical message of this study is that critically ill patients with increased BMI may require larger than approved loading doses of intravenous posaconazole when considering currently recommended dosing targets. Variability in plasma albumin concentration appears unlikely to affect dosing requirements when the assessment is based on unbound concentrations. Where available, therapeutic drug monitoring of unbound concentrations may be useful.

A pharmacokinetic case study of intravenous posaconazole in a critically ill patient with hypoalbuminaemia receiving continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration.

This article reports a pharmacokinetic case study of intravenous posaconazole in a 49-year-old male patient with intra-abdominal sepsis and hypoalbuminaemia receiving continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration. Concentration-time data following 300 mg intravenous posaconazole was analysed using a population pharmacokinetics approach. The 300-mg intravenous dose appears to be adequate for the treatment of yeast infections; however, for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis in isolated cases of critically ill patients with hypoalbuminaemia, the current dosing may not achieve desired exposure, although steady state exposure data are needed.

Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Posaconazole in Critically Ill Patients.

To date, there is no information on the intravenous (i.v.) posaconazole pharmacokinetics for intensive care unit (ICU) patients. This prospective observational study aimed to describe the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of i.v. posaconazole in critically ill patients. Patients with no history of allergy to triazole antifungals and requiring systemic antifungal therapy were enrolled if they were aged ≥18 years, central venous access was available, they were not pregnant, and they had not received prior posaconazole or drugs interacting with posaconazole. A single dose of 300 mg posaconazole was administered over 90 min. Total plasma concentrations were measured from serial plasma samples collected over 48 h, using a validated chromatographic method. The pharmacokinetic data set was analyzed by noncompartmental methods. Eight patients (7 male) were enrolled with the following characteristics: median age, 46 years (interquartile range [IQR], 40 to 51 years); median weight, 68 kg (IQR, 65 to 82 kg); and median albumin concentration, 20 g/liter (IQR, 18 to 24 g/liter). Median (IQR) pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were as follows: observed maximum concentration during sampling period (Cmax), 1,702 ng/ml (1,352 to 2,141 ng/ml); area under the concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-∞), 17,932 ng · h/ml (13,823 to 27,905 ng · h/ml); clearance (CL), 16.8 liters/h (11.1 to 21.7 liters/h); and volume of distribution (V), 529.1 liters (352.2 to 720.6 liters). The V and CL were greater than 2-fold and the AUC0-∞ was 39% of the values reported for heathy volunteers. The AUC0-∞ was only 52% of the steady-state AUC0-24 reported for hematology patients. The median of estimated average steady-state concentrations was 747 ng/ml (IQR, 576 to 1,163 ng/ml), which is within but close to the lower end of the previously recommended therapeutic range of 500 to 2,500 ng/ml. In conclusion, we observed different pharmacokinetics of i.v. posaconazole in this cohort of critically ill patients compared to those in healthy volunteers and hematology patients.