Rational design of a SOCS1-edited tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy using CRISPR/Cas9 screens.

Cell therapies such as tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy have shown promise in the treatment of patients with refractory solid tumors, with improvement in response rates and durability of responses nevertheless sought. To identify targets capable of enhancing the antitumor activity of T cell therapies, large-scale in vitro and in vivo clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9 screens were performed, with the SOCS1 gene identified as a top T cell-enhancing target. In murine CD8+ T cell-therapy models, SOCS1 served as a critical checkpoint in restraining the accumulation of central memory T cells in lymphoid organs as well as intermediate (Texint) and effector (Texeff) exhausted T cell subsets derived from progenitor exhausted T cells (Texprog) in tumors. A comprehensive CRISPR tiling screen of the SOCS1-coding region identified sgRNAs targeting the SH2 domain of SOCS1 as the most potent, with an sgRNA with minimal off-target cut sites used to manufacture KSQ-001, an engineered TIL therapy with SOCS1 inactivated by CRISPR/Cas9. KSQ-001 possessed increased responsiveness to cytokine signals and enhanced in vivo antitumor function in mouse models. These data demonstrate the use of CRISPR/Cas9 screens in the rational design of T cell therapies.

Reverse Translating Molecular Determinants of Anti-Programmed Death 1 Immunotherapy Response in Mouse Syngeneic Tumor Models.

Targeting the programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) pathway with immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of many cancers. Somatic tumor mutational burden (TMB) and T-cell-inflamed gene expression profile (GEP) are clinically validated pan-tumor genomic biomarkers that can predict responsiveness to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy in many tumor types. We analyzed the association between these biomarkers and the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitor in 11 commonly used preclinical syngeneic tumor mouse models using murinized rat anti-mouse PD-1 DX400 antibody muDX400, a surrogate for pembrolizumab. Response to muDX400 treatment was broadly classified into three categories: highly responsive, partially responsive, and intrinsically resistant to therapy. Molecular and cellular profiling validated differences in immune cell infiltration and activation in the tumor microenvironment of muDX400-responsive tumors. Baseline and on-treatment genomic analysis showed an association between TMB, murine T-cell-inflamed gene expression profile (murine-GEP), and response to muDX400 treatment. We extended our analysis to investigate a canonical set of cancer and immune biology-related gene signatures, including signatures of angiogenesis, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and stromal/epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition/TGFß biology previously shown to be inversely associated with the clinical efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade. Finally, we evaluated the association between murine-GEP and preclinical efficacy with standard-of-care chemotherapy or antiangiogenic agents that previously demonstrated promising clinical activity, in combination with muDX400. Our profiling studies begin to elucidate the underlying biological mechanisms of response and resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade represented by these models, thereby providing insight into which models are most appropriate for the evaluation of orthogonal combination strategies.