Genetics of Parkinson's disease heterogeneity: A genome-wide association study of clinical subtypes.

INTRODUCTION: Substantial heterogeneity between individual patients in the clinical presentation of Parkinson's disease (PD) has led to the classification of distinct PD subtypes. However, genetic susceptibility factors for specific PD subtypes are not well understood. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the genetics of PD heterogeneity by performing a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of PD subtypes. METHODS: A total of 799 PD patients were included and classified into tremor-dominant (TD) (N = 345), akinetic-rigid (AR) (N = 227), gait-difficulty (GD) (N = 82), and mixed (MX) (N = 145) phenotypic subtypes. After array genotyping and subsequent imputation, a total of 7,918,344 variants were assessed for association with each PD subtype using logistic regression models that were adjusted for age, sex, and the top five principal components of GWAS data. RESULTS: We identified one genome-wide significant association (P < 5 × 10-8), which was between the MIR3976HG rs7504760 variant and the AR subtype (Odds ratio [OR] = 6.12, P = 2.57 × 10-8). Suggestive associations (P < 1 × 10-6) were observed regarding TD for RP11-497G19.3/RP11-497G19.1 rs7304254 (OR = 3.33, P = 3.89 × 10-7), regarding GD for HES2 rs111473931 (OR = 3.18, P = 6.85 × 10-7), RP11-400D2.3/CTD-2012I17.1 rs149082205 (OR = 8.96, P = 9.08 × 10-7), and RN7SL408P/SGK1 rs56161738 (OR = 2.97, P = 6.19 × 10-7), and regarding MX for MMRN2 rs112991171 (OR = 4.98, P = 1.02 × 10-7). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that genetic variation may account for part of the clinical heterogeneity of PD. In particular, we found a novel genome-wide significant association between MIR3976HG variation and the AR PD subtype. Replication of these findings will be important in order to better define the genetic architecture of clinical variability in PD disease presentation.

Tau polygenic risk scoring: a cost-effective aid for prognostic counseling in Alzheimer's disease.

Tau deposition is one of two hallmark features of biologically defined Alzheimer's disease (AD) and is more closely related to cognitive decline than amyloidosis. Further, not all amyloid-positive individuals develop tauopathy, resulting in wide heterogeneity in clinical outcomes across the population with AD. We hypothesized that a polygenic risk score (PRS) based on tau PET (tau PRS) would capture the aggregate inherited susceptibility/resistance architecture influencing tau accumulation, beyond solely the measurement of amyloid-ß burden. Leveraging rich multimodal data from a population-based sample of older adults, we found that this novel tau PRS was a strong surrogate of tau PET deposition and captured a significant proportion of the variance in tau PET levels as compared with amyloid PET burden, APOE (apolipoprotein E) ε4 (the most common risk allele for AD), and a non-APOE PRS of clinical case-control AD risk variants. In independent validation samples, the tau PRS was associated with cerebrospinal fluid phosphorylated tau levels in one cohort and with postmortem Braak neurofibrillary tangle stage in another. We also observed an association of the tau PRS with longitudinal cognitive trajectories, including a statistical interaction of the tau PRS with amyloid burden on cognitive decline. Although additional study is warranted, these findings demonstrate the potential utility of a tau PRS for capturing the collective genetic background influencing tau deposition in the general population. In the future, a tau PRS could be leveraged for cost-effective screening and risk stratification to guide trial enrollment and clinical interventions in AD.

Outcomes of COVID-19 With the Mayo Clinic Model of Care and Research.

OBJECTIVE: To report the Mayo Clinic experience with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) related to patient outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with COVID-19 diagnosed between March 1, 2020, and July 31, 2020, at any of the Mayo Clinic sites. We abstracted pertinent comorbid conditions such as age, sex, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index variables, and treatments received. Factors associated with hospitalization and mortality were assessed in univariate and multivariate models. RESULTS: A total of 7891 patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection with research authorization on file received care across the Mayo Clinic sites during the study period. Of these, 7217 patients were adults 18 years or older who were analyzed further. A total of 897 (11.4%) patients required hospitalization, and 354 (4.9%) received care in the intensive care unit (ICU). All hospitalized patients were reviewed by a COVID-19 Treatment Review Panel, and 77.5% (695 of 897) of inpatients received a COVID-19-directed therapy. Overall mortality was 1.2% (94 of 7891), with 7.1% (64 of 897) mortality in hospitalized patients and 11.3% (40 of 354) in patients requiring ICU care. CONCLUSION: Mayo Clinic outcomes of patients with COVID-19 infection in the ICU, hospital, and community compare favorably with those reported nationally. This likely reflects the impact of interprofessional multidisciplinary team evaluation, effective leveraging of clinical trials and available treatments, deployment of remote monitoring tools, and maintenance of adequate operating capacity to not require surge adjustments. These best practices can help guide other health care systems with the continuing response to the COVID-19 pandemic.