Radiotherapy plus camrelizumab and irinotecan for oligometastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients after first-line immunotherapy plus chemotherapy failure: An open-label, single-arm, phase II trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of advanced and metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but most patients eventually developed disease progression. Immuno-resistance is becoming an unavoidable clinical problem. Oligometastasis is a limited-metastatic state, and patients at this stage should be evaluated for the addition of metastasis-directed local intervention, which may be associated with improved prognosis. As an immunomodulator, radiotherapy may exhibit synergistic effect when added to immunotherapy. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of low-dose radiotherapy plus immunotherapy and second-line chemotherapy in oligometastatic ESCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this phase II trial (ChiCTR2000040533), oligometastatic ESCC patients after first-line immunotherapy plus chemotherapy failure were treated with low dose radiotherapy plus camrelizumab and second-line irinotecan chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and safety. Abscopal response rate (ARR) and abscopal control rate (ACR) were also been explored. RESULTS: Between November 19, 2018 and March 17, 2021, 49 patients were enrolled. With a median follow-up of 12.8 months, median PFS and OS were 6.9 months (95%CI, 4.6-9.3) and 12.8 months (95%CI, 10.1-15.5), respectively. ORR was 40.8% (95%CI, 27.3-55.7). DCR was 75.5% (95%CI, 60.8-86.2). ARR was 34.7% (95%CI, 22.1-49.7). ACR was 69.4% (95%CI, 54.4-81.3). The most common adverse effects of any grade were myelosuppression, weight loss and fatigue. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 31 (63.3%) patients, with the most common being leukopenia (30.6%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: Low dose radiotherapy plus camrelizumab and irinotecan exhibited survival benefit with manageable safety for oligometastatic ESCC patients after first-line immunotherapy plus chemotherapy failure. It deserves to be validated in a larger trial.

An exploratory clinical trial of apatinib combined with intensity-modulated radiation therapy for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Open-label, single-arm, exploratory clinical trial of apatinib combined with IMRT for uHCC patients. Patients aged 18-75 years with adequate hematological, liver, and renal functions and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of ≤2 were enrolled in this study from March 2017 to September 2020. Patients were received IMRT (biological effective dose: 46-60 Gy) and continuous apatinib (250-500 mg/day) oral administration until HCC progression or unacceptable toxic effects. The endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. The trial registration number is ChiCTR-OPC-17011890. RESULTS: A total of 33 patients have taken part in the study. The median age was 58 years old (range 32-77), 27 (81.9%) patients were ECOG PS 0-1, and 28 (84.9%) patients were male. In addition, 25 (75.7%) patients suffered from hepatitis B, 32 cases (97.0%) were in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Stages B-C, and eight (24.2%) had portal vein involvement. Moreover, 12 (36.4%) and 21 (63.6%) patients received apatinib as first-line and second or later-line therapy, respectively. The average follow-up was 11.4 months, the median PFS was 7.8 months (95% confidence interval: 3.9-11.7). The OS rates at 6 and 12 months were 96.7% and 66.2%. The ORR and DCR were 15.1% and 81.8%, respectively. Hepatic toxicity was the most common treatment-related adverse events in Grades 3-4 (12.1%). No radiation-induced liver disease and Grade 5 toxicity were recorded. CONCLUSION: Apatinib combined with IMRT is a safe and effective method to improve PFS and DCR and has good anti-tumor activity in patients with uHCC.

Evaluation of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Survival Outcomes in Patients With Synchronous Oligometastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Importance: The optimal treatment for and potential benefit populations of synchronous oligometastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SOESCC) remain unclear. Objectives: To evaluate outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and to construct decision tree models for predicting the risk of progression and mortality in patients with SOESCC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prognostic study included 532 patients with SOESCC who were treated at 2 cancer centers in China from January 2012 to December 2018 and consisted of a development cohort (n = 381) and a validation cohort (n = 151). Data were analyzed from March 2019 to December 2021. Exposures: All patients received chemotherapy alone or CCRT. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end points of the study were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and the secondary end points were locoregional control and treatment-related toxic effects. Propensity score matching was performed to control potential confounding factors. Cox regression was used to screen important explanatory variables. Decision trees for optimally partitioning patients were established using recursive partitioning analysis and were then subjected to internal and independent external validation. Results: Among the 532 patients (median [range] age, 63 [32-82] years; 367 men [69.0%]), 292 patients received chemotherapy alone and 240 patients underwent CCRT. With a median (IQR) follow-up time of 37.0 (21.6-55.8) months, CCRT was associated with improved objective response rate (139 of 240 [57.9%] vs 123 of 292 [42.1%]; P < .001), median (IQR) PFS (9.7 [8.5-10.9] months vs 7.6 [6.6-8.6] months; P < .001), and median (IQR) OS (18.5 [16.1-20.9] months vs 15.2 [13.6-16.8] months; P < .001) compared with chemotherapy alone. Propensity score matching analysis verified the results. Cox multivariate analysis indicated that treatment modality (CCRT vs chemotherapy alone) was an independent prognostic factor related to PFS (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.57-0.83; P < .001) and OS (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.93; P = .008). The final decision trees divided patients with SOESCC into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups in both the internal and external validations, and the corresponding cumulative risk function curves had significant differences (all P < .001). Time-dependent maximum areas under receiver operating curves of decision trees for progression risk at 3 years and mortality risk at 5 years were 0.820 (95% CI, 0.693-0.948) and 0.894 (95% CI, 0.822-0.966), respectively. Calibration curves also demonstrated that the decision trees had favorable performance of risk stratification. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, CCRT vs chemotherapy alone as a first-line treatment for patients with SOESCC had superior survival. Patients with low risk had promising long-term survival based on the current treatment modality. The predictive information of the decision tree could provide accurate decision-making for the management of patients with SOESCC.

Regional Lymph Node Metastasis and Axillary Surgery of Microinvasive Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study.

Microinvasive breast cancer (MBC for short) is a rare entity with the decision of axillary surgery under debate in clinical practice. We aimed to unravel the lymph node metastasis (LNM) rate, axillary surgery, and prognosis of MBC based on 11,692 patients derived from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database between 2003 and 2015. In this retrospective study, 19.5% (2276/11,692) of patients received axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), 80.5% (9416/11,692) received non-ALND. In the total cohort, 10-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) was 96.3%, and the LNM rate was 6.4% (754/11,692). Multivariate analyses showed that LNM had the strongest predictive weight (N3, HR 14.200, 95% CI 7.933−25.417; N2, HR 12.945, 95% CI 7.725−21.694; N1, HR 3.05, 95% CI 2.246−4.140, all p < 0.001). Kaplan−Meier analyses showed that ALND did not confer a survival benefit on 10-year BCS in patients with N0 (94.7% vs. 97.1%, p < 0.001) and in patients with 1−2 positive nodes (92.1% vs. 89.5%, p = 0.355), respectively, when compared to non-ALND. Our study demonstrated that the vast majority of MBC have a low LNM rate and excellent prognosis; patients with LNM showed poor prognosis. Assessment of lymph node status is necessary, and non-ALND surgery is required and sufficient for MBC with 0−2 positive nodes.

Preoperative Chemotherapy for Limited-stage Small Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment approach for limited-stage small cell carcinoma of the esophagus remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative chemotherapy in combination with surgery vs upfront surgery in those patients. METHODS: From June 2001 to June 2015, a total of 280 patients with limited-stage small cell carcinoma of the esophagus were screened from 60 131 patients with esophageal cancer. Outcome analysis of those patients who underwent preoperative chemotherapy in combination with surgery or upfront surgery was conducted. The primary end point was overall survival, and secondary end points included progression-free survival and safety. RESULTS: Of the 280 patients, 200 were men (71.4%), the median age was 64 years (range, 42-75 years), 171 patients (61.1%) patients had preoperative chemotherapy in combination with surgery, and 109 patients (38.9%) underwent upfront surgery. A pathologic complete response rate of 8.8% was noted in patients who received preoperative chemotherapy. Compared with the upfront surgery group, the preoperative chemotherapy group had a better median overall survival (26.0 months vs 19.5 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.92; P = .011) and a prolonged progression-free survival (16.0 months vs 13.0 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.99; P = .039). Postoperative complications and peritreatment mortality were comparable between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with upfront surgery, preoperative chemotherapy in combination with surgery improves overall survival in patients with limited-stage small cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

Survival impact of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for elderly patients with synchronous oligometastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score matching and landmark analyses.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the potential benefits of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), and to establish a nomogram for predicting survival outcomes of elderly patients with synchronous oligometastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SOEC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study eventually enrolled 314 elderly patients who initially diagnosed with SOEC from two centers. Treatment responses and outcomes of 151 patients receiving CCRT and 163 patients undergoing chemotherapy alone (CT) were compared. Propensity score matching and landmark analyses were performed to control potential confounding factors. A nomogram was established on the basis of the Cox regression model. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 42.3 months, CCRT was superior to CT alone in objective response rate (ORR, 59.6% vs. 39.9%, P < 0.001), median progression-free survival (PFS, 10.0 vs. 7.2 months, P < 0.001), and median overall survival (OS, 18.5 vs. 15.6 months, P < 0.001). The propensity score matching (PSM) and landmark analyses redemonstrated the same trend (P < 0.01). On hierarchical analysis, patients with 1-3 metastatic lesions involving one organ displayed longer median PFS (9.0 vs. 7.8 months, P = 0.008) and OS (17.8 vs. 15.2 months, P < 0.001) than those with 4-5 metastatic lesions involving 2-3 organs. The major toxicities of grade III or higher for CCRT included leukocytopenia (23.2%), radiation esophagitis (7.3%), and radiation pneumonitis (8.6%). Cox multivariate analysis showed that the number of metastatic lesions (P = 0.012) and tumor response (P < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors associated with OS. A nomogram was established by incorporating the number of metastatic lesions and tumor response, with a concordance index of 0.743 after internal cross-validation. Calibration curves and decision curve analysis confirmed that nomogram had a favorable predictive value for individualized survival. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with CT alone, CCRT exhibited superior efficacy and acceptable toxicity in the first-line treatment for elderly patients with SOEC. The current study supports the oligometastatic definition of ≤3 metastatic lesions involving one organ for esophageal cancer patients. The constructed nomogram can effectively predict the individualized survival.

Enhancing the photodynamic therapy efficacy of black phosphorus nanosheets by covalently grafting fullerene C60.

Few-layer black phosphorus (BP) nanosheets show potential application in biomedicine such as photodynamic therapy (PDT), and are therefore commonly used in anticancer therapy and nanomedicine due to being relatively less invasive. However, they suffer from low ambient stability and poor therapeutic efficacy. Herein, C60 was covalently grafted onto the edges of BP nanosheets, and the resultant BP-C60 hybrid was applied as a novel endocytosing photosensitizer, resulting in not only significantly enhanced PDT efficacy relative to that of the pristine BP nanosheets, but also drastically improved stability in a physiological environment, as confirmed by both in vitro and in vivo studies. Such improved stability was due to shielding effect of the stable hydrophobic C60 molecules. The enhanced PDT efficacy is interpreted from the photoinduced electron transfer from BP to C60, leading to the promoted generation of ˙OH radicals, acting as a reactive oxygen species (ROS) that is effective in killing tumor cells. Furthermore, the BP-C60 hybrid exhibited low systemic toxicity in the major organs of mice. The BP-C60 hybrid represents the first BP-fullerene hybrid nanomaterial fulfilling promoted ROS generation and consequently enhanced PDT efficacy.