Percutaneous balloon venoplasty for symptomatic lead-related venous stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Lead-related venous stenosis (LRVS) is common after transvenous lead implantation and generally diagnosed incidentally. Symptomatic LRVS, causing discomfort and swelling, is less common. OBJECTIVE: We report on the management and outcomes of patients with symptomatic LRVS after percutaneous balloon venoplasty. METHODS: We included patients with symptomatic LRVS unresponsive to >30 days of anticoagulation who underwent venoplasty at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania between 2014 and 2020. Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) was performed first if the lesion could not be crossed with a wire. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (mean age, 62 ± 10 years; 44% female) underwent 27 venoplasty procedures. Symptoms included arm swelling in 9 (50%), facial/neck swelling in 1 (6%), and both in 8 (44%). Venography revealed LRVS in the axillary/subclavian veins in 10 (56%), the brachiocephalic vein in 6 (33%), and the superior vena cava in 4 (11%). Most patients (83%) required TLE before venoplasty, and only 5 of 18 (28%) remained with leads crossing the stenosed segment. Thirteen patients (72%) had complete symptom resolution, 4 (22%) had partial resolution due to secondary lymphedema, and 1 showed no improvement. Patients with complete resolution had shorter times from symptom onset to intervention (195 vs 690 days; P = .02). CONCLUSION: LRVS can affect any part of the venous system and may be manifested with swelling of the arm, face/neck, or both. Balloon venoplasty is safe and effective, often requires TLE, and is particularly durable when leads no longer cross the stenosed region. Venoplasty is less effective for secondary lymphedema, highlighting the need for timely intervention.

Long-term risk of right coronary artery injury after catheter ablation of cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent flutter.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent atrial flutter requires ablation of the tricuspid annulus overlying the right coronary artery (RCA). Although it is considered safe, reports of acute and subacute RCA injury in human and animal studies raise the possibility of late RCA stenosis. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the incidence and severity of angiographic RCA stenoses in patients who have undergone CTI RFA with a control group to assess the long-term risk of RCA damage. METHODS: A 2-center retrospective case-cohort study was performed including all patients from 2002 to 2018 undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) with CTI ablation (CTI + AF) or AF ablation alone with subsequent coronary angiography (CAG). The AF alone group served as controls because of anticipated similarity of baseline characteristics. Coronary arteries that are anatomically remote to the CTI were examined as prespecified falsification end points. CAG was scored by a blinded observer. RESULTS: There were 156 patients who underwent pulmonary vein isolation with subsequent CAG (CTI + AF, n = 81; AF alone, n = 75) with no difference in baseline characteristics including age, sex, comorbidities, and medications. Mean time from ablation to CAG was similar (CTI + AF, 5.0 ± 3.7 years; AF alone, 5.4 ± 3.9 years; P = .5). The mid and distal RCA showed no difference in the average number of angiographic stenoses or lesion severity. In regression analysis, CTI ablation was not a predictor of RCA stenosis severity (P = .6). There was no difference in coronary disease at sites remote to the CTI ablation (P = NS for all). CONCLUSION: There was no observed relationship between CTI RFA and the number or severity of angiographically apparent RCA stenoses in long-term follow-up.

Intraoperative pectoral nerve blocks during cardiac implantable electronic device procedures.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) procedures can cause significant postoperative pain. Opioid use for postoperative pain is associated with risk of persistent use. The benefits of pectoral nerve (PECs) blocks have been established for other chest wall surgeries, but adoption in electrophysiology has been limited. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative ultrasound-guided PECs blocks performed at the time of CIED procedures by the implanting physician from within the device pocket. METHODS: Patients undergoing a pectoral CIED procedure at 7 centers from 2022-2023 were included. Patients underwent intraoperative PECs blocks and subcutaneous local anesthetic vs subcutaneous local anesthetic only at the discretion of the operator. Patients were prospectively evaluated for postoperative pain. RESULTS: Six hundred ten patients (age 67 ± 15 years old; 63% male) were enrolled. and half (n = 305) underwent PECs block. Patients who underwent PECs block were more likely to have a history of chronic pain (32% vs 11%, P <.001). PECs block was associated with lower pain scores in the 4 hours after the procedure (1.5 ± 2.1 vs 4.5 ± 2.5, P <.001). Pain scores were not different after 24 hours (2.8 ± 1.7 vs 3.1 ± 2.2) and 2 weeks (0.9 ± 1.4 vs 0.9 ± 1.2). PECs block patients were less likely to receive inpatient opioids (10% vs 48%, P <.001) and to be discharged with an opioid prescription (15% vs 59%, P <.001). In multivariable linear regression, PECs block (P <.001), age (P = .002), and absence of chronic pain (P = .009) were associated with lower acute postoperative pain. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative PECs block can reduce postoperative pain and opioid use. This procedure can be readily performed by the implanting physician from within the device pocket.

Incremental Benefit of Stepwise Nonpulmonary Vein Trigger Provocation During Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: The importance of nonpulmonary vein (PV) triggers for the initiation/recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is well established. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the incremental benefit of provocative maneuvers for identifying non-PV triggers. METHODS: We included consecutive patients undergoing first-time AF ablation between 2020 and 2022. The provocation protocol included step 1, identification of spontaneous non-PV triggers after cardioversion of AF and/or during sinus rhythm; step 2, isoproterenol infusion (3, 6, 12, and 20-30 µg/min); and step 3, atrial burst pacing to induce AF followed by cardioversion during residual or low-dose isoproterenol infusion or induce focal atrial tachycardia. Non-PV triggers were defined as non-PV ectopic beats triggering AF or sustained focal atrial tachycardia. RESULTS: Of 1,372 patients included, 883 (64.4%) underwent the complete stepwise provocation protocol with isoproterenol infusion and burst pacing, 334 (24.3%) isoproterenol infusion only, 77 (5.6%) burst pacing only, and 78 (5.7%) no provocative maneuvers (only step 1). Overall, 161 non-PV triggers were found in 135 (9.8%) patients. Of these, 51 (31.7%) non-PV triggers occurred spontaneously, and the remaining 110 (68.3%) required provocative maneuvers for induction. Among those receiving the complete stepwise provocation protocol, there was a 2.2-fold increase in the number of patients with non-PV triggers after isoproterenol infusion, and the addition of burst pacing after isoproterenol infusion led to a total increase of 3.6-fold with the complete stepwise provocation protocol. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of non-PV triggers require provocative maneuvers for induction. A stepwise provocation protocol consisting of isoproterenol infusion followed by burst pacing identifies a 3.6-fold higher number of patients with non-PV triggers.

The Safety and Efficacy of Epicardial Carbon Dioxide Insufflation Compared With Conventional Epicardial Access.

BACKGROUND: Epicardial (Epi) access is commonly required during ventricular tachycardia ablation. Conventional Epi (ConvEpi) access targets a "dry" pericardial space presenting technical challenges and risk of complications. Recently, intentional puncture of coronary venous branches with Epi carbon dioxide insufflation (EpiCO2) has been described as a technique to improve Epi access. The safety of this technique relative to conventional methods remains unproven. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to compare the feasibility and safety of EpiCO2 to ConvEpi access. METHODS: All patients at a high-volume center undergoing Epi access between January 2021 and December 2023 were included and grouped according to ConvEpi or EpiCO2 approach. Access technique was according to the discretion of the operator. RESULTS: Epi access was attempted in 153 cases by 17 different operators (80 ConvEpi vs 73 EpiCO2). There was no difference in success rate whether the ConvEpi or EpiCO2 approach was used (76 [95%] cases vs 67 [91.8%] cases; P = 0.4). Total Epi access time was shorter in the ConvEpi group compared with the EpiCO2 group (16.3 ± 11.6 minutes vs 26.9 ± 12.7 minutes; P < 0.001), though the total procedure duration was similar. Major Epi access-related complications occurred in only the ConvEpi group (6 [7.5%] ConvEpi vs 0 [0%] EpiCo2; P = 0.02). Bleeding ≥80 mL was more frequently observed following ConvEpi access (14 [17.5%] cases vs 4 [5.5%] cases; P = 0.02). After adjusting for age, repeat Epi access, and antithrombotic therapy, EpiCO2 was associated with a reduction in bleeding ≥80 mL (OR: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.08-0.89; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: EpiCO2 access is associated with lower rates of major complication and bleeding when compared with ConvEpi access.

Long-Term Freedom From Ventricular Arrhythmias in ARVC With Endocardial Only Ablation: Predictors of Success.

BACKGROUND: Although the epicardial predominance of substrate abnormalities has been well demonstrated in early stages of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), endocardial (ENDO) ablation may suffice to eliminate ventricular tachycardia (VT) in some patients. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to report the long-term outcomes of ENDO-only ablation in ARVC patients and factors that predict VT-free survival. METHODS: We included consecutive patients with Task Force Criteria diagnosis of ARVC undergoing a first ENDO-only VT ablation between 1998 and 2020. Ablation was predominantly guided by activation/entrainment mapping for mappable VTs and pace mapping/targeting abnormal electrograms for unmappable VTs. The primary endpoint was freedom from any recurrent sustained VT after the last ENDO-only ablation. RESULTS: Seventy-four ARVC patients underwent ENDO-only VT ablation. VT noninducibility was achieved in 49 (66%) patients. During median follow-up of 6.6 years (Q1-Q3: 3.4-11.2 years), 40 (54.1%) patients remained free from any VT recurrence with rare VT ≤2 episodes in additional 12.2%. Among patients with noninducibility, VT-free survival was 75.5% during long-term follow-up. In multivariable analysis, >45 y of age at diagnosis (HR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.17-0.98) and VT noninducibility (HR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.16-0.80) were predictors of VT-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term VT-free survival can be achieved in over half of ARVC patients following ENDO-only VT ablation, increasing to over 75% if VT noninducibility is achieved. Our results support consideration of a stepwise ENDO-only approach before proceeding to epicardial ablation if VT noninducibility can be achieved particularly in older patients.

Programmed Ventricular Stimulation: Risk Stratification and Guiding Antiarrhythmic Therapies.

Electrophysiologic testing with programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) has been utilized to induce ventricular tachycardia (VT), thereby improving risk stratification for patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathies and determining the effectiveness of antiarrhythmic therapies, especially catheter ablation. A variety of procedural aspects can be modified during PVS in order to alter the sensitivity and specificity of the test including the addition of multiple baseline pacing cycle lengths, extrastimuli, and pacing locations. The definition of a positive result is also critically important, which has varied from exclusively sustained monomorphic VT (>30 seconds) to any ventricular arrhythmia regardless of morphology. In this review, we discuss the history of PVS and evaluate its role in sudden cardiac death risk stratification in a variety of patient populations. We propose an approach to future investigations that will capitalize on the unique ability to vary the sensitivity and specificity of this test. We then discuss the application of PVS during and following catheter ablation. The strategies that have been utilized to improve the efficacy of intraprocedural PVS are highlighted during a discussion of the limitations of this probabilistic strategy. The role of noninvasive programmed stimulation is also reviewed in predicting recurrent VT and informing management decisions including repeat ablations, modifications in antiarrhythmic drugs, and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming. Based on the available evidence and guidelines, we propose an approach to future investigations that will allow clinicians to optimize the use of PVS for risk stratification and assessment of therapeutic efficacy.

Predictors of nonpulmonary vein triggers for atrial fibrillation: A clinical risk score.

BACKGROUND: Targeting non-pulmonary vein triggers (NPVTs) after pulmonary vein isolation may reduce atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. Isoproterenol infusion and cardioversion of spontaneous or induced AF can provoke NPVTs but typically require vasopressor support and increased procedural time. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for the presence of NPVTs and create a risk score to identify higher-risk subgroups. METHODS: Using the AF ablation registry at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, we included consecutive patients who underwent AF ablation between January 2021 and December 2022. We excluded patients who did not receive NPVT provocation testing after failing to demonstrate spontaneous NPVTs. NPVTs were defined as non-pulmonary vein ectopic beats triggering AF or focal atrial tachycardia. We used risk factors associated with NPVTs with P <.1 in multivariable logistic regression model to create a risk score in a randomly split derivation set (80%) and tested its predictive accuracy in the validation set (20%). RESULTS: In 1530 AF ablations included, NPVTs were observed in 235 (15.4%). In the derivation set, female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-2.03; P = .080), sinus node dysfunction (OR 1.67; 95% CI 0.98-2.87; P = .060), previous AF ablation (OR 2.50; 95% CI 1.70-3.65; P <.001), and left atrial scar (OR 2.90; 95% CI 1.94-4.36; P <.001) were risk factors associated with NPVTs. The risk score created from these risk factors (PRE2SSS2 score; [PRE]vious ablation: 2 points, female [S]ex: 1 point, [S]inus node dysfunction: 1 point, left atrial [S]car: 2 points) had good predictive accuracy in the validation cohort (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.728; 95% CI 0.648-0.807). CONCLUSION: A risk score incorporating predictors for NPVTs may allow provocation of triggers to be performed in patients with greatest expected yield.

Accuracy of symptoms and pulse checking for detecting atrial fibrillation following catheter ablation.

BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in the possibility of discontinuing oral anticoagulation following successful catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, it remains unknown whether patients can accurately detect arrhythmia recurrences following ablation. We therefore sought to characterize the accuracy of pulse checking and arrhythmia symptoms for the identification of AF following ablation. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included patients at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania with an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) treated with catheter ablation for AF who recorded the results from minimum twice daily pulse checks and additionally with arrhythmia symptoms into a diary for 2 months following their procedure. Accuracy of this self-assessment protocol was determined by comparison to ICM-detected AF. RESULTS: A total of 55 patients (age 69 ± 8 years, 30 (55%) male, CHA2DS2VASc score 3.2 ± 1. 5) were included. Patients recorded a total of 5911 pulse checks, and there were 280 episodes of ICM-documented AF among 26 patients with an average duration of 2.5 ± 3.3 h. Among 362 episodes of patient-suspected AF, 134 correlated with ICM-identified AF (37% true positive rate). Of the 5549 pulse checks that did not identify AF, 196 correlated with ICM-identified AF (4% false negative rate). Twice daily pulse checking had a sensitivity of 47% and a specificity of 96% for identifying each episode of AF. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that a strategy of pulse checks and symptom assessment is insufficient to identify all episodes of AF in many patients following catheter ablation.

Characteristics of the phenotype of mixed cardiomyopathy in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

BACKGROUND OR PURPOSE: The prognosis of m ixed cardiomyopathy (CMP) in patients with implanted cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) has not been investigated. We aim to study the demographic, clinical, device therapies and survival characteristics of mixed CMP in a cohort of patients implanted with a defibrillator. METHODS: The term mixed CMP was used to categorise patients with impaired left ventricular ejection fraction attributed to documented non-ischemic triggers with concomitant moderate coronary artery disease. This is a single center observational cohort of 526 patients with a mean follow-up of 8.7 ± 3.5 years. RESULTS: There were 42.5% patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), 26.9% with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) and 30.6% with mixed CMP. Mixed CMP, compared to NICM, was associated with higher mean age (69.1 ± 9.6 years), atrial fibrillation (55.3%) and greater incidence of comorbidities. The proportion of patients with mixed CMP receiving device shocks was 23.6%, compared to 18.4% in NICM and 27% in ICM. The VT cycle length recorded in mixed CMP (281.6 ± 43.1 ms) was comparable with ICM (282.5 ± 44 ms; p = 0.9) and lesser than NICM (297.7 ± 48.7 ms; p = 0.1). All-cause mortality in mixed CMP (21.1%) was similar to ICM (20.1%; p = 0.8) and higher than NICM (15.6%; p = 0.2). The Kaplan-Meier curves revealed hazards of 1.57 (95% CI: 0.91, 2.68) for mixed CMP compared to NICM. CONCLUSION: In a cohort of patients with ICD, the group with mixed CMP represents a phenotype predominantly comprised of the elderly with a higher incidence of comorbidities. Mixed CMP resembles ICM in terms of number of device shocks and VT cycle length. Trends of long-term prognosis of patients with mixed CMP are worse than NICM and similar to ICM.

Identifying Origin of Nonpulmonary Vein Triggers Using 2 Stationary Linear Decapolar Catheters: A Novel Algorithm.

BACKGROUND: Targeting nonpulmonary vein triggers (NPVTs) of atrial fibrillation (AF) after pulmonary vein isolation can be challenging. NPVTs are often single ectopic beats with a surface P-wave obscured by a QRS or T-wave. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to construct an algorithm to regionalize the site of origin of NPVTs using only intracardiac bipolar electrograms from 2 linear decapolar catheters positioned in the posterolateral right atrium (along the crista terminalis with the distal bipole pair in the superior vena cava) and in the proximal coronary sinus (CS). METHODS: After pulmonary vein isolation in 42 patients with AF, pacing from 15 typical anatomic NPVT sites was conducted. For each pacing site, the electrogram activation sequence was analyzed from the CS catheter (simultaneous/chevron/inverse chevron/distal-proximal/proximal-distal) and activation time (ie, CSCTAT) between the earliest electrograms from the 2 decapolar catheters was measured referencing the earliest CS electrogram; a negative CSCTAT value indicates the crista terminalis catheter electrogram was earlier, and a positive CSCTAT value indicates the CS catheter electrogram was earlier. A regionalization algorithm with high predictive value was defined and tested in a validation cohort with AF NPVTs localized with electroanatomic mapping. RESULTS: In the study patient cohort (71% male; 43% with persistent AF, 52% with left atrial dilation), the algorithm grouped with high precision (positive predictive value 81%-99%, specificity 94%-100%, and sensitivity 30%-94%) the 15 distinct pacing sites into 9 clinically useful regions. Algorithm testing in a 98 patient validation cohort showed predictive accuracy of 91%. CONCLUSIONS: An algorithm defined by the activation sequence and timing of electrograms from 2 linear multipolar catheters provided accurate regionalization of AF NPVTs to guide focused detailed mapping.

Utility of Very High-Output Pacing to Identify VT Circuits in Patients Manifesting Traditionally Inexcitable Scar.

BACKGROUND: Entrainment and pace mapping are used to identify critical components (CCs) of ventricular tachycardia (VT) circuits. In patients with dense myocardial scarring, VT circuits may elude capture at standard high pacing outputs (up to 10 mA at a 2-millisecond pulse width). OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of very high-output pacing (V-HOP, 50 mA at 2 milliseconds) for identifying CCs of VT circuits after standard high pacing output failed to elicit capture in densely scarred myocardial tissue. METHODS: Our standard VT ablation approach included electroanatomic mapping for substrate characterization and entrainment and/or pace mapping to identify CCs of VT circuits. Patients that required V-HOP to capture sites of interest comprised the study cohort. Ablation endpoints were VT termination and noninducibility. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (71 ± 10 years of age, all males) undergoing 26 VT ablations met the inclusion criteria. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 30% ± 14%, and 85% had ischemic cardiomyopathy. V-HOP was used to successfully entrain VT in 17 patients, yielding central isthmus sites in 10 and entrance/exit sites in 4. VT terminated with radiofrequency ablation at these sites in 15 patients. In 9 patients, V-HOP identified scar locations with a delayed exit. Acute procedural success was achieved in 24 patients without any adverse events. Over a follow-up period of 16 ± 21 months, 2 patients experienced VT recurrence requiring repeat ablation during which the same location was targeted successfully in 1 patient. CONCLUSIONS: In VT patients with a dense scar that is traditionally inexcitable, V-HOP can identify CCs of the re-entrant circuit and guide successful ablation.

Septal Substrate Ablation Guided by Delayed Transmural Conduction Times: A Novel Ablation Approach to Target Intramural Substrates.

BACKGROUND: Intraprocedural identification of intramural septal substrate for ventricular tachycardia (ISS-VT) in nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) is challenging. Delayed (>40 ms) transmural conduction time (DCT) with right ventricular basal septal pacing has been previously shown to identify ISS-VT. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether substrate catheter ablation incorporating areas of DCT may improve acute and long-term outcomes. METHODS: We included patients with NICM and ISS-VT referred for catheter ablation between 2016 and 2020. ISS-VT was defined by the following: 1) confluent septal areas of low unipolar voltage (<8.3 mV) in the presence of normal or minimal bipolar abnormalities; and 2) presence of abnormal electrograms in the septum. Substrate ablation was guided by the following: 1) activation and/or entrainment mapping for tolerated VT and pace mapping with ablation of abnormal septal electrograms for unmappable VTs (n = 57, Group 1); and 2) empirically extended to target areas of DCT during right ventricular basal septal pacing regardless of their participation in inducible VT(s) but sparing the conduction system when possible (n = 24, Group 2). RESULTS: There were no significant baseline differences between Groups 1 and 2. Noninducibility of any VT programmed stimulation at the end of ablation was higher in Group 2 compared with Group 1 (80% vs 53%; P = 0.03). At 12-month follow-up, single-procedure VT-free survival was significantly higher (79% vs 46%; P = 0.006) and the time to VT recurrence was longer (mean 10 ± 3 months vs 7 ± 4 months; P = 0.02) in Group 2 compared with Group 1. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NICM and ISS-VT, a substrate ablation strategy that incorporates areas of DCT appears to improve freedom from recurrent VT.